Connect with us

Entertainment

Sutton Stracke Plays Coy About Kyle Richards’ Split Being for ‘Clicks’ on January 26, 2024 at 11:25 pm Us Weekly

Published

on

Sutton Stracke wasn’t afraid to sip wine and spill the tea during Us Weekly’s latest episode of “Housewives Happy Hour.”

However, when the topic of Kyle Richards came up, Sutton, 52, played coy with her answers. Sutton sipped her wine when asked whether it was “unfair” for the cast to “question” Kyle’s recent lifestyle changes, seemingly confirming she thought the criticism was warranted.

Sutton’s Real Housewives of Beverly Hills costar Kyle, 55, raised eyebrows when she grew closer to singer Morgan Wade as her marriage fell apart last year. Sutton, meanwhile, also chose to drink from her glass when asked whether Kyle and her estranged husband, Mauricio Umansky, broke up for “clicks” and story lines.

Sutton Stracke and Kyle Richards Emily Shur/Bravo

Advertisement

Vanderpump Rules alum Jax Taylor previously raised eyebrows when he insinuated that Kyle and Mauricio’s summer 2023 separation was a ploy for publicity.

“Everybody does things for clicks. People will ruin their marriages for clicks. I mean, look at what’s going on with Housewives,” Jax, 44, claimed on a January episode of his “When Reality Hits With Jax & Brittany” podcast. “Now they are saying that Kyle and Mauricio were just doing the breakup for clout. For clicks. They are doing that.”

Who Is Your Favorite OG Housewife?

When asked whether she agrees with Jax’s assessment of the situation, Sutton looked away from the camera and sipped her wine. “Mhmm,” she said under her breath.

Advertisement

Sutton exclusively told Us on Tuesday, January 23, that she and Kyle are “taking some space” from each other after a few rocky moments in season 13. The twosome feuded during a November 2023 episode after Sutton said she was “offended” by the male dancers at a Las Vegas Magic Mike Live show.

Related: Every Time Kyle Richards Hints at Mauricio Umansky Separation on’RHOBH’

Advertisement
Greg Doherty/Bravo It was hard for Kyle Richards to hide her struggles with Mauricio Umansky on season 13 of The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills. Us Weekly confirmed in July 2023 that Kyle and Mauricio had separated after 27 years of marriage. The Bravo stars, who got married in 1996, denied at the time that […]

At the time, Kyle told Sutton she “has a habit of losing [her] s­­–t” often. Sutton denied the claims and yelled at Kyle to “name” examples.

“I miss her,” Sutton told Us on Tuesday of her relationship with Kyle now. “I miss our friendship, and hopefully we’re going to get into a good space again, but we’ll see.”

While Sutton hinted at her feelings toward Kyle in the “Housewives Happy Hour” episode, she made it clear what she thinks of former RHOBH costar Lisa Rinna. Lisa, 60, exited the Bravo series in 2022 after season 12.

Advertisement

Related: Name ’Em! The Most Iconic ‘Real Housewives’ Quotes of 2023

Scandoval may have dominated pop culture in 2023, but no one on Vanderpump Rules was capable of delivering one-liners like the Real Housewives (except for maybe James Kennedy, who deserves an Emmy for “worm with a mustache”). The women of Bravo worked overtime this year to bring fans quotes that will look great on novelty […]

Sutton told Us she doesn’t “miss” Lisa on the show, explaining, “The dynamics changed and yeah, we had fun [in the past].” In real life, Sutton said, “I’m a bit indifferent, but I do miss her.”

Watch the exclusive video above to hear more of Sutton’s “Housewives Happy Hour” secrets, including whether she’s been back to a Magic Mike Live show.

Advertisement

The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills airs on Bravo Wednesdays at 8 p.m. ET.

Sutton Stracke wasn’t afraid to sip wine and spill the tea during Us Weekly’s latest episode of “Housewives Happy Hour.” However, when the topic of Kyle Richards came up, Sutton, 52, played coy with her answers. Sutton sipped her wine when asked whether it was “unfair” for the cast to “question” Kyle’s recent lifestyle changes, 

​   Us Weekly Read More 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

What the Michael Biopic Means for Every Indie Filmmaker

Published

on

The Michael Jackson biopic Michael is more than celebrity drama; it is a real-time lesson in how legal decisions can quietly rewrite a story that millions of people will see. You do not need a $200M budget for the same forces—contracts, settlements, and rights issues—to shape or even erase key parts of your own work.

“The Michael Jackson Movie Is A HUGE HIT!” by Adam Does Movies, CC BY, via YouTube.

What Happened to Michael

The film Michael originally included a third act that addressed the 1993 child sexual abuse allegations and their impact on Jackson’s life and career. Trade reports say this version showed investigators at Neverland Ranch and dramatized the scandal as a turning point in the story. After cameras rolled, lawyers for the Jackson estate realized there was a clause in the settlement with accuser Jordan Chandler that barred any depiction or mention of him in a movie.

Because of that old agreement, the filmmakers had to remove all references to Chandler and rework the ending so the story stopped years earlier, in the late 1980s at Jackson’s commercial peak.

According to reporting, this meant roughly 22 days of reshoots, costing around 10–15 million dollars and pushing the total budget over 200 million.

Meanwhile, actress Kat Graham confirmed her portrayal of Diana Ross was cut for “legal considerations,” showing how likeness and approval issues can wipe out an entire character even after filming.

For audiences, the result is a movie that intentionally avoids one of the most controversial chapters of Jackson’s life, which some critics argue makes the portrait feel incomplete or selectively curated.

Advertisement

The Hidden Power of Contracts and Rights

The key detail in the Michael story is that a contract signed decades ago could dictate what present-day filmmakers are allowed to show. That settlement clause did not just affect the people who signed it; it effectively controlled the narrative of a big-budget film made years later. This is how legal documents become invisible co-authors: they quietly set boundaries around what your story can and cannot include.

Creators face similar invisible lines with:

  • Life-rights and defamation: If you dramatize real people, especially in a negative light, they can claim defamation or invasion of privacy if your portrayal is inaccurate or harmful.
  • Copyright and trademarks: Unlicensed music, clips, logos, or artwork can trigger copyright or trademark claims that block distribution or force expensive changes.
  • Distribution contracts: Some deals give distributors the right to re-edit, retitle, or repackage your work without your approval unless you negotiate otherwise.

Legal commentary warns that fictionalizing real events and people carries heightened risk because audiences tend to connect your dramatization back to actual individuals. That risk does not disappear just because you are “small” or “indie”; impact, not audience size, usually determines exposure.


Why This Matters for Indie Filmmakers and Creators

Independent filmmakers often choose the indie route precisely to maintain creative control, but they can face more risk if they skip legal planning. Common problems include unclear ownership of the script, missing music licenses, handshake agreements with collaborators, and no written permission to use locations or people’s likenesses. These are the kinds of issues that can derail distribution, block a streaming deal, or force last-minute cuts that fundamentally change your story.

Legal guides for indie filmmakers consistently emphasize a few realities:

  • You do not fully “own” your film unless you have clear contracts for writing, directing, producing, and underlying rights.
  • Unregistered or unlicensed creative elements (like music and logos) can make your project uninsurable or unattractive to distributors.
  • Fixing legal problems after the fact is almost always more expensive and limiting than planning for them at the beginning.

So when you watch Michael skip over certain events, you are seeing, in exaggerated form, the same forces that can shape an indie short, web series, documentary, or podcast episode.


You do not need a law degree, but you do need a basic legal strategy for your creative work. Here are practical steps drawn from entertainment-law and indie-film resources:

  1. Clarify who owns the story
    • Use written agreements with co-writers, directors, and producers that state who owns the script and finished film.
    • If your work is based on a real person or memoir, secure life-rights or written permission where appropriate, especially if the portrayal is sensitive.
  2. Be intentional with real people and events
    • When telling true or inspired-by-true stories, avoid making specific, negative claims about identifiable people unless they are well-documented and legally vetted.
    • Change names, details, and circumstances enough that the person is not clearly identifiable if you do not have their cooperation.
  3. Lock down music and visuals
    • Use original scores, licensed tracks, or reputable libraries; never assume you can keep a song just because it is in a rough cut.
    • Clear artwork, logos, and recognizable brands, or replace them with generic or custom-designed alternatives.
HCFF
HCFF
  1. Protect yourself in contracts
    • When signing any distribution or platform deal, read the clauses about editing, retitling, and marketing carefully; ask for limits or at least consultation rights.
    • Include terms that let you reclaim rights if a partner fails to release the work, goes dark, or breaches key promises.
  2. Document everything
    • Keep organized copies of releases, licenses, and contracts; these documents are part of your project’s value and proof of your rights.
    • Register your work where applicable (for example, copyright), which strengthens your ability to enforce your rights if someone copies you.

Education-focused legal resources repeatedly stress that preventative steps—basic contracts, clear permissions, and simple registrations—are far cheaper than dealing with takedowns, lawsuits, or forced rewrites later.


The Big Takeaway: Story and Law Are Connected

The Michael biopic illustrates what happens when legal obligations and creative vision collide: whole characters disappear, endings are rewritten, and the public only sees a version of the story that fits within old contracts.

Advertisement

As an indie filmmaker, writer, or content creator, you may not have millions at stake, but you do have something just as valuable—your voice and your ability to tell the story you meant to tell.

Understanding the legal dimensions of your work is not a distraction from creativity; it is a way of protecting it. When you know where the legal boundaries are, you can design stories that are bold, truthful, and still safe enough to reach the audiences they deserve.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Mother’s Day AfroFun Praise Party: Gospel Dance, Fitness & Feel‑Good Stats in 60 Minutes

Published

on

This Mother’s Day in Spring, Texas, you’re invited to do more than just sit at brunch—come dance, sweat, and celebrate at the Mother’s Day AfroFun Praise Party: Gospel Dance, Fitness & Feel‑Good Stats in 60 Minutes. This one‑hour Afrobeat gospel dance class is for men and women, bringing live worship, high‑energy choreography, and real fitness benefits together in one unforgettable experience.

Shawna Pat Official Music Video

Live gospel + Afrobeat energy

On the mic is powerhouse gospel singer Shawna Pat, known for her heartfelt worship, energetic praise songs, and ministry that makes every room feel like church and concert at the same time. She’ll be leading live vocals all class long, turning each track into a moment to sing along, shout, or just soak in the presence while you move.

On the floor, Andrew from WoWo Boyz and the Kingdrewwskyy crew bring the Afrobeat power. Expect easy‑to‑follow, Afro‑inspired choreography that looks hype on video but still feels doable if you’re brand new to dance. Together, Shawna and Andrew create a “praise party meets fitness class” vibe you can’t get from a playlist or a regular gym session.

A co‑ed Mother’s Day celebration that counts

This event is built for men and women—moms, dads, sons, daughters, couples, and friends who want to honor the mothers in their lives while doing something healthy and fun. The format is simple: warm‑up, dance‑cardio, a short ministry moment focused on mothers and families, and a cool‑down to breathe and stretch it out.

All levels are welcome. If you can walk and two‑step, you can do this class. You choose your intensity: go all‑in with every jump or keep it low‑impact and still stay in the groove. The music is clean and faith‑filled, so you never have to worry about lyrics or the vibe if you’re inviting church friends or bringing teens.

The feel‑good fitness stats

Behind the fun, this one hour delivers real health wins. Health guidelines recommend at least 150 minutes of moderate‑intensity cardio per week, but less than half of adults hit that number. AfroFun helps close that gap—by making movement feel like a celebration instead of a chore.

Advertisement

In just 60 minutes, many people can:

  • Hit 4,000–6,000+ steps, based on what similar dance‑fitness and Mother’s Day cardio sessions log in under an hour.
  • Spend solid time in their heart‑healthy zone, where cardio actually strengthens the heart and builds endurance.
  • Knock out a big chunk of their weekly 150‑minute cardio goal in one fun, faith‑filled session.

You walk out with more than photos and memories—you leave with better numbers for your heart, body, and mood.

Get your tickets

AfroFun Praise Party happens Sunday, May 10, 4–5 PM at 2400 FM 2920, Spring, TX 77388, with free parking and in‑person, high‑energy vibes. Tickets are limited, and early spots always move fastest once people see Shawna Pat and WoWo Boyz are in the building.

🎟️ Grab your tickets now on Eventbrite for the Mother’s Day AfroFun Praise Party and lock in your spot before it sells out.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Advice

How Far Would You Go to Book Your Dream Role?

Published

on

The question Sydney Sweeney’s career forces every serious artist to ask themselves.


Most people say they want to be an actor. But wanting the life and being willing to do what the life requires are two entirely different things. Sydney Sweeney’s performance as Cassie Howard in Euphoria is one of the clearest examples in recent television of what it actually looks like when an artist refuses to protect themselves from the story they are telling.


The Performance That Started a Conversation

Cassie Howard is not a comfortable character to watch. She is messy, desperate, and heartbreakingly human in ways that most scripts would have softened or simplified. Sydney Sweeney did not soften her. She played every scene at full exposure — the breakdowns, the humiliation, the moments where Cassie is both completely wrong and completely understandable at the same time.

What made the performance remarkable was not the difficulty of the scenes. It was the consistency of her commitment to them. Night after night on set, take after take, she showed up and gave the camera something real. That is not a small thing. That is the kind of discipline that separates working actors from generational ones.

Advertisement

What the Industry Does Not Tell You

The entertainment industry sells you a version of success built around talent, timing, and luck. And while all three matter, none of them are the real differentiator in a room full of equally talented people. The real differentiator is willingness — the willingness to be honest, to be vulnerable, and to let the work require something personal from you.

Most actors hit a wall at some point in their career where a role demands more than they have publicly shown before. The ones who say yes to that moment, who trust the material and the director enough to go somewhere uncomfortable, are the ones audiences remember long after the credits roll.

Sydney Sweeney said yes repeatedly. And the industry took notice.


The Question Worth Asking Yourself

Before you answer, really think about it. There is a moment in every serious audition room where someone might ask you to go further than you are comfortable with — to access something real, to stop performing and start revealing. In that moment, you have to decide what your dream is actually worth to you and, more importantly, what parts of yourself you are not willing to trade for it.

That is the question Euphoria quietly raises for anyone watching with ambition in their chest. Not “could I do that,” but “should I ever feel pressured to.” There is a difference between an artist who chooses vulnerability as a creative tool and one who is pressured into exposure they never agreed to. Knowing that difference is not a weakness. It is the most important thing a young actor can understand before they walk into a room that will test it.

Because the only role that truly costs too much is the one that asks you to abandon who you are to play it.

Advertisement
HCFF
HCFF

What You Can Take From This

Whether you are an actor, a filmmaker, a content creator, or someone simply building something from scratch, the principle is the same. The work that connects with people is almost always the work that cost the creator something real. Audiences can feel the difference between performance and truth. They always could.

Sydney Sweeney did not become one of the most talked-about actresses of her generation because she got lucky. She got there because she was willing to be completely, uncomfortably human in front of a camera — and because she knew exactly who she was before she let the role take over.

That combination — full commitment and a clear sense of self — is rarer than talent. And it is the thing worth chasing.


Written for Bolanle Media | Entertainment. Culture. Conversation.


Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending