Connect with us

Entertainment

‘1989 (Taylor’s Version)’ Vault Titles Are Here — Just Decode 89 Puzzles on September 19, 2023 at 9:45 pm Us Weekly

Published

on

Taylor Swift Scott Eisen/TAS23/Getty Images for TAS Rights Management

Taylor Swift is asking fans to fill in the blank space. 

Just a few weeks out from the release of her fourth rerecorded album 1989 (Taylor’s Version) — which drops on October 27 — Swift, 33, is doing what she does best: leaving Easter eggs for fans to decode. This time, she’s paired up with Google for a word puzzle game that will seemingly help uncover the titles of the record’s five vault tracks — the bonus songs that never made the final cut of the original album. 

Starting Saturday, September 16, a closed blue vault began popping up when googling Swift’s name. Clicking on the vault brings up scattered letters in a word jumble accompanied by a hint to help solve the puzzle. At first, the only clue was, “My name is Taylor and I was born in…,” with “1989 Taylor’s Version” being the answer. 

Advertisement

Beginning on Tuesday, September 19, however, the puzzles began to expand. The hint “Blank Space” leads to “Nice to meet you,” while other answers include “Got a haircut,” “She lost him,” “Love,” “Golf Club, “Pen Click” and “Summer Fling.” 

Tom Cooper/TAS23/Getty Images for TAS Rights Management

Advertisement

Related: Everything to Know About Taylor Swift’s ‘1989 (Taylor’s Version)’

If Taylor Swift is the perpetrator, her fans are the detectives. The pop star — who is notorious for dropping cryptic messages in her liner notes, music videos and social media posts — seems to have left several clues that 1989 (Taylor’s Version) will be the next album she’ll release. In May 2022, the singer-songwriter […]

According to Google,  there are a total of 89 puzzles to get through — because Swift was born in 1989, get it? — and the vault titles won’t be released until 33 million puzzles are solved.

Swift herself took to social media earlier on Tuesday to tease fans about the Easter eggs. “You can tell me when the *search* is over … if the high was worth the pain,” she quipped via Instagram, referencing the 1989 single “Blank Space.” The post also included a video of the same blue vault releasing five jumbled letters and symbols that include L, S, U, T, an exclamation point and a period. 

While Swifties are usually lightning quick to solve Swift’s riddles — her latest challenge seems to be stumping them more than usual, with fans sharing their impatience via social media. 

Advertisement

“Me checking Taylor Swift google page every single minute just to see ‘check back soon’ while trying to open the vault,” one person commented via X (formerly known as Twitter) alongside a photo of a woman trying to open a safe with a knife and hammer. 

“Swifties typing Taylor Swift into google every 30 seconds trying to get the 1989 TV vault puzzles to work,” another captioned a video of someone typing furiously on their laptop. 

Swift announced the release of 1989 (Taylor’s Version) on August 9 at her final Eras Tour concert in Los Angeles. The singer sported the album’s signature color blue throughout the show before revealing the rerecorded album will drop in October. 

“I figured that [this tour] would be fun but I did not know it would be like this. The last time I was pleasantly surprised by something you guys did was when I announced that I was going to be rerecording my first six albums,” she told the crowd at the time. “And so now here we are, the last night of the U.S. leg of the Eras Tour in the eighth month of the year on the ninth day. You might have noticed there are different outfits in the show. There’s something I’ve been planning for a really, really long time and I think instead of just telling you about it I’ll just show you.” 

Advertisement

Taylor Hill/TAS23/Getty Images for TAS Rights Management

Swift later reflected on what 1989 means to her as an artist — and revealed there would be five never-before-heard songs on Taylor’s Version

“Surprise!! 1989 (Taylor’s Version) is on its way to you ! The 1989 album changed my life in countless ways, and it fills me with such excitement to announce that my version of it will be out October 27th,” she wrote via Instagram. “To be perfectly honest, this is my most FAVORITE re-record I’ve ever done because the 5 From The Vault tracks are so insane. I can’t believe they were ever left behind. But not for long! Pre order 1989 (Taylor’s Version) on my site .”

Fans began theorizing that 1989 (Taylor’s Version) was coming long before she ever announced it, particularly with the release of “Wildest Dreams (Taylor’s Version)” which dropped in March 2021. “This Love (Taylor’s Version)” was later used for seasons 1 and 2 of Prime Video’s The Summer I Turned Pretty, which premiered in June 2022. 

Advertisement

Swift released the original 1989 — a critically acclaimed record that marked her official debut into pop and first collaboration with producer Jack Antonoff — in October 2014, earning her second Album of the Year Grammy in 2016. 

Upon its release, fans heavily theorized the record was a recollection of her on-off relationship with ex-boyfriend Harry Styles — particularly in songs like “Out of the Woods” and “Style.” While Swift never officially confirmed who the songs are about, she told Rolling Stone in February 2015 that “Style” should have just been titled, “I’m Not Even Sorry.’” 

Advertisement

Related: Which Taylor Swift Album Will Be Rerecorded Next? Wild Fan Theories

Are you ready for it? Taylor Swift just released Red (Taylor’s Version), but fans are already thinking about which one of her early albums she’ll rerecord next. The “State of Grace” singer embarked on a mission to rerecord her first six records in 2019 after losing control of her masters in a highly publicized battle […]

“‘Style’ is actually about those relationships that are never really done,” Swift explained during a December 2014 episode of The Morning Show. “You always kind of have that one person who you feel like might interrupt your wedding and be like, ‘Don’t do it, we’re not over yet.’ I think everybody has that one person who kind of floats in and out of their life and the narrative is never truly over.”

1989 (Taylor’s Version) comes after the release of Fearless (Taylor’s Version), Red (Taylor’s Version) and Speak Now (Taylor’s Version) which were dropped in April 2021, October 2021 and July 2023, respectively. Swift’s choice to rerecord her first six albums stems from her losing her masters in 2019 when Scooter Braun purchased her music catalog in a Big Machine Records acquisition. (The music mogul later sold the masters for $300 million to a private equity company.) Her self-titled debut and sixth studio album, Reputation, are the final two re-records yet to be announced.

Taylor Swift is asking fans to fill in the blank space.  Just a few weeks out from the release of her fourth rerecorded album 1989 (Taylor’s Version) — which drops on October 27 — Swift, 33, is doing what she does best: leaving Easter eggs for fans to decode. This time, she’s paired up with 

Advertisement

​   Us Weekly Read More 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advice

How Far Would You Go to Book Your Dream Role?

Published

on

The question Sydney Sweeney’s career forces every serious artist to ask themselves.


Most people say they want to be an actor. But wanting the life and being willing to do what the life requires are two entirely different things. Sydney Sweeney’s performance as Cassie Howard in Euphoria is one of the clearest examples in recent television of what it actually looks like when an artist refuses to protect themselves from the story they are telling.


The Performance That Started a Conversation

Cassie Howard is not a comfortable character to watch. She is messy, desperate, and heartbreakingly human in ways that most scripts would have softened or simplified. Sydney Sweeney did not soften her. She played every scene at full exposure — the breakdowns, the humiliation, the moments where Cassie is both completely wrong and completely understandable at the same time.

What made the performance remarkable was not the difficulty of the scenes. It was the consistency of her commitment to them. Night after night on set, take after take, she showed up and gave the camera something real. That is not a small thing. That is the kind of discipline that separates working actors from generational ones.

Advertisement

What the Industry Does Not Tell You

The entertainment industry sells you a version of success built around talent, timing, and luck. And while all three matter, none of them are the real differentiator in a room full of equally talented people. The real differentiator is willingness — the willingness to be honest, to be vulnerable, and to let the work require something personal from you.

Most actors hit a wall at some point in their career where a role demands more than they have publicly shown before. The ones who say yes to that moment, who trust the material and the director enough to go somewhere uncomfortable, are the ones audiences remember long after the credits roll.

Sydney Sweeney said yes repeatedly. And the industry took notice.


The Question Worth Asking Yourself

Before you answer, really think about it. There is a moment in every serious audition room where someone might ask you to go further than you are comfortable with — to access something real, to stop performing and start revealing. In that moment, you have to decide what your dream is actually worth to you and, more importantly, what parts of yourself you are not willing to trade for it.

That is the question Euphoria quietly raises for anyone watching with ambition in their chest. Not “could I do that,” but “should I ever feel pressured to.” There is a difference between an artist who chooses vulnerability as a creative tool and one who is pressured into exposure they never agreed to. Knowing that difference is not a weakness. It is the most important thing a young actor can understand before they walk into a room that will test it.

Because the only role that truly costs too much is the one that asks you to abandon who you are to play it.

Advertisement
HCFF
HCFF

What You Can Take From This

Whether you are an actor, a filmmaker, a content creator, or someone simply building something from scratch, the principle is the same. The work that connects with people is almost always the work that cost the creator something real. Audiences can feel the difference between performance and truth. They always could.

Sydney Sweeney did not become one of the most talked-about actresses of her generation because she got lucky. She got there because she was willing to be completely, uncomfortably human in front of a camera — and because she knew exactly who she was before she let the role take over.

That combination — full commitment and a clear sense of self — is rarer than talent. And it is the thing worth chasing.


Written for Bolanle Media | Entertainment. Culture. Conversation.


Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Bieber’s Coachella Set Has Everyone Arguing Again

Published

on

And honestly? That might be exactly what he wanted.

Justin Bieber stepped onto the Coachella stage Saturday night as the highest-paid headliner in the festival’s history — reportedly pocketing $10 million — and proceeded to sit down at a laptop and play YouTube videos.

The internet, predictably, lost its mind.


What Actually Happened

This was Bieber’s first major U.S. performance since his Justice era — a long-awaited comeback after battling Ramsay Hunt syndrome in 2022, which caused partial facial paralysis, plus years of mental health struggles and a very public disappearing act from the industry.

Advertisement

The stage setup was minimal: a fluid cocoon-like structure, no backup dancers, no elaborate lighting rigs. Just Bieber, a stool, and a laptop.

He opened with tracks from his 2025 albums Swag and Swag II, then invited the crowd on a journey — “How far back do you go?”

What followed was a nostalgic scroll through his entire career: old YouTube covers before he was famous, classic hits Baby and Never Say Never playing on screen while he sang alongside his younger self. Guests including The Kid Laroi, Wizkid, and Tems joined him throughout the night.

He even played his viral “Standing on Business” paparazzi rant and re-enacted it live, hoodie on, completely unbothered.

Advertisement
HCFF
HCFF

The Moment Nobody Predicted

But here’s what the critics burying him in their hot takes chose not to lead with: Bieber closed his set with worship music.

In the middle of Coachella — one of the most secular stages on the planet — he performed songs rooted in his Christian faith, openly crediting Jesus as the reason he was standing on that stage at all.

It wasn’t subtle. It wasn’t a quick prayer and a thank-you. He leaned into it fully, in front of a crowd of 125,000 people who came expecting pop bangers and got a testimony instead.

For fans who have followed his faith journey — his deep involvement with Hillsong and later Churchome, his baptism in 2014, and his very public declaration that Jesus saved his life during his darkest years — the moment landed like a full-circle miracle.


Why People Are Mad

Critics have been brutal.

Zara Larsson summed up the skeptics perfectly, posting on TikTok: It’s giving let’s smoke and watch YouTube — and that clip went just as viral as the performance itself.

Advertisement

One fan on X wrote: I’m crying, this might actually be the worst performance I’ve ever seen. He’s just playing videos from YouTube… zero effort, pure laziness.”

The comparison to Sabrina Carpenter’s Friday headlining set — elaborate staging, multiple costume changes, celebrity cameos — only made Bieber’s stripped-down show look more controversial.

And the $10 million figure kept coming up. People felt cheated.


Why His Fans Think Everyone’s Missing the Point

Here’s where it gets interesting.

One commenter on X put it best: “He did not force a high-production machine that could burn him out again. Instead, he sat with his past, scrolling through old YouTube videos, duetting with his younger self, and mixing nostalgia with new chapters.”

As the set progressed, Bieber visibly opened up. He removed his sunglasses. He took off his hoodie. He smiled, made jokes about falling through a stage as a teenager.

Advertisement

One Instagram account with millions of followers posted: This Justin Bieber performance healed something in me.”

That healing language is intentional for Bieber — it mirrors how he talks about his faith. In interviews, he has repeatedly said Jesus didn’t just save his career; He saved his life. The worship set at Coachella wasn’t a gimmick. It was a confession.

The Hollywood Reporter noted the performance also sparked a broader debate about double standards — whether a female artist could ever get away with the same low-key approach without being completely destroyed.


The Bigger Picture

Love it or hate it, Bieber’s Coachella set is the most talked-about moment from Weekend One — more than Karol G making history as the first Latina to headline the festival, more than Sabrina Carpenter’s spectacle.

Advertisement

That’s not an accident.

In an era where every headliner tries to out-produce the last one, Bieber walked out with a laptop, a stool, and his faith — and made it personal. For millions of fans watching, the worship songs weren’t filler. They were the point.

Whether you call it lazy or legendary, one thing is clear: Justin Bieber isn’t performing for the critics anymore. He’s performing for an audience of One — and the rest of us just happened to be there.


Drop your take in the comments — was Bieber’s Coachella set lazy, legendary, or something even bigger?

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Vertical Films Changed Everything. Are You Ready?

Published

on

People don’t watch films the way they used to—and if you’re still cutting everything for the big screen first, you’re losing the audience that lives in your pocket.

Every swipe on TikTok is a tiny festival: new voices, wild visuals, heartbreak, comedy, and chaos, all judged in under three seconds. In that world, vertical films aren’t a gimmick. They’re the new front door to your work, your brand, and your career.

The movie theater is now in your hand

Think about where you’ve discovered your favorite clips lately: your phone, in bed, in an Uber, between texts. The “cinema” experience has shrunk into a glowing rectangle we hold inches from our face. That’s intimate. That’s personal. That’s power.

Vertical video fills that space completely. No black bars. No distractions. Just one story, one face, one moment staring back at you. It feels less like “I’m watching a movie” and more like “this is happening to me.” For storytellers, that’s gold.

The old rules still matter—but they bend

Film school taught you:

  • Compose for the wide frame.
  • Let the world breathe at the edges.
  • Save the close-up for maximum impact.

Vertical filmmaking says: bring all of that craft… and then flip it. You still need composition, rhythm, framing, and sound. But now:

  • The close-up is the default, not the climax.
  • Depth replaces width—what’s in front and behind matters more than left and right.
  • Micro-scenes—60 seconds or less—must feel like complete emotional beats.

It’s not “less cinematic.” It’s a different kind of cinematic—one that lives where people already are instead of asking them to come to you.

Your characters can live beyond the film

Here’s the secret no one tells you: audiences don’t just fall in love with stories; they fall in love with people. Vertical video lets your characters exist outside the runtime.

Advertisement

Imagine this:

When someone feels like they “know” a character from their feed, buying a ticket or renting your film stops feeling like a risk. It feels like catching up with a friend.

Behind the scenes is no longer optional

Vertical films thrive on honesty. Shaky behind-the-scenes clips. Laughing fits between takes. The director’s 2 a.m. rant about a shot that won’t work. The makeup artist fixing tears after a heavy scene. That’s the texture that makes people care about the final product.

You don’t have to be perfect. You have to be present.
Ideas you can start capturing tomorrow:

  • “What we can’t afford, so we’re faking it.”
  • “The shot we were scared to try.”
  • “One thing we argued about for three days.”

When you show the process, you’re not just selling a film—you’re inviting people into a journey.

Think in episodes, not posts

Most people treat vertical video like a one-off blast: post, pray, forget. Instead, think like a showrunner.

Ask yourself:

Advertisement
  • If my project were a vertical series, what’s Episode 1? What’s the hook?
  • How can I end each clip with a question, a twist, or a feeling that makes people need the next part?
  • Can I tell one complete emotional story across 10 vertical videos?

Suddenly, your feed isn’t random. It’s a season. People don’t just “like” a video—they “follow” to see what happens next.

HCFF

The attention is real. The opportunity is bigger.

We’re in a rare moment where a micro-drama shot on your phone can sit in the same feed as a studio campaign and still win. A fearless 45-second monologue in a bathroom. A quiet scene of someone deleting a text. A single, wordless push-in on a face that tells the whole story.

Vertical films give you:

  • Low cost, high experimentation.
  • Immediate feedback from real viewers.
  • Proof that your story, your voice, your world can hold attention.

You don’t have to wait for permission, a greenlight, or a perfect budget. You can start where you are, with what you have, and let the audience tell you what’s working.

So, are you ready?

Some filmmakers will roll their eyes and call vertical a phase. They’ll keep making beautiful work that no one sees until a festival says it exists. Others will treat every swipe, every scroll, and every tiny screen as a chance to connect, teach, provoke, and move people.

Those are the filmmakers whose names we’ll be hearing in five years.

The question isn’t whether vertical films are “real cinema.” The question is: when the next person scrolls past your work, do they feel nothing—or do they stop, stare, and think, “I need more of this”?

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Subscribe for the updates!