Connect with us

Entertainment

Royal Who Made Racist Remarks About Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s Son Identified … on November 29, 2023 at 2:55 pm The Hollywood Gossip

Published

on

Back in 2021, Meghan Markle revealed that prior to the birth of her first child, a member of the royal family had expressed concerns about the baby’s skin tone.

Meghan was obviously horrified by the remark, but while she poignantly cited the incident as an example of the casual bigotry that she endured during her time living in London, she stopped short of identifying the party responsible for the comment.

Now, however, after years of speculation, it looks as though the royal racist may have finally been outed.

Earlier this month, a new book by journalist and Sussex supporter Omid Scobie created controversy with new claims about Meghan and Prince Harry’s strained relationship with the royals.

Advertisement

Life in the U.S. has not exactly been all peaches and cream for Harry and Meghan. (Photo Credit: Getty Images)

But the initial uproar paled in comparison to the scandal created by a clerical error in a Dutch version of the book that was delivered to a publishing company in the Netherlands.

According to a new report from Page Six, that edition of the book explicitly identified the person responsible for those racist remarks about Prince Archie.

The article explains that “Dutch media members who saw the errant book say it matches the claims of previously released royal biographies which we featured last year.”

Advertisement

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle attend the 2020 UN Nelson Mandela Prize award ceremony at the United Nations in New York on July 18, 2022. (Getty)

It then links to an article explaining that the previous biographies identified Charles as the culprit.

Obviously, we can’t say with any certainty that the king is the person responsible for those wildly offensive remarks — but that would explain quite a lot.

Royal experts have long theorized that if anyone less powerful than Charles made the comment, they probably would have been publicly identified right off the bat.

Advertisement

King Charles III departs the Coronation service at Westminster Abbey on May 06, 2023 in London, England. (Getty Images)

This latest development comes on the heels of indications that Charles and Harry are working hard to repair their relationship.

Harry and Meghan called Charles on his birthday, and observers were reportedly surprised to see the king take time out of his busy schedule to chat with the Sussexes.

But the Scobie book appears to have complicated these recent reconciliation efforts.

Advertisement

King Charles III at Prince Harry at the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II. (Emilio Morenatti – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

In one controversial passage, Scobie claims that Harry essentially threatened Charles after the king evicted the Sussexes from Frogmore Cottage, which had served as their home base during visits to the UK.

Concerned that it would be difficult for the family to book secure accommodations of their own, Harry reportedly posed the following question to Charles:

“Don’t you want to see your grandchildren?”

Advertisement

Prince Harry whispers to Meghan Markle as they watch a dance performance by Jukebox Collective in the banqueting hall during a visit to Cardiff Castle on January 18, 2018 in Cardiff, Wales. (Photo Credit: Getty Images)

Some readers have praised Harry’s courage in standing up to his powerful father, while others have accused him of using his children as bargaining chips.

Regardless of your interpretation of the situation, it seems obvious that won’t be easy for Harry and Charles to leave the past behind them and bury the hatchet for good.

We already know that Harry and Meghan will not be traveling to the UK for Christmas, and it’s unclear if there are any current plans for Charles to see the couple’s children again.

Advertisement

It might be a very long time before all parties involved are able to set aside their differences long enough to make that happen.

Royal Who Made Racist Remarks About Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s Son Identified … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

Back in 2021, Meghan Markle revealed that prior to the birth of her first child, a member of the royal …
Royal Who Made Racist Remarks About Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s Son Identified … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip. 

​   The Hollywood Gossip Read More 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Kim and Kanye’s Daughter North West Faces Criticism Over Her Tattoos

Published

on

North West, the 12-year-old daughter of Kim Kardashian and Kanye West, is under the spotlight once again — this time for showing off a collection of tattoos that set social media on fire. In recent photos and videos circulating online, North was seen with several arm designs, including tributes to her parents and fashion-inspired symbols. While fans were quick to admire her bold style, not everyone was impressed.

Critics argue that the tattoos — even though they appear to be temporary — are another example of celebrity children being pushed into adult trends too early. Comments flooded social media platforms, with some users saying Kim allows North too much freedom, while others defended the reality star’s parenting approach, praising her for letting her daughter explore creativity and self-expression.

“Kids should be kids,” one commenter wrote, reflecting a broader sentiment among parents online. Meanwhile, supporters pointed out that North comes from one of the most fashion-forward families in the world and that experimenting with style is part of her upbringing.

Kim Kardashian has not directly addressed the controversy, but she has often spoken about encouraging her children to express themselves authentically. North, already known for her viral TikTok appearances and fashion collaborations, seems unfazed by the criticism.

At just 12, North West continues to blur the lines between youth culture and celebrity identity — reminding the public that in the Kardashian–West household, individuality isn’t just allowed, it’s celebrated.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Jennifer Lopez’s Ex Fires Back: “You Are the Problem”

Published

on

Ojani Noa Accuses J.Lo of Cheating After “Never Been Loved” Comments

Jennifer Lopez is once again at the center of a media storm — but this time, it’s her first husband, Ojani Noa, turning up the heat. Following Lopez’s recent Howard Stern Show interview, in which she claimed she has “never been truly loved” by any of her exes, Noa has publicly accused the superstar of cheating and playing the victim.

In the viral Instagram post that has now spread across major outlets like TMZ and New York Post, Noa didn’t hold back.

“Stop putting us down. Stop putting me down with your victim card,” he wrote. “The problem is not us. Not me. The problem is you. You’re the one who couldn’t keep it in your pants.”

“You Chose Fame and Lies Over Love”

Noa and Lopez were married briefly from 1997 to 1998, before her rise to Hollywood superstardom. In his explosive statement, he accused her of being unfaithful during their marriage, claiming she prioritized fame over their relationship.

“You have been loved a few times. You’ve been married four times. And have had countless relationships in between,” Noa continued. “You decided to lie, to cheat on me. You begged me to keep the marriage intact to avoid bad press.”

Noa described himself as “faithful, honest, and loving,” saying he uprooted his life and career to support Lopez at the beginning of her entertainment journey. “I left my family, my friends, everything behind for you,” he wrote, “but once fame came calling, you left me behind.”​

Lopez Silent Amid Growing Backlash

As of now, Jennifer Lopez has not publicly responded to Noa’s allegations. During her Howard Stern interview, the singer and actress claimed her former partners “weren’t capable” of loving her, saying, “It’s not that I’m not lovable… it’s that they’re not capable.”

Advertisement

Her remarks were widely interpreted as referencing all of her ex-husbands — including Marc Anthony, Cris Judd, and Ben Affleck — but it was Noa who reacted first and most forcefully. His comments have ignited widespread debate online, with many questioning whether Lopez’s honesty came at the expense of others’ reputations.

Public Response and Media Fallout

The online reaction has been intense, with social media users split between defending Lopez’s right to share her truth and blasting her for allegedly rewriting history. Meanwhile, entertainment analysts note that the controversy adds to an increasingly turbulent year for the singer, following canceled tours, underperforming films, and ongoing scrutiny over her marriage to Affleck.

This latest backlash has also reignited conversations about Lopez’s highly publicized romantic history. As tabloids and fans speculate whether more exes might respond, the situation underscores an old truth in celebrity culture — that every candid confession comes with consequences.

For now, Jennifer Lopez remains silent. But in the court of public opinion, the debate about who’s really at fault in her love story is only just beginning.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Selling Your Soul in Hollywood: The Hidden Cost of Fame

Published

on

By all appearances, Hollywood is a dream factory — a place where charisma, talent, and luck collide to create stars. But behind the camera lights and red carpets lies a conversation few inside the industry speak openly about: the spiritual and moral price of ambition.

For actor Omar Gooding, the idea of “selling your soul” in Hollywood isn’t a metaphor — it’s a moral process that begins with tiny compromises. In an October 2025 interview, Gooding explained that no one in Hollywood makes a literal deal with the devil. Instead, it’s the quiet yeses, the moments when comfort overrides conviction, that mark the beginning of the trade. “They don’t say, ‘Take this or you’ll never make it,’” he said. “They just put it in front of you. You choose.”

Those choices, he argues, create a pattern. Once you show that you’ll accept something you once resisted, the industry notices. “Hollywood knows who it can get away with what,” Gooding said. “One thing always leads to another.” The phrase “selling your soul,” in this context, means losing your say — doing what you’re told rather than what you believe in.

That moral tension has long shadowed the arts. Comedians like Dave Chappelle, who famously walked away from millions to preserve his creative integrity, often serve as examples of where conviction and career collide. In resurfaced interviews, Chappelle hinted that he felt manipulated and silenced by powerful figures who sought control of his narrative, warning that “they’re trying to convince me I’m insane.”

This isn’t just about conspiracy — it’s about agency. Hollywood runs on perception. Performers are rewarded for being agreeable, moldable, entertaining. Those who question the machine or refuse the script risk exile, while those who conform are elevated — sometimes beyond what they can handle.

We see the ‘collections’ all the time,” Gooding explained. “When the bill comes due, you can tell. They made that deal long ago.”

But the story doesn’t end in darkness. Gooding also emphasizes that in today’s entertainment landscape, artists have more control than ever. With streaming, social media, and creator‑driven platforms, performers don’t have to “play the game” to be seen. Independent creators can build their own stages, speak their own truths, and reach millions without trading authenticity for access.

Still, the temptation remains — recognition, validation, quick success. And every generation of artists must answer the same question: What are you willing to do for fame?

Advertisement

As Gooding put it, “You just make the best choices you can. Because once it’s gone — your name, your peace, your soul — there’s no buying it back.”

Continue Reading

Trending