News
The Fall of a Fraudulent Psychologist in the Digital Age

In today’s digital era, the internet has become a vast marketplace for knowledge, advice, and self-improvement. Yet, the recent scandal involving Sadia Khan—a self-proclaimed licensed psychologist and dating coach—brings to light a worrisome truth: the crisis of online expertise, where appearance often supersedes authenticity, and the lines between legitimate credentials and fabricated personas blur dangerously.

The Illusion of Authority
Sadia Khan positioned herself as a respected figure in the fields of psychology and relationship counseling, offering guidance to thousands. However, a rigorous investigation revealed that her claims were largely fabricated. Khan is not licensed as a psychologist anywhere, and many of her purported degrees and certifications are either fake, photoshopped, or sourced from dubious institutions masquerading as legitimate. This exploitation of trust underlines a systemic problem where digital audiences frequently accept credentials at face value without adequate verification.
The Fallout of Deception
Beyond the issue of false qualifications, Khan’s behavior illuminates a deeper breach of professional conduct. Reports surfaced of her harassing critics online, issuing threats, and engaging in highly unprofessional conduct inconsistent with ethical standards expected from genuine therapists. Such conduct not only harms individuals but also jeopardizes public confidence in bona fide mental health professionals striving to maintain integrity online.

The Conflation of Identity and Deflection
Khan’s defense partially relied on invoking her identity as a brown-skinned Muslim woman, claiming she faces disproportionate scrutiny compared to her white counterparts. While racial and gender bias in digital spaces is a legitimate concern, her repeated weaponization of identity to deflect valid questions about her integrity complicates the discourse. This illustrates how identity can both empower and shield, but should never obscure the need for accountability in expertise.
The Wider Implications for Digital Consumers
This scandal serves as a cautionary tale for consumers navigating online advice. It underscores the necessity of vigilance—seeking transparency, demanding evidence of credentials, and recognizing that charisma and polished online personas are not substitutes for genuine expertise. The high fees Khan charged, purportedly for exclusive coaching services, raise concerning questions about exploitation under the guise of authority.
A Call for Accountability and Authenticity
The Sadia Khan case forces a reflection on the broader crisis of expertise in the internet age. As digital influence grows, so does the responsibility of creators to uphold honesty, and for platforms and audiences to cultivate critical thinking. Authentic voices rooted in real qualifications and ethical conduct must be elevated. Only through fostering transparency and demanding integrity can the digital community rebuild trust and ensure that expertise online serves its true purpose: to educate, support, and uplift.

The unmasking of Sadia Khan stands not just as an isolated incident but a microcosm of a much larger problem—the erosion of genuine expertise in an environment ripe for deception. For anyone seeking guidance online, her story is a stark reminder: to look beyond the surface, question claims boldly, and prioritize substance over showmanship.
News
From Failing 39 Times to Fortune: The Ultimate Comeback Story

In the world of entrepreneurship, failure often teaches more than success ever could. But for one relentless entrepreneur, failure wasn’t a chapter — it was 39 of them. What set his story apart was not just his endurance but his pivotal 40th business, which transformed $10,000 in savings into a $100 million empire within five years.

The Turning Point
After decades of setbacks across nearly forty ventures, he found inspiration in the most unexpected place — a meeting where someone blew what looked like smoke into the air. It wasn’t smoke at all — it was vapor from an electronic cigarette. He realized instantly that this was a revolution waiting to happen. That spark became the foundation for Logic, the brand that would eventually dominate the U.S. e-cigarette market.
Armed with just $10,000, he dove in headfirst. Instead of chasing investors or waiting for ideal conditions, he took a raw, hands-on approach. He spent twenty hours a day visiting stores, personally pitching his product: a safer alternative to traditional cigarettes. His enthusiasm was contagious — customers responded, retailers stocked up, and soon his brand was in thousands of locations nationwide.
The $10,000 Bet That Changed Everything
Unlike many startups that rely on outside funding, he bootstrapped his way forward. That $10,000 became his symbol of focus and scrappiness. Every sale mattered. Every conversation counted. And unlike businesses before it, this idea had a mission behind it — to help millions quit deadly cigarette habits through healthier alternatives.
Within 18 months, Logic reached over 100,000 distribution points. In less than five years, it crossed $100 million in revenue and was eventually acquired by Japan Tobacco through Goldman Sachs, a deal that validated every failure that came before it.

The “Focus Group” Hack That Made History
One of his most genius moves wasn’t about technology at all — it was marketing mastery. Without the funds for a formal focus group, he looked for a loophole that would give him legitimacy in the marketplace. Instead of spending $250,000 on a focus group study, he trademarked the phrase “The Most Trusted Brand” under the electronic cigarette category. Because it was a registered brand, he could legally make that claim — no focus group needed.
This trademark became a powerful differentiator. Soon, the slogan appeared on 2,000 New York City taxis, wrapping the streets in brand visibility. Retailers across the East Coast recognized it, and the brand’s credibility skyrocketed overnight, all thanks to one creative legal maneuver.
Lessons from the 40th Business
His story underscores a timeless entrepreneurial truth: persistence always beats perfection. The 39 failed ventures weren’t wasted — they honed his instincts, sharpened his resilience, and taught him how to recognize opportunity when it appeared.
From guerrilla marketing to working store-to-store, his journey reflects the grit every entrepreneur must channel to break through. When the 40th business finally hit, it wasn’t luck — it was the cumulative reward of decades of failure, refined into wisdom.
His words capture the essence of his journey best: “Volume negates luck. Every no is a step closer to a yes.” After 39 failures, that 40th “yes” became the billion-dollar answer he had worked his whole life to find.
Entertainment
Selling Your Soul in Hollywood: The Hidden Cost of Fame

By all appearances, Hollywood is a dream factory — a place where charisma, talent, and luck collide to create stars. But behind the camera lights and red carpets lies a conversation few inside the industry speak openly about: the spiritual and moral price of ambition.

For actor Omar Gooding, the idea of “selling your soul” in Hollywood isn’t a metaphor — it’s a moral process that begins with tiny compromises. In an October 2025 interview, Gooding explained that no one in Hollywood makes a literal deal with the devil. Instead, it’s the quiet yeses, the moments when comfort overrides conviction, that mark the beginning of the trade. “They don’t say, ‘Take this or you’ll never make it,’” he said. “They just put it in front of you. You choose.”
Those choices, he argues, create a pattern. Once you show that you’ll accept something you once resisted, the industry notices. “Hollywood knows who it can get away with what,” Gooding said. “One thing always leads to another.” The phrase “selling your soul,” in this context, means losing your say — doing what you’re told rather than what you believe in.
That moral tension has long shadowed the arts. Comedians like Dave Chappelle, who famously walked away from millions to preserve his creative integrity, often serve as examples of where conviction and career collide. In resurfaced interviews, Chappelle hinted that he felt manipulated and silenced by powerful figures who sought control of his narrative, warning that “they’re trying to convince me I’m insane.”
This isn’t just about conspiracy — it’s about agency. Hollywood runs on perception. Performers are rewarded for being agreeable, moldable, entertaining. Those who question the machine or refuse the script risk exile, while those who conform are elevated — sometimes beyond what they can handle.
“We see the ‘collections’ all the time,” Gooding explained. “When the bill comes due, you can tell. They made that deal long ago.”

But the story doesn’t end in darkness. Gooding also emphasizes that in today’s entertainment landscape, artists have more control than ever. With streaming, social media, and creator‑driven platforms, performers don’t have to “play the game” to be seen. Independent creators can build their own stages, speak their own truths, and reach millions without trading authenticity for access.
Still, the temptation remains — recognition, validation, quick success. And every generation of artists must answer the same question: What are you willing to do for fame?
As Gooding put it, “You just make the best choices you can. Because once it’s gone — your name, your peace, your soul — there’s no buying it back.”
Entertainment
California Bans AI Clones from Replacing Real Talent

California just made a dramatic stand for human creativity, defeating the threat of AI actor clones with a sweeping new law that puts people—not algorithms—back in the Hollywood spotlight. With the stroke of Governor Gavin Newsom’s pen in October 2025, the state has sent a clear message to studios, tech companies, and the world: entertainment’s heart belongs to those who create and perform, not to digital facsimiles.
California Draws a Hard Line: No More AI Clones
For months, the entertainment industry has been divided over the use of artificial intelligence in filmmaking. Studios, lured by promises of cost-cutting and creative flexibility, have invested in software that can mimic an actor’s face, voice, and even emotional range. But for performers, this wave of synthetic reproduction has triggered alarm—encouraged by chilling stories of deepfakes, unauthorized digital doubles, and contracts that let studios reuse a star’s likeness indefinitely, sometimes without pay or approval.
The new California law, anchored by AB 2602 and AB 1836, changes everything:
- Every contract must explicitly detail how studios can use digital replicas or voice models, preventing once-common “blank check” agreements that overlooked this risk.
- No one—not studios nor streaming giants—can create or release AI-generated clones of an actor, living or dead, without clear, written consent from the performer or their estate.
- The law gives families new powers to defend loved ones from posthumous deepfake exploitation, closing painful loopholes that once let virtual versions of late icons appear in new ads, films, or games.
Actors Celebrate a Major Victory
The legislation rides the momentum of the recent SAG-AFTRA strike, where real-life talent demanded control over their own digital destinies. Leaders say these protections will empower artists to negotiate fair contracts and refuse participation in projects that cross ethical lines, restoring dignity and choice in an industry threatened by silent algorithms.
Stars, unions, and advocacy groups are hailing the law as the most robust defense yet against unwanted AI replications.
As one actor put it, “This isn’t just about money—it’s about identity, legacy, and respect for real artists in a synthetic age.”
A New Chapter for the Entertainment Industry
California’s move isn’t just a victory for local talent—it’s a warning shot to studios everywhere. Companies will now be forced to rethink production pipelines, consult legal counsel, and obtain proper clearance before digitally cloning anyone. Global entertainment platforms and tech developers will need to comply if they want to do business in the world’s entertainment capital.

These laws also set a template likely to ripple through other creative fields, from musicians whose voices can be synthesized to writers whose work could be mimicked by generative AI. For now, California performers finally have a powerful shield, ready to fight for the right to shape their own public image.
Conclusion: Human Talent Takes Center Stage
With its no-nonsense ban on AI actor clones, California draws a bold line, championing the work, likeness, and very humanity of its creative stars. It’s a landmark step that forces the entertainment industry to choose: respect real talent, or face real consequences. The age of the consentless digital double is over—human performers remain the true source of Hollywood magic.
- Business4 weeks ago
Disney Loses $3.87 Billion as Subscription Cancellations Surge After Kimmel Suspension
- Entertainment4 weeks ago
What the Deletion Frenzy Reveals in the David and Celeste Tragedy
- Entertainment4 weeks ago
Executive Producer Debut: How Celia Carver Created Festival Hit ‘Afterparty’
- Health4 weeks ago
Russia Claims 100% Success With New mRNA Cancer Vaccine
- Business3 weeks ago
Why Are Influencers Getting $7K to Post About Israel?
- Health4 weeks ago
Why Did Gen Z QUIT Drinking Alcohol?
- Advice4 weeks ago
How AI Is Forcing Everyone Into the Entrepreneur Game
- Entertainment3 weeks ago
Keith Urban and Nicole Kidman Split After 20 Years as Actress Files for Divorce