Connect with us

Health

Bill Gates Wants to Replace Your Butter — And the Internet Is Losing It

Published

on

In a groundbreaking move that has stirred widespread attention, Bill Gates is backing a California-based startup, Savor, that has developed a lab-made butter made entirely from carbon and hydrogen — without any involvement of animals, plants, or traditional farming. This carbon-made butter promises to be indistinguishable from traditional dairy butter in taste, smell, and texture, but with a fraction of the environmental impact.

How Is This Butter Made?

Savor’s innovative process involves capturing carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the air and hydrogen from water, then heating and oxidizing these components to create fat molecules chemically identical to those found in dairy butter, beef, cheese, and vegetable oils. The result is a creamy butter-like product made without farmland, fertilizers, or greenhouse gas emissions. The company’s food scientist describes the initial product as resembling candle wax, but in molecular terms it is genuine fat.

Sustainability at Its Core

Traditional butter production involves raising cows on farmland, producing significant greenhouse gases such as methane, and consuming vast amounts of water and land. In contrast, Savor’s carbon butter production requires nearly 1,000 times less land and releases zero greenhouse gases during manufacturing. Moreover, the product contains no palm oil, a common ingredient in butter alternatives often linked to deforestation.

Bill Gates, a vocal advocate for sustainable innovations, expressed on his blog:

The idea of switching to lab-made fats and oils may seem strange at first. But their potential to significantly reduce our carbon footprint is immense. The process doesn’t release any greenhouse gases, uses no farmland, and less than a thousandth of the water that traditional agriculture does. Most important, it tastes really good – like the real thing, because chemically it is”.

Public Reaction: Praise and Backlash

The announcement has sparked a mix of excitement and skepticism. Many admire the potential to transform the food industry and tackle climate change with this innovation. Savor is already partnering with restaurants and food suppliers to launch butter-infused products, such as chocolates, as early as the 2025 holiday season, with broader retail availability expected around 2027.

However, not everyone is on board. Online reactions have included outspoken critics like right-wing radio host Alex Jones, who publicly rejected the product, tweeting:

Bill Gates’ attempt to roll out disgusting lab-grown meat and butter triggers the MOTHER OF ALL BACKLASHES. We the People aren’t buying it, and we’re certainly not eating it either!“.

Many social media users express distrust specifically tied to Bill Gates’ involvement, reflecting the polarization around new food technologies and high-profile backers.

Advertisement

What This Means for the Future of Food

Savor’s technology represents a bold step towards a future where food production is decoupled from environmental harm. By creating fats and oils from air and water, this new approach can reduce the 7% of global greenhouse gas emissions linked to animal and plant fat production, making it a key player in climate action strategies within the food sector.

As Bill Gates emphasizes, this is not just about butter:

This is really about how we feed our species and heal our planet at the same time.“.


This innovation in butter production, backed by one of the world’s most influential investors and climate advocates, promises a future where environmental responsibility and culinary delight come together in a single spread. Whether embraced or rejected, it marks a defining moment in the evolving landscape of sustainable food technology.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Film Industry

Why Burnt-Out Filmmakers Need to Unplug Right Now

Published

on

If you’re reading this at 2 AM, scrolling through industry news instead of writing your script, you already know something’s wrong.

You’re not lazy. You’re not untalented. You’re burnt out—and you’re far from alone.

The Numbers Don’t Lie

87% of film and TV workers are facing mental health challenges right now. 62% of creators report burnout, with 65% constantly obsessing over content performance. Even more alarming: 1 in 10 creators experience suicidal thoughts—nearly twice the rate of the general population.

But here’s what the statistics don’t capture: the paralysis. The endless scrolling. The “should I make a feature or pivot to vertical shorts?” loop that keeps you stuck for months. The guilt of watching tutorials instead of shooting. The way political chaos and industry upheaval make creating feel pointless.

The Trap You’re In

You’re waiting. Waiting for the algorithm to make sense. Waiting for the industry to be “fair” again. Waiting for the perfect format, the right budget, the ideal moment when your head is finally clear enough to make something worthy.

Advertisement

That moment isn’t coming.

The filmmakers you admire didn’t wait for perfect conditions. They made their breakthrough films during recessions, pandemics, personal crises, and industry chaos. The only difference between them and you right now? They gave themselves permission to create imperfectly.

Why Now Is Actually the Perfect Time

The industry’s chaos is real, but it’s also created an opening. Streaming platforms are hungry for authentic stories. Independent films are driving growth in the global film market. In 2026, filmmakers with deep trust in a niche have more power than studios chasing mass appeal.

But none of that matters if you’re too exhausted to pick up a camera.

Advertisement

The 3-Day Reset

Here’s what actually helps when you’re stuck:

Day 1: News blackout during creative hours. Not forever. Just when you’re supposed to be creating. The world will still be chaotic tomorrow—but you’ll have protected the only hours that matter for your art.

Day 2: Pick one format. Just one. Feature, shorts, or vertical content—it doesn’t matter which. What matters is ending the analysis paralysis. Your first project won’t be your breakthrough anyway. It’ll be your fifth. So start.

Day 3: Make something imperfect this week. Not good. Not portfolio-worthy. Just made. A 60-second test. A rough scene. Anything that reminds you why you started doing this in the first place.

The Real Problem Isn’t Your Idea

You don’t have a creativity problem. You have an input-overload problem. Your brain is processing election cycles, algorithm changes, industry layoffs, and the constant pressure to “choose the right path” before you’re “allowed” to create.

But creativity doesn’t work on permission slips.

Advertisement

72% of film and TV professionals say the industry is not a mentally healthy place to work. 59% struggle to maintain any work-life balance. 50% face relentless, unrealistic timelines. The system is designed to burn you out.

Your response can’t be to wait for the system to fix itself. It has to be to protect your creative energy like it’s the most valuable resource you have—because it is.

What Happens If You Don’t Reset

The filmmakers who “wait for the right time” never make their films. They become the people who talk about the script they’re “working on” for five years. They’re the ones who know every piece of gear, every distribution strategy, every festival deadline—but have nothing to submit.

Don’t let information replace creation. Don’t let the news cycle steal your narrative.

Advertisement

Start Monday

Not when things calm down. Not when you figure out the perfect format. Not when the industry is “fair” again.

Monday. Imperfectly. With whatever you have.

Your story—messy, unpolished, and made anyway—is what the world needs right now. Not your perfectly researched plan. Not your anxiety about choosing wrong.

Your work.

The filmmakers who win in 2026 won’t be the ones who waited for permission. They’ll be the ones who created despite the noise, shipped despite the doubt, and remembered that done beats perfect every single time.

Advertisement

So take the weekend. Unplug from the chaos. Rest without guilt.

Then Monday morning, make something imperfect.

The industry doesn’t need you to wait until you’re ready. It needs you to start before you feel ready—and figure it out as you go.

That’s not reckless. That’s how every film you’ve ever loved actually got made.

Advertisement

If this hit home, you’re not alone. Thousands of independent filmmakers are choosing to create despite the overwhelm. Start your 3-day reset Monday. Your future self will thank you.

Continue Reading

Health

Oral Sex Is Spreading More Than Pleasure — It’s Fueling a Cancer Surge

Published

on

Once viewed as one of the “safer” forms of sexual activity, oral sex is now under intense scientific scrutiny for fueling a surge in throat cancers caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV). In Texas, where vaccination rates lag behind national averages, the impact is particularly alarming.

Texas at the Center of a Growing Epidemic

According to the Texas Department of State Health Services, nearly 20,000 HPV-associated cancers were diagnosed in the state between 2018 and 2022, with oropharyngeal cancer emerging as the most common among men. The disease affects the tonsils, tongue base, and throat—and it’s overwhelmingly linked to oral transmission of HPV-16, a high-risk viral strain also responsible for cervical cancers.

Specialists in Austin report that HPV-driven throat cancer has risen by more than 225% in recent years, outpacing national growth and surpassing cervical cancer as the dominant HPV-related malignancy in men. These cancers are increasingly affecting younger, non-smoking men—a demographic once considered low-risk.

The Texas Vaccination Gap

While prevention is possible, Texas remains one of the lowest-ranking states in HPV vaccination completion. Data published in JAMA Network Open found that Texas ranks 48th nationwide in completing the HPV vaccine series, with only 16–17% of adolescents fully protected as of 2022. Counties in North Texas report the highest cancer rates alongside the lowest vaccination uptake, a combination experts attribute partly to misinformation and anti-vaccine sentiment.

Changing Faces of Throat Cancer

Unlike traditional throat cancers linked to tobacco and alcohol, HPV-related oropharyngeal tumor cases often appear in otherwise healthy middle-aged adults. Dr. Baran Sumer of UT Southwestern Medical Center explains that these patients often have “no smoking or drinking history” — the virus itself is the culprit.​

HPV types 16 and 18 remain the most aggressive, capable of lingering in the throat tissue for years before mutating normal cells into tumors. Men in particular face higher risk: the immunological clearance rate for HPV is slower, allowing infections to persist and increase cancer odds.

Preventing a Preventable Cancer

The HPV vaccine can prevent over 90% of HPV-related cancers, including throat, anal, and cervical cancers. Yet public health leaders warn that adult vaccination rates remain far below the threshold needed to halt transmission. Physicians are calling for stronger awareness campaigns aimed at parents of preteens—especially in underserved Texas regions where education and access remain limited.

The Bottom Line

Oral sex may be common, but the misconceptions around its safety are costing lives. The data from Texas paints a clear picture: as vaccination lags, cancer cases rise. Experts agree that turning the tide will require confronting stigma, expanding education, and recognizing that protecting against HPV is not about morality—it’s about survival.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

Nation Split as Luigi Mangione Fights Death Penalty in CEO Murder Case

Published

on

The case of Luigi Mangione, the 27‑year‑old accused of killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, has ignited national debate, pitting supporters who see him as a whistleblower against critics who view his actions as an act of cold‑blooded violence. What began as a shocking corporate tragedy in December 2024 has evolved into one of the most polarizing death‑penalty battles in recent U.S. history.

The Killing That Shocked Corporate America

Brian Thompson, a respected CEO and father of two, was gunned down outside the New York Hilton Midtown on December 4, 2024. Surveillance footage reportedly showed a masked gunman lying in wait before firing a 3D‑printed pistol fitted with a silencer. Authorities later identified the suspect as Luigi Mangione, an Ivy League‑educated software engineer from Maryland who had grown increasingly vocal about his resentment toward the health‑insurance industry.

The killing triggered a multi‑state manhunt that ended when Mangione was captured at a McDonald’s in Altoona, Pennsylvania, five days later. Police said they recovered a 3D‑printed weapon and a handwritten letter denouncing “corporate greed” and calling the healthcare system “parasitic” from his backpack.

A Divided Public

Public opinion around Mangione’s motives has since fractured the nation. His supporters—many of whom have donated to his legal defense fund, which has surpassed $900,000—view his actions as symbolic resistance to perceived corporate corruption. Conversely, victims’ rights groups and law‑enforcement advocates argue that painting him as a “folk hero” disrespects the life of an innocent man and glorifies domestic terrorism.

The Legal Fight

Mangione faces federal charges including murder, use of a firearm in a crime of violence, and two counts of stalking. Because of the weapon’s use and the nature of the alleged planning, he could face the federal death penalty. However, his attorneys have filed motions to dismiss the capital charge, arguing that prosecutors violated his constitutional rights by questioning him without reading his Miranda rights and by searching his belongings without a warrant.

Their argument echoes a previous legal victory: in state court, a New York judge dismissed charges that attempted to classify the murder as an act of terrorism. The current federal motion seeks to suppress key evidence—including the weapon—on grounds of unlawful search and interrogation.

Advertisement

Possible Political Overtones

Defense filings have also accused federal prosecutors of turning Mangione into a “pawn” of the Trump administration to demonstrate toughness on violent crime. Attorney General Pam Bondi has publicly stated that seeking the death penalty aligns with President Trump’s directive to “make America safe again,” further intensifying political scrutiny of the case.

What’s Next

The federal court has until October 31 to rule on whether the death‑penalty charge will stand. If the motion fails, Mangione could face trial with the possibility of execution; if successful, the most severe penalty left would be life imprisonment with the chance of parole.

As his case unfolds, the moral and legal tensions surrounding Luigi Mangione reflect deeper American divisions over justice, corporate accountability, and who society chooses to blame—or defend—when outrage turns violent.

Continue Reading

Trending