Connect with us

News

Why Facebook Is Failing in 2025

Published

on

The Rise…and the Slow Fade

A decade ago, Facebook felt unstoppable. It was the online living room for two billion people, a platform that brought friends, families, and even old classmates back together with one click. Now, in 2025, many log in only to be greeted by a wasteland of mobile game ads, recycled memes, and updates from people they barely remember. So why, with over 3 billion monthly users, do so many feel like Facebook is on the decline?

Where Did Everybody Go?

Engagement is plummeting. According to recent surveys, over 30% of users aged 18 to 34 have significantly reduced their Facebook time. The culprit? “Too many ads, irrelevant content, and friends and family who just aren’t active there anymore.” In fact, 47% of 18–24-year-olds now say they prefer other platforms entirely, especially Instagram and TikTok.

“Facebook has lost its purpose in our lives,” laments one survey of 45–54-year-olds, with 45% reducing their usage and 36% citing ad overload as the main reason.

The Algorithm Problem

Facebook’s once-innovative algorithm is, ironically, a big reason users are leaving. Instead of showing updates from actual friends, the feed is now flooded with “recommended” videos, viral bait, and irrelevant posts. The ever-present push for engagement comes at the cost of real connection—and users have noticed.

Shop Our Store- Click Here

Chasing a Younger Crowd…and Losing

Younger generations see Facebook as the social network of their parents and grandparents. Gen Z flocks to new platforms with snappier, more visual content, leaving Facebook to skew older. For small businesses, the pay-to-play landscape all but eliminates organic reach, forcing owners to shell out for ads that might not even reach real people. Bots and fake accounts are a concern, with engagement sometimes feeling artificial.

“It’s just not cool anymore,” sums up a 24-year-old ex-user.

Privacy, Trust, and Relevance

From the Cambridge Analytica scandal to ongoing concerns about misinformation and privacy, Facebook’s reputation has taken hit after hit. These trust issues, combined with intrusive ads and the pressure to monetize every click, have soured even the platform’s most loyal users.

Numbers Don’t Tell the Whole Story

Despite boasting over 3 billion monthly users in 2025, daily time spent on Facebook has fallen from 58 minutes in 2019 to just 30 minutes today—a 48% drop. Search interest is down 43% since 2021, and the platform is now a distant contender behind TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube in both engagement and daily usage.

“Facebook remains the world’s largest social network. But it feels emptier than ever.”

The Future: Too Big to Fail?

Will Facebook ever regain its cultural clout? Or is it destined to be the next digital ghost town—a vast, active user base in numbers only, with little real conversation or connection left? One thing is clear: to survive another decade, Facebook must find a way to reclaim the trust and interest of users who have already moved on.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

FIPRM Expands Into Sports, Partners With Bolanle Media to Launch New Media Platform

Published

on

FIPRM is expanding its footprint into the sports industry through a new partnership with Bolanle Media, marking a strategic move into athlete-focused media and content development.

The Houston-based public relations firm announced the launch of its sports division alongside plans to co-develop a new sports media platform in collaboration with Bolanle Media.

The initiative reflects a growing demand for athlete-driven storytelling, as players increasingly seek control over their narratives both during and after their careers.

Through this expansion, FIPRM will offer specialized services including crisis management, media training, and business consulting tailored specifically for athletes. The goal is to support clients not only in navigating public visibility but also in building long-term business ventures beyond sports.

The partnership with Bolanle Media adds a strong content and distribution component to the strategy. Known for its work in digital storytelling and media production, Bolanle Media will play a key role in developing original programming and amplifying athlete voices across platforms.

Advertisement

One of the first projects under the collaboration is The Basketball Exchange, a biweekly podcast focused on news, analysis, and cultural conversations surrounding the WNBA, BIG3, Unrivaled, and women’s college basketball. The show will be executive produced by Bolanle Media founder Roselyn Omaka, who also serves as a network partner on the project.

Hosted by publicist Kretonia Morgan, the podcast will feature contributions from former NBA player Orien Green, BIG3 player Adam Drexler, and former WNBA champion Janell Burse. The format is designed to combine insider perspective with broader conversations around the evolving business and culture of basketball.

The move comes as both companies position themselves at the intersection of sports, media, and branding. For FIPRM, the sports division represents a natural extension of its public relations expertise into a high-growth sector. For Bolanle Media, the partnership strengthens its expansion into sports content and athlete-led programming.

As the sports media landscape continues to shift toward direct-to-audience platforms, collaborations like this highlight a larger trend: athletes are no longer just subjects of coverage—they are becoming media brands in their own right.

Advertisement

Follow Basketball Exchange -Kretonia’s Substack

Continue Reading

News

ON MAY 8, 2026, YOUR INSTAGRAM DMS STOP BEING TRULY PRIVATE

Published

on


Bolanle Tech Newsroom Report

Instagram Is Quietly Changing What “Private” Means in Your DMs

From the Bolanle Tech Newsroom: Instagram has officially confirmed it will stop supporting end‑to‑end encrypted DMs on that date, and this is a documented policy change, not a rumor. That optional encrypted mode was the one feature that kept certain chats locked so tightly that not even Meta could read them, and once it’s gone, your “private” conversations lose their highest level of protection. In simple terms, the lock on those messages is being removed, and Meta will once again be in a position to see more of what you say in DMs if it chooses to, or if it is compelled to by law.

End‑to‑end encryption is what made some Instagram chats feel like a sealed envelope: the message left your phone scrambled and only arrived readable on the other person’s device. Without that, your DMs sit on Meta’s servers in a form that can be scanned by safety systems, reviewed for policy violations, and potentially used to inform AI and ad targeting. Meta is presenting this as a clean‑up of a “low‑usage” feature and is directing privacy‑focused users toward WhatsApp instead. But if you’ve been sending addresses, money talk, contracts, intimate photos, or receipts over Instagram, this marks a serious shift in what “private” really means on the platform.

“THESE CHATS WON’T BE PUBLIC, BUT THEY WON’T BE FULLY LOCKED DOWN EITHER.”

Practically, this does not mean your DMs become public or searchable by other users—strangers still can’t just open your messages, and your audience settings, blocking, and reporting tools remain in place.

What changes is who else can see inside: Meta’s internal systems, safety tools, and, when required, law enforcement will have a clearer path to the content of your conversations than they did under full end‑to‑end encryption. That is why privacy advocates are sounding the alarm—and why, from the Bolanle Tech Newsroom, our guidance is to treat Instagram DMs as semi‑public space: useful for networking, coordination, and light conversation, but not the place to keep your most sensitive secrets.

Continue Reading

Advice

How Far Would You Go to Book Your Dream Role?

Published

on

The question Sydney Sweeney’s career forces every serious artist to ask themselves.


Most people say they want to be an actor. But wanting the life and being willing to do what the life requires are two entirely different things. Sydney Sweeney’s performance as Cassie Howard in Euphoria is one of the clearest examples in recent television of what it actually looks like when an artist refuses to protect themselves from the story they are telling.


The Performance That Started a Conversation

Cassie Howard is not a comfortable character to watch. She is messy, desperate, and heartbreakingly human in ways that most scripts would have softened or simplified. Sydney Sweeney did not soften her. She played every scene at full exposure — the breakdowns, the humiliation, the moments where Cassie is both completely wrong and completely understandable at the same time.

What made the performance remarkable was not the difficulty of the scenes. It was the consistency of her commitment to them. Night after night on set, take after take, she showed up and gave the camera something real. That is not a small thing. That is the kind of discipline that separates working actors from generational ones.

Advertisement

What the Industry Does Not Tell You

The entertainment industry sells you a version of success built around talent, timing, and luck. And while all three matter, none of them are the real differentiator in a room full of equally talented people. The real differentiator is willingness — the willingness to be honest, to be vulnerable, and to let the work require something personal from you.

Most actors hit a wall at some point in their career where a role demands more than they have publicly shown before. The ones who say yes to that moment, who trust the material and the director enough to go somewhere uncomfortable, are the ones audiences remember long after the credits roll.

Sydney Sweeney said yes repeatedly. And the industry took notice.


The Question Worth Asking Yourself

Before you answer, really think about it. There is a moment in every serious audition room where someone might ask you to go further than you are comfortable with — to access something real, to stop performing and start revealing. In that moment, you have to decide what your dream is actually worth to you and, more importantly, what parts of yourself you are not willing to trade for it.

That is the question Euphoria quietly raises for anyone watching with ambition in their chest. Not “could I do that,” but “should I ever feel pressured to.” There is a difference between an artist who chooses vulnerability as a creative tool and one who is pressured into exposure they never agreed to. Knowing that difference is not a weakness. It is the most important thing a young actor can understand before they walk into a room that will test it.

Because the only role that truly costs too much is the one that asks you to abandon who you are to play it.

Advertisement
HCFF
HCFF

What You Can Take From This

Whether you are an actor, a filmmaker, a content creator, or someone simply building something from scratch, the principle is the same. The work that connects with people is almost always the work that cost the creator something real. Audiences can feel the difference between performance and truth. They always could.

Sydney Sweeney did not become one of the most talked-about actresses of her generation because she got lucky. She got there because she was willing to be completely, uncomfortably human in front of a camera — and because she knew exactly who she was before she let the role take over.

That combination — full commitment and a clear sense of self — is rarer than talent. And it is the thing worth chasing.


Written for Bolanle Media | Entertainment. Culture. Conversation.


Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending