World News
Why Ukraine’s backers are selling defense chief’s exit as a victory on September 5, 2023 at 9:18 pm

TBILISI, Georgia — Ukraine’s strongest supporters are rallying around Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s decision to remove the country’s war-time defense minister after a series of corruption scandals have plagued the ministry.
Kyiv’s backers say Zelensky’s ousting of Oleski Reznikov is a sign that Ukraine views the fight against corruption as a necessary part of its war to push out Russia’s invading forces.
And they are softening blows against Reznikov, pointing out that the minister was not directly implicated in any of the corruption scandals, and is reportedly being considered for a senior diplomatic posting.
“There’s no indication Reznikov had a problem with corruption, he had a problem with the ministry,” William Taylor, the vice president of the Russia, Ukraine program at the U.S. Institute of Peace, said at an international conference in Tbilisi, Georgia on Monday.
“It has to be clear that there is no tolerance for corruption, it has to be clear this is part of a broader effort…the anticorruption institutions in Ukraine are now succeeding.”
Taylor added that he was exchanging messages with Reznikov Monday. “He says his wife is very happy that he’s not in that same job. But he also has great confidence in Minister [Rustem] Umerov,” Taylor said, referring to Zelensky’s replacement pick.
Taylor was speaking at a conference rallying support for Ukraine and other victims of Russian aggression, titled “Defeating Putinism,” where his sentiments were widely shared.
But critics are likely to seize on the Ukrainian government shakeup as another example of what they say is endemic corruption, which underscores their opposition to military and financial support to the country.
Lawmakers in Washington are considering a request from President Biden for $24 billion in aid for Ukraine, part of a $40 billion supplemental budget request. A small but vocal group of Republican lawmakers oppose aid for Ukraine, spurring some concern in Europe about ongoing American support for Kyiv.
“People who are dead set against helping Ukraine are going to do what they always do, they’re going to say, ‘Oh, this just shows that Ukraine hasn’t changed,” said Tom Malinowski, a former Democratic congressman from New Jersey, and now a visiting fellow with the McCain Institute, one of the co-sponsors of the conference.
“But in fact, it shows just how much Ukraine has changed. Five or 10 years ago, the idea that a defense minister would be fired because something bad happened on his watch, even though he himself wasn’t responsible for it, would be unbelievable.”
Zelensky’s announcement on Sunday that he would be replacing Reznikov came after months of speculation about Reznikov’s future.
Reznikov outlasted a potential firing in February, after an investigation in January revealed that the Ministry of Defense was overpaying for the purchase of food at between two and three times its normal price. A deputy defense minister and a procurement officer were reportedly arrested connected to the food scandal.
And then in April, an investigation by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty found more price gouging for food provisions.
Further, The New York Times reported in June that Ukraine had paid contractors hundreds of millions of dollars in weapons that were not delivered. Some of that money was clawed back, the Times reported.
Reznikov said in July he would take steps to address corruption over the procurement of food in his ministry.
But last month, an investigation by the Ukrainian publication ZN.UA revealed that the ministry had overpaid for more than 200,000 light-weight coats, and that were deemed unfit to protect soldiers for winter. Ukraine paid $20 million to import the coats from Turkey, and ZN.UA reported that the ministry overpaid by three-times the actual price.
“In ideal conditions, there is no place for corruption in highly developed and democratic state. Unfortunately we’re living not in an ideal world,” Alexander Shulga, charge d’affaires of the Ukrainian Embassy in Georgia, said on a panel at the conference.
“In such circumstances for Ukrainians, state of war, with zero tolerance to corruption and with fighting against corruption in Ukraine, all these steps are essential for our future victory over Russian Federation.”
Kurt Volker, Distinguished Fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis and former U.S. Ambassador to NATO, said that it was not Reznikov’s “job to micromanage the ministry procurement process. People below him are in charge of that.”
Reznikov’s firing is “many things at once,” he added. It’s Zelensky demonstrating that he’s taking accountability, that he’s paying attention to corruption issues and willing to make changes.
“It’s a chance for Reznikov to do something else after 18 months leading the Ministry of Defense in wartime,” he added.
Rebecca Harms, a German politician who served as a member of parliament for the European Union, described the corruption scandals in the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense as deadly serious, but echoed the view that Reznikov’s dismissal signaled steps towards accountability.
“It is a good sign that even in this horrid war Ukrainian journalists are doing their job. And it is another good sign that the president draws the right conclusions,” she said.
“If the scandals around procurement would not lead to consequences for the leadership in the Ministry this would become a burden for the brave men and women who are risking their lives for their country.”
She added that it’s also important for Zelensky to signal to Ukraine’s international supporters that “war is not an excuse for neither mismanagement or corruption.”
Zelensky said Sunday that he had decided to replace Reznikov because the ministry “needs new approaches and other formats of interaction with both the military and society at large.”
He nominated Umerov, a Ukrainian parliamentarian member of the political party “Voice”, and who is from the minority community of Crimean-Tatar, Muslims.
“The fact that Ukraine has a Jewish president who appointed an ethnic minority Muslim defense minister, tells you a lot about what Ukraine is. This is a patriotic country, but one in which patriotism isn’t based on ethnicity or religion. It’s based on an idea. It’s based on democracy,” Malinowski, the former Democratic congressman, said.
Reznikov is reportedly being considered to serve as ambassador to the United Kingdom, replacing the previous ambassador, Vadym Prystaiko, who was fired by Zelensky in July.
The president’s office did not give a reason for Prystaiko’s dismissal at the time, but that came after the former ambassador gave an interview where he said Zelensky’s criticism of western supporters at the NATO Summit was not “healthy.”
Volker, of CEPA, said that Reznikov’s reported consideration for the London diplomatic posting shows Zelensky still holds him in his confidence.
“Offering him another position shows they are happy with him,” Volker said.
Disclosure: The author had her travel and accommodation paid for by the conference, which was sponsored by The McCain Institute, The George W. Bush Institute and the Economic Policy Research Center.
TBILISI, Georgia — Ukraine’s strongest supporters are rallying around Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s decision to remove the country’s war-time defense minister after a series of corruption scandals have plagued the ministry. Kyiv’s backers say Zelensky’s ousting of Oleski Reznikov is a sign that Ukraine views the fight against corruption as a necessary part of its…
News
US May Completely Cut Income Tax Due to Tariff Revenue

President Donald Trump says the United States might one day get rid of federal income tax because of money the government collects from tariffs on imported goods. Tariffs are extra taxes the U.S. puts on products that come from other countries.

What Trump Is Saying
Trump has said that tariff money could become so large that it might allow the government to cut income taxes “almost completely.” He has also talked about possibly phasing out income tax over the next few years if tariff money keeps going up.
How Taxes Work Now
Right now, the federal government gets much more money from income taxes than from tariffs. Income taxes bring in trillions of dollars each year, while tariffs bring in only a small part of that total. Because of this gap, experts say tariffs would need to grow by many times to replace income tax money.
Questions From Experts
Many economists and tax experts doubt that tariffs alone could pay for the whole federal budget. They warn that very high tariffs could make many imported goods more expensive for shoppers in the United States. This could hit lower- and middle‑income families hardest, because they spend a big share of their money on everyday items.
What Congress Must Do
The president can change some tariffs, but only Congress can change or end the federal income tax. That means any real plan to remove income tax would need new laws passed by both the House of Representatives and the Senate. So far, there is no detailed law or full budget plan on this idea.

What It Means Right Now
For now, Trump’s comments are a proposal, not a change in the law. People and businesses still have to pay federal income tax under the current rules. The debate over using tariffs instead of income taxes is likely to continue among lawmakers, experts, and voters.
News
Epstein Files to Be Declassified After Trump Order

