Connect with us

Entertainment

Shannon Beador Melts Down at Housewives After “Rat Feeding Frenzy” Over … on August 10, 2023 at 7:13 pm The Hollywood Gossip

Published

on

You know how Shannon Beador dressed up as Gina Kirschenheiter? For better or for worse, it was part of a costumed party.

On The Real Housewives of Orange County, this lighthearted get-together took a turn for the serious.

First, Shannon confronted Heather Dubrow over “concerns” about Shannon’s relationship. But this wasn’t really about Heather.

It ended with Shannon having a tearful, yelling meltdown — declaring that she has never been more in love. Despite their “fights that paralyze” her. And a whole lot of other stuff.

Advertisement

Shannon Beador arrives at the You Do Me And I’ll Do You Party, dressed as Gina Kirschenheiter. Sort of. (Bravo)

It all started off so fun and carefree. Mostly.

Okay, Shannon’s decision to dress as Gina’s most busted looks — from when her life was in shambles — was not a tasteful choice.

Some costumes were better. We loved Gina’s (the real Gina’s) booty when she dressed as Emily. Emily falling for real while dressed as Shannon was very on-the-nose.

Advertisement

Vicki Gunvalson makes the most of her “Friend” role, doing a keg stand. (Bravo)

It’s unclear why producers decided to prolong Vicki’s “Friend” role so much this season.

Either way, she used it as an opportunity to show off her keg stand skills.

Like we said, standard pre-drama shenanigans.

Advertisement

It turns out that Heather Dubrow and Tamra Judge have different ideas about what it means to be Heather. (Bravo)

Even the initial “conflicts” were pretty friendly.

Tamra, dressed as Heather, decided to make it a little bawdier than Heather would have.

But there wasn’t real animosity. Not yet, anyway.

Advertisement

Indoors at the You Do Me And I Do You party on RHOC, Emily Simpson and Gina Kirschenheiter compare notes. (Bravo)

But inside, Emily Simpson and Gina Kirschenheiter compared notes.

Shannon has spoken to both of them about her relationship. But she has done this separately. There’s a lot of that going around, and people are starting to notice.

Interestingly, they have different perspectives on Heather’s role in this. Gina sees Heather as just another concerned friend. Emily seems to see her as stirring the pot.

Advertisement

Wearing a frightful wig, Shannon Beador confronts a castmate for allegedly gossiping about her. (Bravo)

As darkness falls, Shannon sits a short distance from the group, chatting with Heather.

She is now under the impression that Heather is spilling the beans of what she’s confided in her.

(Remember, Tamra has led Shannon to believe that people know what they know about her relationship issues from Heather)

Advertisement

Here, Heather Dubrow listens to Shannon Beador’s complaints. (Bravo)

But Heather Dubrow has no interest in taking the blame for this.

One, she resents the implication that she cannot keep a secret.

And second … it’s not a secret. Because Shannon has told a lot of things to a lot of Housewives.

Advertisement

Emily Simpson opines about how one of her castmates likes to share things one-on-one but doesn’t ever want the information to be a topic of discussion. (Bravo)

At the table, Emily makes a similar point.

She knows that Shannon wants to talk with people one-on-one about all of this, but does not want it to become a topic of discussion.

But when everyone knows the same stuff … Emily describes it as a bit “unfair.”

Advertisement

Heather Dubrow makes some solid points about her castmate’s priorities while speaking to the confessional camera during Season 17. (Bravo)

To the confessional camera, Heather observes that Shannon seems to really focus upon who is saying what about her relationship.

Heather would rather see her focus upon the relationship itself.

She sees a lot of problems. And she’s far from alone.

Advertisement

Shannon Beador discusses her (now former) relationship while wearing pink during Season 17. (Bravo)

But, during her own confessional, Shannon cannot stop raving about John Janssen.

She praises his treatment of her and her daughters. According to her, this is the most she’s loved someone, and the best relationship of her life.

Considering everything that we heard later in the episode … that is so profoundly sad.

Advertisement

Shannon Beador and Heather Dubrow face off over who is discussing what about Shannon’s relationship. (Bravo)

Simply put, Heather says, she has voiced concerns.

That’s it.

She’s not spreading information, just her opinions about the relationship as a whole. And the people to whom she’s speaking already know — because Shannon has spoken to them, too.

