Connect with us

Entertainment

How Much Do Actors Earn in Residuals? Breaking Down the Surprising Numbers on August 6, 2023 at 7:24 pm Us Weekly

Published

on

Many working actors earn residual paychecks anytime that a TV show they appeared on air in reruns.

Such sums even help stars such as Mandy Moore and Glen Powell pay their living expenses between jobs.

“Ours is a fickle industry and in my 20+ years of being a performer, my career has ebbed and flowed,” Moore, who has been acting since she was a teenager, wrote via Instagram in July 2023. “I’ve had very lean years where I couldn’t get a job and those are precisely the moments when in years past, actors could rely on residuals from their past work to help them get by.”

Powell, for his part, tweeted that same month that he used to survive on residuals “for years” when he was still attempting to “make it as a working actor.”

Advertisement

TV Stars’ Salaries Revealed: See What The Actors Are Paid

Read article

Many actors have since seen their residual check amounts dwindle with the onset of streaming platforms. Due to the staggeringly low amounts, members of the SAG-AFTRA acting union called out the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) for refusing to compromise on better terms regarding residual checks during contract negotiations. As a result, the SAG actors went on strike in July 2023 shortly after the Writers Guild of America stood up for similar causes.

Keep reading to find out how much the stars really make in residuals:

Advertisement

Mandy Moore

Milo Ventimiglia as Jack and Mandy Moore as Rebecca in ‘This Is Us.’ Ron Batzdorff/NBC

Moore has received 81-cent checks for streaming residuals of This Is Us, the Emmy-winning drama that she starred in between 2016 and 2022. “I was talking with my business manager who said he’s received a residual for a penny and two pennies,” she told The Hollywood Reporter on the picket lines in July 2023.

Robert Carradine

The Lizzie McGuire alum — who played Hilary Duff’s onscreen father on the Disney Channel series — once received a residual check in August 2019 for $0. While Carradine did not reveal what program the check was for, it had been sent by Walt Disney Pictures. (In addition to Lizzie, Carradine has starred in several other Disney projects.)

Carradine’s Lizzie McGuire costars have also seen similarly low residuals. Davida Williams, who played cheerleader Claire Miller, revealed on her Lizzie McGuire recap podcast in March 2023 that she usually gets a sum of $3.50 or less.

Advertisement

“It used to be, like, you’d have to take this huge stack of checks every month for residuals over to the bank and deposit them,” Jake Thomas (a.k.a. Lizzie’s little brother Matt) chimed in at the time. “But the huge stack would be like, ‘Oh, this is a massive stack. This is $8.’”

Jamie Lynn Spears and More Stars Join the SAG-AFTRA Picket Lines

Read article

Kendrick Sampson

Sampson, who starred as Nathan on HBO’s Insecure between 2018 and 2021, received 56 residual checks in July 2023. However, they only totaled $86, which was not enough to cover his monthly bills, which he shared on Instagram.

Advertisement

William Stanford Davis

Davis, who is known for his role as Mr. Johnson on ABC’s Abbott Elementary, revealed via Instagram in July 2023 that he once got a check for 5 cents. “The postage, the paper, everything costs more than that. That’s what they think of us as actors,” he said at the time. “This is why we’re on strike for better wages, for better residuals [and] for a piece of the subscription.”

Kimiko Glenn

Kimiko Glenn as Brook Soso in ‘Orange in the New Black.’ JoJo Whilden/Netflix

Glenn, who played inmate Brook Soso on Orange Is The New Black, showed off a handful of residual paystubs via TikTok in July 2023. They only amounted to $27.

Constance Marie

Marie shared a copy of her paystubs via TikTok in July 2023, noting she’s gotten between 3 cents and 74 cents in residuals for repeat viewings of Freeform’s Switched at Birth. (Marie was one of the main characters on the show for five years, even sustaining an injury from excessive American Sign Language use.)

Advertisement

Heather Matarazzo

The Princess Diaries star clapped back at TikTok fans’ assertions that she was rich by showing her residuals. Several of the checks were less than 10 cents each.

Jana Schmieding

Jana Schmieding as Bev, Tamara Podemski as Teenie, Sarah Podemski as Rita, and Natalie Stadingcloud as Natalie on ‘Reservation Dogs.’ Shane Brown/FX

“To fans of my character Bev on Reservation Dogs, here’s a peek behind the IHS counter at what part of my residuals looks like for acting on a show that I love,” Schmieding tweeted in July 2023. “I pull in $.03 each quarter for UNLIMITED worldwide streams on fx/hulu/DISNEY.”

Brandee Evans

Evans, who is best known for her role as Mercedes Woodine on P-Valley, got three residual checks in July 2023 for $3.99, $4.67 and 1 cent, respectively.

Advertisement

Greer Grammer

Grammer, who played Lissa Miller on MTV’s Awkward, primarily gets her residual checks for episodes of the five-season sitcom. In August 2023, she opened up a handful of paystubs via TikTok.

“Awkward, ‘Are You there God, It’s Me, Jenna.’ Total gross: .80 cents. Oh, actually that’s what this [paystub] says but the check is actually for .50 cents,” she said, before revealing additional checks for $.63, $.60, $.30 and $.68.

Many working actors earn residual paychecks anytime that a TV show they appeared on air in reruns. Such sums even help stars such as Mandy Moore and Glen Powell pay their living expenses between jobs. “Ours is a fickle industry and in my 20+ years of being a performer, my career has ebbed and flowed,” Moore, 

​   Us Weekly Read More 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advice

How Far Would You Go to Book Your Dream Role?

Published

on

The question Sydney Sweeney’s career forces every serious artist to ask themselves.


Most people say they want to be an actor. But wanting the life and being willing to do what the life requires are two entirely different things. Sydney Sweeney’s performance as Cassie Howard in Euphoria is one of the clearest examples in recent television of what it actually looks like when an artist refuses to protect themselves from the story they are telling.


The Performance That Started a Conversation

Cassie Howard is not a comfortable character to watch. She is messy, desperate, and heartbreakingly human in ways that most scripts would have softened or simplified. Sydney Sweeney did not soften her. She played every scene at full exposure — the breakdowns, the humiliation, the moments where Cassie is both completely wrong and completely understandable at the same time.

What made the performance remarkable was not the difficulty of the scenes. It was the consistency of her commitment to them. Night after night on set, take after take, she showed up and gave the camera something real. That is not a small thing. That is the kind of discipline that separates working actors from generational ones.

Advertisement

What the Industry Does Not Tell You

The entertainment industry sells you a version of success built around talent, timing, and luck. And while all three matter, none of them are the real differentiator in a room full of equally talented people. The real differentiator is willingness — the willingness to be honest, to be vulnerable, and to let the work require something personal from you.

Most actors hit a wall at some point in their career where a role demands more than they have publicly shown before. The ones who say yes to that moment, who trust the material and the director enough to go somewhere uncomfortable, are the ones audiences remember long after the credits roll.

Sydney Sweeney said yes repeatedly. And the industry took notice.


The Question Worth Asking Yourself

Before you answer, really think about it. There is a moment in every serious audition room where someone might ask you to go further than you are comfortable with — to access something real, to stop performing and start revealing. In that moment, you have to decide what your dream is actually worth to you and, more importantly, what parts of yourself you are not willing to trade for it.

That is the question Euphoria quietly raises for anyone watching with ambition in their chest. Not “could I do that,” but “should I ever feel pressured to.” There is a difference between an artist who chooses vulnerability as a creative tool and one who is pressured into exposure they never agreed to. Knowing that difference is not a weakness. It is the most important thing a young actor can understand before they walk into a room that will test it.

Because the only role that truly costs too much is the one that asks you to abandon who you are to play it.

Advertisement
HCFF
HCFF

What You Can Take From This

Whether you are an actor, a filmmaker, a content creator, or someone simply building something from scratch, the principle is the same. The work that connects with people is almost always the work that cost the creator something real. Audiences can feel the difference between performance and truth. They always could.

Sydney Sweeney did not become one of the most talked-about actresses of her generation because she got lucky. She got there because she was willing to be completely, uncomfortably human in front of a camera — and because she knew exactly who she was before she let the role take over.

That combination — full commitment and a clear sense of self — is rarer than talent. And it is the thing worth chasing.


Written for Bolanle Media | Entertainment. Culture. Conversation.


Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Bieber’s Coachella Set Has Everyone Arguing Again

Published

on

And honestly? That might be exactly what he wanted.

Justin Bieber stepped onto the Coachella stage Saturday night as the highest-paid headliner in the festival’s history — reportedly pocketing $10 million — and proceeded to sit down at a laptop and play YouTube videos.

The internet, predictably, lost its mind.


What Actually Happened

This was Bieber’s first major U.S. performance since his Justice era — a long-awaited comeback after battling Ramsay Hunt syndrome in 2022, which caused partial facial paralysis, plus years of mental health struggles and a very public disappearing act from the industry.

Advertisement

The stage setup was minimal: a fluid cocoon-like structure, no backup dancers, no elaborate lighting rigs. Just Bieber, a stool, and a laptop.

He opened with tracks from his 2025 albums Swag and Swag II, then invited the crowd on a journey — “How far back do you go?”

What followed was a nostalgic scroll through his entire career: old YouTube covers before he was famous, classic hits Baby and Never Say Never playing on screen while he sang alongside his younger self. Guests including The Kid Laroi, Wizkid, and Tems joined him throughout the night.

He even played his viral “Standing on Business” paparazzi rant and re-enacted it live, hoodie on, completely unbothered.

Advertisement
HCFF
HCFF

The Moment Nobody Predicted

But here’s what the critics burying him in their hot takes chose not to lead with: Bieber closed his set with worship music.

In the middle of Coachella — one of the most secular stages on the planet — he performed songs rooted in his Christian faith, openly crediting Jesus as the reason he was standing on that stage at all.

It wasn’t subtle. It wasn’t a quick prayer and a thank-you. He leaned into it fully, in front of a crowd of 125,000 people who came expecting pop bangers and got a testimony instead.

For fans who have followed his faith journey — his deep involvement with Hillsong and later Churchome, his baptism in 2014, and his very public declaration that Jesus saved his life during his darkest years — the moment landed like a full-circle miracle.


Why People Are Mad

Critics have been brutal.

Zara Larsson summed up the skeptics perfectly, posting on TikTok: It’s giving let’s smoke and watch YouTube — and that clip went just as viral as the performance itself.

Advertisement

One fan on X wrote: I’m crying, this might actually be the worst performance I’ve ever seen. He’s just playing videos from YouTube… zero effort, pure laziness.”

The comparison to Sabrina Carpenter’s Friday headlining set — elaborate staging, multiple costume changes, celebrity cameos — only made Bieber’s stripped-down show look more controversial.

And the $10 million figure kept coming up. People felt cheated.


Why His Fans Think Everyone’s Missing the Point

Here’s where it gets interesting.

One commenter on X put it best: “He did not force a high-production machine that could burn him out again. Instead, he sat with his past, scrolling through old YouTube videos, duetting with his younger self, and mixing nostalgia with new chapters.”

As the set progressed, Bieber visibly opened up. He removed his sunglasses. He took off his hoodie. He smiled, made jokes about falling through a stage as a teenager.

Advertisement

One Instagram account with millions of followers posted: This Justin Bieber performance healed something in me.”

That healing language is intentional for Bieber — it mirrors how he talks about his faith. In interviews, he has repeatedly said Jesus didn’t just save his career; He saved his life. The worship set at Coachella wasn’t a gimmick. It was a confession.

The Hollywood Reporter noted the performance also sparked a broader debate about double standards — whether a female artist could ever get away with the same low-key approach without being completely destroyed.


The Bigger Picture

Love it or hate it, Bieber’s Coachella set is the most talked-about moment from Weekend One — more than Karol G making history as the first Latina to headline the festival, more than Sabrina Carpenter’s spectacle.

Advertisement

That’s not an accident.

In an era where every headliner tries to out-produce the last one, Bieber walked out with a laptop, a stool, and his faith — and made it personal. For millions of fans watching, the worship songs weren’t filler. They were the point.

Whether you call it lazy or legendary, one thing is clear: Justin Bieber isn’t performing for the critics anymore. He’s performing for an audience of One — and the rest of us just happened to be there.


Drop your take in the comments — was Bieber’s Coachella set lazy, legendary, or something even bigger?

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Vertical Films Changed Everything. Are You Ready?

Published

on

People don’t watch films the way they used to—and if you’re still cutting everything for the big screen first, you’re losing the audience that lives in your pocket.

Every swipe on TikTok is a tiny festival: new voices, wild visuals, heartbreak, comedy, and chaos, all judged in under three seconds. In that world, vertical films aren’t a gimmick. They’re the new front door to your work, your brand, and your career.

The movie theater is now in your hand

Think about where you’ve discovered your favorite clips lately: your phone, in bed, in an Uber, between texts. The “cinema” experience has shrunk into a glowing rectangle we hold inches from our face. That’s intimate. That’s personal. That’s power.

Vertical video fills that space completely. No black bars. No distractions. Just one story, one face, one moment staring back at you. It feels less like “I’m watching a movie” and more like “this is happening to me.” For storytellers, that’s gold.

The old rules still matter—but they bend

Film school taught you:

  • Compose for the wide frame.
  • Let the world breathe at the edges.
  • Save the close-up for maximum impact.

Vertical filmmaking says: bring all of that craft… and then flip it. You still need composition, rhythm, framing, and sound. But now:

  • The close-up is the default, not the climax.
  • Depth replaces width—what’s in front and behind matters more than left and right.
  • Micro-scenes—60 seconds or less—must feel like complete emotional beats.

It’s not “less cinematic.” It’s a different kind of cinematic—one that lives where people already are instead of asking them to come to you.

Your characters can live beyond the film

Here’s the secret no one tells you: audiences don’t just fall in love with stories; they fall in love with people. Vertical video lets your characters exist outside the runtime.

Advertisement

Imagine this:

When someone feels like they “know” a character from their feed, buying a ticket or renting your film stops feeling like a risk. It feels like catching up with a friend.

Behind the scenes is no longer optional

Vertical films thrive on honesty. Shaky behind-the-scenes clips. Laughing fits between takes. The director’s 2 a.m. rant about a shot that won’t work. The makeup artist fixing tears after a heavy scene. That’s the texture that makes people care about the final product.

You don’t have to be perfect. You have to be present.
Ideas you can start capturing tomorrow:

  • “What we can’t afford, so we’re faking it.”
  • “The shot we were scared to try.”
  • “One thing we argued about for three days.”

When you show the process, you’re not just selling a film—you’re inviting people into a journey.

Think in episodes, not posts

Most people treat vertical video like a one-off blast: post, pray, forget. Instead, think like a showrunner.

Ask yourself:

Advertisement
  • If my project were a vertical series, what’s Episode 1? What’s the hook?
  • How can I end each clip with a question, a twist, or a feeling that makes people need the next part?
  • Can I tell one complete emotional story across 10 vertical videos?

Suddenly, your feed isn’t random. It’s a season. People don’t just “like” a video—they “follow” to see what happens next.

HCFF

The attention is real. The opportunity is bigger.

We’re in a rare moment where a micro-drama shot on your phone can sit in the same feed as a studio campaign and still win. A fearless 45-second monologue in a bathroom. A quiet scene of someone deleting a text. A single, wordless push-in on a face that tells the whole story.

Vertical films give you:

  • Low cost, high experimentation.
  • Immediate feedback from real viewers.
  • Proof that your story, your voice, your world can hold attention.

You don’t have to wait for permission, a greenlight, or a perfect budget. You can start where you are, with what you have, and let the audience tell you what’s working.

So, are you ready?

Some filmmakers will roll their eyes and call vertical a phase. They’ll keep making beautiful work that no one sees until a festival says it exists. Others will treat every swipe, every scroll, and every tiny screen as a chance to connect, teach, provoke, and move people.

Those are the filmmakers whose names we’ll be hearing in five years.

The question isn’t whether vertical films are “real cinema.” The question is: when the next person scrolls past your work, do they feel nothing—or do they stop, stare, and think, “I need more of this”?

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Subscribe for the updates!