Connect with us

Entertainment

Donald Trump Indicted for Failed Attempt to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election on August 2, 2023 at 3:53 pm The Hollywood Gossip

Published

on

He tried.

He failed.

And now he may spend the rest of his life in prison as a result.

On August 1, Donald Trump was indicted on four criminal counts by a federal grand jury investigating the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot, along with other efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Advertisement

Donald Trump enters Erie Insurance Arena for a political rally while campaigning for the GOP nomination in the 2024 election on July 29, 2023 in Erie, Pennsylvania. (Getty)

According to the indictment, Trump was charged with one count each of conspiracy to defraud the United States… conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding… obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding… and conspiracy against rights.

Six co-conspirators, four of whom are lawyers who acted on behalf of the former President around this time, were also named in the legal papers.

The indictment claims that Trump, after losing the aforementioned election to Joe Biden “was determined to remain in power.”

Advertisement

The indictment also says these co-conspirators “helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification” of votes.

Donald Trump speaks to guests at the Republican Party of Iowa 2023 Lincoln Dinner on July 28, 2023 in Des Moines, Iowa. (Getty)

Reads a section of the indictment:

“So for more than two months following election day on November 3, 2020, the Defendant spread lies that there had been outcome-determinative fraud in the election and that he had actually won.”

Advertisement

Special Counsel Jack Smith, who led the investigation, held a brief press conference shortly after the indictment was publicized, stating:

“The attack on our nation’s Capitol on January 6, 2021 was an unprecedented assault on the seat of American democracy. As described in the indictment, it was fueled by lies. Lies by the defendant.”

Donald Trump speaks to supporters at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster following his appearance in a Miami court on June 13, 2023. (Getty Images)

Indeed, at the crux of this indictment is the belief that Trump didn’t merely rattle on and on about the 2020 election having been rigged or stolen.

Advertisement

It’s that he knew this was a lie.

Hilariously, and depressingly, this marks the THIRD indictment of the twice-impeached former Commander-in-Chief, who has indicted two times before in 2023:

Once for alleged hush money payments made to women surrounding the 2016 election.

And then again on federal charges related to his handling of classified documents after leaving the White House.

Advertisement

Donald Trump speaks during a Team Trump Volunteer Leadership Training at the Grimes Community Center in Grimes, Iowa, on June 1, 2023. (Getty)

In a message posted to his social media site Truth Social moments before the indictment was announced, Trump basically called Smith a lunatic, adding:

“I hear that Deranged Jack Smith, in order to interfere with the Presidential Election of 2024, will be putting out yet another Fake Indictment of your favorite President, me, at 5:00 P.M.

“Why didn’t they do this 2.5 years ago? Why did they wait so long?

Advertisement

“Because they wanted to put it right in the middle of my campaign. Prosecutorial Misconduct!”

Donald Trump greets supporters at a Team Trump volunteer leadership training event held at the Grimes Community Complex on June 01, 2023 in Grimes, Iowa. (Getty Images)

Trump’s ex-running mate, former Vice President Mike Pence, issues his harshest rebuke to date of Trump after this indictment was made official.

Said the 2024 Presidential hopeful in a statement that showed the tiniest bit of spine:

Advertisement

“Today’s indictment serves as an important reminder: anyone who puts himself over the Constitution should never be President of the United States.”

We’ll soon find out if the American voting public agrees.

Donald Trump Indicted for Failed Attempt to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

Donald Trump has been accused of trying to overthrow the federal government after he lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden.
Donald Trump Indicted for Failed Attempt to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip. 

Advertisement

​   The Hollywood Gossip Read More 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Beyoncé’s Unreleased Music Stolen in Atlanta Car Break-In

Published

on

Atlanta, GA — Unreleased music by Beyoncé, along with critical tour plans and personal belongings, was stolen during a brazen car break-in last week. The theft occurred on July 8, just before the start of the megastar’s “Cowboy Carter” tour performances in Atlanta, sparking a swift police investigation.

