Connect with us

World News

Netanyahu tests Biden’s patience as war pressure builds on January 24, 2024 at 11:00 am

Published

on

President Biden’s relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is showing new signs of strain amid the Gaza War, which has put both leaders under extraordinary political pressure.

Biden has stood firm in defense of Israel despite intense backlash among voters calling for a ceasefire, and Democratic lawmakers appalled at a Palestinian death toll of nearly 25,000 people. 

But Netanyahu’s rejection of Biden’s push for a two-state solution in a day-after scenario for the Gaza Strip is challenging Biden’s efforts to stand strong in the face of Israel’s critics. The Israeli leader also appears to be blocking U.S. efforts to broker a new hostage deal.

“What’s happening now is that Prime Minister Netanyahu is rebuffing the Biden administration at virtually every turn,” said Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.).

Advertisement

“Ignoring their entreaties, slapping down the proposal to move quickly toward a two-state solution, I would think there’s a point when the Biden administration runs out of patience, they have a lot more patience than I would. I think that Prime Minister Netanyahu’s actions are hurting Israel and I think they’re hurting the United States.” 

Since Israel launched its retaliatory war following Hamas’ Oct. 7 terrorist attack, Biden and his senior aides have sought to strike a delicate balance between unqualified support for Israel’s stated goal to defeat Hamas militarily, and confronting the horrendous humanitarian toll on Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. 

On top of the deaths, the vast majority of Gaza’s population of more than 2 million people has been forced out of their homes and face rampant crises of hunger and disease.

“The administration wants to see more done on humanitarian assistance, they want to continue to see fewer civilian Palestinian casualties,” said Dennis Ross, a veteran Middle East peace negotiator across Republican and Democrat administrations, and distinguished fellow with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Advertisement

Ross said reports that Biden is frustrated and running out of patience with the Israeli leader is “a function of people below the president who are also dealing with pressures internationally and wanting to show that we’re putting pressure on Netanyahu.”

The White House has rejected calls for a ceasefire and argued one would only help Hamas, but the administration is putting its support behind efforts to pause the fighting for weeks to allow for humanitarian groups to aid Palestinians and help secure the release of about 100 hostages.

“We are in serious discussions about trying to get another pause in place,” White House National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby said on Tuesday, amid reports that Israel had offered a two-month pause in fighting in exchange for Hamas releasing hostages.

But Netanyahu has signaled he’s not interested in U.S. calls to restrain Israel’s military operation in the Gaza Strip. 

Advertisement

“Only total victory will ensure the elimination of Hamas and the return of all our hostages. I told President Biden this in our conversation over the weekend,” Netanyahu said on Sunday.

Netanyahu has further rejected Biden’s calls to establish a Palestinian state in a day-after scenario for Hamas’s defeat in the Gaza Strip, saying Israel must retain security control over Palestinian territories.

Biden has publicly played down these differences.

“There are a number of types of two-state solutions. There’s a number of countries that are members of the UN that are still — don’t have their own militaries,” Biden told reporters last week. “And so I think there’s ways in which this could work.”

Advertisement

Ross said the president’s response was likely influenced by Netanyahu — commonly called Bibi — when the two spoke on Jan. 19. 

“What that reflected was clearly, Bibi said something to him privately in a way that led him to say that,” he said.

“Meaning, this was Bibi talking about, if you’re talking about a state that’s demilitarized, then we’re talking about a different kind of state. There’s different kinds of states that don’t pose a threat to us that we could accept  — so that allows Biden to say this.” 

Biden has not shied away from criticizing Netanyahu in public throughout the two leaders’ nearly 40 years of knowing each other, spanning Netanyahu’s early diplomatic career in the U.S. and Biden’s time as Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman.

Advertisement

Biden, as President Obama’s vice president, had a front-row seat to some of the most fraught times in U.S. and Israel relations – from the failure of the U.S.-led peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians to Netanyahu’s lobbying Congress against Obama’s efforts for a nuclear deal with Iran. 

And throughout 2023, Biden has raised alarm over the Israeli leaders’ embrace of far-right fringe politicians and pursuit of judicial reforms that had sparked wide-spread protests in the months preceding Oct. 7. 

