Connect with us

World News

Netanyahu tests Biden’s patience as war pressure builds on January 24, 2024 at 11:00 am

Published

on

President Biden’s relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is showing new signs of strain amid the Gaza War, which has put both leaders under extraordinary political pressure.

Biden has stood firm in defense of Israel despite intense backlash among voters calling for a ceasefire, and Democratic lawmakers appalled at a Palestinian death toll of nearly 25,000 people. 

But Netanyahu’s rejection of Biden’s push for a two-state solution in a day-after scenario for the Gaza Strip is challenging Biden’s efforts to stand strong in the face of Israel’s critics. The Israeli leader also appears to be blocking U.S. efforts to broker a new hostage deal.

“What’s happening now is that Prime Minister Netanyahu is rebuffing the Biden administration at virtually every turn,” said Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.).

Advertisement

“Ignoring their entreaties, slapping down the proposal to move quickly toward a two-state solution, I would think there’s a point when the Biden administration runs out of patience, they have a lot more patience than I would. I think that Prime Minister Netanyahu’s actions are hurting Israel and I think they’re hurting the United States.” 

Since Israel launched its retaliatory war following Hamas’ Oct. 7 terrorist attack, Biden and his senior aides have sought to strike a delicate balance between unqualified support for Israel’s stated goal to defeat Hamas militarily, and confronting the horrendous humanitarian toll on Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. 

On top of the deaths, the vast majority of Gaza’s population of more than 2 million people has been forced out of their homes and face rampant crises of hunger and disease.

“The administration wants to see more done on humanitarian assistance, they want to continue to see fewer civilian Palestinian casualties,” said Dennis Ross, a veteran Middle East peace negotiator across Republican and Democrat administrations, and distinguished fellow with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Advertisement

Ross said reports that Biden is frustrated and running out of patience with the Israeli leader is “a function of people below the president who are also dealing with pressures internationally and wanting to show that we’re putting pressure on Netanyahu.”

The White House has rejected calls for a ceasefire and argued one would only help Hamas, but the administration is putting its support behind efforts to pause the fighting for weeks to allow for humanitarian groups to aid Palestinians and help secure the release of about 100 hostages.

“We are in serious discussions about trying to get another pause in place,” White House National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby said on Tuesday, amid reports that Israel had offered a two-month pause in fighting in exchange for Hamas releasing hostages.

But Netanyahu has signaled he’s not interested in U.S. calls to restrain Israel’s military operation in the Gaza Strip. 

Advertisement

“Only total victory will ensure the elimination of Hamas and the return of all our hostages. I told President Biden this in our conversation over the weekend,” Netanyahu said on Sunday.

Netanyahu has further rejected Biden’s calls to establish a Palestinian state in a day-after scenario for Hamas’s defeat in the Gaza Strip, saying Israel must retain security control over Palestinian territories.

Biden has publicly played down these differences.

“There are a number of types of two-state solutions. There’s a number of countries that are members of the UN that are still — don’t have their own militaries,” Biden told reporters last week. “And so I think there’s ways in which this could work.”

Advertisement

Ross said the president’s response was likely influenced by Netanyahu — commonly called Bibi — when the two spoke on Jan. 19. 

“What that reflected was clearly, Bibi said something to him privately in a way that led him to say that,” he said.

“Meaning, this was Bibi talking about, if you’re talking about a state that’s demilitarized, then we’re talking about a different kind of state. There’s different kinds of states that don’t pose a threat to us that we could accept  — so that allows Biden to say this.” 

Biden has not shied away from criticizing Netanyahu in public throughout the two leaders’ nearly 40 years of knowing each other, spanning Netanyahu’s early diplomatic career in the U.S. and Biden’s time as Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman.

Advertisement

Biden, as President Obama’s vice president, had a front-row seat to some of the most fraught times in U.S. and Israel relations – from the failure of the U.S.-led peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians to Netanyahu’s lobbying Congress against Obama’s efforts for a nuclear deal with Iran. 

And throughout 2023, Biden has raised alarm over the Israeli leaders’ embrace of far-right fringe politicians and pursuit of judicial reforms that had sparked wide-spread protests in the months preceding Oct. 7. 

But the president is using significant political capital to stand alongside Netanyahu, with an increasing number of Democratic lawmakers pushing for a ceasefire, protests and some resignations among staff at federal agencies, and protests staged outside his campaign events across the country. 

Pro-Palestine advocates have warned that Bicen’s staunch support for Israel, even amid the carnage in Gaza, could cost him crucial votes in swing states like Michigan. 

Advertisement

Still, the majority of U.S. public opinion is in support of Israel in its war against Hamas, which slaughtered an estimated 1,200 people in southern Israel and took 240 people hostage – dozens who have since been released in U.S. brokered deals. 

“This is an extremely sensitive year in the United States. No serious presidential contender would basically take on either Netanyahu or Israel,” said Fawaz Gerges, professor of international relations and Middle Eastern politics at the London School of Economics. 

“Between now and the elections, the Biden team will not do anything to either anger or upset or really engage in any public spat with Netanyahu and Netanyahu knows this. Netanyahu truly, historically, is a manipulator-in-chief of the American electoral system.”

Biden and his top aides, as part of efforts to degrade Hamas, are looking to get Israel on board with agreeing to the creation of a Palestinian state by offering normalization with Saudi Arabia in return – a strategy the Saudis have endorsed. 

Advertisement

Netanyahu has pushed for establishing ties with Saudi Arabia, but his rejections of a Palestinian state are further isolating him on the global stage. 

Josep Borrell, the plain-spoken foreign policy chief for the E.U., was blunt in his criticism of Netanyahu’s rejection of a two-state solution. 

“Which are the other solutions they have in mind? To make all the Palestinians leave? To kill them?” Borrell said. “Certainly, the way of trying to destroy Hamas is not the way they are doing, because they are seeding the hate for generations.” 

That has left Biden one of Netanyahu’s last allies amid the overwhelming international calls for Israel to implement a ceasefire. 

Advertisement

“Netanyahu really cares about one man’s audience, and that’s Joe Biden,” Gerges said. “Israel has really lost in the court of public opinion. Whether you’re talking about Spain or Ireland or Belgium. I mean, it’s world public opinion. Truly, the United States and Germany and to a lesser extent, the U.K., are still solid supporters of Israel, but the United States really is against the world when it comes to Israel.”

Netanyahu also faces a reckoning at home. 

Protests against Netanyahu that were put on hold in the wake of Oct. 7 have restarted amid growing criticism within Israel over failure to secure the release of hostages, the conduct of the war, and the failures that allowed Hamas to attack in the first place. The protests are still relatively small, but signal growing anger among the public even as they support efforts to defeat Hamas. 

Gadi Eisenkot, a former head of the Israel Defense Forces and opposition lawmaker whose son was killed fighting in Gaza, has called for elections to be held after the war and raised doubt over the military defeat of Hamas. 

Advertisement

“It is necessary, within a period of months, to bring the Israeli voter back to the polls and hold elections in order to renew trust, because right now there is no trust,” Eisenkot said in an interview with the Israeli program Uvda. 

“As a democracy, the State of Israel needs to ask itself after such a serious event, ‘How do we continue from here with a leadership that has failed us miserably?’” 

Families of hostages have criticized Netanyahu as prolonging the military fight against Hamas to preserve his political power. 

“This holdup is with the Netanyahu government,” said Liz Naftali, who’s four-year-old niece was released after 50 days of captivity, and is advocating for the release of all the hostages.

Advertisement

She accused the Israeli prime minister of being “unwilling to agree to the terms to release our loved ones, to make these deals final.”

It’s a view that Netanyahu’s critics in Washington also believe. 

“There’s a reason why he’s had nine political lives, he’s a very gifted politician, but that does not mean he’s taking the right course now,” Van Hollen said.

“In fact, I think it’s very clear he’s put his own political ambitions and political interests above the interest of Israel and its allies.”

Advertisement

​ President Biden’s relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is showing new signs of strain amid the Gaza War, which has put both leaders under extraordinary political pressure. Biden has stood firm in defense of Israel despite intense backlash among voters calling for a ceasefire, and Democratic lawmakers appalled at a Palestinian death toll of… 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Netanyahu’s UN Speech Triggers Diplomatic Walkouts and Mass Protests

Published

on

What Happened at the United Nations

On Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, defending Israel’s ongoing military operations in Gaza. As he spoke, more than 100 delegates from over 50 countries stood up and left the chamber—a rare and significant diplomatic walkout. Outside the UN, thousands of protesters gathered to voice opposition to Netanyahu’s policies and call for accountability, including some who labeled him a war criminal. The protest included activists from Palestinian and Jewish groups, along with international allies.

Why Did Delegates and Protesters Walk Out?

The walkouts and protests were a response to Israel’s continued offensive in Gaza, which has resulted in widespread destruction and a significant humanitarian crisis. Many countries and individuals have accused Israel of excessive use of force, and some international prosecutors have suggested Netanyahu should face investigation by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, including claims that starvation was used as a weapon against civilians. At the same time, a record number of nations—over 150—recently recognized the State of Palestine, leaving the United States as the only permanent UN Security Council member not to join them.

International Reaction and Significance

The diplomatic walkouts and street protests demonstrate increasing global concern over the situation in Gaza and growing support for Palestinian statehood. Several world leaders, including Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro, showed visible solidarity with protesters. Petro called for international intervention and, controversially, for US troops not to follow orders he viewed as supporting ongoing conflict. The US later revoked Petro’s visa over his role in the protests, which he argued was evidence of a declining respect for international law.

BILATERAL MEETING WITH THE PRIME MINISTER OF ISRAEL Photo credit: Matty STERN/U.S. Embassy Jerusalem

Why Is This News Important?

The Gaza conflict is one of the world’s most contentious and closely-watched issues. It has drawn strong feelings and differing opinions from governments, activists, and ordinary people worldwide. The United Nations, as an international organization focused on peace and human rights, is a key arena for these debates. The events surrounding Netanyahu’s speech show that many nations and voices are urging new action—from recognition of Palestinian rights to calls for sanctions against Israel—while discussion and disagreement over the best path forward continue.

This episode at the UN highlights how international diplomacy, public protests, and official policy are all intersecting in real time as the search for solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains urgent and unresolved.

Continue Reading

News

Is a Nuclear-Powered Alien Spacecraft Flying Toward Earth?

Published

on

A mysterious interstellar object speeding through our solar system has reignited debates about extraterrestrial technology — and whether Earth might currently be under quiet observation.

The object, known as 3I/ATLAS, is only the third confirmed interstellar visitor ever detected. Unlike ordinary comets, however, this cosmic traveler has baffled astronomers with its unusual brightness, strange trajectory, and lack of a visible cometary tail. While most scientists cautiously describe it as a natural body, one leading astrophysicist believes something much stranger is at play.

Harvard Scientist’s Bold Claim

Professor Avi Loeb of Harvard University, head of the Galileo Project, has suggested that 3I/ATLAS may in fact be a nuclear-powered alien spacecraft designed to test how humanity would respond to an interstellar visitor. He argues that its flight path is improbably precise, bringing it close to Mars, Venus, and Earth — a pattern highly unlikely to occur by chance.

Loeb also points out that telescope images show a glow inconsistent with ordinary dust behavior. Instead of trailing behind like a comet, the halo-like light appears to extend in unusual ways, sparking debate about whether the object could be emitting energy of its own.

Headed Toward Earth’s Neighborhood

3I/ATLAS is expected to make its closest approach in late 2025, passing near Mars before swinging by the inner solar system. Although Earth itself will be on the opposite side of the Sun when it comes closest, the alignment will still enable space-based observatories to capture sharper data.

Loeb has called on NASA and other agencies to use spacecraft already stationed near Mars or Jupiter — including the Juno mission — to take high-resolution photographs. He believes such efforts could reveal whether the interstellar object is truly natural, or the first technological probe humanity has ever encountered.

Should We Be Worried?

While most astronomers argue caution before jumping to alien conclusions, Loeb insists that scientific openness is key. “If it’s just a comet, we learn something new,” he said. “But if it’s a spacecraft, it would be the most important discovery in human history.”

Advertisement
Shop Our Store

For now, 3I/ATLAS remains a mysterious speck on astronomers’ charts, drifting closer with each passing day. Whether it proves to be a frozen remnant of another star system or something far more advanced, the interstellar visitor has already succeeded in one mission: reminding us how vast and unpredictable the universe really is.

Continue Reading

News

AI Automation Could Cause Up to 20% Unemployment—A Workforce on the Brink

Published

on

Stark Warning from Anthropic CEO Highlights Rapid Job Displacement Risk

The looming threat of widespread unemployment due to AI automation has sparked intense debate among experts, business leaders, and policymakers. Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic—the company behind the influential AI language model Claude—issued a stark warning that has sent shockwaves through corporate America:

“Up to half of all entry-level white collar jobs could disappear within the next one to five years, potentially pushing unemployment rates as high as 20% during this period.”

This dramatic forecast paints a picture of a rapid and unsettling transformation in the workforce, driven by AI technologies that can perform complex cognitive tasks.

Balancing Predictions: Worst-Case Scenarios vs. Moderate Impact

However, this forecast represents one end of a spectrum of expert predictions. While Amodei’s warning highlights the worst-case scenario driven by the swift adoption of AI agents capable of coding, analyzing data, drafting legal documents, and managing workflows around the clock, other analyses suggest a more moderate impact. For example, Goldman Sachs estimates that AI could temporarily displace about 6-7% of U.S. jobs, with unemployment rising by approximately half a percentage point during the adjustment period. Their research anticipates a more gradual transition with a mixture of job disruption and creation.

The Unprecedented Speed and Scope of AI-Driven Job Disruption

The truth likely lies somewhere in between. AI is advancing at unprecedented speed, and the scope of jobs affected spans far beyond blue-collar roles to white-collar positions that required college degrees and years of training. Entry-level roles such as customer service representatives, data entry clerks, junior analysts, and administrative assistants face the greatest near-term risk. Mid-level roles in accounting, marketing, law, and engineering could soon follow, with companies already laying off workers citing AI-driven efficiencies.

Shop Our Store- Click Here

Preparing for an AI-Transformed Workforce: Adaptation Is Essential

Ultimately, the AI-driven job transformation is no longer a distant prospect but unfolding now. Whether unemployment spikes to 20% or stabilizes at lower levels depends on many factors, including business adoption rates, government policies, and the ability of workers to reskill. What is certain is that the workforce of tomorrow will look very different from today—and the time to prepare is right now.

Continue Reading

Trending