Connect with us

Entertainment

Ariana Grande’s Most Controversial Moments: Alleged Cheating and More on August 1, 2023 at 12:00 am Us Weekly

Published

on

Ariana Grande Matt Baron/Shutterstock

Ariana Grande‘s on-set romance with Ethan Slater is far from her first brush with controversy.

Since her rise to the top of the charts, Grande’s career has been plagued by scandals. In July 2015, she sparked outrage online after a video of her licking donuts — and later calling them “disgusting” and saying she hates America — went viral. She issued several apologies about the incident, asserting in a statement to Us Weekly that she would “strive to be better” after the public took offense to her “poor choice of words.”

Along with allegedly feuding with former costars and being accused of plagiarism, Grande’s personal relationships have raised eyebrows over the years. Naya Rivera once claimed the pop star’s romance with Big Sean may have overlapped with her own — and some fans have allegedly found evidence that the pattern continued in more of Grande’s relationships.

Advertisement

Following her whirlwind engagement to Pete Davidson, Grande attempted to keep her love life on the down-low. She exchanged vows with Dalton Gomez in May 2021, but the couple called it quits after two years of marriage.

As news broke of Grande’s divorce, Us confirmed her relationship with Slater — and fans quickly tried to piece together their dating timeline. “Ariana’s determined to move forward,” a source exclusively told Us of the scandal in July 2023.

Keep scrolling for a breakdown of Grande’s biggest controversies through the years:

The ‘I Hate America’ Donut

Grande sparked backlash in July 2015 when footage went viral of her and then-boyfriend Ricky Alvarez at Wolfee Donuts in California. In the clip originally posted by TMZ, Grande licked pastries she didn’t appear to have purchased when an employee’s back was turned. When a tray of fresh donuts was brought out, she teased, “What the f—k is that? I hate Americans. I hate America! That’s disgusting.” (The incident took place on the 4th of July.)

Advertisement

The video was immediately met with outrage, and Grande issued a statement to Us apologizing for her behavior. “I am EXTREMELY proud to be an American and I’ve always made it clear that I love my country. … As an advocate for healthy eating, food is very important to me and I sometimes get upset by how freely we as Americans eat and consume things without giving any thought to the consequences that it has on our health and society as a whole,” she explained, acknowledging that she should have had “more discretion with my choice of words.”

During a Good Morning America appearance in September 2015, Grande apologized once again. “I think one of the biggest things I learned from that was what it feels like to disappoint so many people who love and believe in you. And that’s an excruciating feeling,” she said.

Todd Williamson/January Images/Shutterstock

Calling Out the Grammys

In February 2019, reports surfaced that Grande canceled her planned performance at the 61st annual Grammys due to production disagreements. Producer Ken Ehrlich later claimed to the Associated Press that Grande “felt it was too late for her to pull something together.”

Advertisement

Grande swiftly clapped back via Twitter, writing, “Mhmmm here it is! I’ve kept my mouth shut but now you’re lying about me. I can pull together a performance over night and you know that, Ken. It was when my creativity & self expression was stifled by you, that I decided not to attend. I hope the show is exactly what you want it to be and more.”

Grande was reportedly told she couldn’t perform “7 Rings” unless it was part of a medley. In her string of tweets, Grande claimed she offered suggestions for different songs. “It’s about collaboration. It’s about feeling supported. It’s about art and honesty. Not politics. Not doing favors or playing games,” she wrote. “It’s just a game y’all.. and I’m sorry but that’s not what music is to me.”

That year, Grande was nominated for Best Pop Vocal Performance and Best Pop Vocal Album, winning the latter. She returned to the Grammys stage in January 2020 to perform.

Jennette McCurdy Fallout

After her stint on Victorious, Grande teamed up with iCarly‘s Jennette McCurdy for a Nickelodeon spinoff titled Sam & Cat. In her 2022 memoir, I’m Glad My Mom Died, McCurdy claimed that she wasn’t allowed to pursue other opportunities while working on the show — but Grande was. She alleged that Nickelodeon offered her $300,000 to not discuss her experience at the network publicly.

Advertisement

“What finally undid me was when Ariana came whistle-toning in with excitement because she had spent the previous evening playing charades at Tom Hanks’ house,” she wrote. “That was the moment I broke.”

She added: “Ariana misses work in pursuit of her music career while I act with a box. I’m pissed about it. And I’m pissed at her. Jealous of her.”

Before the series was canceled in July 2014, it was put on a production hiatus amid reports that Grande was earning a much higher salary than her costar. Grande shut down the “absolutely ridiculous and false” speculation via Twitter.

“Jennette and I agreed upfront that we would be treated equally on this show in all regards (as we should be, considering we each work just as hard as the other on this show),” she wrote. “I don’t know who’s putting these idiotic quotes out there but I thought I’d straighten it out and try to end this nonsense.”

Advertisement

McCurdy fueled rumors of a feud between her and Grande with her web series What’s Next for Sarah? after Sam & Cat’s cancelation. The show featured a pop star named Gloriana who rocked a high ponytail — Grande’s signature style.

Broadimage/Shutterstock

Naya Rivera Caught Her With Big Sean

Grande dated Big Sean in 2014 after his split from former fiancée Rivera — but the Glee alum claimed there was some overlap in the two romances.

“On the one day that he was back in LA, [Sean] said he didn’t want to see me. But since she had a key, she let herself in to his house,” Rivera wrote in her 2016 memoir, Sorry Not Sorry. “I walk in, go downstairs, and guess what little girl is sitting cross-legged on the couch listening to music? … It rhymes with ‘Smariana Schmande.’”

Advertisement

Rivera remembered feeling blindsided by her and Sean’s breakup. “I learned that I was no longer getting married from the internet, and at the same time as the rest of the world,” she alleged. “Not only were we not getting married, we weren’t even together anymore.”

Grande never responded to Rivera’s claims. Rivera, meanwhile, died in a drowning accident in July 2020.

‘Wicked’ Romance With Ethan Slater

Us confirmed in July 2023 that Grande and Gomez were separated after two years of marriage. Shortly after the breakup made headlines, Us confirmed that Grande had already moved on with her Wicked costar. (Slater was married to Lilly Jay at the time, with whom he welcomed a son in 2022.)

According to a source, Slater informed Jay about his relationship with Grande “days before” it became public. (A source close to Grande denied the claims.) While Grande and Slater didn’t immediately comment on the scandal, Jay shared her side of the story with Page Six.

Advertisement

“[Ariana’s] the story really. Not a girl’s girl. My family is just collateral damage,” she claimed. “The story is her and Dalton.”

Slater filed for divorce from Jay in July 2023. An insider exclusively told Us that Gomez, meanwhile, wanted to give Grande “space” but hadn’t “given up hope that they can make things work.”

Annie Wermiel/NY Post; Xavier Collin/Image Press Agency/MEGA

Cultural Appropriation Accusations

Grande has been criticized for Blackfishing — or seemingly making her skin darker — and other instances of appropriation through the years. In 2019, she was accused of exploiting Asian culture by using Japanese characters in her visuals (and in a misspelled tattoo).

Advertisement

“I can’t read or write kanji obviously. What do you want me to do? It was done out of love and appreciation,” she wrote in a since-deleted tweet about her ink at the time. “What do you want me to say? U kno how many people make this mistake and DON’T care just cause they like how it looks? Bruh… I care sooooo much. What would u like me to do or say? Forreal.”

Grande was also selling merch with Japanese characters on it that was eventually taken down from her site. “People on this app really don’t know how to be forgiving or gentle when someone has made an innocent mistake. No one considers feelings other than their own,” she wrote amid the backlash.

Around the same time, Grande was accused of plagiarizing “7 Rings.” Princess Nokia claimed in a social media video that Grande’s hit sounded similar to “Mine” from her mixtape 1992. “Ain’t that the lil song I made about brown women and their hair? Hmmm… sounds about white,” she hinted.

In response, Grande posted — and subsequently deleted — via her Instagram Story: “White women talking about their weaves is how we’re gonna solve racism.” She later apologized for the “out of pocket” quip.

Advertisement

Alleged Diva Behavior

Since the beginning of her career, Grande has been accused of making outrageous demands and demonstrating unprofessional behavior. In 2014, rumors swirled that Grande’s team had a list of off-limits topics prepared for interviews and that Grande only wanted to be photographed on her left side. (She called the reports “nonsense” in a radio interview at the time.)

Grande opened up about being labeled a “diva” during a 2020 sit-down with Zane Lowe. “I stopped doing interviews for a really long time because I felt like whenever I would get into a position where somebody would try to say something for clickbait or twist my words or blah, blah, blah, I would defend myself. And then, people would be like, ‘Oh, she’s a diva,’” she said. “I was like, ‘This doesn’t make any sense.’”

While she felt like her “opinions” were often “manipulated” for a headline, Grande didn’t see the same thing happening to men in the public eye. “It’s like when men express their opinions or defend themselves or are directing something and making notes on something, they’re brilliant. And they’re genius at it. And yet, it’s just so not the same thing with women … It’s not always that way. But it does make you want to quiet down a little bit.”

Advertisement

Grande confessed that it hasn’t always been easy to approach negativity with a “f–k that” attitude.

Ariana Grande‘s on-set romance with Ethan Slater is far from her first brush with controversy. Since her rise to the top of the charts, Grande’s career has been plagued by scandals. In July 2015, she sparked outrage online after a video of her licking donuts — and later calling them “disgusting” and saying she hates 

​   Us Weekly Read More 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Why HIM Movie Sparks Talk About Satanism and Occult Rituals

Published

on

The 2025 horror film Him, produced by Jordan Peele and directed by Justin Tipping, has sparked significant discussion and controversy due to its prominent use of satanic and occult symbolism. Marlon Wayans stars as Isaiah White, a legendary but sinister quarterback who leads a secretive football cult where dark rituals and supernatural elements are central to the story.

The Occult and Satanism Themes at the Core of Him

The movie goes far beyond a traditional sports drama and plunges into horror by depicting an elite football mentorship that turns into a terrifying cult experience. Cameron Cade, a young quarterback injured early in his career, is invited to Isaiah White’s secluded compound to train. There, what seems like mentorship quickly reveals itself as indoctrination into a disturbing satanic cult.

One of the most striking symbols in the film is the pentagram combined with the infinity symbol that appears during a key scene where Cameron, blood-splattered, stands atop the symbol on the football field in a pose reminiscent of Christ’s crucifixion. This imagery blends themes of sacrifice, power, and eternity—tying the occult symbolism directly to the quest for greatness and the dark costs it entails.

Still shot from trailer

As described in the teaser trailer breakdown:
“In the final shot, a blood-splattered Cameron stands on the field atop a sigil that combines a pentagram with the infinity symbol. He raises his arms in a Christ-like pose to form the I in ‘Him’.”

The pentagram here serves as a powerful symbol associated with satanism and occult practices, suggesting that the football cult is steeped in rituals that transcend the physical game and venture into supernatural terror.

Audience and Critical Reactions

The use of overt satanic imagery and occult symbolism like the pentagram has fascinated viewers and critics alike but also raised concerns. Some see it as a bold narrative choice adding depth and horror to the story, while others question the growing use of demonic and occult visuals in mainstream films.

One commentary notes:
“He’s stretching out like Jesus on the cross standing on top of a pentagram with, you know, blood depicted. What is this? Like, why is this happening in Hollywood? Why are people going more and more openly demonic with their direction?”

Advertisement
Still shot from trailer

This is a reminder that the film’s horror is not just about external scares but about spiritual and psychological corruption as symbolized by the pentagram and other satanic imagery.

Social Commentary Behind the Horror

Him uses these occult motifs not just for shock but to critique the dark side of fame, power, and idol worship. The pentagram and cult rituals symbolize how the pursuit of excellence can consume individuals, turning mentorship into blind devotion and self-sacrifice.

The film asks viewers to consider:
“When the pursuit of greatness turns into blind devotion, the real horror lies in who we choose to follow.”

Shop Our Store- Click Here

In Summary

Him is a unique blend of sports drama and horror, using satanic and occult rituals—especially the evocative pentagram symbolism—to explore themes of ambition, power, and corruption. Its unsettling depiction of a football cult infused with dark rituals has made it a standout horror film of 2025, sparking both fascination and debate over its use of these potent symbols and themes.

Still shot from trailer

The film releases on September 19, 2025, inviting audiences to confront the terrifying price of greatness—and what it means to truly worship in the age of celebrity.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Hollywood Shake-Up: Warner Bros. Goes All In on Original Stories

Published

on

Warner Bros. is making a decisive and strategic shift in 2025, emphasizing original movies as a core pillar of its box office strategy while maintaining a hybrid approach that balances franchise blockbusters with fresh, original content. This approach has already shown significant success, with the studio surpassing Disney to achieve a domestic gross of $1.32 billion as of mid-2025. While blockbuster franchises like Superman ($331 million domestic) and the Minecraft Movie ($950 million global) remain strong anchors, Warner Bros. is increasingly investing in a growing slate of original productions that resonate with audiences and prove financially rewarding.

Notable original films in 2025 include Ryan Coogler’s “Sinners,” an original vampire movie that earned over $200 million domestically, marking it the highest-grossing original film since “Coco.” Another example is the horror hit “Weapons,” which opened to $42 million and gained sizable viral attention on social media. Impressively, half of Warner Bros.’ recent streak of six consecutive $40 million+ opening weekends are original stories, underlining the studio’s commitment to diversifying beyond legacy franchises. This strategy helps attract both niche and mainstream viewers, emphasizing that originality can drive considerable box office returns.

To support this, Warner Bros. has adopted a tiered content model that balances high-budget franchise productions with moderate to low-budget original films. This approach mitigates financial risks by leveraging strong brand loyalty from established franchises like DC Comics, while also exploring new intellectual properties and underserved genres like horror and sports dramas. For instance, the $2 million horror film “Presence” grossed $9.3 million, exemplifying the studio’s ability to find profitable niches.

Warner Bros. plans to release between 12 and 14 theatrical films annually across its divisions—Warner Bros. Pictures, DC Studios, New Line Cinema, and Warner Bros. Animation. In this lineup, only 1 to 2 films will be DC superhero movies, reflecting a conscious effort to limit the superhero franchise output and broaden their portfolio with originals and diverse genres. According to CEO David Zaslav, this mix includes:

  • 1-2 Warner Bros. Pictures tentpoles, primarily leveraging well-known Warner Bros. IP
  • 1-2 DC Studios films
  • 3-4 New Line Cinema releases, including horror and comedy genres
  • 1-2 Warner Bros. Animation titles
  • A select number of moderately budgeted original films

Zaslav has highlighted this sustainable growth strategy with a target of reaching $3 billion in annual studio profits, driven by both proven intellectual properties and innovative original storytelling. This strategic balance enhances the studio’s creative footprint, profitability, and cultural relevance, especially in a post-streaming era where theatrical exclusivity remains important.

Moreover, Warner Bros.’ hybrid approach reduces volatility by avoiding overreliance on any single content formula. Leveraging nostalgia through tentpole franchise films offers predictable revenue streams, while calculated bets on original films foster innovation and appeal to evolving audience tastes. This is particularly pertinent as theaters regain importance amid streaming fatigue, and audiences demonstrate enthusiasm for immersive, big-screen experiences.

Despite their successes, Warner Bros. faces challenges such as managing production costs and creative risks. Films like “Mickey 17,” though high-profile, have shown the risks inherent in overestimating demand for original IP. However, the tiered “franchise-plus” model provides an effective framework to balance financial stability and creative experimentation.

In summary, Warner Bros. in 2025 exemplifies a forward-thinking studio model that values originality alongside franchise strength. By focusing on more original movies while limiting DC superhero films to 1-2 per year, the studio is broadening its creative range, catering to diverse audiences, and positioning itself for sustained success and artistic innovation in a shifting industry landscape.

This strategy signals a shift where originality is not just a side bet but an essential element of Warner Bros.’ future in the film industry, blending financial prudence with cultural impact.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Paramount Seals $7.7B Deal for Exclusive UFC Streaming Rights

Published

on

Paramount Global has secured the exclusive U.S. rights to the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) in a groundbreaking deal worth $7.7 billion over seven years, beginning in 2026. This agreement marks a major shift in UFC’s distribution, moving away from the traditional pay-per-view model currently offered by ESPN to a new streaming-focused strategy centered on Paramount’s platform, Paramount+. All 43 annual UFC live events, including 13 major numbered events and 30 Fight Nights, will be available exclusively on Paramount+ at no additional cost to subscribers, with select marquee events also simulcast on the CBS broadcast network.

The deal comes just days after Paramount completed its merger with Skydance Media and represents the company’s first major sports rights acquisition under its new leadership. Paramount CEO David Ellison emphasized the uniqueness of partnering exclusively with a global sports powerhouse like UFC, highlighting the move as a key part of Paramount’s strategy to enhance viewer engagement and grow its streaming subscriber base.

For UFC, the deal ends the pay-per-view model common in the sport, greatly increasing accessibility for fans and potentially expanding the sport’s U.S. audience. The contract also doubles the yearly average payment compared to the $550 million ESPN currently pays, reflecting the growing value and popularity of UFC content.

TKO Group Holdings, UFC’s parent company, sees this agreement as a milestone in their decade-long growth, with TKO’s CEO Ari Emanuel affirming trust in Paramount’s vision to leverage technology to improve storytelling and the viewing experience.

This landmark deal reflects the rapidly evolving sports media landscape, with streaming services increasingly vying for premium content to attract and retain subscribers. Paramount’s move to bring UFC to its platform exclusively is a strong statement of commitment to live sports as a vital driver of engagement in the streaming age.

Shop Our Store- Click Here

Key Points:

  • Paramount secured UFC U.S. media rights for $7.7 billion over 7 years, starting 2026.
  • UFC events will be exclusively streamed on Paramount+, ending ESPN’s pay-per-view model.
  • The deal includes 13 major numbered events and 30 Fight Nights annually.
  • Some marquee events will also air on CBS broadcast TV.
  • The yearly payment doubles ESPN’s previous contract.
  • The deal was announced shortly after Paramount’s merger with Skydance.
  • Paramount aims to use UFC to boost Paramount+ subscriber growth and engagement.
  • TKO Group (UFC parent company) supports the deal and foresees enhanced tech-enabled storytelling.
  • Streaming services continue to disrupt traditional sports broadcasting models.
Continue Reading

Trending