Advertisement

In hushed whispers, Tamra Judge begins to ask her castmates “Did Heather talk to you?” (Bravo)

Back at the table, Tamra is quietly asking people if Heather has spoken to them.

She’s not being loud. But she’s also not being subtle.

Heather picks up instantly on the whispering that’s going on.

Advertisement

Heather Dubrow and Shannon Beador turn their attentions towards the larger table and the women who are sitting at it. (Bravo)

As Heather asks Tamra what she’s whispering about, the two conversations merge.

Not everyone is on the same page, however.

But the crux of it all is that everyone is talking about Shannon’s relationship. And that’s a nightmare for her.

Advertisement

Not everyone on the RHOC 17 cast sees eye to eye on who is being reasonable here. (Bravo)

As far as Shannon is concerned, this conversation is just a “rat feeding frenzy.”

Speaking frankly, she clearly feels extremely insecure in her relationship.

If her fear is that mere talk about the romance is going to kill it, it’s dying anyway.

Advertisement

“You owe my boyfriend a HUGE f–king apology,” Shannon Beador declares to her castmates. But is she right? (Bravo)

Standing up, a furious Shannon tells everyone — but especially Gina, it seems — “You owe my boyfriend a huge f–king apology.”

For … discussing their relationship?

John Janssen may be a private man, but … that’s not Gina’s fault. Or Heather’s or Tamra’s or Emily’s.

Advertisement

Gina Kirschenheiter points out a clear double standard that her longtime castmate clearly has. (Bravo)

But Gina wants to point out two things.

First, that Shannon has discussed other people’s relationships the entire dang time. She’s being a hypocrite.

And second, that everyone — including Heather — is just expressing their concern. Worrying is just that.

Advertisement

“I’ve never been more in love,” Shannon Beador loudly and angrily declares to her castmates on RHOC 17. (Bravo)

Shannon Beador makes her dramatic exit from the outdoor dining area, while Taylor Armstrong doesn’t know what to make of it. Vicki Gunvalson seemed to want to stay out of it for the moment. (Bravo)

At this point, Shannon has had enough.

Advertisement

She just about crab-walks away as she grows increasingly irate.

And friends like Emily and Tamra following her to try to console her doesn’t help.

“This is my LIFE,” Shannon Beador furiously hisses up at Emily Simpson. (Bravo)

The veins and tendons showing on her neck, Shannon hisses that “this is my LIFE!”

Advertisement

Emily is trying to console and reassure her.

But it’s just not working.

Heather Dubrow asks why her castmate, Emily Simpson, seems to have it out for her. (Bravo)

Given that she’s not exactly masterminding a takedown, Heather asks why this is all about her.

Advertisement

When Tamra confronts Heather, believing that Heather is blaming Tamra, Heather tells her that it’s untrue.

As a rewind illustrates, Heather simply told Shannon that “all of these girls” were discussing her relationship. Which is true. Heather didn’t single out Tamra.

Emily Simpson needed to remind Shannon Beador that they have spoken about certain topics more than the latter seems to remember. (Bravo)

Shannon seems to think that she has only spoken to Emily about her relationship issues once, years ago.

Advertisement

No, baby.

Emily tells her that they have had many conversations about John. Emily has heard more than enough directly from Shannon.

Emily Simpson summarizes her castmate’s relationship issue: he’s not invested, and she can do better. (Bravo)

To the confessional camera, at first, Emily just shares that John doesn’t seem fully invested and that Shannon can do better.

Advertisement

Heather gets more specific, noting many things — like that he’s apparently never stayed over — as red flags.

And later, Emily tells the camera that John has insulted Shannon, calling her “fat” as an insult. Dealbreaker stuff that Shannon has seemingly chosen to ignore.

According to Shannon Beador, the fact that her relationship is a topic of discussion on RHOC means that it will end. (Bravo)

At this point, Shannon is completely losing it.

Advertisement

Emily cannot calm her. Vicki cannot calm her.

She’s admonishing castmates and producers alike that none of this can be the on-screen topic of discussion. (Girl, then don’t have a meltdown about it)

Outside, Shannon Beador whirls around and asks producers to stop following her, on the grounds that she is not “a crazy person.” (Bravo)

But Shannon doesn’t think that she’s having a meltdown.

