News

The Fall of a Fraudulent Psychologist in the Digital Age

Published

3 months ago

September 3, 2025

In today’s digital era, the internet has become a vast marketplace for knowledge, advice, and self-improvement. Yet, the recent scandal involving Sadia Khan—a self-proclaimed licensed psychologist and dating coach—brings to light a worrisome truth: the crisis of online expertise, where appearance often supersedes authenticity, and the lines between legitimate credentials and fabricated personas blur dangerously.

The Illusion of Authority

Sadia Khan positioned herself as a respected figure in the fields of psychology and relationship counseling, offering guidance to thousands. However, a rigorous investigation revealed that her claims were largely fabricated. Khan is not licensed as a psychologist anywhere, and many of her purported degrees and certifications are either fake, photoshopped, or sourced from dubious institutions masquerading as legitimate. This exploitation of trust underlines a systemic problem where digital audiences frequently accept credentials at face value without adequate verification.

The Fallout of Deception

Beyond the issue of false qualifications, Khan’s behavior illuminates a deeper breach of professional conduct. Reports surfaced of her harassing critics online, issuing threats, and engaging in highly unprofessional conduct inconsistent with ethical standards expected from genuine therapists. Such conduct not only harms individuals but also jeopardizes public confidence in bona fide mental health professionals striving to maintain integrity online.

The Conflation of Identity and Deflection

Khan’s defense partially relied on invoking her identity as a brown-skinned Muslim woman, claiming she faces disproportionate scrutiny compared to her white counterparts. While racial and gender bias in digital spaces is a legitimate concern, her repeated weaponization of identity to deflect valid questions about her integrity complicates the discourse. This illustrates how identity can both empower and shield, but should never obscure the need for accountability in expertise.

The Wider Implications for Digital Consumers

This scandal serves as a cautionary tale for consumers navigating online advice. It underscores the necessity of vigilance—seeking transparency, demanding evidence of credentials, and recognizing that charisma and polished online personas are not substitutes for genuine expertise. The high fees Khan charged, purportedly for exclusive coaching services, raise concerning questions about exploitation under the guise of authority.

A Call for Accountability and Authenticity

The Sadia Khan case forces a reflection on the broader crisis of expertise in the internet age. As digital influence grows, so does the responsibility of creators to uphold honesty, and for platforms and audiences to cultivate critical thinking. Authentic voices rooted in real qualifications and ethical conduct must be elevated. Only through fostering transparency and demanding integrity can the digital community rebuild trust and ensure that expertise online serves its true purpose: to educate, support, and uplift.

The unmasking of Sadia Khan stands not just as an isolated incident but a microcosm of a much larger problem—the erosion of genuine expertise in an environment ripe for deception. For anyone seeking guidance online, her story is a stark reminder: to look beyond the surface, question claims boldly, and prioritize substance over showmanship.

Entertainment

Jimmy Cliff, Reggae Legend and Star of ‘The Harder They Come,’ Dies at 81

Published

3 days ago

November 24, 2025

Bolanle Media Staff

Jimmy Cliff, the legendary Jamaican reggae pioneer and star of the iconic film “The Harder They Come,” has died at the age of 81. His family announced on November 24, 2025, that he passed away after suffering a seizure followed by pneumonia. The announcement expressed deep gratitude to his global fans for their support throughout his career, emphasizing how much he cherished his audience’s love.

Career and Legacy

Jimmy Cliff was renowned for popularizing reggae music worldwide through his soulful voice and timeless songs such as “Many Rivers to Cross,” “You Can Get It If You Really Want,” and “Vietnam.” He starred as Ivanhoe “Ivan” Martin in the 1972 musical crime film “The Harder They Come,” which played a pivotal role in bringing reggae and Jamaican culture to a global audience.

Cliff’s influence extended beyond music; he was a symbol of resilience, hope, and positivity through decades of work as a musician and actor.

Recent Activities

In 2025, Jimmy Cliff announced a new album titled “Legacy,” set for release in September, along with a final world tour to mark the end of his performance career. This project was described as a tribute to reggae’s past, present, and future, featuring collaborations with global stars and emerging Jamaican talents. Despite health challenges, Cliff continued to contribute meaningfully to music and culture until the very end.

Personal and Family Acknowledgements

His wife, Latifa Chambers, shared the news of his passing on social media, highlighting the strength he drew from his fans and thanking family, friends, and collaborators who were part of his journey. She requested fans know that their support meant everything to him throughout his life and career.

Jimmy Cliff leaves behind a legacy as one of reggae’s most influential figures, who helped shape the genre’s identity and brought its message of peace and resistance to the world stage.

News

Candace Owens Says Macrons Funded Plot to Kill Her

Published

3 days ago

November 24, 2025

Bolanle Media Staff

Conservative commentator Candace Owens has made explosive allegations that French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte Macron orchestrated and financed a plot to assassinate her. Owens alleges that she was alerted by a high-ranking source within the French government who revealed that the assassination was to be carried out by an elite French police unit, the National Gendarmerie Intervention Group (GIGN), along with the involvement of at least one Israeli operative. According to Owens, this “joint state operation” was motivated by her outspoken coverage and conspiratorial claims about Brigitte Macron, including controversial statements questioning the First Lady’s gender identity.

Owens further claims the payments for the assassination were funneled through a secret French elite club called Club des Cent, suggesting a sophisticated and well-financed scheme. She also links this alleged plot to the assassination of her late friend Charlie Kirk in 2025, suggesting that his killer received training from France’s 13th Foreign Legion Brigade and that these events are part of a larger multi-state conspiracy.

Despite these serious accusations, Owens has not publicly shared concrete evidence, and French, Israeli, and American authorities have not confirmed any part of the story. The Macron family has previously filed defamation lawsuits against Owens over her unfounded assertions about them, highlighting a tense and ongoing feud.

Owens has vowed to provide further details, including identities and financial proof, if given the opportunity, and has called on the public and patriotic investigators to examine the matter closely. While her claims have stirred widespread attention and heated debate across social media and conservative circles, they currently remain unsubstantiated allegations amid a highly charged political and media environment.

This controversy adds a new and dramatic layer to Owens’ volatile relationship with the Macrons, marking perhaps the most sensational claim so far in her ongoing public disputes with the French presidential couple.

News

Fugees Rapper Pras Michel Sentenced to 14 Years in Campaign Scandal

Published

6 days ago

November 21, 2025

Bolanle Media Staff

Pras Michel, Grammy-winning rapper and founding member of the iconic group the Fugees, has been sentenced to 14 years in federal prison for his role in a sprawling illegal campaign finance and foreign influence scheme. The sentencing was handed down on November 20, 2025, by U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Washington, D.C., following Michel’s conviction in April 2023 on charges including conspiracy, money laundering, acting as an unregistered foreign agent, and witness tampering.

At the heart of the scandal was Michel’s involvement in funneling over $120 million from fugitive Malaysian financier Low Taek Jho—known as Jho Low—into the 2012 reelection campaign of former President Barack Obama. Prosecutors detailed how Michel helped hide the origin of foreign donations through shell companies and straw donors, violating U.S. campaign finance laws that prohibit foreign contributions. Beyond the Obama campaign, Michel also engaged in illegal lobbying efforts during the Trump administration to obstruct investigations into Low’s role in the notorious 1MDB scandal, a massive Malaysian sovereign wealth fund corruption case.

Prosecutors described Michel as having “betrayed his country for financial gain,” persistently lying and manipulating government entities over nearly a decade. They advocated for a life sentence, emphasizing the severity of his offenses and the threat posed to U.S. national security. Testimonies during the high-profile trial included notable figures such as Hollywood actor Leonardo DiCaprio and former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Michel’s defense team condemned the harsh sentence as “entirely disproportionate,” arguing that similar cases resulted in lighter penalties, and pointed out that Michel received no espionage charges—a key consideration in foreign agent prosecutions. They announced plans to appeal the verdict and sentence. Following the prison term, Michel faces three years of supervised release and forfeiture of more than $64 million tied to the illegal campaign finance activity.

Michel, who shot to fame in the 1990s as part of the Fugees alongside Lauryn Hill and Wyclef Jean, now confronts a dramatic fall from grace that underscores the extensive consequences of illicit foreign influence in American politics. Despite this setback, his representatives remain grateful for the support received, stating that this chapter does not mark the end of his journey.

This landmark case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of safeguarding U.S. elections from covert foreign interference and the serious repercussions for those who betray democratic principles for financial gain.bbc+4