Connect with us

Entertainment

Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis Explain Writing Letters Supporting Danny Masterson on September 9, 2023 at 8:51 pm Us Weekly

Published

on

Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis with an inset of Danny Masterson. Getty Images (2)

Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis explained why they wrote letters in support of former That ’70s Show costar Danny Masterson after his conviction for two counts rape.

“We are aware of the pain that has been caused by the character letters that we wrote on behalf of Danny Masterson,” Kutcher, 45, said alongside Kunis in a video shared via Instagram on Saturday, September 9.

“We support victims,” Kunis, 40, said. “We have done this historically through our work and we will continue to do so in the future.”

Advertisement

The couple, who married in 2015, made headlines after it was reported that they penned letters to Judge Charlaine F. Olmedo ahead Masterson’s Thursday, September 7, court date, where the 47-year-old was sentenced to 30 years to life in prison after being convicted of two counts of rape.

Related: Danny Masterson’s Sexual Assault Allegations and Trial: What to Know

Advertisement
Danny Masterson made headlines in 2017 when he was first accused of sexual assault. He has since pleaded not guilty after being charged in June 2020 with allegedly raping three women. Four women claimed in March 2017 that the That ‘70s Show alum sexually assaulted them in the early 2000s. A fifth woman came forward […]

Kutcher explained that they wrote the letters at the request of Masterson’s family. “A couple of months ago, Danny and his family reached out to us, and they asked us to write character letters to represent the person that we knew for 25 years so that the judge could take that into full consideration, relative to the sentencing,” he said.

Kunis added that their messages “were not written to question the legitimacy of the judicial system or the validity of the jury’s ruling.”

“They were intended for the judge to read and not to undermine the testimony of the victims or re-traumatize them in any way,” Kutcher said. “We would never want to do that, and we’re sorry if that has taken place.”

Kunis concluded: “Our heart goes out to every single person who’s ever been a victim of sexual assault, sexual abuse or rape.”

Advertisement

Related: ‘That ’70s Show’ Cast: Where Are They Now?

That ’70s Show managed to cultivate some of the most iconic moments in pop culture history. It’s also responsible for catapulting its younger stars Topher Grace, Laura Prepon, Ashton Kutcher, Mila Kunis, Wilmer Valderrama and Danny Masterson into the spotlight. Created by Mark Brazill, Bonnie Turner and Terry Turner, That ’70s Show centered on a […]

The letters went public on Friday, September 8, after being obtained by The Underground Bunker, which specializes in news about Scientology. “As a friend, Danny has been nothing but a positive influence on me,” Kutcher wrote.

Advertisement

He went on to call Masterson a “role model,” noting that he did not fall “into the typical Hollywood life of drugs” and claimed that Masterson supported firefighters affected by the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

“I hope that my testament to his character is taken into consideration in sentencing,” Kutcher concluded. “I do not believe he is an ongoing harm to society and having his daughter raised without a present father would [be] a tertiary injustice in and of itself.”

Ashton Kutcher, Danny Masterson and Mila Kunis. COS via Getty Images/Getty Images

Kunis also praised Masterson’s “exceptional character” in her character letter. “Danny has proven to be an amazing friend, confidant, and, above all, an outstanding older brother figure to me,” she wrote. “His caring nature and ability to offer guidance have been instrumental in my growth both personally and professionally.”

Advertisement

Masterson, for his part, denied the rape allegations in 2017.

“From day one, I have denied the outrageous allegations against me. Law enforcement investigated these claims more than 15 years ago and determined them to be without merit,” Masterson told Us Weekly in a December 2017 statement. “I have never been charged with a crime, let alone convicted of one. In this country, you are presumed innocent until proven guilty. However, in the current climate, it seems as if you are presumed guilty the moment you are accused.”

Advertisement

Related: What Has the ‘That ’70s Show’ Cast Said About Danny Masterson Allegations?

All eyes were back on the cast of That ‘70s Show — and Danny Masterson — when Netflix released the sequel series, That ‘90s Show, featuring appearances by Laura Prepon, Topher Grace, Mila Kunis, Ashton Kutcher and Wilmer Valderrama. Masterson, who played Steven Hyde on the comedy series, which ran on Fox from 1998 to […]

Masterson was arrested and charged in 2020 with three counts of rape after multiple women accused him of assaulting them in the early 2000s. He was convicted on Thursday of two counts of rape, and he plans to appeal the conviction.

Masterson’s attorney Shawn Holley argued that the actor “did not commit the crimes for which he has been convicted,” stating that she and a team of appellate lawyers “are confident that these convictions will be overturned.”

If you or someone you know are experiencing domestic violence, please call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 for confidential support. If you have experienced sexual assault, call the National Sexual Assault Telephone Hotline at 1-800-656-4673 for confidential support.

Advertisement

Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis explained why they wrote letters in support of former That ’70s Show costar Danny Masterson after his conviction for two counts rape. “We are aware of the pain that has been caused by the character letters that we wrote on behalf of Danny Masterson,” Kutcher, 45, said alongside Kunis in 

​   Us Weekly Read More 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Bieber’s Coachella Set Has Everyone Arguing Again

Published

on

And honestly? That might be exactly what he wanted.

Justin Bieber stepped onto the Coachella stage Saturday night as the highest-paid headliner in the festival’s history — reportedly pocketing $10 million — and proceeded to sit down at a laptop and play YouTube videos.

The internet, predictably, lost its mind.


What Actually Happened

This was Bieber’s first major U.S. performance since his Justice era — a long-awaited comeback after battling Ramsay Hunt syndrome in 2022, which caused partial facial paralysis, plus years of mental health struggles and a very public disappearing act from the industry.

Advertisement

The stage setup was minimal: a fluid cocoon-like structure, no backup dancers, no elaborate lighting rigs. Just Bieber, a stool, and a laptop.

He opened with tracks from his 2025 albums Swag and Swag II, then invited the crowd on a journey — “How far back do you go?”

What followed was a nostalgic scroll through his entire career: old YouTube covers before he was famous, classic hits Baby and Never Say Never playing on screen while he sang alongside his younger self. Guests including The Kid Laroi, Wizkid, and Tems joined him throughout the night.

He even played his viral “Standing on Business” paparazzi rant and re-enacted it live, hoodie on, completely unbothered.

Advertisement
HCFF
HCFF

The Moment Nobody Predicted

But here’s what the critics burying him in their hot takes chose not to lead with: Bieber closed his set with worship music.

In the middle of Coachella — one of the most secular stages on the planet — he performed songs rooted in his Christian faith, openly crediting Jesus as the reason he was standing on that stage at all.

It wasn’t subtle. It wasn’t a quick prayer and a thank-you. He leaned into it fully, in front of a crowd of 125,000 people who came expecting pop bangers and got a testimony instead.

For fans who have followed his faith journey — his deep involvement with Hillsong and later Churchome, his baptism in 2014, and his very public declaration that Jesus saved his life during his darkest years — the moment landed like a full-circle miracle.


Why People Are Mad

Critics have been brutal.

Zara Larsson summed up the skeptics perfectly, posting on TikTok: It’s giving let’s smoke and watch YouTube — and that clip went just as viral as the performance itself.

Advertisement

One fan on X wrote: I’m crying, this might actually be the worst performance I’ve ever seen. He’s just playing videos from YouTube… zero effort, pure laziness.”

The comparison to Sabrina Carpenter’s Friday headlining set — elaborate staging, multiple costume changes, celebrity cameos — only made Bieber’s stripped-down show look more controversial.

And the $10 million figure kept coming up. People felt cheated.


Why His Fans Think Everyone’s Missing the Point

Here’s where it gets interesting.

One commenter on X put it best: “He did not force a high-production machine that could burn him out again. Instead, he sat with his past, scrolling through old YouTube videos, duetting with his younger self, and mixing nostalgia with new chapters.”

As the set progressed, Bieber visibly opened up. He removed his sunglasses. He took off his hoodie. He smiled, made jokes about falling through a stage as a teenager.

Advertisement

One Instagram account with millions of followers posted: This Justin Bieber performance healed something in me.”

That healing language is intentional for Bieber — it mirrors how he talks about his faith. In interviews, he has repeatedly said Jesus didn’t just save his career; He saved his life. The worship set at Coachella wasn’t a gimmick. It was a confession.

The Hollywood Reporter noted the performance also sparked a broader debate about double standards — whether a female artist could ever get away with the same low-key approach without being completely destroyed.


The Bigger Picture

Love it or hate it, Bieber’s Coachella set is the most talked-about moment from Weekend One — more than Karol G making history as the first Latina to headline the festival, more than Sabrina Carpenter’s spectacle.

Advertisement

That’s not an accident.

In an era where every headliner tries to out-produce the last one, Bieber walked out with a laptop, a stool, and his faith — and made it personal. For millions of fans watching, the worship songs weren’t filler. They were the point.

Whether you call it lazy or legendary, one thing is clear: Justin Bieber isn’t performing for the critics anymore. He’s performing for an audience of One — and the rest of us just happened to be there.


Drop your take in the comments — was Bieber’s Coachella set lazy, legendary, or something even bigger?

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Vertical Films Changed Everything. Are You Ready?

Published

on

People don’t watch films the way they used to—and if you’re still cutting everything for the big screen first, you’re losing the audience that lives in your pocket.

Every swipe on TikTok is a tiny festival: new voices, wild visuals, heartbreak, comedy, and chaos, all judged in under three seconds. In that world, vertical films aren’t a gimmick. They’re the new front door to your work, your brand, and your career.

The movie theater is now in your hand

Think about where you’ve discovered your favorite clips lately: your phone, in bed, in an Uber, between texts. The “cinema” experience has shrunk into a glowing rectangle we hold inches from our face. That’s intimate. That’s personal. That’s power.

Vertical video fills that space completely. No black bars. No distractions. Just one story, one face, one moment staring back at you. It feels less like “I’m watching a movie” and more like “this is happening to me.” For storytellers, that’s gold.

The old rules still matter—but they bend

Film school taught you:

  • Compose for the wide frame.
  • Let the world breathe at the edges.
  • Save the close-up for maximum impact.

Vertical filmmaking says: bring all of that craft… and then flip it. You still need composition, rhythm, framing, and sound. But now:

  • The close-up is the default, not the climax.
  • Depth replaces width—what’s in front and behind matters more than left and right.
  • Micro-scenes—60 seconds or less—must feel like complete emotional beats.

It’s not “less cinematic.” It’s a different kind of cinematic—one that lives where people already are instead of asking them to come to you.

Your characters can live beyond the film

Here’s the secret no one tells you: audiences don’t just fall in love with stories; they fall in love with people. Vertical video lets your characters exist outside the runtime.

Advertisement

Imagine this:

When someone feels like they “know” a character from their feed, buying a ticket or renting your film stops feeling like a risk. It feels like catching up with a friend.

Behind the scenes is no longer optional

Vertical films thrive on honesty. Shaky behind-the-scenes clips. Laughing fits between takes. The director’s 2 a.m. rant about a shot that won’t work. The makeup artist fixing tears after a heavy scene. That’s the texture that makes people care about the final product.

You don’t have to be perfect. You have to be present.
Ideas you can start capturing tomorrow:

  • “What we can’t afford, so we’re faking it.”
  • “The shot we were scared to try.”
  • “One thing we argued about for three days.”

When you show the process, you’re not just selling a film—you’re inviting people into a journey.

Think in episodes, not posts

Most people treat vertical video like a one-off blast: post, pray, forget. Instead, think like a showrunner.

Ask yourself:

Advertisement
  • If my project were a vertical series, what’s Episode 1? What’s the hook?
  • How can I end each clip with a question, a twist, or a feeling that makes people need the next part?
  • Can I tell one complete emotional story across 10 vertical videos?

Suddenly, your feed isn’t random. It’s a season. People don’t just “like” a video—they “follow” to see what happens next.

HCFF

The attention is real. The opportunity is bigger.

We’re in a rare moment where a micro-drama shot on your phone can sit in the same feed as a studio campaign and still win. A fearless 45-second monologue in a bathroom. A quiet scene of someone deleting a text. A single, wordless push-in on a face that tells the whole story.

Vertical films give you:

  • Low cost, high experimentation.
  • Immediate feedback from real viewers.
  • Proof that your story, your voice, your world can hold attention.

You don’t have to wait for permission, a greenlight, or a perfect budget. You can start where you are, with what you have, and let the audience tell you what’s working.

So, are you ready?

Some filmmakers will roll their eyes and call vertical a phase. They’ll keep making beautiful work that no one sees until a festival says it exists. Others will treat every swipe, every scroll, and every tiny screen as a chance to connect, teach, provoke, and move people.

Those are the filmmakers whose names we’ll be hearing in five years.

The question isn’t whether vertical films are “real cinema.” The question is: when the next person scrolls past your work, do they feel nothing—or do they stop, stare, and think, “I need more of this”?

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

What Kanye’s ‘Father’ Says About Power, Faith, and Control

Published

on

Kanye West’s “Father” video looks like a fever dream in a church, but underneath the spectacle it’s a quiet argument about who really runs the world. The altar isn’t just about God; it’s about every “father” structure that decides what’s true, who belongs, and who gets cast out.

The church as power, not comfort

The church in “Father” doesn’t behave like a safe, sacred space. It feels like a headquarters. The aisle becomes a catwalk for power: brides, a knight, a nun, a Michael Jackson double, astronauts, Travis Scott, all moving through the frame while Kanye mostly sits and watches. The room doesn’t change for them—they’re the ones being processed.

That’s the first big tell: this isn’t just about religion. It’s about systems. The church stands in for any institution that claims moral authority—governments, platforms, labels, churches, media—places where identity, status, and “truth” are negotiated behind the scenes. Faith is the language; control is the product.

HCFF
HCFF

Kanye as the unmanageable outsider

In this universe, Kanye isn’t the leader of the service. He’s a problem in the pews. The wildest scene makes that explicit: astronauts move in, pull off his mask, expose him as an “alien,” and carry him out. It’s funny, surreal—and brutal.

That moment plays like a metaphor for what happens when someone stops being useful to the system. If you’re too unpredictable, too loud, too off‑script, the institution finds a way to unmask you, label you, and remove you. But here’s the twist: once he’s gone, the spectacle continues. Travis still shines, the ceremony rolls on, the church keeps doing what the church does. The message is cold: no one is bigger than the machine.

Advertisement

Faith vs obedience

The title “Father” is doing triple duty: God, parent, and patriarchal authority. The video leans into a hard question—are we following something we believe in, or something we’re afraid to disappoint?

Inside this church, people don’t react when things get strange. A nun is handled like a criminal, cards burn, an alien is dragged away, and the room barely flinches. That’s not devotion, that’s conditioning. The deeper critique is that many of our modern “faiths”—political, religious, even fandom—have slid from relationship into obedience. You’re not invited to wrestle with meaning; you’re expected to sit down, sing along, and accept the script.

Who gets meaning, who gets sacrificed

The casting in “Father” feels like a visual ranking chart. The knight represents sanctioned force: power that’s old, armored, and legitimated by history. The cross and church setting evoke sacrifice: whose pain gets honored, whose story gets canonized, whose doesn’t. The Michael Jackson lookalike signals how even fallen icons remain useful as symbols long after their humanity is gone.

In that context, Kanye’s removal reads as a sacrifice that keeps the system intact. Take the problematic prophet out of the frame, keep the music, keep the ritual, keep the brand. The father‑system doesn’t collapse; it adjusts. Control isn’t loud in this world—it’s quiet, procedural, dressed like order.

Advertisement

A mirror held up to us

The most uncomfortable part of “Father” is that the congregation keeps sitting there. No one storms out. No one screams. The church absorbs aliens, icons, arrests, and weddings like it’s a normal Sunday. That’s where the video stops being about Kanye and starts being about us.

We’ve learned to scroll past absurdity and injustice with the same blank face as those extras in the pews. Faith becomes content. Outrage becomes engagement. Power becomes invisible. “Father” takes all of that and crushes it into one continuous shot, asking a bigger question than “Is Kanye back?”

It’s asking: in a world where power wears holy clothes, faith is filmed, and control looks like normal life, who is your father really—and are you sure you chose him?

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Subscribe for the updates!