Advertisement

Insisting that she’s “not a crazy person,” Shannon tells anyone who will listen that she and John simply have “normal fights.”

No. They are not normal or healthy, by the sound of it.

As Vicki Gunvalson and Tamra Judge listen with concern, Shannon Beador says that she has “normal fights” with her boyfriend “that paralyze” her. She has said this more than once. (Bravo)

Inside, Emily and Heather talk things out a little. And Gina comes to mediate.

Advertisement

They again talk about how Shannon worries that John will leave her when hears about any of this.

That’s not necessarily a bad thing. As Emily said, Shannon deserves better.

Shannon Beador Melts Down at Housewives After “Rat Feeding Frenzy” Over … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

You know how Shannon Beador dressed up as Gina Kirschenheiter? For better or for worse, it was part of a …
Shannon Beador Melts Down at Housewives After “Rat Feeding Frenzy” Over … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip. 

Advertisement

​   The Hollywood Gossip Read More 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

STREAMING PREMIERE · JUNE 13, 2026

Published

on

Laughter Meets Inspiration: Our Ladies Show Lands on The Roku Channel

A bold new sketch comedy series for women premieres June 13 across the U.S., U.K., and Canada — arriving on the back of a festival-winning run that has critics and audiences already paying attention.

It isn’t every day a brand-new comedy arrives already wearing a row of trophies. Our Ladies Show does. The seven-episode inspirational sketch comedy series — created, written by, and starring Christin Jezak — begins streaming on The Roku Channel on Friday, June 13, 2026, available free to viewers in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada.

Produced in partnership with global media services leader Encompass Digital Media, the series sets out to do something rare in today’s streaming landscape: make women laugh out loud and leave them lifted. In a media moment crowded with noise and cynicism, Our Ladies Show is a deliberate counterweight — comedy with a conscience, built for women of every age and background.

A Show Built Around Real Life — and Real Laughs

Each of the seven episodes opens with a monologue from one of the cast members introducing the theme, then rolls into three or more sketches that hit the subject from every comedic angle. The series tackles the things women actually carry: holding grudges, comparison, beauty, patience, gift giving, the importance of community, and dealing with anxiety.

The comedy comes from a place of warmth rather than mockery — a “laugh at ourselves” spirit that runs through a gallery of unforgettable characters: a nosey neighbor, an overwhelmed mom, relentlessly optimistic flight attendants, beauty pageant winners past their prime, and a crew of unruly campers with a counselor who simply cannot hold it together.

Advertisement

Then the show does something most sketch series don’t. In the final segment of every episode, the cast gathers in a living-room setting and invites the audience in — sharing real inspiration drawn from the theme, the sketches, and their own personal stories. It’s the moment the laughter turns into something that stays with you.

The Women Behind the Show

Our Ladies Show brings together three performers with serious range:

  • Christin Jezak — creator, writer, and star (Miracle at Manchester, Raising Hope, Jimmy Kimmel Live!)
  • Hillary Hawkins — (Primal, Nick Jr.’s Play Along, Gullah Gullah Island)
  • Sarah Hernandez — (Nefarious, Unplanned, House of Payne)

“In a world with so much division and depression, I hope women of all ages and backgrounds will watch this show, laugh, be reminded of how beautiful, unique, and loved they are, and remember how much we need each other.”— Christin Jezak, Creator & Star

Already a Festival Favorite

The series’ recurring long-form sketch, Neighborhood Watch, didn’t arrive quietly. Originally released as a web series and revamped for Our Ladies Show with new footage, sound, and music, it has been sweeping the festival circuit:

  • 🏆 Best Webseries — 2026 New Media Film Festival (Los Angeles)
  • 🏆 Best Web/TV Series — Paris Film Awards
  • 🏆 Best Web Series — Dallas Movie Awards
  • 🏅 Additional wins at the London Movie Awards, Florence Film Awards, and Hollywood Gold Awards
  • 🎬 Official Selection — 2026 Harvard Divinity School Film Fest
  • ⭐ Finalist — Houston Comedy Film Festival
  • 📣 Three nominations — 2025 Content Christian Media Conference, including Best Actress in a TV and Web Series nods for both Christin Jezak and Sarah Hernandez

Where and When to Watch

Our Ladies Show premieres Friday, June 13, 2026, streaming on The Roku Channel — the home of premium and free entertainment — in the U.S., U.K., and Canada. All seven episodes deliver the series’ signature blend of sharp sketch comedy and genuine encouragement.

