Connect with us

World News

Biden weighs reimposing Trump-era terrorist designation for Houthis on January 16, 2024 at 10:00 pm

Published

on

The Biden administration may relabel the Houthis in Yemen a foreign terrorist organization, in response to the Iranian-backed group’s increased attacks against Israel and on commercial shipping in the region.

Such a move would see the Biden administration reverse course on a controversial and last-minute Trump-era policy. 

President Biden removed the foreign terrorist organization (FTO) label on the Houthis in February 2021 over concerns that blacklisting the militant group would prevent aid organizations and business from serving a population suffering under nearly a decade of civil war. Nearly 22 million Yemenis, half being children, require humanitarian assistance.  

But the Houthis’ dangerous attacks in the region are raising pressure on the Biden administration from lawmakers in Congress to move beyond counterstrikes on military targets and to burden the group with a terrorist designation by the U.S.

Advertisement

While Biden said last week he considers the Houthis a terrorist group and that the State Department acknowledged it is looking into reimposing the designation, senior administration officials have not committed to imposing the FTO label.  

“Nothing to update yet on the FTO designation,” White House National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby told reporters Tuesday. “We’re still in the process of reviewing it.”

But it’s not entirely clear that labeling the Houthis a terrorist organization would have any practical and immediate impacts on hurting its ability to sow terror and chaos in the region. The Houthis have said their attacks are in support of Hamas in the Gaza Strip, which is under siege from Israel after the group launched its shocking terrorist attack on Oct. 7. 

The FTO designation could embolden the Houthis, indicating its tactics are working, said Dave Harden, a former senior State Department official who served in both the Trump and Obama administrations. 

Advertisement

“It doesn’t matter to the Houthis that they’re a foreign terrorist organization under U.S. law, they probably like it,” he said. 

“They don’t bank and shop and travel and engage in the Western economy. They’re not like [Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov]. These guys, it doesn’t affect them, and if anything, it’s a badge of honor.” 

An FTO designation is meant to disrupt financial support to such a group, giving the Treasury Department a wider hand to issue sanctions and signal to other foreign governments, people or businesses that they could lose access to the U.S. financial system if they engage with the sanctioned group.

Former President Trump’s designation of the Houthis as an FTO drew rare pushback from Republicans in Congress, largely over humanitarian concerns. Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.) opposed the move outright.

Advertisement

In 2021, Sen Jim Risch (Idaho) and Rep. Michael McCaul (Texas), the senior Republicans on the Senate and House Foreign Affairs committees, raised grave concerns that the Trump administration was not putting in place “necessary licenses, waivers and appropriate guidance” to allow the delivery of goods to the Yemeni people.  

Harden, who is founder of the Georgetown Strategy Group, said it’s fair to recognize concerns about blocking the delivery of humanitarian assistance or commercial goods to Yemen, but that the Houthis are threatening that anyway by attacking shipping in the Red Sea.

Major shipping companies are rerouting their vessels on longer and more expensive routes to avoid the Red Sea route toward the Suez Canal, raising concerns over disrupted supply chains, delayed deliveries and higher prices for consumers across the globe. 

Still, Republican and Democratic voices are calling for Biden to take seriously its review of whether to impose the FTO designation for the Houthis — even as many of these lawmakers expressed serious concerns of the terrorist group label when it was imposed by former President Trump. 

Advertisement

McCaul said in a statement last week that the Biden administration “must acknowledge it was a mistake to rescind the Houthis designation as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, and re-list them immediately.”

Other lawmakers calling for Biden to impose the FTO include Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.), a senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.), a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and staunch supporter of Biden’s handling of Israel’s war against Hamas.

Reps. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) and Brian Mast (R-Fla.) wrote a letter last week to Biden in favor of the FTO designation. 

In November, 15 Republican senators wrote a letter to Biden calling for the Houthis to be designated as an FTO. 

Advertisement

Harden reacted to such congressional calls as more of a domestic political signal as opposed to hurting the Houthis. 

“This is something that we care about, and maybe it’s symbolic, but it’s not meaningful,” he continued.

The FTO designation still poses a significant risk to humanitarian organizations, said Bruce Riedel, nonresident senior fellow in the Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution and author of the book “America and the Yemens: A Complex and Tragic Encounter.”

“The reasons why Joe Biden’s administration lifted the FTO still apply today. I would hope there would be some reluctance to go down that road,” he said. 

Advertisement

Riedel also argued that the FTO could push the Houthis closer to Iran. 

“The Houthis are a very independent actor, they’re not like Hezbollah [in Lebanon]. They are a home-grown independent actor. But the more they are attacked, they will naturally go to the Iranians for more and more help, which I don’t think is in our interest either.” 

The Biden administration is so far focused on rallying a global coalition to pressure the Houthis to relent on the attacks, while also taking military action in coordinated strikes. 

“This is a global challenge,” Jake Sullivan, Biden’s national security adviser, told the World Economic Forum in Davos on Tuesday.

Advertisement

“We’re talking about a vital artery of global commerce, a critical maritime choke point that’s being held hostage, and countries and companies that have nothing to do with the Middle East, whatsoever, are being affected — more than 50 nations in nearly 30 attacks. And so it’s a crisis that the whole world needs to respond to.” 

Sullivan said that retaliatory attacks launched by the U.S. and U.K., and supported by other democratic nations, were aimed at degrading the Houthis’ military capabilities but were not expected to eliminate the threat completely. 

“We did not say when we launched our attacks, they’re going to end once and for all, the Houthis will be fully deterred,” he told the forum.

“We anticipated the Houthis would continue to try to hold this critical artery at risk. And we continue to reserve the right to take further action, but this needs to be an all-hands-on-deck effort.”

Advertisement

The Houthis have, unsurprisingly, ignored a directive from the United Nations Security Council to cease attacks on ships in the Red Sea. But Sullivan said the U.S. is looking to work with countries with ties to Iran to pressure the Houthis to get them to understand that their attacks must end.

“We want to work with countries across the board, countries who are allies and partners, countries who are not, in the common interest to get this to stop.”

​ The Biden administration may relabel the Houthis in Yemen a foreign terrorist organization, in response to the Iranian-backed group’s increased attacks against Israel and on commercial shipping in the region. Such a move would see the Biden administration reverse course on a controversial and last-minute Trump-era policy. President Biden removed the foreign terrorist organization (FTO) label on… 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Netanyahu’s UN Speech Triggers Diplomatic Walkouts and Mass Protests

Published

on

What Happened at the United Nations

On Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, defending Israel’s ongoing military operations in Gaza. As he spoke, more than 100 delegates from over 50 countries stood up and left the chamber—a rare and significant diplomatic walkout. Outside the UN, thousands of protesters gathered to voice opposition to Netanyahu’s policies and call for accountability, including some who labeled him a war criminal. The protest included activists from Palestinian and Jewish groups, along with international allies.

Why Did Delegates and Protesters Walk Out?

The walkouts and protests were a response to Israel’s continued offensive in Gaza, which has resulted in widespread destruction and a significant humanitarian crisis. Many countries and individuals have accused Israel of excessive use of force, and some international prosecutors have suggested Netanyahu should face investigation by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, including claims that starvation was used as a weapon against civilians. At the same time, a record number of nations—over 150—recently recognized the State of Palestine, leaving the United States as the only permanent UN Security Council member not to join them.

International Reaction and Significance

The diplomatic walkouts and street protests demonstrate increasing global concern over the situation in Gaza and growing support for Palestinian statehood. Several world leaders, including Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro, showed visible solidarity with protesters. Petro called for international intervention and, controversially, for US troops not to follow orders he viewed as supporting ongoing conflict. The US later revoked Petro’s visa over his role in the protests, which he argued was evidence of a declining respect for international law.

BILATERAL MEETING WITH THE PRIME MINISTER OF ISRAEL Photo credit: Matty STERN/U.S. Embassy Jerusalem

Why Is This News Important?

The Gaza conflict is one of the world’s most contentious and closely-watched issues. It has drawn strong feelings and differing opinions from governments, activists, and ordinary people worldwide. The United Nations, as an international organization focused on peace and human rights, is a key arena for these debates. The events surrounding Netanyahu’s speech show that many nations and voices are urging new action—from recognition of Palestinian rights to calls for sanctions against Israel—while discussion and disagreement over the best path forward continue.

This episode at the UN highlights how international diplomacy, public protests, and official policy are all intersecting in real time as the search for solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains urgent and unresolved.

Continue Reading

News

Is a Nuclear-Powered Alien Spacecraft Flying Toward Earth?

Published

on

A mysterious interstellar object speeding through our solar system has reignited debates about extraterrestrial technology — and whether Earth might currently be under quiet observation.

The object, known as 3I/ATLAS, is only the third confirmed interstellar visitor ever detected. Unlike ordinary comets, however, this cosmic traveler has baffled astronomers with its unusual brightness, strange trajectory, and lack of a visible cometary tail. While most scientists cautiously describe it as a natural body, one leading astrophysicist believes something much stranger is at play.

Harvard Scientist’s Bold Claim

Professor Avi Loeb of Harvard University, head of the Galileo Project, has suggested that 3I/ATLAS may in fact be a nuclear-powered alien spacecraft designed to test how humanity would respond to an interstellar visitor. He argues that its flight path is improbably precise, bringing it close to Mars, Venus, and Earth — a pattern highly unlikely to occur by chance.

Loeb also points out that telescope images show a glow inconsistent with ordinary dust behavior. Instead of trailing behind like a comet, the halo-like light appears to extend in unusual ways, sparking debate about whether the object could be emitting energy of its own.

Headed Toward Earth’s Neighborhood

3I/ATLAS is expected to make its closest approach in late 2025, passing near Mars before swinging by the inner solar system. Although Earth itself will be on the opposite side of the Sun when it comes closest, the alignment will still enable space-based observatories to capture sharper data.

Loeb has called on NASA and other agencies to use spacecraft already stationed near Mars or Jupiter — including the Juno mission — to take high-resolution photographs. He believes such efforts could reveal whether the interstellar object is truly natural, or the first technological probe humanity has ever encountered.

Should We Be Worried?

While most astronomers argue caution before jumping to alien conclusions, Loeb insists that scientific openness is key. “If it’s just a comet, we learn something new,” he said. “But if it’s a spacecraft, it would be the most important discovery in human history.”

Advertisement
Shop Our Store

For now, 3I/ATLAS remains a mysterious speck on astronomers’ charts, drifting closer with each passing day. Whether it proves to be a frozen remnant of another star system or something far more advanced, the interstellar visitor has already succeeded in one mission: reminding us how vast and unpredictable the universe really is.

Continue Reading

News

AI Automation Could Cause Up to 20% Unemployment—A Workforce on the Brink

Published

on

Stark Warning from Anthropic CEO Highlights Rapid Job Displacement Risk

The looming threat of widespread unemployment due to AI automation has sparked intense debate among experts, business leaders, and policymakers. Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic—the company behind the influential AI language model Claude—issued a stark warning that has sent shockwaves through corporate America:

“Up to half of all entry-level white collar jobs could disappear within the next one to five years, potentially pushing unemployment rates as high as 20% during this period.”

This dramatic forecast paints a picture of a rapid and unsettling transformation in the workforce, driven by AI technologies that can perform complex cognitive tasks.

Balancing Predictions: Worst-Case Scenarios vs. Moderate Impact

However, this forecast represents one end of a spectrum of expert predictions. While Amodei’s warning highlights the worst-case scenario driven by the swift adoption of AI agents capable of coding, analyzing data, drafting legal documents, and managing workflows around the clock, other analyses suggest a more moderate impact. For example, Goldman Sachs estimates that AI could temporarily displace about 6-7% of U.S. jobs, with unemployment rising by approximately half a percentage point during the adjustment period. Their research anticipates a more gradual transition with a mixture of job disruption and creation.

The Unprecedented Speed and Scope of AI-Driven Job Disruption

The truth likely lies somewhere in between. AI is advancing at unprecedented speed, and the scope of jobs affected spans far beyond blue-collar roles to white-collar positions that required college degrees and years of training. Entry-level roles such as customer service representatives, data entry clerks, junior analysts, and administrative assistants face the greatest near-term risk. Mid-level roles in accounting, marketing, law, and engineering could soon follow, with companies already laying off workers citing AI-driven efficiencies.

Shop Our Store- Click Here

Preparing for an AI-Transformed Workforce: Adaptation Is Essential

Ultimately, the AI-driven job transformation is no longer a distant prospect but unfolding now. Whether unemployment spikes to 20% or stabilizes at lower levels depends on many factors, including business adoption rates, government policies, and the ability of workers to reskill. What is certain is that the workforce of tomorrow will look very different from today—and the time to prepare is right now.

Continue Reading

Trending