Connect with us

Politics

Rep. Al Green Removed from House Chamber After Heckling Trump

Published

on

In a dramatic turn of events during President Donald Trump’s joint address to Congress on Tuesday, March 4, 2025, Democratic Representative Al Green was forcibly removed from the House chamber after interrupting the President’s speech.

Rep Al Green

The incident occurred just minutes into Trump’s address when the President referenced his November 5 election victory, calling it a “mandate.” Rep. Green, a 77-year-old Democrat representing the Houston area, stood up, pointed his cane at the dais, and shouted, “You have no mandate to cut Medicaid”.

As Trump attempted to continue his speech, Green persisted in his interruption, prompting boos and chants of “USA! USA!” from the Republican side of the chamber1. House Speaker Mike Johnson intervened, banging his gavel and issuing a warning: “Members are directed to uphold and maintain decorum in the House, and to cease any further disruptions. That’s your warning”.

When Green refused to comply and take his seat, Speaker Johnson ordered the sergeant-at-arms to remove him from the chamberAs Green was escorted out, some Republican members cheered, shouting “Get out!” and “Goodbye!” at the lawmaker.

Trump

Aftermath and Reactions

Following his removal, Green spoke to reporters, stating that he was “following the wishes of conscience” and that there are times when it is “better to stand alone than not stand at all”. He expressed his belief that Trump has engaged in actions that should not be tolerated and criticized the president’s budget, particularly the proposed cuts to Medicaid.

House Speaker Mike Johnson later told reporters that Green should be censured for his disruption, calling it a “spectacle that was not necessary”. Johnson indicated that he was “quite certain” several Republicans would bring forward a censure resolution against Green, which he would put up for a vote on the House floor.

Context and Background

Rep. Al Green, serving his 11th term in Congress, has been a vocal critic of President Trump and previously led impeachment efforts against him during his first presidential term. Green currently serves on the Financial Services Committee and the Committee on Homeland Security, and is Chair of the Oversight and Investigations subcommittee.

The incident occurred against the backdrop of carefully crafted Democratic party strategies for responding to Trump’s address. Party leadership had encouraged members to exercise restraint and avoid overt protests that could be exploited by Republicans. However, Green’s actions, along with other forms of protest from Democrats, demonstrated the deep divisions and tensions within Congress.

Advertisement

As the political fallout from this incident continues to unfold, it serves as a stark reminder of the heightened partisanship and contentious atmosphere surrounding President Trump’s second term in office.

Bolanle Media covers a wide range of topics, including film, technology, and culture. Our team creates easy-to-understand articles and news pieces that keep readers informed about the latest trends and events. If you’re looking for press coverage or want to share your story with a wider audience, we’d love to hear from you! Contact us today to discuss how we can help bring your news to life

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Protests Erupt During Ventura County Immigration Raid

Published

on

Federal agents conducting an immigration enforcement operation at Glass House Farms, a major cannabis cultivation site near Camarillo, Ventura County, were met by a large crowd of protesters on Thursday. The raid, which involved officers from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Border Patrol, and reportedly the National Guard, quickly escalated into a chaotic confrontation that drew national attention.

Protesters at Ventura Country Farm

Details of the Operation

Clashes With Protesters

  • Use of Force:
    Tensions escalated when agents deployed tear gas, smoke canisters, and less-than-lethal rounds to disperse the crowd. Protesters reportedly threw rocks and other objects in response. Several people were seen being detained, and at least one person was taken away on a stretcher.
  • Medical Response:
    The Ventura County Fire Department confirmed that paramedics transported four people to the hospital and treated several others at the scene for injuries related to the use of tear gas and crowd-control munitions.
Protesters at Ventura Country Farm

Community Impact and Reactions

Broader Context

  • Policy Shifts:
    The raid is part of a broader increase in federal immigration enforcement actions across Southern California, targeting farms, car washes, and other workplaces. The Trump administration has sent mixed signals on the issue, with recent reversals on enforcement priorities and ongoing debate over the future of undocumented farmworkers.
  • Ongoing Investigation:
    The FBI is investigating reports that a protester fired a handgun at agents during the confrontation. No injuries from gunfire were reported, but authorities are offering a reward for information leading to a conviction.
Protesters at Ventura Country Farm

Key Facts Table

Event DetailDescription
Date of RaidJuly 10, 2025
LocationGlass House Farms, Camarillo, Ventura County
Agencies InvolvedICE, Border Patrol, National Guard
Protester ResponseTear gas, smoke canisters, less-lethal rounds used
DetentionsDozens of workers detained, unclear total number
InjuriesAt least 4 hospitalized, several treated on scene
Community ImpactFear, disruption, family separation
Ongoing InvestigationFBI probing alleged gunfire at agents

Conclusion

The immigration raid at Glass House Farms in Ventura County has become a flashpoint in the national debate over immigration enforcement and farm labor. The confrontation between federal agents and protesters underscores the deep divisions and anxieties within communities that rely on undocumented workers, as well as the challenges facing both law enforcement and advocates in a rapidly shifting policy landscape.

Continue Reading

Business

How Trump’s Tariffs Could Hit American Wallets

Published

on

As the debate over tariffs heats up ahead of the 2024 election, new analysis reveals that American consumers could face significant financial consequences if former President Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs are enacted and maintained. According to a recent report highlighted by Forbes, the impact could be felt across households, businesses, and the broader U.S. economy.

The Household Cost: Up to $2,400 More Per Year

Research from Yale University’s Budget Lab, cited by Forbes, estimates that the average U.S. household could pay an additional $2,400 in 2025 if the new tariffs take effect and persist. This projection reflects the cumulative impact of all tariffs announced in Trump’s plan.

Price Hikes Across Everyday Goods

The tariffs are expected to drive up consumer prices by 1.8% in the near term. Some of the hardest-hit categories include:

  • Apparel: Prices could jump 37% in the short term (and 18% long-term).
  • Footwear: Up 39% short-term (18% long-term).
  • Metals: Up 43%.
  • Leather products: Up 39%.
  • Electrical equipment: Up 26%.
  • Motor vehicles, electronics, rubber, and plastic products: Up 11–18%.
  • Groceries: Items like vegetables, fruits, and nuts could rise up to 6%, with additional increases for coffee and orange juice due to specific tariffs on Brazilian imports.

A Historic Tariff Rate and Economic Impact

If fully implemented, the effective tariff rate on U.S. consumers could reach 18%, the highest level since 1934. The broader economic consequences are also notable:

  • GDP Reduction: The tariffs could reduce U.S. GDP by 0.4% annually, equating to about $110 billion per year.
  • Revenue vs. Losses: While tariffs are projected to generate $2.2 trillion in revenue over the next decade, this would be offset by $418 billion in negative economic impacts.

How Businesses Are Responding

A KPMG survey cited in the report found that 83% of business leaders expect to raise prices within six months of tariff implementation. More than half say their profit margins are already under pressure, suggesting that consumers will likely bear the brunt of these increased costs.

What This Means for Americans

The findings underscore the potential for substantial financial strain on American families and businesses if Trump’s proposed tariffs are enacted. With consumer prices set to rise and economic growth projected to slow, the debate over tariffs is likely to remain front and center in the months ahead.

For more in-depth economic analysis and updates, stay tuned to Bolanlemedia.com.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business & Money

Trump Announces 35% Tariff on Canadian Imports Starting August 1, 2025

Published

on

U.S. President Donald Trump has announced a sweeping 35% tariff on all Canadian imports, effective August 1, 2025. This move marks a significant escalation in trade tensions between the United States and Canada, two of the world’s closest economic partners. The measure is part of Trump’s broader strategy to address what he calls “unsustainable Trade Deficits” and protect American industries.

Details of the Tariff

  • Scope: The 35% tariff applies to virtually all Canadian exports to the United States, with no exemptions for goods that comply with the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement), which had previously provided certain protections.
  • Enforcement: Goods transshipped through third countries to avoid the tariff will still be subject to the 35% rate.
  • Timeline: The tariff takes effect on August 1, 2025.
  • Potential Adjustments: Trump has indicated that the rate could be increased if Canada retaliates with its own tariffs, or lowered if Canada addresses U.S. concerns, such as stopping fentanyl trafficking.

Justifications Cited by the Trump Administration

President Trump’s announcement cited several reasons for the new tariff:

  • Retaliatory Measures: Canada’s previous retaliatory tariffs against U.S. goods.
  • Trade Deficits: Concerns over the U.S. trade deficit with Canada, which Trump claims threatens national security.
  • Dairy Industry: Complaints about Canada’s high tariffs on U.S. dairy products, reportedly up to 400%.
  • Fentanyl Trafficking: Allegations that Canada has not done enough to prevent the flow of fentanyl into the U.S..

Economic and Political Impact

Economic Concerns

  • Business Reaction: A recent poll found that 84% of American business leaders are worried about the negative impact of tariffs on the U.S. economy’s global standing.
  • Supply Chains: The integrated North American supply chain, especially in the automotive sector, is expected to be severely affected. Major automakers have warned of significant disruptions and cost increases.
  • Tariff Trends: U.S. applied tariff rates have surged under Trump’s administration, reaching historic highs in early 2025. The new Canadian tariff could push average rates even higher after a brief reduction earlier in the year.

Diplomatic Repercussions

  • Canadian Response: Prime Minister Mark Carney, recently elected on an anti-Trump platform, is preparing retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. Canada has previously imposed tariffs on $20 billion (CA$30 billion) worth of American products, with plans to expand further.
  • Breakdown in Negotiations: Diplomatic relations have deteriorated, especially after the U.S. ended trade talks following Canada’s implementation of a digital services tax in June 2025. Despite previous commitments at the G7 summit to seek compromise, the relationship remains tense.

Conclusion

The imposition of a 35% tariff on Canadian imports by the United States represents a major shift in North American trade relations. The move is expected to have wide-ranging economic and diplomatic consequences, with both countries bracing for further escalation and uncertainty in cross-border commerce.

Continue Reading

Trending