Connect with us

News

USDA Ends Key Support for Black Farmers Following Trump’s Anti-DEI Orders

Published

on

Overview

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has officially ended key support programs for Black farmers and other minority groups following a mandate from President Donald Trump to dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. As of July 2025, the department will no longer use the term “socially disadvantaged” and will stop considering race or gender as criteria for farm loans, grants, and benefit programs—abruptly ending decades of efforts to address documented discrimination within American agriculture.

What Changed?

  • Elimination of “Socially Disadvantaged” Designation: The USDA will remove all references to “socially disadvantaged” farmers, a term that for more than 30 years provided targeted support to Black, Hispanic, Native American, and Asian producers, as well as women.
  • No Race- or Gender-based Considerations: The new policy, effective immediately, bars the use of race or sex in program decisions for farm loans and grants, shifting all criteria to be “color-blind” and “merit-based”.
  • Termination of DEI-Focused Programs: Over 3,600 related contracts and grants worth more than $5.5 billion have been canceled or frozen, with the USDA claiming to redirect resources towards the principle of “fairness and equal opportunity for all participants”.

Rationale from Trump Administration

USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins, appointed under the Trump administration, stated that the move was designed to end all forms of discrimination at the department. The policy comes in response to new executive orders from Trump specifically instructing the USDA and other federal agencies to terminate all mandates, preferences, and policies based on DEI considerations.

“Under President Trump, USDA does not discriminate and single out individual farmers based on race, sex, or political orientation. Secretary Rollins is working to reorient the department to be more effective at serving the American people and put farmers first while following the law,” a USDA spokesperson told reporters.

The administration argues that the department has already “sufficiently addressed” its history of discrimination through settlements, policy changes, and court-mandated reforms, rendering further race-based support unnecessary or unlawful.

Backlash and Concerns

Lawmakers and Advocates Respond

  • Local Food Systems at Risk: Experts and grassroots organizers highlight that these cuts threaten small and urban farms that deliver fresh produce to underserved communities, undermining food security and economic opportunity in rural and urban areas alike.

Farming Community Reaction

Black farmers have expressed shock and unease, noting that the withdrawal of “the little bit we were getting” will force many to scale back operations, lose land, or exit farming altogether. Lawsuits from white farmers, alleging “reverse discrimination,” were cited as part of the pressure prompting the policy shift.

Broader Context and Outlook

The USDA’s rollback aligns with a broader push across the federal government, under Trump’s directives, to eliminate policies and programs supporting specific racial or gender groups. This decision cancels support structures established under previous administrations and removes public access to data on lending to socially disadvantaged farmers.

While supporters of the policy claim it enacts a true meritocracy, critics argue it effectively erases decades of attempted remedies for deep-seated inequity and could further marginalize the country’s most vulnerable farm operators.

Advertisement

Key Facts and Statistics

MetricBefore Policy ShiftAfter Policy Shift
“Socially Disadvantaged” DesignationUsed in USDA programs since 1990Eliminated July 2025
Percentage of USDA Loan Volume21% went to “socially disadvantaged” in 2023No race-based preferences
Black Farmers’ Share of U.S. FarmsLess than 1% todayExpected to fall further
USDA Grants/Contracts Cut3,600+ canceled, $5.5B savedOngoing program reductions

Conclusion

The USDA’s end to targeted support for Black and other minority farmers, in compliance with Trump’s anti-DEI orders, marks a dramatic policy reversal. While advocates warn this will intensify inequities in American agriculture, federal officials maintain that all farmers now compete under a singular, “equal” system—despite the historic and economic context for many Black producers.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

French President Macron Sues Candace Owens for Calling His Wife a Man

Published

on

Background

French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron, have filed a defamation lawsuit in the United States against conservative commentator Candace Owens, following Owens’ repeated allegations that the First Lady is a man. The suit marks a notable escalation in a long-running campaign of harassment and conspiracy theories targeting Madame Macron, with the French couple now seeking legal redress beyond their home country.

Credit: Presidencia de la República Mexicana

Details of the Lawsuit

  • Filed In: Delaware Superior Court, United States
  • Plaintiffs: Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron
  • Defendant: Candace Owens and her business entities
  • Counts: 22 counts, including defamation and “false light”

The suit describes Owens’ claims as “outrageous, libelous, and implausible fabrications,” asserting that they have subjected the Macrons to “relentless bullying” and a “campaign of global humiliation.” The Macrons allege that Owens has repeatedly ignored credible evidence, favoring sensationalism and conspiracy to profit from their personal lives.

Shop Our Store

Owens’ Statements and Actions

According to the legal filings:

  • Owens published a podcast series called Becoming Brigitte, and created social media content with her 4.5 million YouTube subscribers, asserting that Brigitte Macron is actually a man named Jean-Michel Trogneux (the name of Brigitte’s brother).
  • Owens also marketed merchandise and monetized content centered around these false claims.
  • She publicly declared that she would “stake [her] entire professional reputation” on these allegations, despite being repeatedly confronted with contrary evidence and direct denials from the Macrons.

The Macrons’ Response

The Macrons argue that:

Credit: Christophe Licoppe / European Union, 2025 / EC – Audiovisual Service

Context and Precedents

This lawsuit is unusual in that a sitting world leader is personally suing a foreign media personality in another country’s courts. Notably:

Credit: Gage Skidmore

What’s Next

The Macrons are seeking both compensatory and punitive damages, as well as a public correction of the record. Owens has stated she will address the lawsuit on her own podcast, but had not commented further as of the time of filing.

This high-profile case spotlights the difficulties public figures face in combating viral misinformation, while also raising questions about the limits of free speech, defamation laws, and international jurisdiction in the social media age.

Continue Reading

News

Robots Are Ending Household Drudgery — Are Humans Next?

Published

on

The robotic revolution is advancing beyond factory floors and into the center of our homes. AI-powered household helpers are steadily taking the grind out of everyday chores, fundamentally shifting the way we live and redefining what “work” even means for millions. As these technologies accelerate, a pressing question emerges: could robots end the very concept of human drudgery—both in the home and eventually, beyond?

The Rise of Robotic Chore Experts

A decade ago, the idea of autonomous machines scrubbing our floors or sorting laundry sounded like science fiction. Today, it’s fast becoming the new normal:

  • Smart vacuums and mopping robots now handle dust and spills automatically, mapping entire homes and learning the messiest spots.
  • AI kitchen assistants prep basic meals, monitor ingredient stocks, and optimally schedule dishes for busy households.
  • Prototype robots are folding laundry, loading dishwashers, and even organizing closets, with consumer models expected to reach more homes this decade.
Support the Special Olympics- Shop Now

How Far Can Automation Go?

According to multiple studies, as much as 39–46% of household chores could be automated by 2035. Tasks like vacuuming, grocery shopping, dishwashing, and basic cooking are among the first to be delegated to machines, freeing up hours every week for families.

But the implications go wider:

  • AI’s learning curve keeps shrinking. With every update, robots become better at context, personalization, and error handling.
  • Falling costs and rising adoption: What began as pricey tech is approaching mass affordability, putting automated drudgery removal within reach for millions.

Are Humans Next? Beyond Chores to Careers

The same innovations making home life easier are beginning to reshape the workplace:

  • Routine office and service jobs are now being automated by AI at an accelerating pace, from administrative work to entry-level analysis and scheduling.
  • Jobs requiring empathy, creativity, and judgment remain far less susceptible, but the pace of change is forcing a re-examination of what roles truly require a human touch.
  • Adapting to Automation: Education systems and workplaces must pivot quickly to help people move from repetitive tasks to higher-level, more meaningful work.

Society at a Crossroads

As household and professional drudgery decline:

  • Quality of life may rise: With fewer hours spent on menial chores, people gain time for creativity, relationships, and leisure.
  • Redefining “work”: Human contributions may shift toward oversight, innovation, caregiving, and problem-solving—areas where machines still lag behind.

However, this transition also brings challenges, including possible job losses and questions about inequality and access to technology.

Key Takeaways

  • Robots and AI home helpers are erasing the burden of household chores at a rapidly increasing pace.
  • By 2035, up to 46% of domestic tasks could be automated, freeing humans for higher pursuits.
  • As home and workplace automation grow, society will need to adapt, focusing human effort where it matters most.
  • The end of household drudgery could just be the first step toward a broader transformation of work and life.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

3 Obsessed Michael Jackson Fans Who Made His Life a Nightmare

Published

on

Few public figures have inspired as much adoration—or as much dangerous obsession—as Michael Jackson. While millions idolized him from afar, a handful of super-fans took their devotion into darker territory, crossing the line from fandom to frightening fixation. Here are the true accounts of three women whose obsessions made Michael Jackson’s life a very real nightmare.

Denise Feifer: From Devoted Admirer to Criminal Outlaw

Denise Feifer’s fascination with Michael Jackson began at age 12, blossoming into an intense, decades-long obsession. A former bank clerk from Leicestershire, England, Denise followed Jackson around the world during his “Dangerous” tour, attending nearly every date and spending about $40,000. Her devotion bordered on the extreme: she once waited at Heathrow airport for days and even bluffed her way into Jackson’s hotel room in Frankfurt, Germany, managing to spend over an hour with her idol.

Denise Feifer

But when child abuse allegations against Jackson erupted in 1993, Denise’s attachment took a dark turn. Convinced of his innocence, she flew to Los Angeles to confront the family of his accuser, Jordie Chandler. Her actions escalated to vandalism, threatening calls, and attempted break-ins. Denise was eventually arrested and held in harsh jail conditions. International headlines followed when actress Lynn Redgrave posted Denise’s bail. The experience shattered her illusions: feeling abandoned by Jackson and humiliated by her ordeal, she returned to England bitter and disillusioned, ultimately turning away from the fantasy life she had built around him.

Leavonne Powell: The Self-Styled “Billie Jean Jackson”

Leavonne Powell, known by various aliases including “Billie Jean Jackson” and “Gabriella Jamila,” became notorious in the late 1980s for her delusional pursuit of the pop star. Powell insisted that Jackson was her husband and the father of her children, repeatedly filing lawsuits—including a $150 million paternity claim in 1987—and even legally changing her name to Billie Jean Jackson.

Support the Special Olympics- Shop Now

Her behaviors went far beyond the legal realm. Powell trespassed on Jackson’s properties, billed luxury items to his name, and was caught trying to sneak into his house, all while disregarding restraining orders and serving multiple jail sentences. Even after her paternity suit was dismissed for lack of evidence and Powell was ordered to undergo psychiatric evaluation, her fixation endured for years. Remarkably, she reemerged in 2008, now seeking $1 billion in support and visitation rights for yet another child she claimed Jackson had fathered—again, with no proof. Courts repeatedly dismissed her outlandish claims, but for Leavonne Powell, obsession never faded.

Leavonne Powell

Michelle Flowers: Accuser, Litigant, and Reluctant Recantation

Michelle Flowers, a Californian, made headlines in 1994 by filing a paternity and child support lawsuit against Jackson, demanding a mansion and $20 million a year for her alleged son. Her claims spun into ever stranger territory: tales of Jackson disguised and stalking her, kidnapping attempts, and spiritual manipulation. Despite sweeping and uncorroborated allegations, Flowers continued to press her case, even as courts conducted DNA tests that definitively proved Jackson was not the father—the biological father was her former husband.

Judges barred Flowers from filing further suits without special approval, but she persisted, shifting her narrative from paternity to claims of assault and psychological harassment. Years later, during Jackson’s own high-profile criminal trial, Flowers performed a dramatic reversal, publicly recanting her accusations, defending Jackson’s character, and expressing regret for her previous claims. Whether out of remorse or a new phase of obsession, her flip-flop closed one of the most bewildering chapters in Jackson’s decades of legal and personal distress.

Michelle Flowers

The Dark Side of Stardom

For Michael Jackson, the world’s adulation came with a perilous price. Denise Feifer, Leavonne Powell, and Michelle Flowers were more than zealous fans—they were relentless, sometimes delusional presences that invaded his privacy, safety, and peace of mind. These stories expose a chilling truth: while fame can inspire devotion, it can also attract dangerous obsession. For Jackson, the real horror wasn’t just the rumors or the press—but the super-fans whose love became his nightmare.

Continue Reading

Trending