News
French President Macron Sues Candace Owens for Calling His Wife a Man

Background
French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron, have filed a defamation lawsuit in the United States against conservative commentator Candace Owens, following Owens’ repeated allegations that the First Lady is a man. The suit marks a notable escalation in a long-running campaign of harassment and conspiracy theories targeting Madame Macron, with the French couple now seeking legal redress beyond their home country.

Details of the Lawsuit
- Filed In: Delaware Superior Court, United States
- Plaintiffs: Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron
- Defendant: Candace Owens and her business entities
- Counts: 22 counts, including defamation and “false light”
The suit describes Owens’ claims as “outrageous, libelous, and implausible fabrications,” asserting that they have subjected the Macrons to “relentless bullying” and a “campaign of global humiliation.” The Macrons allege that Owens has repeatedly ignored credible evidence, favoring sensationalism and conspiracy to profit from their personal lives.
Owens’ Statements and Actions
According to the legal filings:
- Owens published a podcast series called Becoming Brigitte, and created social media content with her 4.5 million YouTube subscribers, asserting that Brigitte Macron is actually a man named Jean-Michel Trogneux (the name of Brigitte’s brother).
- Owens also marketed merchandise and monetized content centered around these false claims.
- She publicly declared that she would “stake [her] entire professional reputation” on these allegations, despite being repeatedly confronted with contrary evidence and direct denials from the Macrons.
The Macrons’ Response
The Macrons argue that:
- The conspiracy theories have caused “significant economic harm,” including the loss of business opportunities.
- The campaign has turned their personal lives into fodder for profit-driven lies, causing “global humiliation and relentless bullying”.
- Owens continued her efforts despite knowing the claims were false, choosing to double down rather than retract her statements.

Context and Precedents
This lawsuit is unusual in that a sitting world leader is personally suing a foreign media personality in another country’s courts. Notably:
- Brigitte Macron previously won a defamation case in France against individuals who spread similar rumors, although the verdict was overturned by an appeals court on “good faith” grounds; that matter is still under review in France’s highest court.
- Legal experts highlight that American libel law sets a high bar for public figures like the Macrons, requiring proof that Owens acted with “actual malice”—knowing falsity or reckless disregard for the truth.

What’s Next
The Macrons are seeking both compensatory and punitive damages, as well as a public correction of the record. Owens has stated she will address the lawsuit on her own podcast, but had not commented further as of the time of filing.
This high-profile case spotlights the difficulties public figures face in combating viral misinformation, while also raising questions about the limits of free speech, defamation laws, and international jurisdiction in the social media age.
News
FIPRM Expands Into Sports, Partners With Bolanle Media to Launch New Media Platform

FIPRM is expanding its footprint into the sports industry through a new partnership with Bolanle Media, marking a strategic move into athlete-focused media and content development.
The Houston-based public relations firm announced the launch of its sports division alongside plans to co-develop a new sports media platform in collaboration with Bolanle Media.
The initiative reflects a growing demand for athlete-driven storytelling, as players increasingly seek control over their narratives both during and after their careers.
Through this expansion, FIPRM will offer specialized services including crisis management, media training, and business consulting tailored specifically for athletes. The goal is to support clients not only in navigating public visibility but also in building long-term business ventures beyond sports.
The partnership with Bolanle Media adds a strong content and distribution component to the strategy. Known for its work in digital storytelling and media production, Bolanle Media will play a key role in developing original programming and amplifying athlete voices across platforms.
One of the first projects under the collaboration is The Basketball Exchange, a biweekly podcast focused on news, analysis, and cultural conversations surrounding the WNBA, BIG3, Unrivaled, and women’s college basketball. The show will be executive produced by Bolanle Media founder Roselyn Omaka, who also serves as a network partner on the project.
Hosted by publicist Kretonia Morgan, the podcast will feature contributions from former NBA player Orien Green, BIG3 player Adam Drexler, and former WNBA champion Janell Burse. The format is designed to combine insider perspective with broader conversations around the evolving business and culture of basketball.
The move comes as both companies position themselves at the intersection of sports, media, and branding. For FIPRM, the sports division represents a natural extension of its public relations expertise into a high-growth sector. For Bolanle Media, the partnership strengthens its expansion into sports content and athlete-led programming.
As the sports media landscape continues to shift toward direct-to-audience platforms, collaborations like this highlight a larger trend: athletes are no longer just subjects of coverage—they are becoming media brands in their own right.
Follow Basketball Exchange -Kretonia’s Substack
News
ON MAY 8, 2026, YOUR INSTAGRAM DMS STOP BEING TRULY PRIVATE

Bolanle Tech Newsroom Report
Instagram Is Quietly Changing What “Private” Means in Your DMs

From the Bolanle Tech Newsroom: Instagram has officially confirmed it will stop supporting end‑to‑end encrypted DMs on that date, and this is a documented policy change, not a rumor. That optional encrypted mode was the one feature that kept certain chats locked so tightly that not even Meta could read them, and once it’s gone, your “private” conversations lose their highest level of protection. In simple terms, the lock on those messages is being removed, and Meta will once again be in a position to see more of what you say in DMs if it chooses to, or if it is compelled to by law.
End‑to‑end encryption is what made some Instagram chats feel like a sealed envelope: the message left your phone scrambled and only arrived readable on the other person’s device. Without that, your DMs sit on Meta’s servers in a form that can be scanned by safety systems, reviewed for policy violations, and potentially used to inform AI and ad targeting. Meta is presenting this as a clean‑up of a “low‑usage” feature and is directing privacy‑focused users toward WhatsApp instead. But if you’ve been sending addresses, money talk, contracts, intimate photos, or receipts over Instagram, this marks a serious shift in what “private” really means on the platform.
“THESE CHATS WON’T BE PUBLIC, BUT THEY WON’T BE FULLY LOCKED DOWN EITHER.”
Practically, this does not mean your DMs become public or searchable by other users—strangers still can’t just open your messages, and your audience settings, blocking, and reporting tools remain in place.

What changes is who else can see inside: Meta’s internal systems, safety tools, and, when required, law enforcement will have a clearer path to the content of your conversations than they did under full end‑to‑end encryption. That is why privacy advocates are sounding the alarm—and why, from the Bolanle Tech Newsroom, our guidance is to treat Instagram DMs as semi‑public space: useful for networking, coordination, and light conversation, but not the place to keep your most sensitive secrets.
Advice
How Far Would You Go to Book Your Dream Role?

The question Sydney Sweeney’s career forces every serious artist to ask themselves.
Most people say they want to be an actor. But wanting the life and being willing to do what the life requires are two entirely different things. Sydney Sweeney’s performance as Cassie Howard in Euphoria is one of the clearest examples in recent television of what it actually looks like when an artist refuses to protect themselves from the story they are telling.
The Performance That Started a Conversation
Cassie Howard is not a comfortable character to watch. She is messy, desperate, and heartbreakingly human in ways that most scripts would have softened or simplified. Sydney Sweeney did not soften her. She played every scene at full exposure — the breakdowns, the humiliation, the moments where Cassie is both completely wrong and completely understandable at the same time.
What made the performance remarkable was not the difficulty of the scenes. It was the consistency of her commitment to them. Night after night on set, take after take, she showed up and gave the camera something real. That is not a small thing. That is the kind of discipline that separates working actors from generational ones.
What the Industry Does Not Tell You
The entertainment industry sells you a version of success built around talent, timing, and luck. And while all three matter, none of them are the real differentiator in a room full of equally talented people. The real differentiator is willingness — the willingness to be honest, to be vulnerable, and to let the work require something personal from you.
Most actors hit a wall at some point in their career where a role demands more than they have publicly shown before. The ones who say yes to that moment, who trust the material and the director enough to go somewhere uncomfortable, are the ones audiences remember long after the credits roll.
Sydney Sweeney said yes repeatedly. And the industry took notice.
The Question Worth Asking Yourself
Before you answer, really think about it. There is a moment in every serious audition room where someone might ask you to go further than you are comfortable with — to access something real, to stop performing and start revealing. In that moment, you have to decide what your dream is actually worth to you and, more importantly, what parts of yourself you are not willing to trade for it.
That is the question Euphoria quietly raises for anyone watching with ambition in their chest. Not “could I do that,” but “should I ever feel pressured to.” There is a difference between an artist who chooses vulnerability as a creative tool and one who is pressured into exposure they never agreed to. Knowing that difference is not a weakness. It is the most important thing a young actor can understand before they walk into a room that will test it.
Because the only role that truly costs too much is the one that asks you to abandon who you are to play it.
What You Can Take From This
Whether you are an actor, a filmmaker, a content creator, or someone simply building something from scratch, the principle is the same. The work that connects with people is almost always the work that cost the creator something real. Audiences can feel the difference between performance and truth. They always could.
Sydney Sweeney did not become one of the most talked-about actresses of her generation because she got lucky. She got there because she was willing to be completely, uncomfortably human in front of a camera — and because she knew exactly who she was before she let the role take over.
That combination — full commitment and a clear sense of self — is rarer than talent. And it is the thing worth chasing.
Written for Bolanle Media | Entertainment. Culture. Conversation.
News4 weeks agoA Civilization Will Die Tonight — And We’re All Just Watching
News4 weeks agoWhy Your Indie Film Disappears Online
Advice4 weeks agoWhat Actors Can Learn From Zendaya
Entertainment4 weeks agoVertical Films Changed Everything. Are You Ready?
Entertainment3 weeks agoBieber’s Coachella Set Has Everyone Arguing Again
News3 weeks agoON MAY 8, 2026, YOUR INSTAGRAM DMS STOP BEING TRULY PRIVATE
News3 weeks agoShe Was Supposed to Come Home: The Life, Death, and Dehumanization of Ashlee Jenae
Advice3 weeks agoHow Far Would You Go to Book Your Dream Role?






