According to authorities, thieves targeted a rented SUV parked at Krog Street Market, shattering the rear window and making off with two suitcases. Inside were five thumb drives containing unreleased, watermarked Beyoncé tracks, set lists for upcoming shows, and sensitive information tied to her tour. Laptops, headphones, and luxury clothing were also taken in the heist.

The property belonged to Beyoncé’s longtime choreographer, Christopher Grant, and dancer Diandre Blue, who discovered the break-in less than an hour after leaving the vehicle. “It’s really, really important information in there,” one of the victims told 911 operators, emphasizing the material’s significance for one of the world’s most prominent musicians.

Heute.at

Atlanta police rapidly secured an arrest warrant for a suspect, aided by surveillance footage and digital tracking of stolen electronics. As of Tuesday morning, the suspect remains at large25. Despite the disruption, Beyoncé continued her sold-out tour, with authorities urging anyone with information to come forward.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Adults, Fame, and a Four-Year-Old: Critics Question Ms. Shirley’s Exposure to Grown Men

Published

on

Starkville, Mississippi — The viral rise of 4-year-old LaR’iyah Jesireé, better known as “Ms. Shirley,” has captivated millions on TikTok and Instagram. But as her fame grows, so too does a wave of public concern—particularly over her appearances at meet-and-greet events attended by adults, including grown men, raising urgent questions about child safety, parental responsibility, and the blurred boundaries of social media stardom.

A Viral Sensation in the Spotlight

Ms. Shirley’s infectious line dances, especially her signature “Boots on the Ground” routine, have made her a household name in the world of social media. With over a million followers and appearances on national television, she’s become a symbol of youthful talent and joy.

But behind the viral videos lies a controversy that has split public opinion. Critics argue that the very events fueling her fame—public meet-and-greets, often at venues not designed for children—expose her to adult environments and attention that are inappropriate for someone her age.

The Flashpoint: Meet-and-Greet Backlash

  • Adult Attendance: Social media erupted after images and videos surfaced of Ms. Shirley participating in meet-and-greet events where the majority of attendees were adults, many of them men. Critics questioned the wisdom of placing a young child in such settings, with some calling it “gross and exploitative”.
  • Parental Decisions Under Fire: The backlash intensified as Ms. Shirley’s mother, Latisha Tucker, defended her choices online, insisting she remains a protective parent first. “I’m a mother… before anything,” Tucker said in response to critics, but detractors remain unconvinced, pointing to the risks of adult attention and the potential for exploitation.

Safety, Exploitation, and the Role of Social Media

  • Child Safety Concerns: The controversy has led some observers to report the family to Child Protective Services, citing fears over Ms. Shirley’s exposure to adult audiences and the pressures of internet fame at such a young age.
  • Debate Over Exploitation: For every fan who sees a proud mother sharing her daughter’s talent, there are others who see a child being thrust into the limelight for adult entertainment. Critics warn that the combination of viral fame and adult-dominated events could have lasting consequences for Ms. Shirley’s well-being.
  • Online Reactions: The internet is divided—while many celebrate Ms. Shirley’s talent, others voice discomfort at seeing a toddler perform in spaces where alcohol and adult behavior are present. Some question why a 4-year-old is being branded with a mature-sounding stage name and presented in such grown-up contexts.

The Mother’s Response

Latisha Tucker, Ms. Shirley’s mother, has not shied away from the criticism. She maintains that her daughter’s appearances are carefully managed and that the backlash is fueled by outsiders who misunderstand their intentions. Tucker has publicly stated that any earnings from Ms. Shirley’s fame will be set aside for her future, and insists that her daughter is simply “being a kid like any other kid.” Still, she acknowledges that the scrutiny comes with the territory of internet celebrity.

SOURCE: TIKTOK / @@LARIYAH.MISSSHIRLEY

A Broader Conversation

The uproar over Ms. Shirley’s meet-and-greets is part of a larger debate about the responsibilities of parents who share their children’s lives online, the adequacy of social media safeguards, and the potential for exploitation in the pursuit of viral fame. As platforms like TikTok continue to blur the lines between childhood and celebrity, the story of Ms. Shirley stands as a flashpoint—one that forces parents, platforms, and audiences alike to confront uncomfortable questions about where to draw the line.

Table: Key Issues in the Ms. Shirley Controversy

IssueDescription
Adult Attendance at EventsGrown men and other adults present at meet-and-greets, sparking safety concerns
Parental OversightDebate over whether Ms. Shirley’s mother is protecting or exploiting her child
Child SafetyReports to CPS and public calls for better safeguards for young social media stars
Online DivisionFans celebrate her talent, critics warn of long-term risks and inappropriate exposure

As Ms. Shirley’s star continues to rise, so does the scrutiny. For now, her story remains a cautionary tale at the intersection of childhood, celebrity, and the unpredictable power of the internet.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Nicki Minaj Demands $200 Million from Jay-Z in Explosive Twitter Rant

Published

on

Nicki Minaj has once again set social media ablaze, this time targeting Jay-Z with a series of pointed tweets that allege he owes her an eye-popping $200 million. The outburst has reignited debates about artist compensation, industry transparency, and the ongoing power struggles within hip-hop’s elite circles.

Credit: Heute.at

The $200 Million Claim

In a string of tweets, Minaj directly addressed Jay-Z, writing, “Jay-Z, call me to settle the karmic debt. It’s only collecting more interest. You still in my top five though. Let’s get it.” She went further, warning, “Anyone still calling him Hov will answer to God for the blasphemy.” According to Minaj, the alleged debt stems from Jay-Z’s sale of Tidal, the music streaming platform he launched in 2015 with a group of high-profile artists—including Minaj herself, J. Cole, and Rihanna.

When Jay-Z sold Tidal in 2021, Minaj claims she was only offered $1 million, a figure she says falls dramatically short of what she believes she is owed based on her ownership stake and contributions. She has long voiced dissatisfaction with the payout, but this is the most public—and dramatic—demand to date.

Beyond the Money: Broader Grievances

Minaj’s Twitter storm wasn’t limited to financial complaints. She also:

  • Promised to start a college fund for her fans if she receives the money she claims is owed.
  • Accused blogs and online creators of ignoring her side of the story, especially when it involves Jay-Z.
  • Warned content creators about posting “hate or lies,” saying, “They won’t cover your legal fees… I hope it’s worth losing everything including your account.”

She expressed frustration that mainstream blogs and platforms don’t fully cover her statements, especially when they involve Jay-Z, and suggested that much of the coverage she receives is from less reputable sources.

Credit: Heute.at

Satirical Accusations and Industry Critique

Minaj’s tweets took a satirical turn as she jokingly blamed Jay-Z for a laundry list of cultural grievances, including:

  • The state of hip-hop, football, basketball, and touring
  • The decline of Instagram and Twitter
  • Even processed foods and artificial dyes in candy

She repeatedly declared, “The jig is up,” but clarified that her statements were “alleged and for entertainment purposes only.”

Political and Cultural Criticism

Minaj also criticized Jay-Z’s political involvement, questioning why he didn’t campaign more actively for Kamala Harris or respond to President Obama’s comments about Black men. While Jay-Z has a history of supporting Democratic campaigns, Minaj’s critique centered on more recent events and what she perceives as a lack of advocacy for the Black community.

The Super Bowl and Lil Wayne

Adding another layer to her grievances, Minaj voiced disappointment that Lil Wayne was not chosen to perform at the Super Bowl in New Orleans, a decision she attributes to Jay-Z’s influence in the entertainment industry.

Public and Industry Reaction

Despite the seriousness of her financial claim, many observers note that if Minaj truly believed Jay-Z owed her $200 million, legal action—not social media—would likely follow. As of now, there is no public record of a lawsuit or formal complaint.

Advertisement

Some fans and commentators see Minaj’s outburst as part of a larger pattern of airing industry grievances online, while others interpret it as a mix of personal frustration and performance art. Minaj herself emphasized that her tweets were “for entertainment purposes only.”

Credit: Heute.at

Conclusion

Nicki Minaj’s explosive Twitter rant against Jay-Z has once again placed the spotlight on issues of artist compensation and industry dynamics. Whether her claims will lead to further action or remain another dramatic chapter in hip-hop’s ongoing soap opera remains to be seen, but for now, the world is watching—and tweeting.

Continue Reading

Trending