But the president is using significant political capital to stand alongside Netanyahu, with an increasing number of Democratic lawmakers pushing for a ceasefire, protests and some resignations among staff at federal agencies, and protests staged outside his campaign events across the country. 

Pro-Palestine advocates have warned that Bicen’s staunch support for Israel, even amid the carnage in Gaza, could cost him crucial votes in swing states like Michigan. 

Advertisement

Still, the majority of U.S. public opinion is in support of Israel in its war against Hamas, which slaughtered an estimated 1,200 people in southern Israel and took 240 people hostage – dozens who have since been released in U.S. brokered deals. 

“This is an extremely sensitive year in the United States. No serious presidential contender would basically take on either Netanyahu or Israel,” said Fawaz Gerges, professor of international relations and Middle Eastern politics at the London School of Economics. 

“Between now and the elections, the Biden team will not do anything to either anger or upset or really engage in any public spat with Netanyahu and Netanyahu knows this. Netanyahu truly, historically, is a manipulator-in-chief of the American electoral system.”

Biden and his top aides, as part of efforts to degrade Hamas, are looking to get Israel on board with agreeing to the creation of a Palestinian state by offering normalization with Saudi Arabia in return – a strategy the Saudis have endorsed. 

Advertisement

Netanyahu has pushed for establishing ties with Saudi Arabia, but his rejections of a Palestinian state are further isolating him on the global stage. 

Josep Borrell, the plain-spoken foreign policy chief for the E.U., was blunt in his criticism of Netanyahu’s rejection of a two-state solution. 

“Which are the other solutions they have in mind? To make all the Palestinians leave? To kill them?” Borrell said. “Certainly, the way of trying to destroy Hamas is not the way they are doing, because they are seeding the hate for generations.” 

That has left Biden one of Netanyahu’s last allies amid the overwhelming international calls for Israel to implement a ceasefire. 

Advertisement

“Netanyahu really cares about one man’s audience, and that’s Joe Biden,” Gerges said. “Israel has really lost in the court of public opinion. Whether you’re talking about Spain or Ireland or Belgium. I mean, it’s world public opinion. Truly, the United States and Germany and to a lesser extent, the U.K., are still solid supporters of Israel, but the United States really is against the world when it comes to Israel.”

Netanyahu also faces a reckoning at home. 

Protests against Netanyahu that were put on hold in the wake of Oct. 7 have restarted amid growing criticism within Israel over failure to secure the release of hostages, the conduct of the war, and the failures that allowed Hamas to attack in the first place. The protests are still relatively small, but signal growing anger among the public even as they support efforts to defeat Hamas. 

Gadi Eisenkot, a former head of the Israel Defense Forces and opposition lawmaker whose son was killed fighting in Gaza, has called for elections to be held after the war and raised doubt over the military defeat of Hamas. 

Advertisement

“It is necessary, within a period of months, to bring the Israeli voter back to the polls and hold elections in order to renew trust, because right now there is no trust,” Eisenkot said in an interview with the Israeli program Uvda. 

“As a democracy, the State of Israel needs to ask itself after such a serious event, ‘How do we continue from here with a leadership that has failed us miserably?’” 

Families of hostages have criticized Netanyahu as prolonging the military fight against Hamas to preserve his political power. 

“This holdup is with the Netanyahu government,” said Liz Naftali, who’s four-year-old niece was released after 50 days of captivity, and is advocating for the release of all the hostages.

Advertisement

She accused the Israeli prime minister of being “unwilling to agree to the terms to release our loved ones, to make these deals final.”

It’s a view that Netanyahu’s critics in Washington also believe. 

“There’s a reason why he’s had nine political lives, he’s a very gifted politician, but that does not mean he’s taking the right course now,” Van Hollen said.

“In fact, I think it’s very clear he’s put his own political ambitions and political interests above the interest of Israel and its allies.”

Advertisement

​ President Biden’s relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is showing new signs of strain amid the Gaza War, which has put both leaders under extraordinary political pressure. Biden has stood firm in defense of Israel despite intense backlash among voters calling for a ceasefire, and Democratic lawmakers appalled at a Palestinian death toll of… 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY SUMMIT RETURNS FOR ITS 5TH EDITION AT THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT – HOUSE OF LORDS, PALACE OF WESTMINSTER

Published

on

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Theme: “People, Planet, and Profit in the Age of AI and Innovation”

London, United Kingdom — The Global Sustainability Summit (GSS) is officially back for its landmark 5th Edition, continuing its legacy as one of the leading international platforms driving sustainable development, climate action, ethical investment, innovation, and global collaboration.

Advertisement

Convened annually at the prestigious British Parliament, House of Lords, Palace of Westminster, by Ambassador Canon Chinenem Otto, the Summit has, over the last four years, successfully fostered international dialogue and partnerships that have contributed to the advancement of global sustainability goals, the establishment of sustainability-focused ministries, departments and policy structures across national and subnational governments, and the attraction of major investors into sustainable development projects, corporations and emerging economies.

This year’s summit, themed “People, Planet, and Profit in the Age of AI and Innovation,” will explore how emerging technologies, responsible leadership, sustainable finance, innovation, and global partnerships can shape a more inclusive, resilient and environmentally conscious future.

The 5th Edition promises to be the most impactful yet, bringing together world leaders, policymakers, diplomats, investors, academics, innovators, climate experts and youth leaders from across the globe to discuss actionable solutions toward achieving a sustainable and equitable future.

Among the distinguished speakers, delegates and honorees already lined up for the Summit are:

• His Excellency Mallam AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq — Executive Governor of Kwara State, Nigeria and Chairman of the Nigeria Governors’ Forum

• His Excellency Senator Prince Bassey Otu — Executive Governor of Cross River State, Nigeria

Advertisement

• Ambassador Patricia Espinosa Cantellano — Former Executive Secretary of UN Climate Change (UNFCCC) and Former Foreign Minister of Mexico

• Lord Marvin Rees, Baron Rees of Easton OBE — Member of the House of Lords, United Kingdom

• Hon. Neema K. Lugangira — Secretary-General of Women Political Leaders (WPL), Brussels and Former Member of Parliament

• Her Excellency Dr. Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah — President of the Republic of Namibia

• His Excellency Nangolo Mbumba — Former President of Namibia

Advertisement

• Former President of Tanzania

• Her Excellency Ambassador Professor Olufolake AbdulRazaq — First Lady of Kwara State, Nigeria and Chairperson of Nigeria Governors’ Spouses Forum

• Your Excellency Dr. Dikko Umar Radda, PhD, CON — Executive Governor of Katsina State and Chairman of the Northwest Governors Forum, Nigeria

• Hon. Sam Shafiishuna Nujoma — Governor of Khomas Region, Namibia

Advertisement

• H.E. Mr. Veiccoh Nghiwete — High Commissioner of the Republic of Namibia to the United Kingdom

• Her Excellency Ms. Macenje “Che Che” Mazoka — High Commissioner of Zambia to the United Kingdom

• Ms. Danielle Newman — Partner Lead, ICT, World Economic Forum

• Leanne Elliott Young — Co-founder, Institute of Digital Fashion & CommuneEast

• Ms. Chloe Russell — Producer & Presenter, Art, Science and Nature

Advertisement

• Professor Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger — University of Cambridge & University of Waterloo

• Dr. Alexandra R. Harrington — IUCN World Commission on Environmental Law (WCEL)

• Professor Payam Akhavan — Massey College, University of Toronto

• Mr. Mallai C. E. Sathya — President, Dravida Vetri Kazhagam and International Movement for Tamil Culture Asia

Advertisement

The Summit will feature high-level panel discussions, strategic investment conversations, sustainability awards, policy dialogues, innovation showcases, youth engagement sessions and international networking opportunities focused on climate resilience, ethical financing, food-water-energy sustainability, circular economy, artificial intelligence, diplomacy and sustainable development.

Speaking ahead of the Summit, Convener Ambassador Canon Chinenem Otto noted:

“As the world rapidly evolves through artificial intelligence and technological innovation, we must ensure that sustainability remains people-centered, environmentally responsible and economically inclusive. The Global Sustainability Summit continues to serve as a bridge connecting governments, institutions, innovators and investors to accelerate practical sustainability solutions globally. Our fifth edition is not only a celebration of progress made over the years, but also a renewed call for global collaboration and actionable impact toward achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and Net Zero ambitions.”

The Global Sustainability Summit continues to position itself as a catalyst for transformative partnerships and sustainable global progress, reinforcing the urgent need for collective action toward a more resilient and sustainable future.

More announcements regarding additional speakers, partners and summit activities will be unveiled in the coming weeks.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

News

US May Completely Cut Income Tax Due to Tariff Revenue

Published

on

President Donald Trump says the United States might one day get rid of federal income tax because of money the government collects from tariffs on imported goods. Tariffs are extra taxes the U.S. puts on products that come from other countries.

What Trump Is Saying

Trump has said that tariff money could become so large that it might allow the government to cut income taxes “almost completely.” He has also talked about possibly phasing out income tax over the next few years if tariff money keeps going up.

How Taxes Work Now

Right now, the federal government gets much more money from income taxes than from tariffs. Income taxes bring in trillions of dollars each year, while tariffs bring in only a small part of that total. Because of this gap, experts say tariffs would need to grow by many times to replace income tax money.

Questions From Experts

Many economists and tax experts doubt that tariffs alone could pay for the whole federal budget. They warn that very high tariffs could make many imported goods more expensive for shoppers in the United States. This could hit lower- and middle‑income families hardest, because they spend a big share of their money on everyday items.

What Congress Must Do

The president can change some tariffs, but only Congress can change or end the federal income tax. That means any real plan to remove income tax would need new laws passed by both the House of Representatives and the Senate. So far, there is no detailed law or full budget plan on this idea.

What It Means Right Now

For now, Trump’s comments are a proposal, not a change in the law. People and businesses still have to pay federal income tax under the current rules. The debate over using tariffs instead of income taxes is likely to continue among lawmakers, experts, and voters.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Epstein Files to Be Declassified After Trump Order

Published

on


Former President Donald Trump has signed an executive order directing federal agencies to declassify all government files related to Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier whose death in 2019 continues to fuel controversy and speculation.

The order, signed Wednesday at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, instructs the FBI, Department of Justice, and intelligence agencies to release documents detailing Epstein’s network, finances, and alleged connections to high-profile figures. Trump described the move as “a step toward transparency and public trust,” promising that no names would be shielded from scrutiny.

“This information belongs to the American people,” Trump said in a televised statement. “For too long, powerful interests have tried to bury the truth. That ends now.”

U.S. intelligence officials confirmed that preparations for the release are already underway. According to sources familiar with the process, the first batch of documents is expected to be made public within the next 30 days, with additional releases scheduled over several months.

Reactions poured in across the political spectrum. Supporters praised the decision as a bold act of accountability, while critics alleged it was politically motivated, timed to draw attention during a volatile election season. Civil rights advocates, meanwhile, emphasized caution, warning that some records could expose private victims or ongoing legal matters.

The Epstein case, which implicated figures in politics, business, and entertainment, remains one of the most talked-about scandals of the past decade. Epstein’s connections to influential individuals—including politicians, royals, and executives—have long sparked speculation about the extent of his operations and who may have been involved.

Advertisement

Former federal prosecutor Lauren Fields said the release could mark a turning point in public discourse surrounding government transparency. “Regardless of political stance, this declassification has the potential to reshape how Americans view power and accountability,” Fields noted.

Officials say redactions may still occur to protect sensitive intelligence or personal information, but the intent is a near-complete disclosure. For years, critics of the government’s handling of Epstein’s case have accused agencies of concealing evidence or shielding elites from exposure. Trump’s order promises to change that narrative.

As anticipation builds, journalists, legal analysts, and online commentators are preparing for what could be one of the most consequential information releases in recent history.

Continue Reading

Trending