Click Here To Get Tickets

Watch the trailer now on your platform of choice:

For more information, visit www.ourladiesshow.com and follow @ourladiesshow on Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok.


About Christin Jezak

Christin Jezak has worked for over 15 years in the entertainment industry. She created and stars in Our Ladies Show and the award-winning web series Neighborhood Watch. She produced the EWTN TV program For the Sake of the Gospel and the all-women web series Ladies Keepin’ It Real, played Dr. Sam in Miracle at Manchester (starring Dean Cain, Daniel Roebuck, and Eddie McClintock), and voices Agnes in the podcast Confessions of a Catholic Single. She held a lead role in a short film for NTT Data directed by Academy Award–winning cinematographer Janusz Kamiński, has co-starred on Raising Hope, and appeared in Jimmy Kimmel sketches and a Grubhub Super Bowl commercial.

About The Roku Channel

Roku pioneered streaming on TV and is the #1 TV streaming platform in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico by hours streamed (Hypothesis Group, Dec. 2025). The Roku Channel is the home of premium and free entertainment, alongside Roku’s Howdy and Frndly TV services. Roku is headquartered in San Jose, California.

About Encompass Digital Media

Encompass Digital Media is a global managed services company — technology-driven, software-defined, and people-powered. Trusted by world-leading broadcasters, networks, sports rights-holders, and OTT platforms, it processes over 25,000 hours of content daily, serves 850 channels to 84 countries, distributes over 243,000 live events annually, and reaches 400 million radio listeners weekly worldwide. Learn more at www.encompass.tv.

Media & Interview Requests: To interview creator Christin Jezak or the cast, contact Christin at cjezak@p2ptheatre.com.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

What Filmmakers Should Actually Steal From Euphoria

Published

on

Most of the talk about Euphoria asks one question: was it realistic? That’s the wrong question if you make films. The better one is simpler. How did Sam Levinson get an audience to feel addiction from the inside? And what did it cost him to end the show the way he did?

Strip away the noise and Euphoria is a clinic in three choices: point of view, style, and the ending. Here’s what’s worth taking — and what isn’t.

1. Put the Camera Inside the Character

Most shows about drugs watch from across the room. Euphoria doesn’t. When Rue is high, the camera is high too. Walls breathe. Floors tilt. Time skips. You’re not watching her — you’re stuck inside her head.

That’s the lesson: point of view is a decision you make with the camera and the cut, not a mood you add later in color. Levinson builds it into the lens, the blocking, and the edit.

So before you shoot a scene through a character’s eyes, ask one thing on set: whose eyes is this lens standing in for? Then make every cut respect that.

2. Your Style Has to Mean Something

The glitter. The slow push-ins. The impossible club lighting. Euphoria‘s look got copied everywhere. That’s the trap.

Advertisement

The style worked because it carried weight. The beauty wasn’t decoration — it was the lie addiction tells you, the reason the next high looks worth it. The camera made self-destruction gorgeous on purpose.

The copies missed that. A thousand music videos took the look and left the meaning behind, and you can feel how hollow they are. So here’s the test: if your signature style could be swapped onto any other project and still “work,” it’s not a style. It’s a filter. Every choice should have a reason behind it.

3. The Ending Tells the Audience What It All Meant

When Euphoria ended for good in Season 3, Levinson killed Rue — an accidental, fentanyl-laced overdose. He called it “the honest ending,” saying he wanted to tell a true story about addiction and grief in a time when one mistake can be the last one. Reportedly, that wasn’t the original plan; the death of Angus Cloud, who played Fezco, changed the script.

Forget whether you agree with the choice. Study how it works. An ending is the last instruction you give your audience about how to read everything before it.

By ending on consequence instead of recovery, Levinson reframed seven years of beautiful chaos as a story about cost — not a celebration of it.

It’s also the show’s most debatable move, and that’s worth noticing too. A show that spent years making pain look beautiful had to fight to make that pain land as loss. Did it earn the ending, or enjoy the wreckage too long to stick it? Smart filmmakers will disagree — and that argument is exactly what a good ending is supposed to start.

Advertisement

What Not to Take

The neon grief is the most copied part. It’s also the least useful. Take the surface — the colors, the slow-mo, the trauma-as-texture — and you get the costume without the body.

The real craft is underneath. Commit your camera to a real point of view. Make every stylistic choice earn its place. Treat your ending as the point of the whole thing. Do that, and your work won’t look like Euphoria. It’ll do what Euphoria did.


This piece touches on addiction and substance use. If you or someone you know is struggling, support is available through the SAMHSA National Helpline at 1-800-662-4357.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

How a 22-Person Film Crew Each Walked Away With $300,000

Published

on

In the spring of 2020, with Hollywood shut down and most film workers suddenly out of a job, Zendaya made a movie in a single house with a crew of 22. The film was Malcolm & Marie. What happened to that crew afterward is the part worth paying attention to — and it’s quietly become a blueprint indie filmmakers are borrowing five years later.

Instead of paying everyone the standard flat day rate and sending them home, Zendaya structured the production so the crew owned a piece of it. They received “points” — a share of the film’s revenue.

When Malcolm & Marie sold to Netflix for roughly $30 million, those points turned into real money. Because one point typically equals 1%, a single point on that sale was worth around $300,000.

For a crew used to being paid by the day, that’s a life-changing number.

The Math That Makes It Click

The reason points are so powerful is that their value scales with the film, not with your hours on set:

Advertisement
  • At $30 million in revenue, 1% equals $300,000
  • At $50 million, 1% equals $500,000
  • At $100 million, 1% equals $1 million

Now hold that against traditional indie crew pay, which runs roughly $300 to $800 per day. A 20-day shoot totals somewhere between $6,000 and $16,000 — full stop, no upside, no matter how well the film does. The points model flips the entire logic: you stop getting paid for time and start getting paid for success.

This Isn’t New — It’s Just Newly Accessible

Backend deals are how the biggest names in Hollywood get rich. Robert Downey Jr. reportedly earned tens of millions from his Avengers: Endgame backend; Keanu Reeves made a fortune off The Matrix through profit participation. The leverage to demand that kind of deal has always belonged to A-list stars.

What changed with Malcolm & Marie is who got a seat at the table. Zendaya didn’t reserve the points for herself and a couple of producers — she extended them to the crew, the people she described as laying the tracks and doing the heavy lifting. That’s the shift indie filmmakers are now studying: ownership as something you share down the call sheet, not hoard at the top.

Why Indie Filmmakers Should Care

Advertisement

Independent films usually run on budgets between $50,000 and $500,000, where labor can eat up 40% to 60% of total costs. That creates a permanent squeeze: how do you attract genuinely skilled people without torching the budget before you’ve shot a frame?

Equity is the pressure valve. Offering ownership instead of higher upfront pay lets you reduce immediate production costs, attract more experienced collaborators, and — maybe most importantly — build a team that actually wants the film to win.

How to Apply It to Your Own Project

You don’t need a $30 million Netflix sale for this to work. Say your budget is $250,000 and your revenue goal is $500,000, making 1% worth $5,000. Instead of stretching cash thin across every line item, you might offer 1% to a cinematographer, 1% to an editor, and 1–2% to a producer. You preserve cash during production and hand your key people a real reason to overdeliver.

Ownership Changes How People Show Up

Advertisement

A stake rewires behavior. People who own a piece of the outcome stay sharper on set, pitch in on marketing and promotion without being asked, and stay invested long after wrap. That last part matters more than it sounds — a crew that’s financially tied to the film becomes part of its distribution engine, not just its production.

Read the Fine Print

Equity is not a salary, and it’s honest to say so. Malcolm & Marie worked because it sold to Netflix at a high price — that’s the upside scenario, not a guarantee. If a project underperforms, points can be worth little or nothing. So if you use this model, do it cleanly: define revenue participation explicitly in contracts, spell out recoupment structures so everyone knows who gets paid and in what order, and offer partial upfront payment where you can to balance the risk. The whole thing runs on trust, and trust runs on transparency.

The Bigger Picture

What Zendaya pulled off with a 22-person crew in one house pointed to something larger about how creative work gets valued. In an industry where funding is the hardest wall to climb, ownership has become its own currency. You may not control access to millions in financing — but you fully control how value gets shared on your set. And that, more often than not, is the difference between a film that stalls in development and one that actually gets made.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending