Connect with us

Business & Money

Location Matters: The Top 1% Differs By State

Published

on

Bolanle Media – Recent analysis conducted by the personal finance website SmartAsset has shed light on the significant role location plays in determining financial success in the United States. The study, which analyzed 2020 IRS data adjusted to 2023 dollars, reveals that “Location Matters: The Top 1% Differs By State,” as the income needed to be part of the top 1% of earners can vary by over half a million dollars depending on which U.S. state individuals reside in.

Connecticut takes the lead with the highest threshold, requiring households to earn an annual income of $952,902 or more to join the top 1%. In stark contrast, West Virginia has the lowest threshold, with residents needing an income of $367,582 or more to be considered part of the nation’s wealthiest elite.

Nationwide, households making $652,657 or more are classified within the top 1%, which is nearly eight times the median household income of approximately $75,000, as reported in the study.

The Disparities and Influencing Factors

SmartAsset’s analysis showcases significant income disparities across states, largely attributed to various influencing factors:

Advertisement
  1. Cost of Living: States with larger urban hubs like California and New York showcase how “Location Matters: The Top 1% Differs By State,” as they tend to boast higher-paid residents; however, they also have higher costs of living, somewhat offsetting their larger incomes.
  2. Industry and Job Opportunities: Diverse state economies driven by different industries can greatly impact average incomes, with tech-heavy states typically reporting higher earnings.
  3. Taxation Policies: Varied state tax structures can influence disposable income, directly affecting the overall income required to reach the top 1%.
  4. Population Density: States with larger populations may experience higher levels of income competition, which can influence salary ranges across industries.

The Top 1%: Aspirations and Realities

Location Matters: The Top 1% Differs By State

Implications for Financial Planning

Understanding the income disparities by location can significantly impact individuals’ financial planning decisions. Relocating to states with lower income thresholds might offer greater wealth-building opportunities for those aspiring to join the top 1%.

When it comes to being rich, location matters.

Advertisement

That’s because the amount of income you need to be in the top 1% of earners can vary by more than a half million dollars depending on which U.S. state you live in, according to a new analysis by personal finance website SmartAsset, which analyzed 2020 IRS data, adjusted to 2023 dollars.

Below is a list of household incomes needed to be part of the top 1% in each state, ranked from the highest threshold to the lowest:

1. Connecticut

  • Top 1% income threshold: $952,902 

2. Massachusetts

  • Top 1% income threshold: $903,401 

3. California

  • Top 1% income threshold: $844,266

4. New Jersey

  • Top 1% income threshold: $817,346 

5. Washington

  • Top 1% income threshold: $804,853 

6. New York

  • Top 1% income threshold: $776,662 

7. Colorado

  • Top 1% income threshold: $709,092 

8. Florida

  • Top 1% income threshold: $694,987 

9. Illinois

  • Top 1% income threshold: $660,810 

10. New Hampshire

  • Top 1% income threshold: $659,037 

11. Wyoming

  • Top 1% income threshold: $656,118 

12. Virginia

  • Top 1% income threshold: $643,848

13. Maryland

  • Top 1% income threshold: $633,333

14. Texas

  • Top 1% income threshold: $631,849

15. Utah

  • Top 1% income threshold: $630,544

16. Minnesota

  • Top 1% income threshold: $626,451

17. Nevada

  • Top 1% income threshold: $603,751

18. South Dakota

  • Top 1% income threshold: $590,373

19. Pennsylvania

  • Top 1% income threshold: $588,702

20. North Dakota

  • Top 1% income threshold: $585,556

21. Georgia

  • Top 1% income threshold: $585,397

22. Oregon

  • Top 1% income threshold: $571,813

23. Arizona

  • Top 1% income threshold: $564,031

24. Idaho

  • Top 1% income threshold: $560,040

25. North Carolina

  • Top 1% income threshold: $559,762

26. Montana

  • Top 1% income threshold: $559,656

27. Kansas

  • Top 1% income threshold: $554,912

28. Rhode Island

  • Top 1% income threshold: $548,531

29. Tennessee

  • Top 1% income threshold: $548,329

30. Alaska

  • Top 1% income threshold: $542,824

31. Nebraska

  • Top 1% income threshold: $535,651

32. Delaware

  • Top 1% income threshold: $529,928

33. Vermont

  • Top 1% income threshold: $518,039

34. Wisconsin

  • Top 1% income threshold: $517,321

35. South Carolina

  • Top 1% income threshold: $508,427

36. Michigan

  • Top 1% income threshold: $504,671

37. Maine

  • Top 1% income threshold: $502,605

38. Missouri

  • Top 1% income threshold: $500,626

39. Ohio

  • Top 1% income threshold: $500,253

40. Hawaii

  • Top 1% income threshold: $495,263

41. Iowa

  • Top 1% income threshold: $483,985

42. Indiana

  • Top 1% income threshold: $473,685

43. Alabama

  • Top 1% income threshold: $470,341

44. Oklahoma

  • Top 1% income threshold: $460,172

45. Louisiana

  • Top 1% income threshold: $458,269

46. Arkansas

  • Top 1% income threshold: $450,700

47. Kentucky

  • Top 1% income threshold: $445,294

48. New Mexico

  • Top 1% income threshold: $411,395

49. Mississippi

  • Top 1% income threshold: $381,919

50. West Virginia

  • Top 1% income threshold: $367,582

 

The findings from SmartAsset’s analysis present a compelling portrait of the economic diversity across the United States. Location indeed matters when it comes to achieving financial success and becoming part of the nation’s top 1% of earners. As individuals set their financial goals and navigate their paths to success, they must consider these income disparities and the unique opportunities and challenges that different states present.

 

Advertisement

For media inquiries, please contact: Hello@BolanleMedia.com

 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business & Money

The Collapse of Western Luxury Sales in China and the Rise of Local Brands

Published

on

The luxury fashion industry is facing a profound reckoning in China, a market that once powered its global growth. In 2024, the Chinese mainland luxury market experienced a historic decline of 18–20%, reverting to 2020 levels and sending shockwaves through the sector (Bain & Company). This dramatic downturn is not only impacting sales figures but also reshaping the very perception of what luxury means for Chinese consumers.

Several key forces have converged to erode Western brands’ dominance. Economic stagnation, a persistent real estate slump, and widespread pay cuts—especially in the financial sector—have undermined consumer confidence and spending power (Jing Daily). The pandemic and ongoing economic headwinds have prompted consumers to re-evaluate luxury purchases with a more practical lens, moving away from status-driven consumption (Bain & Company).

As travel restrictions eased, there was a notable rebound in overseas luxury shopping, with Chinese consumers flocking to Japan and Europe for better prices and exclusive items. In 2024, only 60% of Chinese luxury spending occurred domestically, with the rest shifting abroad (Bain & Company). Continuous price hikes by Western brands, often without clear added value, have made even affluent shoppers more cautious (Bain & Company).

Adding to these challenges, viral social media content and investigative reports have exposed the reality that many luxury goods—Gucci, Prada, Chanel, and more—are produced in China at a fraction of their retail price, then labeled as European-made. This revelation has shaken consumer trust and eroded the mystique that once justified luxury markups (Pakistan Today). Younger Chinese shoppers, driven by rising nationalism and skepticism of Western consumerism, are increasingly turning to domestic brands that offer comparable quality at lower prices (Pakistan Today).

The numbers tell a stark story. China’s share of global luxury sales has plummeted from 50% a decade ago to just 12% in 2024 (Pakistan Today). The global luxury market saw a 2% decline in 2024, with China accounting for the bulk of that drop (Pakistan TodayMacao News). Leading Western luxury groups suffered steep losses, with all major categories—jewelry, watches, leather goods, and fashion—experiencing double-digit declines (BloombergRetail Asia).

As Western brands stumble, Chinese luxury labels and alternative shopping channels are surging. Local companies are capitalizing on shifting tastes and national pride, offering high-quality products that resonate with younger consumers (Pakistan Today). Price-sensitive shoppers are flocking to grey market platforms and direct-from-factory channels, further undercutting traditional luxury retail (Bain & Company). There’s also a visible shift toward spending on experiences, travel, and unique products, as opposed to traditional status-symbol goods (Bain & Company). Younger generations, especially Gen Z, are gravitating toward brands that are culturally relevant, locally inspired, and digitally savvy (Jing Daily).

The era of easy growth for Western luxury brands in China is over. Brands must now compete fiercely for market share—not just through expansion, but by investing in brand differentiation, product innovation, and authentic consumer engagement (Bain & Company). As Chinese manufacturers and influencers continue to challenge the veneer of Western luxury, only those brands able to deliver genuine value and cultural relevance will survive. As one observer put it, “80% of anything you buy from Gucci is made in China, and over 60% of Prada comes from there too,” likening the revelation to “pulling the curtain back in The Wizard of Oz and realizing there’s no real magic behind the person running the show” (Pakistan Today).

In this new landscape, local brands are on the rise, and the global luxury industry is being forced to confront uncomfortable truths about value, authenticity, and the future of consumer desire.

Bolanle Media covers a wide range of topics, including film, technology, and culture. Our team creates easy-to-understand articles and news pieces that keep readers informed about the latest trends and events. If you’re looking for press coverage or want to share your story with a wider audience, we’d love to hear from you! Contact us today to discuss how we can help bring your news to life

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business & Money

Exposed: The Hidden Costs of Luxury in the Age of U.S.-China Trade Tensions

Published

on

The luxury sector is navigating its most turbulent era in decades as geopolitical tensions and tariffs reshape pricing, supply chains, and consumer trust. With U.S. tariffs up to 245% on select Chinese imports and 20-31% on European goods, brands face mounting pressure to justify soaring prices while preserving their aura of exclusivity.

1. The Tariff Domino Effect

  • U.S. import costs: A 20% tariff on EU goods and 31% on Swiss watches directly threatens the “Made in France/Italy” premium, forcing brands like Chanel and Rolex to raise U.S. prices by 5%+ annually.
  • China’s retaliation: Beijing’s 125% tariffs on U.S. goods pressure brands relying on American exports, while Chinese manufacturers openly challenge luxury craftsmanship claims via viral factory videos.
  • Supply chain chaos: Tariffs on manufacturing hubs like Vietnam (46%) and Cambodia (49%) limit production pivots, forcing brands to stockpile inventory or absorb slimmer margins.

2. Consumer Backlash and “Luxury Fatigue”

  • Price fatigue: Chanel’s Classic Flap bag tripled in price since 2010, with aspirational buyers retreating as tariffs compound years of “greedflation”.
  • Transparency demands: Social media exposes the gap between luxury markups and production costs, eroding perceptions of exclusivity.
  • Shifting spending: U.S. credit card luxury spending fell 5% YoY in March 2025, while European boutiques court American tourists seeking VAT refunds and “authentic” pricing.

3. Survival Strategies

  • Pricing recalibration: Brands like Hermès leverage scarcity and heritage storytelling to justify hikes, while emphasizing entry-level products (scarves, fragrances) for budget-conscious buyers.
  • E-commerce localization: U.S. sites now display tariff-inclusive pricing upfront, with digital exclusives (limited editions, bundles) softening the blow of higher costs.
  • Bespoke diplomacy: Sales associates are trained to frame price increases as reflections of “timeless value” rather than geopolitical fallout.

4. The Road Ahead

The tariff war has exposed luxury’s fragile balance between exclusivity and accessibility. Brands that fail to transparently address cost structures risk alienating the aspirational buyers who drive 70% of luxury revenueMeanwhile, Chinese manufacturers’ growing craftsmanship credibility could disrupt the sector’s Eurocentric prestige model entirely.

Bolanle Media covers a wide range of topics, including film, technology, and culture. Our team creates easy-to-understand articles and news pieces that keep readers informed about the latest trends and events. If you’re looking for press coverage or want to share your story with a wider audience, we’d love to hear from you! Contact us today to discuss how we can help bring your news to life

Continue Reading

Business & Money

How Young Americans Are Navigating the Economic Maze in 2025

Published

on

Young Americans are caught in a paradox of rising wealth and deepening financial anxiety. Despite holding more assets than previous generations at their age, Gen Z and millennials face unprecedented challenges in housing, debt, and economic mobility. Here’s how they’re adapting—and what the data reveals about their struggle.

The Financial Tightrope: Wealth vs. Stress

  • Historic wealth gains: Median wealth for Americans aged 25–39 surged by 140% between 2010 and 2022, reaching record highs.
  • Mounting debt burdens: Student loan debt has grown nine-fold since 1989, with 40% of young adults now carrying educational debt—up from 15% in 1989.
  • The stress factor: 61% of Americans aged 18–35 report feeling financially stressed, driven by the high cost of living (76%), job insecurity (48%), and housing costs (46%).

Housing: The Impossible Dream

  • Soaring costs: Median home prices have nearly doubled in real terms since 1990, while wages lag.
  • Rent woes: Over 90% of Americans live in areas where housing costs outpace income growth.
  • Government priorities: 25% of young adults rank housing costs as a top issue for policy action, compared to just 10% of those aged 60+.

Side Hustles and Budgets: Survival Tactics

  • The gig economy lifeline: Over 40% of young Americans say side hustles improve their financial wellness, with many working multiple jobs to cover expenses.
  • Budget discipline: Similar numbers have adopted strict budgeting to manage spending, though 30% lack a clear strategy for financial setbacks.
  • Emergency gaps: 38% of women and 25% of men aged 18–35 report inadequate emergency savings.

Inflation and the American Dream

  • Top concern: 40% of under-30s prioritize inflation as a critical issue, compared to 25% of older adults.
  • Skepticism: 60% of teens and young adults believe the American dream is harder to achieve today, citing economic barriers as the primary obstacle.
  • Social media influence: 50% say platforms like TikTok and Instagram shape their views of financial success more than traditional media.

The Mental Health Toll

  • Isolation and anxiety: Social engagement among young adults has dropped by one hour daily since 2003, with 48% reporting frequent loneliness.
  • Future fears: Concerns about climate change, Social Security depletion (projected by 2033), and childcare costs (consuming up to 20% of income) compound stress.

The Path Forward

Young Americans are redefining financial success in an era of economic contradictions. While they pursue side hustles, budgeting, and digital financial tools, systemic issues—from student debt to housing affordability—require policy solutions. As the UCLA study notes, “They want financial security, but feel the system is rigged”.

The data paints a clear picture: For Gen Z and millennials, economic resilience means balancing opportunity with unprecedented headwinds. Whether through entrepreneurship, advocacy, or financial innovation, their navigation of this maze will shape the U.S. economy for decades to come.

Bolanle Media covers a wide range of topics, including film, technology, and culture. Our team creates easy-to-understand articles and news pieces that keep readers informed about the latest trends and events. If you’re looking for press coverage or want to share your story with a wider audience, we’d love to hear from you! Contact us today to discuss how we can help bring your news to life

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending