President Donald Trump has formally announced the “Golden Dome,” a $175 billion missile defense initiative intended to shield the United States from a new generation of missile threats, including those launched from space. The plan, revealed in the Oval Office alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, marks the most ambitious U.S. missile defense proposal in decades and would, for the first time, place U.S. weapons in orbit.

Scope and Ambition

The Golden Dome is envisioned as a multilayered defense system, integrating next-generation technologies across land, sea, and space. Unlike Israel’s Iron Dome, which protects against short-range threats over a limited area, the Golden Dome aims to defend the entire U.S.—a country 450 times larger—against advanced ballistic, hypersonic, and even space-launched missiles. The system would use space-based sensors and interceptors to detect and destroy missiles at multiple stages of flight, including before launch, during ascent, midcourse, and terminal phases.

Timeline and Leadership

Trump has set an aggressive three-year timeline, promising the system will be operational before the end of his term in January 2029. He has appointed U.S. Space Force General Michael Guetlein as the program’s lead, tasking him with overseeing the rapid development and integration of the system. The initial funding tranche of $25 billion has been proposed in the current defense budget, with the remainder contingent on Congressional approval.

International and Domestic Reaction

The announcement has triggered immediate international concern, particularly from China, which warned the project could destabilize the global strategic balance and fuel a new arms race. Domestically, critics have questioned the feasibility of the timeline and budget, with estimates from the Congressional Budget Office suggesting a comprehensive shield could ultimately cost more than $500 billion over two decades8. Lawmakers have also raised transparency concerns regarding the procurement process and the involvement of major defense contractors, including SpaceX.

Allied Interest

Canada has expressed interest in collaborating on the Golden Dome, with discussions underway about potential participation in the project.

Expert Skepticism

While Trump has promised a “state-of-the-art” system capable of intercepting missiles launched from anywhere in the world, experts remain skeptical. Many point out the immense technical, logistical, and financial challenges of deploying such a vast and complex defense shield within the proposed timeframe.

The Golden Dome represents a historic escalation in U.S. missile defense ambitions, with the potential to reshape global security dynamics—but also to spark significant controversy and debate at home and abroad.

Kim Kardashian has reached a major milestone in her legal journey, graduating from California’s Law Office Study Program after six years of dedicated effort. The reality star and entrepreneur celebrated her achievement on May 21, 2025, with a backyard ceremony surrounded by her children, sisters Khloé and Kourtney Kardashian, close friends, and mentors.

Kardashian’s path to this accomplishment was unconventional. Rather than attending a traditional law school, she enrolled in California’s Law Office Study Program in 2018, which allows aspiring attorneys to apprentice with a licensed lawyer and complete rigorous self-study requirements. The program, typically four years, took Kardashian six years to finish due to the COVID-19 pandemic and her demanding professional commitments..

During the ceremony, Kardashian expressed her excitement on social media, writing, “I finally graduated law school after six years!!!” Mentors and supporters praised her perseverance, with attorney Jessica Jackson highlighting her 5,184 hours of legal study while balancing motherhood, her business empire, and her advocacy work.. CNN commentator Van Jones, who has worked with Kardashian on criminal justice reform, also honored her dedication at the event.

Kardashian’s legal journey included passing the First-Year Law Students’ Examination, known as the “baby bar,” on her fourth attempt in 2021, and completing the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam (MPRE) in March 2025—both prerequisites for sitting the California Bar Exam.. Throughout her studies, she continued to champion criminal justice reform, helping to commute sentences for several incarcerated individuals.

With her law program now complete, Kim Kardashian is preparing for the next step: taking the California Bar Exam. If successful, she will officially become a licensed attorney, following in the footsteps of her late father, Robert Kardashian Sr., and marking a new chapter in her already remarkable career.

In a rare and revealing on-camera interview, Harvey Weinstein, once a titan of Hollywood, sits down with Candace Owens to break his silence following the overturning of his New York conviction. Weinstein, who became the central figure in the #MeToo movement, claims he is the victim of a miscarriage of justice, insisting he is “wrongfully accused.” In this candid conversation, Weinstein reflects on his fall from grace, the role of the media, the complexities of his relationships, and his ongoing fight for what he calls “fairness and truth.”

Weinstein’s Appeal: “I Am Not Angry, But Angry at the System”

Weinstein opens the interview with a measured tone, expressing gratitude for the opportunity to speak but making clear his frustration with the legal system. “I’m not angry, but I’m angry at the system,” he says, emphasizing that his conviction was overturned and that he is currently awaiting retrial. He draws a distinction between personal failings and criminal acts, admitting to “terrible mistakes” in his personal life—cheating on his wife, hurting family and friends—but vehemently denying the criminal charges against him.

“I did not commit these crimes. I swear that before God and the people watching now and on my family. I’m wrongfully accused. But justice has to know the difference between what is immoral and what is illegal.”

The Media and the Court of Public Opinion

Weinstein is forthright about his belief that the media played a pivotal role in shaping public perception and prejudicing his case. He thanks Candace Owens and podcasters like Joe Rogan for giving him a platform, contrasting their approach with what he sees as the mainstream media’s rush to judgment.

“The media doesn’t favor me… the mainstream media uses every opportunity to discredit me. But I speak for innocent people—justice has to matter. Evidence has to matter.”

He laments the lack of support from former friends and colleagues, attributing their silence to a fear of being “canceled.” Weinstein describes the atmosphere as a “witch hunt,” where even those who might have supported him were too afraid to speak out.

High-Profile Accusations and Weinstein’s Response

The interview touches on specific allegations, most notably those made by Gwyneth Paltrow. Weinstein acknowledges making a pass at Paltrow but denies any abusive behavior, offering his own account of their professional relationship and the incident in question. He points to years of successful collaboration and public displays of friendship as evidence that the relationship was not as toxic as later described.

“I definitely made a pass, I guess. You could call it that. But that was the sum total of that situation… Now I heard, you know, that she thought the relationship was abusive. Anybody who was there who witnessed that relationship—it just turned into total friends.”

The #MeToo Movement: Conflating Immorality with Criminality

Both Weinstein and Owens express concerns about the #MeToo movement’s tendency to blur the lines between uncomfortable encounters and criminal acts. Owens argues that conflating being “hit on” with rape is irresponsible, and Weinstein agrees, suggesting that he became the scapegoat for a movement seeking a high-profile conviction.

“It’s all conflated and it’s all led to the idea that I am going to be the one they prosecute. I am going to be the one they persecute.”

Weinstein points out that after his conviction was overturned, prosecutors chose to pursue a retrial rather than drop the case, further fueling his sense of being targeted.

Polygraph Tests and Unreported Evidence

Weinstein reveals that he has taken lie detector tests regarding some of the accusations, claiming to have scored highly for honesty. He expresses frustration that such details were not widely reported in the press and that certain exculpatory evidence was excluded from court proceedings.

“I want the world to know that I did that. And I hope the women would just take me up on the challenge and say, ‘Okay, we’ll do it, too.’ But I doubt they will, but I will.”

The Fallout: Isolation and the Changing Media Landscape

Weinstein reflects on the personal cost of the allegations and subsequent conviction. He describes losing nearly everything—his career, reputation, and relationships with many in Hollywood. Only a handful of friends from before his rise to power remained loyal, while others distanced themselves or publicly condemned him.

He also notes the shifting media landscape, observing that independent voices and podcasters now have the power to challenge mainstream narratives and revisit controversial cases like his.

Conclusion: A Plea for Fairness and Truth

Harvey Weinstein’s interview is a complex, emotional, and controversial plea for a more nuanced understanding of his case. He admits to moral failings but maintains his innocence regarding the criminal charges. Weinstein calls for a justice system that distinguishes between immorality and illegality, and for a media environment that prioritizes evidence over sensationalism.

Whether or not the public is ready to reconsider Weinstein’s case, his interview is a reminder of the ongoing debates about due process, media influence, and the legacy of the #MeToo movement. As Weinstein awaits retrial, his story continues to provoke questions about justice, accountability, and the power of public opinion.

Disclaimer:
This article summarizes and contextualizes statements made by Harvey Weinstein in a recent interview. The views expressed are those of the interview participants and do not constitute an endorsement or verification of any claims. Weinstein’s legal proceedings are ongoing, and all individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Bolanle Media covers a wide range of topics, including film, technology, and culture. Our team creates easy-to-understand articles and news pieces that keep readers informed about the latest trends and events. If you’re looking for press coverage or want to share your story with a wider audience, we’d love to hear from you! Contact us today to discuss how we can help bring your news to life