Connect with us

Entertainment

Ashton Kutcher Resigns as Chairman of Anti-Child Sex Abuse Organization on September 15, 2023 at 8:48 pm Us Weekly

Published

on

PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images

The fallout from Ashton Kutcher’s support for convicted sex offender Danny Masterson has spilled over into his Thorn organization.

News broke on Friday, September 15, that Kutcher, 45, has resigned from his post as chairman of the board for anti-human trafficking organization Thorn, which he cofounded with ex-wife Demi Moore in 2009. (Kutcher and Moore, 60, split in 2011 and finalized their divorce two years later.)

Kutcher’s wife, Mila Kunis, has also vacated her role as an observer on the organization’s board, according to Time.

Advertisement

“Victims of sexual abuse have been historically silenced and the character statement I submitted is yet another painful instance of questioning victims who are brave enough to share their experiences,” Kutcher wrote in a letter to Thorn’s board on Thursday, September 14, via Time. “After my wife and I spent several days of listening, personal reflection, learning, and conversations with survivors and the employees and leadership at Thorn, I have determined the responsible thing for me to do is resign as Chairman of the Board, effectively immediately. I cannot allow my error in judgment to distract from our efforts and the children we serve.”

Related: Ashton Kutcher’s Ups and Downs Through the Years

Advertisement
Ashton Kutcher hit it out of the park when he made his acting debut in 1998 — and decades later, Hollywood is still enthralled by his life. Kutcher (full name Christopher Ashton Kutcher) rose to fame playing Michael Kelso on That ’70s Show, which is where he met his now-wife, Mila Kunis. The pair — who share […]

Kutcher apologized for his actions, writing, “The mission must always be the priority and I want to offer my heartfelt apology to all victims of sexual violence and everyone at Thorn who I hurt by what I did.”

He concluded: “And to the broader advocacy community, I am deeply sorry. I remain proud of what we have accomplished in the past decade and will continue to support Thorn’s work. Thank you for your tireless advocacy and dedication to this cause.”

Danny Masterson Paul Archuleta/FilmMagic

Kutcher and Kunis’ decision to step down from Thorn’s board came after the couple made headlines for writing letters in support of Masterson, 47, as he awaited sentencing in his rape trial.

Advertisement

Masterson — who costarred on That ‘70s Show with the pair and later with Kutcher on The Ranch — was sentenced to 30 years to life in prison on September 7. He was convicted in May on two charges of rape for sexually assaulting two women in 2003. A verdict was not reacted on the allegation that Masterson raped an ex-girlfriend in 2001.

Related: What Has the ‘That ’70s Show’ Cast Said About Danny Masterson Allegations?

Advertisement
All eyes were back on the cast of That ‘70s Show — and Danny Masterson — when Netflix released the sequel series, That ‘90s Show, featuring appearances by Laura Prepon, Topher Grace, Mila Kunis, Ashton Kutcher and Wilmer Valderrama. Masterson, who played Steven Hyde on the comedy series, which ran on Fox from 1998 to […]

After Kutcher and Kunis, 40, received backlash for their letters, they took to Instagram to explain their thought process. “We are aware of the pain that has been caused by the character letters that we wrote on behalf of Danny Masterson,” they said in a video posted on September 9.

Kunis insisted, “We support victims. We have done this historically through our work and we will continue to do so in the future.”

Advertisement

Related: Danny Masterson’s Sexual Assault Allegations and Trial: What to Know

Danny Masterson made headlines in 2017 when he was first accused of sexual assault. He has since pleaded not guilty after being charged in June 2020 with allegedly raping three women. Four women claimed in March 2017 that the That ‘70s Show alum sexually assaulted them in the early 2000s. A fifth woman came forward […]

Kutcher then explained that they wrote the letters “a couple of months ago” after Masterson’s family “reached out” and asked for “character letters to represent the person that we knew for 25 years.” The letters were meant to inform the judge when sentencing Masterson.

“They were intended for the judge to read and not to undermine the testimony of the victims or re-traumatize them in any way,” Kutcher said. “We would never want to do that, and we’re sorry if that has taken place.”

Kunis, who married Kutcher in 2015, concluded: “Our heart goes out to every single person who’s ever been a victim of sexual assault, sexual abuse or rape.”

Advertisement

PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images The fallout from Ashton Kutcher’s support for convicted sex offender Danny Masterson has spilled over into his Thorn organization. News broke on Friday, September 15, that Kutcher, 45, has resigned from his post as chairman of the board for anti-human trafficking organization Thorn, which he cofounded with ex-wife Demi 

​   Us Weekly Read More 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Beyoncé’s Unreleased Music Stolen in Atlanta Car Break-In

Published

on

Atlanta, GA — Unreleased music by Beyoncé, along with critical tour plans and personal belongings, was stolen during a brazen car break-in last week. The theft occurred on July 8, just before the start of the megastar’s “Cowboy Carter” tour performances in Atlanta, sparking a swift police investigation.

According to authorities, thieves targeted a rented SUV parked at Krog Street Market, shattering the rear window and making off with two suitcases. Inside were five thumb drives containing unreleased, watermarked Beyoncé tracks, set lists for upcoming shows, and sensitive information tied to her tour. Laptops, headphones, and luxury clothing were also taken in the heist.

The property belonged to Beyoncé’s longtime choreographer, Christopher Grant, and dancer Diandre Blue, who discovered the break-in less than an hour after leaving the vehicle. “It’s really, really important information in there,” one of the victims told 911 operators, emphasizing the material’s significance for one of the world’s most prominent musicians.

Heute.at

Atlanta police rapidly secured an arrest warrant for a suspect, aided by surveillance footage and digital tracking of stolen electronics. As of Tuesday morning, the suspect remains at large25. Despite the disruption, Beyoncé continued her sold-out tour, with authorities urging anyone with information to come forward.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Adults, Fame, and a Four-Year-Old: Critics Question Ms. Shirley’s Exposure to Grown Men

Published

on

Starkville, Mississippi — The viral rise of 4-year-old LaR’iyah Jesireé, better known as “Ms. Shirley,” has captivated millions on TikTok and Instagram. But as her fame grows, so too does a wave of public concern—particularly over her appearances at meet-and-greet events attended by adults, including grown men, raising urgent questions about child safety, parental responsibility, and the blurred boundaries of social media stardom.

A Viral Sensation in the Spotlight

Ms. Shirley’s infectious line dances, especially her signature “Boots on the Ground” routine, have made her a household name in the world of social media. With over a million followers and appearances on national television, she’s become a symbol of youthful talent and joy.

But behind the viral videos lies a controversy that has split public opinion. Critics argue that the very events fueling her fame—public meet-and-greets, often at venues not designed for children—expose her to adult environments and attention that are inappropriate for someone her age.

The Flashpoint: Meet-and-Greet Backlash

  • Adult Attendance: Social media erupted after images and videos surfaced of Ms. Shirley participating in meet-and-greet events where the majority of attendees were adults, many of them men. Critics questioned the wisdom of placing a young child in such settings, with some calling it “gross and exploitative”.
  • Parental Decisions Under Fire: The backlash intensified as Ms. Shirley’s mother, Latisha Tucker, defended her choices online, insisting she remains a protective parent first. “I’m a mother… before anything,” Tucker said in response to critics, but detractors remain unconvinced, pointing to the risks of adult attention and the potential for exploitation.

Safety, Exploitation, and the Role of Social Media

  • Child Safety Concerns: The controversy has led some observers to report the family to Child Protective Services, citing fears over Ms. Shirley’s exposure to adult audiences and the pressures of internet fame at such a young age.
  • Debate Over Exploitation: For every fan who sees a proud mother sharing her daughter’s talent, there are others who see a child being thrust into the limelight for adult entertainment. Critics warn that the combination of viral fame and adult-dominated events could have lasting consequences for Ms. Shirley’s well-being.
  • Online Reactions: The internet is divided—while many celebrate Ms. Shirley’s talent, others voice discomfort at seeing a toddler perform in spaces where alcohol and adult behavior are present. Some question why a 4-year-old is being branded with a mature-sounding stage name and presented in such grown-up contexts.

The Mother’s Response

Latisha Tucker, Ms. Shirley’s mother, has not shied away from the criticism. She maintains that her daughter’s appearances are carefully managed and that the backlash is fueled by outsiders who misunderstand their intentions. Tucker has publicly stated that any earnings from Ms. Shirley’s fame will be set aside for her future, and insists that her daughter is simply “being a kid like any other kid.” Still, she acknowledges that the scrutiny comes with the territory of internet celebrity.

SOURCE: TIKTOK / @@LARIYAH.MISSSHIRLEY

A Broader Conversation

The uproar over Ms. Shirley’s meet-and-greets is part of a larger debate about the responsibilities of parents who share their children’s lives online, the adequacy of social media safeguards, and the potential for exploitation in the pursuit of viral fame. As platforms like TikTok continue to blur the lines between childhood and celebrity, the story of Ms. Shirley stands as a flashpoint—one that forces parents, platforms, and audiences alike to confront uncomfortable questions about where to draw the line.

Table: Key Issues in the Ms. Shirley Controversy

IssueDescription
Adult Attendance at EventsGrown men and other adults present at meet-and-greets, sparking safety concerns
Parental OversightDebate over whether Ms. Shirley’s mother is protecting or exploiting her child
Child SafetyReports to CPS and public calls for better safeguards for young social media stars
Online DivisionFans celebrate her talent, critics warn of long-term risks and inappropriate exposure

As Ms. Shirley’s star continues to rise, so does the scrutiny. For now, her story remains a cautionary tale at the intersection of childhood, celebrity, and the unpredictable power of the internet.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Nicki Minaj Demands $200 Million from Jay-Z in Explosive Twitter Rant

Published

on

Nicki Minaj has once again set social media ablaze, this time targeting Jay-Z with a series of pointed tweets that allege he owes her an eye-popping $200 million. The outburst has reignited debates about artist compensation, industry transparency, and the ongoing power struggles within hip-hop’s elite circles.

Credit: Heute.at

The $200 Million Claim

In a string of tweets, Minaj directly addressed Jay-Z, writing, “Jay-Z, call me to settle the karmic debt. It’s only collecting more interest. You still in my top five though. Let’s get it.” She went further, warning, “Anyone still calling him Hov will answer to God for the blasphemy.” According to Minaj, the alleged debt stems from Jay-Z’s sale of Tidal, the music streaming platform he launched in 2015 with a group of high-profile artists—including Minaj herself, J. Cole, and Rihanna.

When Jay-Z sold Tidal in 2021, Minaj claims she was only offered $1 million, a figure she says falls dramatically short of what she believes she is owed based on her ownership stake and contributions. She has long voiced dissatisfaction with the payout, but this is the most public—and dramatic—demand to date.

Beyond the Money: Broader Grievances

Minaj’s Twitter storm wasn’t limited to financial complaints. She also:

  • Promised to start a college fund for her fans if she receives the money she claims is owed.
  • Accused blogs and online creators of ignoring her side of the story, especially when it involves Jay-Z.
  • Warned content creators about posting “hate or lies,” saying, “They won’t cover your legal fees… I hope it’s worth losing everything including your account.”

She expressed frustration that mainstream blogs and platforms don’t fully cover her statements, especially when they involve Jay-Z, and suggested that much of the coverage she receives is from less reputable sources.

Credit: Heute.at

Satirical Accusations and Industry Critique

Minaj’s tweets took a satirical turn as she jokingly blamed Jay-Z for a laundry list of cultural grievances, including:

  • The state of hip-hop, football, basketball, and touring
  • The decline of Instagram and Twitter
  • Even processed foods and artificial dyes in candy

She repeatedly declared, “The jig is up,” but clarified that her statements were “alleged and for entertainment purposes only.”

Political and Cultural Criticism

Minaj also criticized Jay-Z’s political involvement, questioning why he didn’t campaign more actively for Kamala Harris or respond to President Obama’s comments about Black men. While Jay-Z has a history of supporting Democratic campaigns, Minaj’s critique centered on more recent events and what she perceives as a lack of advocacy for the Black community.

The Super Bowl and Lil Wayne

Adding another layer to her grievances, Minaj voiced disappointment that Lil Wayne was not chosen to perform at the Super Bowl in New Orleans, a decision she attributes to Jay-Z’s influence in the entertainment industry.

Public and Industry Reaction

Despite the seriousness of her financial claim, many observers note that if Minaj truly believed Jay-Z owed her $200 million, legal action—not social media—would likely follow. As of now, there is no public record of a lawsuit or formal complaint.

Advertisement

Some fans and commentators see Minaj’s outburst as part of a larger pattern of airing industry grievances online, while others interpret it as a mix of personal frustration and performance art. Minaj herself emphasized that her tweets were “for entertainment purposes only.”

Credit: Heute.at

Conclusion

Nicki Minaj’s explosive Twitter rant against Jay-Z has once again placed the spotlight on issues of artist compensation and industry dynamics. Whether her claims will lead to further action or remain another dramatic chapter in hip-hop’s ongoing soap opera remains to be seen, but for now, the world is watching—and tweeting.

Continue Reading

Trending