Politics

Bill Aims to Strip Convicted Felons of Secret Service Protection

Published

7 months ago

June 7, 2024

Washington, D.C. – In a significant legislative move, Rep. Bennie G. Thompson (D-MS), Ranking Member of the Committee on Homeland Security, has introduced the *Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable Former Protectees Act* (DISGRACED Former Protectees Act). This bill aims to address a critical gap in current U.S. law regarding Secret Service protection for convicted felons who are sentenced to prison.

Under existing law, the Secret Service is mandated to protect former presidents and other high-level officials, even if they are convicted of a felony. The DISGRACED Former Protectees Act seeks to terminate such protection if the individual is convicted of a felony and sentenced to prison.

Key Provisions of the DISGRACED Former Protectees Act

1. Automatic Termination of Protection: The Act would automatically end Secret Service protection for any former protectee, including former presidents, who are sentenced to prison following a felony conviction. This provision ensures that convicted individuals do not receive special treatment due to their previous status.

2. Responsibility Shift: Once Secret Service protection is terminated, the responsibility for the protection of the convicted individual would shift to prison authorities. This change ensures that the individual is treated like any other inmate, maintaining the integrity of the prison system and the justice process.

3. Legislative Intent: The legislation is designed to ensure that protective status does not result in special treatment for convicted felons. By updating the law, the bill aims to maintain the integrity of the justice system and ensure that all individuals serve their sentences as required, without the complications of Secret Service protection.

Registration Code: BolanleVIP

Context and Implications

This legislative move comes in the context of former President Donald J. Trump’s recent conviction on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. The historic conviction has raised questions about the implications of Secret Service protection if he were to be sentenced to prison. Under current law, the Secret Service would be responsible for protecting him within prison premises, a scenario that presents significant logistical and legal challenges.

Rep. Thompson emphasized the necessity of the legislation, stating, “Unfortunately, current law doesn’t anticipate how Secret Service protection would impact the felony prison sentence of a protectee—even a former President. It is regrettable that it has come to this, but this previously unthought-of scenario could become our reality. Therefore, it is necessary for us to be prepared and update the law so the American people can be assured that protective status does not translate into special treatment—and that those who are sentenced to prison will indeed serve the time required of them”.

Political Reactions

The introduction of the DISGRACED Former Protectees Act has sparked a range of political reactions. Governor Tate Reeves (R-MS) criticized the legislation, calling it “truly shameful, outrageous, and a new low for the leftwing in America.” He argued that the bill could leave former President Trump vulnerable to assassination attempts, a claim that has been met with both support and opposition from various political figures.

Despite the controversy, the bill has garnered support from several Democratic co-sponsors, including Reps. Troy A. Carter Sr., Barbara Lee, Frederica Wilson, Yvette D. Clarke, Bonnie Watson Coleman, Jasmine Crockett, Joyce Beatty, and Steve Cohen. They argue that the legislation is necessary to ensure the fair administration of justice and to prevent any individual from receiving preferential treatment due to their former status.

Conclusion

The DISGRACED Former Protectees Act represents a significant step in addressing the complexities of providing Secret Service protection to convicted felons. By terminating such protection upon sentencing, the legislation aims to uphold the principles of justice and equality, ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their past positions, are subject to the same legal standards and treatment.

As the bill moves through the legislative process, it will undoubtedly continue to generate debate and discussion about the balance between security, justice, and the rule of law in the United States.

Stay Connected

If you want to create awesome branded experiences that truly captivate your audience, look no further than Bolanle Media. Our team of experts specializes in crafting immersive, unforgettable events that seamlessly blend creativity and strategy. From product launches to experiential marketing activations, we’ll ensure your brand makes a lasting impression. With our finger on the pulse of the latest trends and technologies, we’ll help you engage customers in innovative ways they’ll be buzzing about. Don’t settle for ordinary – let Bolanle Media elevate your brand with extraordinary experiences tailored to your unique vision. Click this link to learn more and take your marketing to new heights.

Politics

Donald Trump Named TIME’s 2024 Person of the Year

Published

1 week ago

December 15, 2024

Bolanle Media Staff

Donald Trump has been selected as TIME magazine’s Person of the Year for 2024, marking his second time receiving this distinction. The former president, who won a historic comeback victory in the 2024 election, was chosen for his significant impact on global affairs and American politics.

TIME editor-in-chief Sam Jacobs explained the decision, citing Trump’s “comeback of historic proportions,” his role in driving “a once-in-a-generation political realignment,” and his reshaping of both the American presidency and the country’s global role. This recognition comes after Trump’s unprecedented achievement of reclaiming the White House after losing reelection four years earlier.

The selection process involved an extensive interview with Trump at Mar-a-Lago in November, covering a wide range of topics including the economy, foreign policy, and his plans for a second term. Notably, TIME took the unprecedented step of publishing a comprehensive fact-check alongside the interview transcript, examining 15 distinct assertions made by Trump.

Trump’s relationship with TIME has been tumultuous over the years. While he expressed honor at receiving the title in 2016, he has also criticized the magazine’s selections and even claimed he refused a potential Person of the Year offer in 2017. Despite this, Trump participated in the process this year, granting TIME access for an in-depth interview.

To commemorate the announcement, Trump rang the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). This event marked a significant moment in Trump’s career, as it was his first time participating in this Wall Street tradition.

Trump’s selection as Person of the Year reflects his continued influence on American politics and his ability to reshape the political landscape. As the country prepares for his return to the White House, all eyes will be on how Trump’s second term might further impact both domestic and international affairs.

**Your support keeps us going!**
**Every purchase helps us do what we love. Thank you!**

Bolanle Media is excited to announce our partnership with The Newbie Film Academy to offer comprehensive courses designed specifically for aspiring screenwriters. Whether you’re just starting out or looking to enhance your skills, our resources will provide you with the tools and knowledge needed to succeed in the competitive world of screenwriting. Join us today to unlock your creative potential and take your first steps toward crafting compelling stories that resonate with audiences. Let’s turn your ideas into impactful scripts together!

Business

David Sacks: The New White House AI and Crypto Czar

Published

2 weeks ago

December 6, 2024

Bolanle Media Staff

According to CNBC and NBC News, David Sacks, a prominent venture capitalist and former PayPal executive, has been appointed as the White House AI and Crypto Czar by President-elect Donald Trump. This newly created position underscores the incoming administration’s focus on artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency as critical areas for American competitiveness.

Role and Responsibilities

Sacks will be tasked with several key responsibilities in his new role:

Guiding policy for the administration in AI and cryptocurrency
Establishing a legal and regulatory framework for the cryptocurrency industry
Safeguarding free speech online, and steering away from Big Tech bias and censorship
Leading the Presidential Council of Advisors for Science and Technology

Trump emphasized that Sacks will focus on making America the clear global leader in both AI and cryptocurrency.

Background and Qualifications

David Sacks brings a wealth of experience to his new position:

Former Chief Operating Officer of PayPal
Founder of Yammer, which was sold to Microsoft for $1.2 billion in 2012
Co-founder of Craft Ventures, a venture capital firm
Investor in major tech companies including SpaceX, Palantir, Uber, and Airbnb

Sacks is also known for his close associations with tech entrepreneurs like Elon Musk and Peter Thiel, being part of the “PayPal Mafia“.

Political Involvement

Sacks has been a vocal supporter of Trump during his campaign:

Hosted a fundraiser for Trump at his San Francisco estate, with tickets priced at $50,000 each and a more exclusive $300,000 tier
Delivered a speech at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee in July 2024
Wrote a detailed essay on X explaining his reasons for supporting Trump

Implications for AI and Crypto Industries

The appointment of Sacks signals a potential shift towards more crypto-friendly policies and regulatory clarity for the digital asset industry. This move, along with Trump’s nomination of crypto advocate Paul Atkins to head the Securities and Exchange Commission, marks a departure from the stricter oversight approach seen under the previous administration.

As the White House AI and Crypto Czar, Sacks is expected to play a crucial role in shaping the future of these rapidly evolving technologies in the United States, potentially influencing their development and adoption on a global scale.

Politics

Trump’s Victory: What It Means for Big Tech

Published

1 month ago

November 9, 2024

Bolanle Media Staff

Donald Trump’s victory in the 2024 U.S. presidential election has significant implications for the tech industry, particularly in terms of regulation and the relationship between Big Tech and the government. This could signal potential shifts for major technology companies as his administration re-enters the White House. Known for his critical stance toward the influence of big tech firms, Trump’s policies may target social media regulation, privacy rights, and cryptocurrency oversight. This article examines what these changes could mean for tech giants, as well as how industry leaders like Elon Musk may navigate the administration’s policy direction.

Trump’s Stance on Big Tech – A New Wave of Scrutiny?

During his previous tenure, Trump’s administration raised concerns over the growing power of major tech firms, often accusing them of bias and unfair practices. His win could mean increased scrutiny for companies like Meta, Alphabet (Google), and X (formerly Twitter). With a history of advocating for transparency and accountability, Trump may push for regulations requiring tech firms to disclose their algorithms and data practices more openly. This stance may introduce significant challenges, forcing companies to rethink their operational transparency, while also appealing to conservative voices concerned with tech influence over political discourse.

A significant focus for Trump’s new term is likely to be the regulation of social media platforms, especially regarding content moderation practices. During his last administration, Trump criticized platforms like Facebook and Twitter for alleged censorship. Now, the debate around free speech versus misinformation has only intensified, and his administration might seek to implement laws ensuring “viewpoint neutrality.” Trump could push for reforms to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which currently shields platforms from liability for user-generated content. Potential reforms could restrict tech companies’ ability to moderate content without consequence, fundamentally reshaping how platforms handle controversial content.

Privacy Rights – Balancing Data Use and Individual Freedoms

Trump’s election could also impact the ongoing conversation around data privacy, with likely implications for companies reliant on user data collection. His administration may support data privacy reforms, pushing for clearer user consent requirements and limiting companies’ use of personal information. Recent years have seen growing public concern over digital privacy, and Trump’s stance could introduce legislation closer to Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). These changes would mean more robust data security measures, transparency on data collection practices, and possibly heavy penalties for privacy violations.

Cryptocurrency Oversight – Toward Greater Regulation?

The cryptocurrency landscape has rapidly evolved since Trump’s last term, with digital currencies now occupying a more significant role in financial markets. Trump’s views on cryptocurrency have historically been cautious, even skeptical, as he once deemed Bitcoin a “scam.” This administration might seek tighter regulations on digital assets, especially as concerns over fraud and financial stability grow. Regulatory action could include enforcing anti-money laundering (AML) compliance and requiring more transparency from decentralized exchanges. For tech giants invested in blockchain or digital assets, like Meta’s Libra project, this could mean adjusting their strategies to meet compliance standards.

Dynamics with Tech Leaders – Collaboration or Conflict?

The Trump administration’s relationship with tech industry figures could be crucial in shaping regulatory approaches. Elon Musk, for instance, has had a complex, often vocal stance on political matters, supporting free speech but also advocating for limited government interference in tech. Trump’s policies around social media and free speech could resonate with Musk, yet there could be friction on regulatory grounds, especially if federal guidelines challenge the open nature of X (formerly Twitter). The administration’s stance toward leaders like Musk and Zuckerberg may range from collaborative to confrontational, depending on how they align with Trump’s regulatory goals.

Conclusion

Trump’s victory could bring a renewed focus on tech regulation, affecting social media, privacy rights, and cryptocurrency oversight. With increasing bipartisan scrutiny on Big Tech, Trump’s administration is expected to drive policies that push tech companies toward greater accountability, transparency, and user protection. How tech leaders respond will shape the future of these industries in a potentially more regulated landscape, where balancing innovation with oversight becomes essential.