World News
South Africa alleges Israel violating ruling to prevent Gaza deaths on February 1, 2024 at 5:26 pm
Published
8 months agoon
By
South Africa on Wednesday accused Israel of violating the United Nations’ top court’s recent ruling to prevent deaths in Gaza, as Israel pushes forward with its campaign to eliminate the threat of Palestinian militant group Hamas.
The U.N. International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) ruling last week ordered Israel to do more to protect civilians in the Gaza Strip, and gave Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government one month to present a plan. The ruling, however, did not explicitly call for a cease-fire in the war.
The ICJ also found it is “at the very least plausible that Israel is committing genocide,” as the death toll climbs past 26,700 people in Gaza, The Associated Press reported, citing the Health Ministry in Gaza.
Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor on Wednesday said the ICJ’s ruling “makes it clear that it is plausible that genocide is taking place against the Palestinian people in Gaza. This necessarily imposes an obligation on all states to cease funding and facilitating Israel’s military actions,” Reuters reported.
Israel has repeatedly defended its bombardment of Gaza following Hamas’s surprise attack on Israel Oct. 7, which left approximately 1,200 people dead.
Israeli forces continued attacks in the territory following the ruling, according to the Health Ministry, which said Wednesday 150 people were killed in the 24 hours prior, The AP reported. The Health Ministry did not discern between combatants and civilians in its count, but has said the majority of those killed are women and children.
Israel’s government has argued its actions in Gaza do not amount to genocide, and that it has made attempts to limit civilian deaths in the coastal enclave. Netanyahu has said his country “will continue to do what is necessary to defend our country and defend our people.”
“I can’t be dishonest. I believe the rulings of the court have been ignored,” South Africa’s foreign minister said, per The AP. “Hundreds of people have been killed in the last three or four days. And clearly Israel believes it has license to do as it wishes.”
Pandor warned of the dangers if the world does not do more to curb civilian causalities, comparing the situation in Gaza to the genocide in Rwanda in 1994, when over 800,000 people were killed in the East African nation, the AP noted.
“We are allowing this to happen again, right before our eyes, on our TV screens,” Pandor reportedly said.
She also raised the question of why an arrest warrant for Netanyahu has not been issued in South Africa’s separate case filed at the International Criminal Court (ICC), the AP reported.
Pandor added South Africa would “look at proposing other measures to the global community,” to prevent Israel from killing more civilians in Gaza Strip. Hamas, a group the U.S. and E.U. have designated as a terrorist organization, controls Gaza.
South Africa filed a case against Netanyahu to the ICC in November, alleging Israel is committing war crimes.
“The (ICC) prosecutor assured us the matter is in hand and being looked at by his office,” Pandor said of her country’s allegations. “What I felt he didn’t answer me sufficiently on was, I asked him why he was able to issue an arrest warrant for Mr. Putin while he is unable to do so for the Prime Minister of Israel. He couldn’t answer and didn’t answer that question.”
South Africa on Wednesday accused Israel of violating the United Nations’ top court’s recent ruling to prevent deaths in Gaza, as Israel pushes forward with its campaign to eliminate the threat of Palestinian militant group Hamas. The U.N. International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) ruling last week ordered Israel to do more to protect civilians in…
You may like
News
Humans Need Not Apply: The AI Candidate Promising to Disrupt Democracy
Published
4 months agoon
June 15, 2024The rise of AI Steve, the artificial intelligence candidate running for a seat in the UK Parliament, has sparked a heated debate about the role of AI in governance and the potential disruption it could bring to traditional democratic processes.
Steven Endacott, the human force behind AI Steve, envisions his AI co-pilot as a conduit for direct democracy, enabling constituents to engage with the AI, share concerns, and shape its policy platform through a voting system of “validators.” Endacott has pledged to vote in Parliament according to the AI’s constituent-driven platform, even if it conflicts with his personal views.
Proponents argue that AI Steve can revolutionize politics by bringing more voices into the process and ensuring that policies truly reflect the will of the people. They claim that an AI candidate can engage in up to 10,000 conversations simultaneously, allowing for unprecedented levels of public participation and input.
However, critics raise valid concerns about transparency, accountability, and the potential for AI systems to be manipulated or influenced by their creators, data limitations, or external actors. There are also questions about whether an AI can fully grasp the nuances and human elements involved in complex political issues.
Some argue that AI Steve is merely a clever marketing ploy to garner attention and votes, rather than a genuine effort to “humanize” politics. There are fears that the use of AI in elections could undermine faith in electoral outcomes and democratic processes if voters become aware of potential scams or manipulation.
Beyond the specific case of AI Steve, the rise of AI candidates and the increasing use of AI in political campaigns and elections raise broader questions about the integrity of democratic systems and the need for effective regulations and guidelines.
Anti-democratic actors and authoritarian regimes may seek to exploit AI technologies for censorship, surveillance, and suppressing dissent under the guise of enhancing governance. There are also concerns about the potential for an “AI arms race” between political parties to develop and deploy the most sophisticated AI technologies, further eroding public trust.
As AI tools become more advanced and accessible, upholding electoral integrity will require proactive efforts to establish guardrails, transparency measures, and accountability frameworks around their use in politics. Policymakers, advocates, and citizens must work together to ensure that AI is leveraged as a force for a better and more inclusive democracy, rather than a tool for manipulation or consolidation of power.
The rise of AI candidates like AI Steve serves as a wake-up call for democratic societies to grapple with the implications of artificial intelligence in governance and to strike the right balance between harnessing its potential benefits and mitigating its risks to the democratic process.
Stay Connected
Author: Bolanle Media Staff
Saudi Arabia is reportedly considering abandoning the US dollar for oil trade settlements, a move that could shake the foundations of the global financial system. For decades, the petrodollar system has propped up the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency, with Saudi Arabia insisting on dollar payments for its vast oil exports.
However, recent comments from Saudi officials hint at exploring alternatives to the dollar amid growing tensions with the US over various geopolitical issues and the rise of economic powerhouses like China.
Implications of a Petrodollar Shift
If Saudi Arabia abandons the petrodollar, the implications could be significant:
1. Dollar Dominance Eroded: The dollar’s reserve currency status could weaken, potentially leading to a decline in its value.
2. Global Financial Instability: A sudden shift could trigger volatility in global markets as investors adjust portfolios.
3. Geopolitical Realignment: The move could signal Saudi alignment with China and challenge US economic hegemony.
Challenges and Uncertainties
While the prospect is significant, challenges remain:
1. Finding a suitable alternative currency with the dollar’s liquidity and stability.
2. Potential economic disruption for Saudi Arabia and trading partners.
3. Political backlash and strained relations with the US and allies.
As the world watches, it remains uncertain whether Saudi Arabia’s comments signal a negotiating tactic or a profound shift in the global financial order.
Author: Bolanle Media Staff
X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, has made a significant policy shift by officially permitting adult content on its platform with some restrictions and guidelines.
In an update to its rules, X stated that users can now share “consensually produced and distributed adult nudity or sexual behavior” as long as it is properly labeled and not prominently displayed in areas like profile pictures or header images.
“We recognize that many of our users are adults who want to freely express themselves by sharing legal adult content,” said an X spokesperson. “At the same time, we have a responsibility to protect minors and prevent exposure to explicit material without proper labeling.”
Under the new guidelines, users who “regularly post” adult content must adjust their settings to automatically mark images and videos as sensitive content, which blurs or hides the media by default. By default, users under 18 or who haven’t entered their birth date cannot view this sensitive adult content.
The policy prohibits content “promoting exploitation, nonconsent, objectification, sexualization or harm to minors, and obscene behaviors.” It applies to all adult content, whether photographic, animated, or AI-generated.
X has stated that it will monitor user-generated content and adjust account settings for those who fail to properly mark pornographic posts. Similar rules and enforcement will apply to violent content as well.
The move aligns X with Apple’s app store guidelines, which allow apps with adult content as long as it is hidden by default and behind proper age gates and content warnings.
While adult content was already present on X, this policy update officially permits and regulates it, aiming to balance freedom of expression for consenting adults with protecting minors from exposure to explicit material.
However, enforcing these rules consistently may prove challenging for X’s reduced content moderation teams following recent layoffs and cost-cutting measures.
The policy shift has drawn mixed reactions, with some praising X for embracing adult expression while others raise concerns about the potential for the platform to become inundated with pornographic content despite the restrictions.
As X navigates this new territory, the effectiveness of its labeling requirements, age verification measures, and content moderation efforts will be closely watched by users, regulators, and advocacy groups alike.
Stay Connected
Author: Bolanle Media Staff
Trending
- Advice6 days ago
6 Top Common Audio Issues In Film Production
- Entertainment4 weeks ago
“Her Corpse”: A Darkly Hilarious Take on True Crime
- Entertainment2 weeks ago
“Happy Landing”: A Story of Humor in Aging
- Entertainment3 weeks ago
“Mutt”: A Story of Identity, Belonging, and Laughter
- Spotlight3 weeks ago
Miachel Pruett: Online Dating and Comedy in ‘Try a Waffle Cone’
- Entertainment11 hours ago
Matthew Gilleece: Comedy Screenwriter on the Rise
- Entertainment1 week ago
Theresa Romaniec: A Rising Star in Screenwriting
- Entertainment4 weeks ago
Sock It To Me: Comedy Meets Thriller