Connect with us

Politics

Rep. Al Green Removed from House Chamber After Heckling Trump

Published

on

In a dramatic turn of events during President Donald Trump’s joint address to Congress on Tuesday, March 4, 2025, Democratic Representative Al Green was forcibly removed from the House chamber after interrupting the President’s speech.

Rep Al Green

The incident occurred just minutes into Trump’s address when the President referenced his November 5 election victory, calling it a “mandate.” Rep. Green, a 77-year-old Democrat representing the Houston area, stood up, pointed his cane at the dais, and shouted, “You have no mandate to cut Medicaid”.

As Trump attempted to continue his speech, Green persisted in his interruption, prompting boos and chants of “USA! USA!” from the Republican side of the chamber1. House Speaker Mike Johnson intervened, banging his gavel and issuing a warning: “Members are directed to uphold and maintain decorum in the House, and to cease any further disruptions. That’s your warning”.

When Green refused to comply and take his seat, Speaker Johnson ordered the sergeant-at-arms to remove him from the chamberAs Green was escorted out, some Republican members cheered, shouting “Get out!” and “Goodbye!” at the lawmaker.

Trump

Aftermath and Reactions

Following his removal, Green spoke to reporters, stating that he was “following the wishes of conscience” and that there are times when it is “better to stand alone than not stand at all”. He expressed his belief that Trump has engaged in actions that should not be tolerated and criticized the president’s budget, particularly the proposed cuts to Medicaid.

House Speaker Mike Johnson later told reporters that Green should be censured for his disruption, calling it a “spectacle that was not necessary”. Johnson indicated that he was “quite certain” several Republicans would bring forward a censure resolution against Green, which he would put up for a vote on the House floor.

Context and Background

Rep. Al Green, serving his 11th term in Congress, has been a vocal critic of President Trump and previously led impeachment efforts against him during his first presidential term. Green currently serves on the Financial Services Committee and the Committee on Homeland Security, and is Chair of the Oversight and Investigations subcommittee.

The incident occurred against the backdrop of carefully crafted Democratic party strategies for responding to Trump’s address. Party leadership had encouraged members to exercise restraint and avoid overt protests that could be exploited by Republicans. However, Green’s actions, along with other forms of protest from Democrats, demonstrated the deep divisions and tensions within Congress.

Advertisement

As the political fallout from this incident continues to unfold, it serves as a stark reminder of the heightened partisanship and contentious atmosphere surrounding President Trump’s second term in office.

Bolanle Media covers a wide range of topics, including film, technology, and culture. Our team creates easy-to-understand articles and news pieces that keep readers informed about the latest trends and events. If you’re looking for press coverage or want to share your story with a wider audience, we’d love to hear from you! Contact us today to discuss how we can help bring your news to life

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Film Industry

100% Tariffs: The Death Sentence for International Movies

Published

on

The 100% tariff announced by President Trump on movies produced outside the U.S. aims to revive the “dying” American film industry by discouraging studios from filming abroad, where tax incentives attract productions to countries like the UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand (Variety, 2024).

This tariff threatens to double costs for foreign-made films entering the U.S. market, potentially causing studios to shift production back to the U.S., but also risking fewer films being made due to increased expenses (Hollywood Reporter, 2024).

The move has sparked widespread alarm internationally, with film sectors in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand warning of devastating job losses and industry damage, especially as these countries have become major hubs for high-end film and TV production (Deadline, 2024). Industry insiders call the tariffs “insane” and warn they could cripple independent distributors and streaming platforms reliant on global production networks (The Guardian, 2024). Major U.S. media stocks, including Disney and Netflix, fell sharply following the announcement due to concerns over increased costs and disrupted international collaboration (CNBC, 2024).

Uncertainties remain about the tariffs’ exact scope-whether they apply to streaming content, co-productions, or how enforcement would work-adding to industry confusion and anxiety (Variety, 2024). Experts caution that retaliatory tariffs by other countries could further harm U.S. films abroad, potentially shrinking the global market and undermining Hollywood’s recovery from recent setbacks like the pandemic and strikes (Hollywood Reporter, 2024).

In summary, the 100% tariff on foreign-made films is widely seen as a drastic measure that could severely disrupt the global film industry, raise production costs, threaten thousands of jobs internationally, and create significant uncertainty for studios, distributors, and audiences worldwide (Deadline, 2024).

Bolanle Media covers a wide range of topics, including film, technology, and culture. Our team creates easy-to-understand articles and news pieces that keep readers informed about the latest trends and events. If you’re looking for press coverage or want to share your story with a wider audience, we’d love to hear from you! Contact us today to discuss how we can help bring your news to life

Continue Reading

News

Putin Prepares Russians for Prolonged War, Citing WWII Sacrifice

Published

on

President Vladimir Putin is rallying Russians for a long-term commitment to the war in Ukraine, drawing direct parallels to the Soviet Union’s sacrifices during World War II. Speaking at what is being called the “grandest” Victory Day parade in Moscow, Putin is invoking the memory of the nation’s immense suffering and resilience during the defeat of Nazi Germany to galvanize support for Russian troops fighting in Ukraine.

Putin’s address emphasized unity, historical continuity, and the need for national endurance: “Victory Day unites all generations. We are going forward relying on our centuries-old traditions and feel confident that together we will ensure a free and secure future of Russia,” he declared, as military hardware paraded and warplanes flew overhead. He accused the West of fueling global conflicts and reaffirmed Russia’s readiness to defend itself, warning that “our strategic forces are in combat readiness,” while expressing hope that nuclear weapons will not be needed in the Ukraine conflict.

The Kremlin is using government initiatives to place war veterans in positions of influence, reinforcing the message of national struggle and preparing society for an extended campaignPutin’s rhetoric, steeped in references to WWII, aims to legitimize continued military action and sustain public support by framing the Ukraine war as a test of Russian endurance and historical destiny.

Recent intelligence suggests Putin may be shifting immediate war goals to consolidating occupied territory and strengthening Russia’s economy, but Western officials remain skeptical about his willingness to end the conflict soonAs the war grinds on, Putin’s invocation of WWII sacrifice seeks to fortify Russian resolve for what he signals could be a drawn-out confrontation.

Bolanle Media covers a wide range of topics, including film, technology, and culture. Our team creates easy-to-understand articles and news pieces that keep readers informed about the latest trends and events. If you’re looking for press coverage or want to share your story with a wider audience, we’d love to hear from you! Contact us today to discuss how we can help bring your news to life

Continue Reading

News

Trump Signals Tariff Relief as U.S.-China Tensions Rise

Published

on

President Donald Trump has signaled the possibility of easing tariffs on Chinese goods, even as U.S.-China tensions continue to escalate and both sides exchange new rounds of economic retaliation. The move comes amid growing concern over the global economic impact of the ongoing trade war between the world’s two largest economies.

Tariff Shifts and Mixed Signals

In early April, President Trump imposed sweeping new tariffs, raising duties on most Chinese imports to 145% as part of his “Liberation Day” trade policy overhaul. While a universal 10% tariff on all imports remains in place, China-specific tariffs have surged far higher, prompting Beijing to retaliate by raising its own tariffs on U.S. goods to as much as 125%. The Trump administration also announced a 90-day pause on “reciprocal” tariffs for most other trading partners, but excluded China from this relief.

Despite this hardline stance, Trump has recently suggested that tariffs on China could be lowered if Beijing offers “something substantial” in return. These comments have fueled speculation of a potential de-escalation, with Wall Street responding positively to the prospect of reduced trade barriers. However, the president has made clear that any rollback would be contingent on significant concessions from China.

China Pushes Back, Demands Respect

Chinese officials have dismissed claims that formal tariff negotiations are underway, urging the U.S. to stop “misleading the public” and insisting that talks can only proceed on the basis of mutual respect and equality. China’s Ministry of Commerce has called the escalating tariffs a “mistake on top of a mistake” and warned that China will “fight to the end” if the U.S. continues to increase pressure.

Advertisement
President of China, Xi Jinping arrives in London, 19 October 2015.

In addition to raising tariffs, China has placed several U.S. companies on export control and unreliable entities lists, further complicating the trade relationship6Chinese leaders have also downplayed the impact of U.S. tariffs on their economic recovery, signaling confidence in their ability to weather the dispute.

Economic and Market Impact

The tariff standoff has had immediate effects on global markets and U.S. retailers. Companies like Walmart and Target have warned of potential empty shelves and higher prices for American consumers as a result of the trade barriers.Meanwhile, the White House is considering exemptions for certain sectors, such as consumer electronics and auto parts, but maintains that tariffs will ultimately be enforced.

Outlook

While President Trump’s hints at tariff relief have raised hopes for a possible thaw, the underlying tensions between the U.S. and China remain high. Both governments continue to demand major concessions from each other, and there are no signs of formal negotiations resuming soon. For now, businesses and consumers are bracing for continued volatility as the trade dispute shows no clear path to resolution.

Bolanle Media covers a wide range of topics, including film, technology, and culture. Our team creates easy-to-understand articles and news pieces that keep readers informed about the latest trends and events. If you’re looking for press coverage or want to share your story with a wider audience, we’d love to hear from you! Contact us today to discuss how we can help bring your news to life

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending