Connect with us

News

Who Owns Your AI Afterlife?

Published

on

As artificial intelligence increasingly resurrects the voices and faces of the dead, the question of ownership over a person’s “digital afterlife” has never been more urgent. Generative AI can now create digital avatars, voice clones, and chatbots echoing the memories and personalities of those long gone, propelling a rapidly expanding global industry projected to reach up to $80 billion by 2035. Yet behind the novelty and comfort offered by these virtual presences lies a complex web of legal, ethical, and emotional challenges about who truly controls a person’s legacy after death.

The Rise of Digital Resurrection

AI-driven “deadbots” now allow families to interact with highly realistic digital versions of departed loved ones, sometimes for as little as $30 per video. In China, more than 1,000 people have reportedly been digitally “revived” for families using AI, while platforms in Russia, the U.S., and beyond have seen a wave of demand following tragic losses. Globally, tech firms like Microsoft, Meta, and various startups are investing heavily in tools that can preserve memories and even simulate ongoing conversations after death.

Market and Adoption Statistics

Industry analysis shows that the digital afterlife market, encompassing AI-powered grief technology, memorial services, and “legacy chatbots,” was worth over $22 billion in 2024 and is on track for a compound annual growth rate of 13-15% into the next decade. As more than 50% of people now store digital assets and personal data online, demand for posthumous control over these “digital selves” is surging. By 2100, there could be as many as 1.4 billion deceased Facebook users, further complicating the landscape of digital rights and memorialization.

Who Controls the Data: The Legal Uncertainty

Ownership of a digital afterlife is a legal gray zone worldwide. Laws about digital assets after death differ by country and platform, with many social media and AI firms resisting calls to grant families or estates clear ownership or deletion rights. There is limited global consensus, and few legal mechanisms for relatives to prevent (or approve) AI recreations or to control how the data and digital likenesses are used after death.

A 2024 study found that 58% of people believe digital resurrection should require explicit “opt-in” consent from the deceased, while only 3% supported allowing digital clones without any advance approval. Still, AI companies often hold ultimate authority over the deceased’s data and images, operating on terms of service that many users never read or fully understand.

Advertisement

Ethical and Emotional Questions

The debate goes far beyond just ownership. While some psychologists argue that digital afterlife tech can provide comfort or therapeutic closure, others warn it may trap grieving individuals in endless “loops” of loss, unable to truly let go. Public figures like Zelda Williams have publicly condemned unauthorized AI recreations, calling them “horrendous Frankensteinian monsters” that disrespect the dead. As these recreations expand—sometimes for memorial purposes, sometimes for profit or political gain—the risk of reputational harm, deepfakes, or even fraud increases.

The Future: Demand for Control, Not Just Comfort

As the landscape evolves, demand is rising for “digital legacy” services that allow people to set rules for their AI afterlife, designate heirs to data, or permanently erase online profiles. Some startups are building secure digital “wills” and vaults to give users control even from beyond the grave.

Yet until legal systems catch up, the answer to “who owns your AI afterlife?” remains unsettled—caught between the comfort of those left behind, the commercial interests of tech firms, and the fundamental rights of the deceased to control their own legacy in the digital age.


Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Jimmy Cliff, Reggae Legend and Star of ‘The Harder They Come,’ Dies at 81

Published

on

Jimmy Cliff, the legendary Jamaican reggae pioneer and star of the iconic film “The Harder They Come,” has died at the age of 81. His family announced on November 24, 2025, that he passed away after suffering a seizure followed by pneumonia. The announcement expressed deep gratitude to his global fans for their support throughout his career, emphasizing how much he cherished his audience’s love.

Career and Legacy

Jimmy Cliff was renowned for popularizing reggae music worldwide through his soulful voice and timeless songs such as “Many Rivers to Cross,” “You Can Get It If You Really Want,” and “Vietnam.” He starred as Ivanhoe “Ivan” Martin in the 1972 musical crime film “The Harder They Come,” which played a pivotal role in bringing reggae and Jamaican culture to a global audience.

Cliff’s influence extended beyond music; he was a symbol of resilience, hope, and positivity through decades of work as a musician and actor.

Recent Activities

In 2025, Jimmy Cliff announced a new album titled “Legacy,” set for release in September, along with a final world tour to mark the end of his performance career. This project was described as a tribute to reggae’s past, present, and future, featuring collaborations with global stars and emerging Jamaican talents. Despite health challenges, Cliff continued to contribute meaningfully to music and culture until the very end.

Personal and Family Acknowledgements

His wife, Latifa Chambers, shared the news of his passing on social media, highlighting the strength he drew from his fans and thanking family, friends, and collaborators who were part of his journey. She requested fans know that their support meant everything to him throughout his life and career.

Jimmy Cliff leaves behind a legacy as one of reggae’s most influential figures, who helped shape the genre’s identity and brought its message of peace and resistance to the world stage.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Candace Owens Says Macrons Funded Plot to Kill Her

Published

on

Conservative commentator Candace Owens has made explosive allegations that French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte Macron orchestrated and financed a plot to assassinate her. Owens alleges that she was alerted by a high-ranking source within the French government who revealed that the assassination was to be carried out by an elite French police unit, the National Gendarmerie Intervention Group (GIGN), along with the involvement of at least one Israeli operative. According to Owens, this “joint state operation” was motivated by her outspoken coverage and conspiratorial claims about Brigitte Macron, including controversial statements questioning the First Lady’s gender identity.

Owens further claims the payments for the assassination were funneled through a secret French elite club called Club des Cent, suggesting a sophisticated and well-financed scheme. She also links this alleged plot to the assassination of her late friend Charlie Kirk in 2025, suggesting that his killer received training from France’s 13th Foreign Legion Brigade and that these events are part of a larger multi-state conspiracy.

Despite these serious accusations, Owens has not publicly shared concrete evidence, and French, Israeli, and American authorities have not confirmed any part of the story. The Macron family has previously filed defamation lawsuits against Owens over her unfounded assertions about them, highlighting a tense and ongoing feud.

Owens has vowed to provide further details, including identities and financial proof, if given the opportunity, and has called on the public and patriotic investigators to examine the matter closely. While her claims have stirred widespread attention and heated debate across social media and conservative circles, they currently remain unsubstantiated allegations amid a highly charged political and media environment.

This controversy adds a new and dramatic layer to Owens’ volatile relationship with the Macrons, marking perhaps the most sensational claim so far in her ongoing public disputes with the French presidential couple.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Fugees Rapper Pras Michel Sentenced to 14 Years in Campaign Scandal

Published

on

Pras Michel, Grammy-winning rapper and founding member of the iconic group the Fugees, has been sentenced to 14 years in federal prison for his role in a sprawling illegal campaign finance and foreign influence scheme. The sentencing was handed down on November 20, 2025, by U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Washington, D.C., following Michel’s conviction in April 2023 on charges including conspiracy, money laundering, acting as an unregistered foreign agent, and witness tampering.

At the heart of the scandal was Michel’s involvement in funneling over $120 million from fugitive Malaysian financier Low Taek Jho—known as Jho Low—into the 2012 reelection campaign of former President Barack Obama. Prosecutors detailed how Michel helped hide the origin of foreign donations through shell companies and straw donors, violating U.S. campaign finance laws that prohibit foreign contributions. Beyond the Obama campaign, Michel also engaged in illegal lobbying efforts during the Trump administration to obstruct investigations into Low’s role in the notorious 1MDB scandal, a massive Malaysian sovereign wealth fund corruption case.

Prosecutors described Michel as having “betrayed his country for financial gain,” persistently lying and manipulating government entities over nearly a decade. They advocated for a life sentence, emphasizing the severity of his offenses and the threat posed to U.S. national security. Testimonies during the high-profile trial included notable figures such as Hollywood actor Leonardo DiCaprio and former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Michel’s defense team condemned the harsh sentence as “entirely disproportionate,” arguing that similar cases resulted in lighter penalties, and pointed out that Michel received no espionage charges—a key consideration in foreign agent prosecutions. They announced plans to appeal the verdict and sentence. Following the prison term, Michel faces three years of supervised release and forfeiture of more than $64 million tied to the illegal campaign finance activity.

Michel, who shot to fame in the 1990s as part of the Fugees alongside Lauryn Hill and Wyclef Jean, now confronts a dramatic fall from grace that underscores the extensive consequences of illicit foreign influence in American politics. Despite this setback, his representatives remain grateful for the support received, stating that this chapter does not mark the end of his journey.

Advertisement

This landmark case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of safeguarding U.S. elections from covert foreign interference and the serious repercussions for those who betray democratic principles for financial gain.bbc+4

  1. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg7n7l70vzgo
  2. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/11/21/fugees-rapper-sentenced-to-14-years-in-prison-over-illegal-obama-donations
  3. https://www.wsj.com/us-news/fugees-member-sentenced-to-14-years-for-campaign-donation-scheme-7bbb7850
  4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ow4bcn8mkIM
  5. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2025/11/21/fugees-rapper-pras-michel-sentenced-to-14-years-in-prison-in-us-campaign-financing-scandal_6747698_4.html
  6. https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-influence/2025/11/20/fugees-star-sentenced-to-14-years-in-fara-case-00664124
  7. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/us-entertainer-convicted-engaging-foreign-influence-campaign
  8. https://apnews.com/article/852e3aa86a604597b99c5e81179a7b6b
  9. https://www.reddit.com/r/hiphopheads/comments/11g6you/the_fugee_the_fugitive_and_the_fbi_how_rapper/
Continue Reading

Trending