Former President Donald Trump has signed an executive order directing federal agencies to declassify all government files related to Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier whose death in 2019 continues to fuel controversy and speculation.
The order, signed Wednesday at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, instructs the FBI, Department of Justice, and intelligence agencies to release documents detailing Epstein’s network, finances, and alleged connections to high-profile figures. Trump described the move as “a step toward transparency and public trust,” promising that no names would be shielded from scrutiny.
“This information belongs to the American people,” Trump said in a televised statement. “For too long, powerful interests have tried to bury the truth. That ends now.”
U.S. intelligence officials confirmed that preparations for the release are already underway. According to sources familiar with the process, the first batch of documents is expected to be made public within the next 30 days, with additional releases scheduled over several months.
Reactions poured in across the political spectrum. Supporters praised the decision as a bold act of accountability, while critics alleged it was politically motivated, timed to draw attention during a volatile election season. Civil rights advocates, meanwhile, emphasized caution, warning that some records could expose private victims or ongoing legal matters.
The Epstein case, which implicated figures in politics, business, and entertainment, remains one of the most talked-about scandals of the past decade. Epstein’s connections to influential individuals—including politicians, royals, and executives—have long sparked speculation about the extent of his operations and who may have been involved.

Former federal prosecutor Lauren Fields said the release could mark a turning point in public discourse surrounding government transparency. “Regardless of political stance, this declassification has the potential to reshape how Americans view power and accountability,” Fields noted.
Officials say redactions may still occur to protect sensitive intelligence or personal information, but the intent is a near-complete disclosure. For years, critics of the government’s handling of Epstein’s case have accused agencies of concealing evidence or shielding elites from exposure. Trump’s order promises to change that narrative.
As anticipation builds, journalists, legal analysts, and online commentators are preparing for what could be one of the most consequential information releases in recent history.
Politics
Netanyahu’s UN Speech Triggers Diplomatic Walkouts and Mass Protests

What Happened at the United Nations
On Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, defending Israel’s ongoing military operations in Gaza. As he spoke, more than 100 delegates from over 50 countries stood up and left the chamber—a rare and significant diplomatic walkout. Outside the UN, thousands of protesters gathered to voice opposition to Netanyahu’s policies and call for accountability, including some who labeled him a war criminal. The protest included activists from Palestinian and Jewish groups, along with international allies.

Why Did Delegates and Protesters Walk Out?
The walkouts and protests were a response to Israel’s continued offensive in Gaza, which has resulted in widespread destruction and a significant humanitarian crisis. Many countries and individuals have accused Israel of excessive use of force, and some international prosecutors have suggested Netanyahu should face investigation by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, including claims that starvation was used as a weapon against civilians. At the same time, a record number of nations—over 150—recently recognized the State of Palestine, leaving the United States as the only permanent UN Security Council member not to join them.
International Reaction and Significance
The diplomatic walkouts and street protests demonstrate increasing global concern over the situation in Gaza and growing support for Palestinian statehood. Several world leaders, including Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro, showed visible solidarity with protesters. Petro called for international intervention and, controversially, for US troops not to follow orders he viewed as supporting ongoing conflict. The US later revoked Petro’s visa over his role in the protests, which he argued was evidence of a declining respect for international law.

Why Is This News Important?
The Gaza conflict is one of the world’s most contentious and closely-watched issues. It has drawn strong feelings and differing opinions from governments, activists, and ordinary people worldwide. The United Nations, as an international organization focused on peace and human rights, is a key arena for these debates. The events surrounding Netanyahu’s speech show that many nations and voices are urging new action—from recognition of Palestinian rights to calls for sanctions against Israel—while discussion and disagreement over the best path forward continue.
This episode at the UN highlights how international diplomacy, public protests, and official policy are all intersecting in real time as the search for solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains urgent and unresolved.
Advice2 weeks agoHow to Make Your Indie Film Pay Off Without Losing Half to Distributors
Business3 weeks agoHow Epstein’s Cash Shaped Artists, Agencies, and Algorithms
Entertainment4 weeks agoWhat Epstein’s Guest Lists Mean for Working Filmmakers: Who Do You Stand Next To?
Film Industry2 weeks agoWhy Burnt-Out Filmmakers Need to Unplug Right Now
Business3 weeks agoNew DOJ Files Reveal Naomi Campbell’s Deep Ties to Jeffrey Epstein
Entertainment3 weeks agoYou wanted to make movies, not decode Epstein. Too late.
Business & Money4 weeks agoGhislaine Maxwell Just Told Congress She’ll Talk — If Trump Frees Her
News2 weeks agoHarlem’s Hottest Ticket: Ladawn Mechelle Taylor Live




















