Entertainment
Writers Guild of America Reaches Tentative Deal After 4-Month Strike on September 25, 2023 at 12:52 pm Us Weekly

David Livingston/Getty Images
The Writers Guild of America has reached a temporary agreement with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers to end the strikes that have halted production for four months.
The three-year contract was proposed on Sunday, September 24, after five days of negotiations, effectively putting a stop to the picket lines. (The strike itself will remain in progress through the approval and ratification process, per Variety.)
Details of the contract are expected to be released as the final language is determined. The guild issued a statement to its members on Sunday, noting in part, “We can say, with great pride, that this deal is exceptional — with meaningful gains and protections for writers in every sector of the membership.”
The WGA and AMPTP issued a rare joint statement on Wednesday, September 20, to announce that the two organizations had “met for bargaining today and will meet again tomorrow” amid reports that a deal was close to being reached.
The WGA, which represents more than 11,000 writers, went on strike in May, while SAG-AFTRA, which represents approximately 160,000 actors, followed suit two months later. Prior to the agreement, the WGA was nearing the record for the longest strike in its history. The work stoppage in 1988 lasted 154 days, while Sunday marked the 2023 strike’s 146th.
Writer Eric Heisserer hold his sign on the picket line on the fourth day of the strike by the Writers Guild of America in front of Netflix in Hollywood, California, on May 5, 2023. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images
Both unions asked the AMPTP for better wages, increased residual payments from streaming services and protections against the use of artificial intelligence. Work on most major productions had already shut down in May due to the writers’ strike. Though filming for some talk shows could have resumed if only the WGA reached a deal, actors would not have been allowed to return to sets as long as SAG-AFTRA was still on strike.
In a message shared via social media on Sunday, SAG-AFTRA congratulated the WGA on the new development. “We look forward to reviewing the terms of the WGA and AMPTP’s tentative agreement. And we remain ready to resume our own negotiations with the AMPTP as soon as they are prepared to engage on our proposals in a meaningful way,” the organization noted.
Earlier this month, Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav hinted that studio heads were prepared to do what was needed to end the writers and actors’ strikes. “We need to do everything we can to get people back to work,” he said at an investors conference. “We really have to focus as an industry and we are on trying to get this resolved in a way that’s really fair.”
While the studios have been able to tide fans over in the months since the strikes began with projects that were already filmed, some companies were open about the financial strains caused by the unions’ efforts. Warner Bros. Discovery warned investors of a $300 million to $500 million loss by the end of the year, and CNN reported earlier this month that the strikes had already cost multiple industries a combined $5 billion.
Meanwhile, the strikes disrupted the fall TV schedule, which is typically filled with season and series premieres in September and October. As reality shows replaced the usual scripted fare across the major networks, Fox entertainment president Michael Thorn told Deadline that if the strikes did not end by October 1, it would be difficult to salvage the TV season as a whole. “You’re going to get to a point in the fall, in the late fall, where it’s going to be very hard to launch [scripted shows] within the traditional TV viewing season,” he said earlier this month.
David Livingston/Getty Images The Writers Guild of America has reached a temporary agreement with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers to end the strikes that have halted production for four months. The three-year contract was proposed on Sunday, September 24, after five days of negotiations, effectively putting a stop to the picket lines.
Us Weekly Read More
Advice
How Far Would You Go to Book Your Dream Role?

The question Sydney Sweeney’s career forces every serious artist to ask themselves.
Most people say they want to be an actor. But wanting the life and being willing to do what the life requires are two entirely different things. Sydney Sweeney’s performance as Cassie Howard in Euphoria is one of the clearest examples in recent television of what it actually looks like when an artist refuses to protect themselves from the story they are telling.
The Performance That Started a Conversation
Cassie Howard is not a comfortable character to watch. She is messy, desperate, and heartbreakingly human in ways that most scripts would have softened or simplified. Sydney Sweeney did not soften her. She played every scene at full exposure — the breakdowns, the humiliation, the moments where Cassie is both completely wrong and completely understandable at the same time.
What made the performance remarkable was not the difficulty of the scenes. It was the consistency of her commitment to them. Night after night on set, take after take, she showed up and gave the camera something real. That is not a small thing. That is the kind of discipline that separates working actors from generational ones.
What the Industry Does Not Tell You
The entertainment industry sells you a version of success built around talent, timing, and luck. And while all three matter, none of them are the real differentiator in a room full of equally talented people. The real differentiator is willingness — the willingness to be honest, to be vulnerable, and to let the work require something personal from you.
Most actors hit a wall at some point in their career where a role demands more than they have publicly shown before. The ones who say yes to that moment, who trust the material and the director enough to go somewhere uncomfortable, are the ones audiences remember long after the credits roll.
Sydney Sweeney said yes repeatedly. And the industry took notice.
The Question Worth Asking Yourself
Before you answer, really think about it. There is a moment in every serious audition room where someone might ask you to go further than you are comfortable with — to access something real, to stop performing and start revealing. In that moment, you have to decide what your dream is actually worth to you and, more importantly, what parts of yourself you are not willing to trade for it.
That is the question Euphoria quietly raises for anyone watching with ambition in their chest. Not “could I do that,” but “should I ever feel pressured to.” There is a difference between an artist who chooses vulnerability as a creative tool and one who is pressured into exposure they never agreed to. Knowing that difference is not a weakness. It is the most important thing a young actor can understand before they walk into a room that will test it.
Because the only role that truly costs too much is the one that asks you to abandon who you are to play it.
What You Can Take From This
Whether you are an actor, a filmmaker, a content creator, or someone simply building something from scratch, the principle is the same. The work that connects with people is almost always the work that cost the creator something real. Audiences can feel the difference between performance and truth. They always could.
Sydney Sweeney did not become one of the most talked-about actresses of her generation because she got lucky. She got there because she was willing to be completely, uncomfortably human in front of a camera — and because she knew exactly who she was before she let the role take over.
That combination — full commitment and a clear sense of self — is rarer than talent. And it is the thing worth chasing.
Written for Bolanle Media | Entertainment. Culture. Conversation.
Entertainment
Bieber’s Coachella Set Has Everyone Arguing Again

And honestly? That might be exactly what he wanted.
Justin Bieber stepped onto the Coachella stage Saturday night as the highest-paid headliner in the festival’s history — reportedly pocketing $10 million — and proceeded to sit down at a laptop and play YouTube videos.
The internet, predictably, lost its mind.
What Actually Happened
This was Bieber’s first major U.S. performance since his Justice era — a long-awaited comeback after battling Ramsay Hunt syndrome in 2022, which caused partial facial paralysis, plus years of mental health struggles and a very public disappearing act from the industry.
The stage setup was minimal: a fluid cocoon-like structure, no backup dancers, no elaborate lighting rigs. Just Bieber, a stool, and a laptop.
He opened with tracks from his 2025 albums Swag and Swag II, then invited the crowd on a journey — “How far back do you go?”
What followed was a nostalgic scroll through his entire career: old YouTube covers before he was famous, classic hits “Baby“ and “Never Say Never“ playing on screen while he sang alongside his younger self. Guests including The Kid Laroi, Wizkid, and Tems joined him throughout the night.
He even played his viral “Standing on Business” paparazzi rant and re-enacted it live, hoodie on, completely unbothered.
The Moment Nobody Predicted
But here’s what the critics burying him in their hot takes chose not to lead with: Bieber closed his set with worship music.
In the middle of Coachella — one of the most secular stages on the planet — he performed songs rooted in his Christian faith, openly crediting Jesus as the reason he was standing on that stage at all.
It wasn’t subtle. It wasn’t a quick prayer and a thank-you. He leaned into it fully, in front of a crowd of 125,000 people who came expecting pop bangers and got a testimony instead.
For fans who have followed his faith journey — his deep involvement with Hillsong and later Churchome, his baptism in 2014, and his very public declaration that Jesus saved his life during his darkest years — the moment landed like a full-circle miracle.
Why People Are Mad
Critics have been brutal.
Zara Larsson summed up the skeptics perfectly, posting on TikTok: “It’s giving let’s smoke and watch YouTube“ — and that clip went just as viral as the performance itself.
One fan on X wrote: “I’m crying, this might actually be the worst performance I’ve ever seen. He’s just playing videos from YouTube… zero effort, pure laziness.”
The comparison to Sabrina Carpenter’s Friday headlining set — elaborate staging, multiple costume changes, celebrity cameos — only made Bieber’s stripped-down show look more controversial.
And the $10 million figure kept coming up. People felt cheated.
Why His Fans Think Everyone’s Missing the Point
Here’s where it gets interesting.
One commenter on X put it best: “He did not force a high-production machine that could burn him out again. Instead, he sat with his past, scrolling through old YouTube videos, duetting with his younger self, and mixing nostalgia with new chapters.”
As the set progressed, Bieber visibly opened up. He removed his sunglasses. He took off his hoodie. He smiled, made jokes about falling through a stage as a teenager.
One Instagram account with millions of followers posted: “This Justin Bieber performance healed something in me.”
That healing language is intentional for Bieber — it mirrors how he talks about his faith. In interviews, he has repeatedly said Jesus didn’t just save his career; He saved his life. The worship set at Coachella wasn’t a gimmick. It was a confession.
The Bigger Picture
Love it or hate it, Bieber’s Coachella set is the most talked-about moment from Weekend One — more than Karol G making history as the first Latina to headline the festival, more than Sabrina Carpenter’s spectacle.
That’s not an accident.
In an era where every headliner tries to out-produce the last one, Bieber walked out with a laptop, a stool, and his faith — and made it personal. For millions of fans watching, the worship songs weren’t filler. They were the point.
Whether you call it lazy or legendary, one thing is clear: Justin Bieber isn’t performing for the critics anymore. He’s performing for an audience of One — and the rest of us just happened to be there.
Drop your take in the comments — was Bieber’s Coachella set lazy, legendary, or something even bigger?
Entertainment
Vertical Films Changed Everything. Are You Ready?

People don’t watch films the way they used to—and if you’re still cutting everything for the big screen first, you’re losing the audience that lives in your pocket.
Every swipe on TikTok is a tiny festival: new voices, wild visuals, heartbreak, comedy, and chaos, all judged in under three seconds. In that world, vertical films aren’t a gimmick. They’re the new front door to your work, your brand, and your career.

The movie theater is now in your hand
Think about where you’ve discovered your favorite clips lately: your phone, in bed, in an Uber, between texts. The “cinema” experience has shrunk into a glowing rectangle we hold inches from our face. That’s intimate. That’s personal. That’s power.
Vertical video fills that space completely. No black bars. No distractions. Just one story, one face, one moment staring back at you. It feels less like “I’m watching a movie” and more like “this is happening to me.” For storytellers, that’s gold.
The old rules still matter—but they bend
Film school taught you:
- Compose for the wide frame.
- Let the world breathe at the edges.
- Save the close-up for maximum impact.
Vertical filmmaking says: bring all of that craft… and then flip it. You still need composition, rhythm, framing, and sound. But now:
- The close-up is the default, not the climax.
- Depth replaces width—what’s in front and behind matters more than left and right.
- Micro-scenes—60 seconds or less—must feel like complete emotional beats.
It’s not “less cinematic.” It’s a different kind of cinematic—one that lives where people already are instead of asking them to come to you.
Your characters can live beyond the film
Here’s the secret no one tells you: audiences don’t just fall in love with stories; they fall in love with people. Vertical video lets your characters exist outside the runtime.
Imagine this:
- The day your trailer drops, your lead character is already a recurring presence on people’s For You Pages.
- There are 10 short vertical scenes—arguments, confessions, jokes—that never made the final cut but live as their own mini-episodes.
- Fans aren’t asking “What is this movie?” They’re asking, “When do I get more of her?”
When someone feels like they “know” a character from their feed, buying a ticket or renting your film stops feeling like a risk. It feels like catching up with a friend.
Behind the scenes is no longer optional
Vertical films thrive on honesty. Shaky behind-the-scenes clips. Laughing fits between takes. The director’s 2 a.m. rant about a shot that won’t work. The makeup artist fixing tears after a heavy scene. That’s the texture that makes people care about the final product.
You don’t have to be perfect. You have to be present.
Ideas you can start capturing tomorrow:
- “What we can’t afford, so we’re faking it.”
- “The shot we were scared to try.”
- “One thing we argued about for three days.”
When you show the process, you’re not just selling a film—you’re inviting people into a journey.
Think in episodes, not posts
Most people treat vertical video like a one-off blast: post, pray, forget. Instead, think like a showrunner.
Ask yourself:
- If my project were a vertical series, what’s Episode 1? What’s the hook?
- How can I end each clip with a question, a twist, or a feeling that makes people need the next part?
- Can I tell one complete emotional story across 10 vertical videos?
Suddenly, your feed isn’t random. It’s a season. People don’t just “like” a video—they “follow” to see what happens next.
The attention is real. The opportunity is bigger.
We’re in a rare moment where a micro-drama shot on your phone can sit in the same feed as a studio campaign and still win. A fearless 45-second monologue in a bathroom. A quiet scene of someone deleting a text. A single, wordless push-in on a face that tells the whole story.
Vertical films give you:
- Low cost, high experimentation.
- Immediate feedback from real viewers.
- Proof that your story, your voice, your world can hold attention.
You don’t have to wait for permission, a greenlight, or a perfect budget. You can start where you are, with what you have, and let the audience tell you what’s working.

So, are you ready?
Some filmmakers will roll their eyes and call vertical a phase. They’ll keep making beautiful work that no one sees until a festival says it exists. Others will treat every swipe, every scroll, and every tiny screen as a chance to connect, teach, provoke, and move people.
Those are the filmmakers whose names we’ll be hearing in five years.
The question isn’t whether vertical films are “real cinema.” The question is: when the next person scrolls past your work, do they feel nothing—or do they stop, stare, and think, “I need more of this”?
News3 weeks agoThe Timothée Chalamet Guide to Ruining Your Image
Entertainment3 weeks agoThe machine isn’t coming. It’s aleady the room.
Entertainment3 weeks agoWhat Kanye’s ‘Father’ Says About Power, Faith, and Control
News4 weeks agoHow She Earns $40M+ In 2026
News4 weeks agoDid OnlyFans Save Creators—or Trap Them?
News2 weeks agoWhy Your Indie Film Disappears Online
News2 weeks agoThe Franchise Is Over. Here’s Who’s Winning Now.
News2 weeks agoA Civilization Will Die Tonight — And We’re All Just Watching





















