Politics
Bill Aims to Strip Convicted Felons of Secret Service Protection
Washington, D.C. – In a significant legislative move, Rep. Bennie G. Thompson (D-MS), Ranking Member of the Committee on Homeland Security, has introduced the *Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable Former Protectees Act* (DISGRACED Former Protectees Act). This bill aims to address a critical gap in current U.S. law regarding Secret Service protection for convicted felons who are sentenced to prison.
Under existing law, the Secret Service is mandated to protect former presidents and other high-level officials, even if they are convicted of a felony. The DISGRACED Former Protectees Act seeks to terminate such protection if the individual is convicted of a felony and sentenced to prison.
Key Provisions of the DISGRACED Former Protectees Act
1. Automatic Termination of Protection: The Act would automatically end Secret Service protection for any former protectee, including former presidents, who are sentenced to prison following a felony conviction. This provision ensures that convicted individuals do not receive special treatment due to their previous status.
2. Responsibility Shift: Once Secret Service protection is terminated, the responsibility for the protection of the convicted individual would shift to prison authorities. This change ensures that the individual is treated like any other inmate, maintaining the integrity of the prison system and the justice process.
3. Legislative Intent: The legislation is designed to ensure that protective status does not result in special treatment for convicted felons. By updating the law, the bill aims to maintain the integrity of the justice system and ensure that all individuals serve their sentences as required, without the complications of Secret Service protection.
Registration Code: BolanleVIP
Context and Implications
This legislative move comes in the context of former President Donald J. Trump’s recent conviction on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. The historic conviction has raised questions about the implications of Secret Service protection if he were to be sentenced to prison. Under current law, the Secret Service would be responsible for protecting him within prison premises, a scenario that presents significant logistical and legal challenges.
Rep. Thompson emphasized the necessity of the legislation, stating, “Unfortunately, current law doesn’t anticipate how Secret Service protection would impact the felony prison sentence of a protectee—even a former President. It is regrettable that it has come to this, but this previously unthought-of scenario could become our reality. Therefore, it is necessary for us to be prepared and update the law so the American people can be assured that protective status does not translate into special treatment—and that those who are sentenced to prison will indeed serve the time required of them”.
Political Reactions
The introduction of the DISGRACED Former Protectees Act has sparked a range of political reactions. Governor Tate Reeves (R-MS) criticized the legislation, calling it “truly shameful, outrageous, and a new low for the leftwing in America.” He argued that the bill could leave former President Trump vulnerable to assassination attempts, a claim that has been met with both support and opposition from various political figures.
Despite the controversy, the bill has garnered support from several Democratic co-sponsors, including Reps. Troy A. Carter Sr., Barbara Lee, Frederica Wilson, Yvette D. Clarke, Bonnie Watson Coleman, Jasmine Crockett, Joyce Beatty, and Steve Cohen. They argue that the legislation is necessary to ensure the fair administration of justice and to prevent any individual from receiving preferential treatment due to their former status.
Conclusion
The DISGRACED Former Protectees Act represents a significant step in addressing the complexities of providing Secret Service protection to convicted felons. By terminating such protection upon sentencing, the legislation aims to uphold the principles of justice and equality, ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their past positions, are subject to the same legal standards and treatment.
As the bill moves through the legislative process, it will undoubtedly continue to generate debate and discussion about the balance between security, justice, and the rule of law in the United States.
