Connect with us

World News

Ukraine’s US ambassador breaks convention during desperate times on December 18, 2023 at 11:00 am

Published

on

Oksana Markarova, Ukraine’s war-time ambassador to the U.S., has had to step out of her comfort zone to be more insistent and “unconventional” when advocating for the existential needs of her country in Washington.  

“When you develop relations, you need to be diplomatic, you need to be polite, you need to wait sometimes — and that’s something that I had to change after 24th of February,” Markarova said in an interview with The Hill, citing the day of Russia’s full-scale invasion on her country. 

Markarova is Kyiv’s point person on pushing for weapons, economic assistance, vocal support and leadership from the most powerful country in the world — ones whose support is increasingly coming under pressure from GOP critics.  

“It’s always not easy. I mean the previous four supplementary budgets were not easy,” she said when asked about her task to bring President Biden’s latest request for more than $60 billion in support for Ukraine over the finish line.  

Advertisement

“These four supplementary bills that were to support Ukraine in the past, they were very critical for us, we’re very grateful for them. But we believe they’re also very important for the U.S. as a leader of the free world.”  

A new generation of women ambassadors

Markarova is also Ukraine’s first woman ambassador, serving at a time where more legacy diplomatic missions have also, for the first time, sent women envoys. This includes the United KingdomCanadaItaly, to name a few. The European Union is dispatching its first woman ambassador to Washington later this year.  

Greece’s first woman ambassador, Alexandra Papadopoulou, told The Hill in 2020 that these female diplomats started a Whatsapp group. Markarova said she’s a member.  

“Working with so many female ambassadors has been a game changer,” she said.  

Advertisement

Markarova, center, marches on Pennsylvania Avenue to protest Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as demonstrators celebrate the 31st Independence Day of Ukraine outside of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

When asked if working in Washington as a war-time ambassador has changed her personality, Markarova points to a story about Israel’s prime minister during the 1973 Yom Kippur war, the Kyiv-born Golda Meir. 

As Israel was under surprise assault from the Arab armies invading from Egypt and Syria, Meir was on the phone with her ambassador in Washington telling him to wake up the White House at 3 a.m. and to send more weapons to the Jewish state.  

“Call when you need to call, and talk to people when you need to talk to people, and not be shy about reaching out to whoever you need to reach out because the life of your country, and your countryman and your family depends on it,” she explains about the lesson from the story. 

Advertisement

“We had to become more unconventional and sometimes, not always adhere to the diplomatic protocols.”  

Russia’s war in Ukraine has now lasted more than 21 months, and expectations are that Kyiv’s efforts to rout all of Russia from its territory is going to be a years-long battle.  

Markarova said that she and the team at the embassy have found an equilibrium for their work, compared to what was frenetic and all-consuming in those first few days, weeks and months after Feb. 24.  

“People see you, they keep asking, ‘How are you?’ And how can you be when there is war back home. But I think all of the team here, we have found our new reason or new balance, so to say. And we can even say that we’re fine,” she said.  

Advertisement

“Every day that we’re getting closer to victory, every day that we can secure more weapons or more support every day that we talk to more people is a good day. But, of course, we’re not completely fine.” 

The Ukraine House

Markarova arrived in Washington in April 2021, and her first seven months were spent working on two fronts. 

Publicly, she was laying the groundwork for Ukrainian President Voldoymr Zelensky’s first Oval Office visit with President Biden and to solidify language on two documents that would establish a foundation for a new era of the U.S.-Ukraine relationship — a Strategic Partnership Charter and Strategic Defense Cooperation. 

Markarova meets with Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), from left, Ukrainian Minister of Defense Rustem Umerov and Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) at the Capitol in Washington. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)

Advertisement

Privately, discussions were being had about how their public work, actions and statements could signal to Putin that any further incursion into Ukraine would be disastrous for Russia, which had since 2014 been occupying the eastern territories of Ukraine’s Donbas and the Crimean peninsula.

“And we were thinking on, a) How do we strengthen our defense cooperation, get more weapons, to show them [Moscow] that it’s going to be too expensive for Russia, and that we will be able to inflict unbearable pain for them, if they attack,” Markarova said of the thinking at the time. 

The ambassador also worked on issues of economic resilience for Ukraine, laying the groundwork for deeper ties with the International Monetary Fund that has been the intermediary for billions of dollars in financial assistance from the U.S. 

Those funds have allowed the Ukrainian government to pay the salaries of teachers, health care workers, provide for pensioners, and other budget requirements that help the State function in the midst of war.   

Advertisement

On another front, Markarova was working on a passion project: to open “Ukraine House” in Washington to serve as a hub — separate from the embassy — that could be used to promote Ukrainian culture.  

It has since served as an extension of Ukraine’s wartime efforts – organizing fundraisers for weapons, drones, reconstruction or recovery. It has also hosted press conferences about holding Russia accountable for its violations of international law, atrocities against civilians and the crime of aggression against a sovereign nation.  

“This is my pet project. It’s my baby,” Markarova said of the two-story, brick building in Washington’s Kalorama neighborhood. It was officially opened in September 2021 when Zelensky came for his first meeting with Biden.  

“He said, ‘Oh, you said you were going to open the Ukraine house. Let’s do it when I’m there,’” Markarova described the Ukrainian president saying to her. “So that pretty much accelerated the timeline of the preparation.” 

Advertisement

‘Have to act’

In the months leading up to February 2022, alarm was growing in Washington and around the world that Russia was poised to launch an attack against Ukraine.

Markarova and the embassy were preparing a number of contingency plans in the event that Russia would launch its full-scale invasion, focused on how the embassy would operate and coordinate with Kyiv, how to build in redundancy to communication systems in case they were cut.  

It was no secret the threat-level was high. The Biden administration was convening extraordinary diplomatic meetings with the backing of NATO to warn Russia from launching an invasion, and dispatching CIA Director Bill Burns to Moscow to personally try and walk back Putin from the ledge.  

“There was a lot of non-public preparatory work that went into this, just in case — we were changing the protocol from time to time,” she said.  

Advertisement

“But of course, when it happened, that’s when suddenly you just have to act.”  

Markarova, right, is hooded by President of Boston College William Leahy, left, as she is awarded with the honorary degree of Doctor of Laws during commencement ceremonies in Boston. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)

Markarova points out the extraordinary circumstances of the moment, that social media and smartphones transmitted images of Russia’s invasion in real time, in addition to prominent media being in the country at the time of the invasion, as important in getting the world — but most importantly the U.S. and Americans — on board to support Ukraine.  

And that the messages are personal too. From Zelensky’s cellphone video from the government compound in Kyiv, proving that he was alive and in the capital – to Markarova’s own communication with her husband, who was evacuating their parents from in and around Kyiv.  

Advertisement

“I’m yet to find, or to meet people here, who I would talk to, and explain it to them and show them, and show them the messages on my phone, or show them the videos that my husband sent me when he was there from the day one of this full-scale aggression, that people would say, ‘I don’t think we should help’… the majority of people say, ‘Oh, my God, this is horrible. This is important for all of us.’” 

But that has been challenged by an oversaturation of information, the length of the war and fighting and the emergence of new crises around the world, particularly Hamas’s terror attack on Israel and subsequent conflict in Gaza. 

Markarova said that the ups and downs in support for Ukraine reinforces the importance of the embassy’s mission and their work to communicate with people. 

“I think we should be even more active, and this is what we’re doing and have even more events to champion Ukrainian culture, Ukrainian history, to tell more people about how — even though we’re so far away from the U.S., but I think we’re very similar to Americans,” she said.  

Advertisement

​ Oksana Markarova, Ukraine’s war-time ambassador to the U.S., has had to step out of her comfort zone to be more insistent and “unconventional” when advocating for the existential needs of her country in Washington. “When you develop relations, you need to be diplomatic, you need to be polite, you need to wait sometimes — and… 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

US May Completely Cut Income Tax Due to Tariff Revenue

Published

on

President Donald Trump says the United States might one day get rid of federal income tax because of money the government collects from tariffs on imported goods. Tariffs are extra taxes the U.S. puts on products that come from other countries.

What Trump Is Saying

Trump has said that tariff money could become so large that it might allow the government to cut income taxes “almost completely.” He has also talked about possibly phasing out income tax over the next few years if tariff money keeps going up.

How Taxes Work Now

Right now, the federal government gets much more money from income taxes than from tariffs. Income taxes bring in trillions of dollars each year, while tariffs bring in only a small part of that total. Because of this gap, experts say tariffs would need to grow by many times to replace income tax money.

Questions From Experts

Many economists and tax experts doubt that tariffs alone could pay for the whole federal budget. They warn that very high tariffs could make many imported goods more expensive for shoppers in the United States. This could hit lower- and middle‑income families hardest, because they spend a big share of their money on everyday items.

What Congress Must Do

The president can change some tariffs, but only Congress can change or end the federal income tax. That means any real plan to remove income tax would need new laws passed by both the House of Representatives and the Senate. So far, there is no detailed law or full budget plan on this idea.

What It Means Right Now

For now, Trump’s comments are a proposal, not a change in the law. People and businesses still have to pay federal income tax under the current rules. The debate over using tariffs instead of income taxes is likely to continue among lawmakers, experts, and voters.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Epstein Files to Be Declassified After Trump Order

Published

on


Former President Donald Trump has signed an executive order directing federal agencies to declassify all government files related to Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier whose death in 2019 continues to fuel controversy and speculation.

The order, signed Wednesday at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, instructs the FBI, Department of Justice, and intelligence agencies to release documents detailing Epstein’s network, finances, and alleged connections to high-profile figures. Trump described the move as “a step toward transparency and public trust,” promising that no names would be shielded from scrutiny.

“This information belongs to the American people,” Trump said in a televised statement. “For too long, powerful interests have tried to bury the truth. That ends now.”

U.S. intelligence officials confirmed that preparations for the release are already underway. According to sources familiar with the process, the first batch of documents is expected to be made public within the next 30 days, with additional releases scheduled over several months.

Reactions poured in across the political spectrum. Supporters praised the decision as a bold act of accountability, while critics alleged it was politically motivated, timed to draw attention during a volatile election season. Civil rights advocates, meanwhile, emphasized caution, warning that some records could expose private victims or ongoing legal matters.

The Epstein case, which implicated figures in politics, business, and entertainment, remains one of the most talked-about scandals of the past decade. Epstein’s connections to influential individuals—including politicians, royals, and executives—have long sparked speculation about the extent of his operations and who may have been involved.

Advertisement

Former federal prosecutor Lauren Fields said the release could mark a turning point in public discourse surrounding government transparency. “Regardless of political stance, this declassification has the potential to reshape how Americans view power and accountability,” Fields noted.

Officials say redactions may still occur to protect sensitive intelligence or personal information, but the intent is a near-complete disclosure. For years, critics of the government’s handling of Epstein’s case have accused agencies of concealing evidence or shielding elites from exposure. Trump’s order promises to change that narrative.

As anticipation builds, journalists, legal analysts, and online commentators are preparing for what could be one of the most consequential information releases in recent history.

Continue Reading

Politics

Netanyahu’s UN Speech Triggers Diplomatic Walkouts and Mass Protests

Published

on

What Happened at the United Nations

On Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, defending Israel’s ongoing military operations in Gaza. As he spoke, more than 100 delegates from over 50 countries stood up and left the chamber—a rare and significant diplomatic walkout. Outside the UN, thousands of protesters gathered to voice opposition to Netanyahu’s policies and call for accountability, including some who labeled him a war criminal. The protest included activists from Palestinian and Jewish groups, along with international allies.

Why Did Delegates and Protesters Walk Out?

The walkouts and protests were a response to Israel’s continued offensive in Gaza, which has resulted in widespread destruction and a significant humanitarian crisis. Many countries and individuals have accused Israel of excessive use of force, and some international prosecutors have suggested Netanyahu should face investigation by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, including claims that starvation was used as a weapon against civilians. At the same time, a record number of nations—over 150—recently recognized the State of Palestine, leaving the United States as the only permanent UN Security Council member not to join them.

International Reaction and Significance

The diplomatic walkouts and street protests demonstrate increasing global concern over the situation in Gaza and growing support for Palestinian statehood. Several world leaders, including Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro, showed visible solidarity with protesters. Petro called for international intervention and, controversially, for US troops not to follow orders he viewed as supporting ongoing conflict. The US later revoked Petro’s visa over his role in the protests, which he argued was evidence of a declining respect for international law.

BILATERAL MEETING WITH THE PRIME MINISTER OF ISRAEL Photo credit: Matty STERN/U.S. Embassy Jerusalem

Why Is This News Important?

The Gaza conflict is one of the world’s most contentious and closely-watched issues. It has drawn strong feelings and differing opinions from governments, activists, and ordinary people worldwide. The United Nations, as an international organization focused on peace and human rights, is a key arena for these debates. The events surrounding Netanyahu’s speech show that many nations and voices are urging new action—from recognition of Palestinian rights to calls for sanctions against Israel—while discussion and disagreement over the best path forward continue.

This episode at the UN highlights how international diplomacy, public protests, and official policy are all intersecting in real time as the search for solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains urgent and unresolved.

Continue Reading

Trending