Connect with us

Entertainment

Jill Duggar: Jim Bob Sent My Siblings to Harass Me After I Asked to Get Paid For TV Work on September 15, 2023 at 2:10 pm The Hollywood Gossip

Published

on

After months of anticipation, Jill Duggar’s debut memoir finally hit stores this week.

As expected, the book contains several startling revelations about Jill’s tumultuous upbringing and the bizarre system of rules forced upon her by her father, Jim Bob Duggar.

Jill cut off contact with her parents back in 2019, a decision that was motivated as much by their behavior toward her in her adult years as it was by the abuse she endured as a child.

Specifically, Jim Bob and Michelle turned on Jill after she revealed that she received very little money for her work on her family’s TLC reality shows.

Advertisement

Jill Duggar holds a cup of coffee while looking into the camera for this selfie. (Instagram)

When Jill’s husband, Derick Dillard, publicly complained about the lack of remuneration, Jim Bob allegedly recruited his other kids to try and quash the rebellion

“Pops went ballistic,” Jill wrote in her book, according to The Ashley’s Reality Roundup.

“Then came the next wave, a consolidated effort from several of my siblings,” Jill wrote.

Advertisement

“They hit the phones, sending voicemails and texts all day long, each one pleading with us to get this resolved [with Jim Bob].”

Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar pose with their many, many children. (Photo Credit: TLC)

Jill recalls that the efforts were ramped up when she requested a copy of her contract and hired an attorney.

“[They were] trying to figure out what our problem was and why we weren’t doing what Pops wanted,” Jill wrote.

Advertisement

In an obvious intimidation tactic, the siblings would show up unannounced and linger in her home well past midnight, at which time Jill or Derick would politely ask them to leave.

Jill Duggar and her husband hold very little back in the Amazon documentary meant to expose the former’s parents. (Photo Credit: Amazon)

She added that the siblings often became upset when she would respectfully end the conversation and request that they leave her home.

Jill claims that for several years, Jim Bob expected his kids to work for him for free as “volunteers.”

Advertisement

In 2017, he finally agreed to pay them a “small, non-negotiable” stipend for their services.

Apparently, this was enough to convince the other Duggars that Jim Bob was a benevolent boss and that Jill and Derick were just being greedy.

Jim Bob Duggar speaks at the Values Voter Summit in Washington, DC. (Getty Images)

“It seemed to me as if they had been brainwashed into thinking that they weren’t owed anything…that they should be nothing but grateful for all the gifts and good favors he was giving them,” Jill wrote.

Advertisement

From there, the siblings were happy to “pile on” her and Derick “when we caused trouble, but it seemed like nearly none of them were willing to question what Pops was doing.”

One of her siblings eventually confessed to Jill that Jim Bob had drawn a line in the sand and demanded that each of his kids choose a side.

Jill Duggar is preparing to publish her debut memoir. (Photo Credit: Instagram)

“[The sibling said,] ‘Pops is telling everyone that if we don’t stand against you both on this, then we’re standing against him,” Jill wrote in her book.

Advertisement

“He said none of us can be neutral here, and that this affects all of us. He says we might all be sued as a result of what you’re doing.’”

Jill says she broke down in tears upon learning that her father had issued such an ultimatum.

“It was one thing for Pops to be angry at Derick and me, but how could he justify bringing his other children into it like this?” she wrote.

Look out, Michelle and Jim Bob! Jill Duggar has come out with a book that exposes just how evil you truly are. (Photo Credit: Amazon)

Advertisement

“How could he mislead them into thinking they might be sued…it made me sad for him. It made me scared for them.”

Jill says that Jim Bob eventually offered her a one-time $20,000 payment in exchange for her silence.

She turned the offer down.

At that point, most of the siblings cut off contact with Jill — a situation that only changed when Josh Duggar was arrested on child pornography charges, and they began to realize that Jim Bob had been lying to them all along.

Advertisement

Jill Duggar looks pretty pleased with life while holding this cute bunny. (Photo Credit: Instagram)

“Some of my siblings started to reach out,” Jill wrote.

“For the first time it was clear that some of them were beginning to be skeptical of the narrative they’d been hearing at home,” she continued.

“As they looked for themselves at the Duggar family spectacle, they started to ask their own questions.”

Advertisement

Hopefully, they’ll continue to think for themselves and begin to see the truth about their father.

Jill Duggar: Jim Bob Sent My Siblings to Harass Me After I Asked to Get Paid For TV Work was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

After months of anticipation, Jill Duggar’s debut memoir finally hit stores this week. As expected, the book contains several startling …
Jill Duggar: Jim Bob Sent My Siblings to Harass Me After I Asked to Get Paid For TV Work was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip. 

​   The Hollywood Gossip Read More 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Christian Keyes Announces ‘All the Queen’s Men’ Departure from BET+

Published

on

A Major Shift for the Hit Series

Christian Keyes, the creator and star of the popular drama series “All the Queen’s Men, has officially announced that the show will be leaving BET and BET+. This decision marks a significant turning point for the series, which has garnered a dedicated fanbase since its debut.

Credit: Christian Keyes Facebook

Keyes’ Frustrations with BET+

Keyes took to social media to share his reasons for the departure, citing ongoing frustrations with the network. He revealed that he often learned about major show updates, such as premiere dates and trailers, through the internet rather than directly from BET+. This lack of communication left him feeling sidelined from the very project he created.

“It is continuously disappointing to find out that your show is coming back on the internet instead of finding out from the network,” Keyes stated, describing the treatment as “dismissive and disrespectful.”

He also disclosed that his “Created By” credit was removed in the show’s second season, forcing him to involve the Writers Guild of America to have his credit restored. Keyes emphasized that he conceived the series 15 years ago and remains deeply protective of its legacy.

No More BET+ Projects

Keyes confirmed that he will not be developing any prequels, spinoffs, or future projects related to “All the Queen’s Men” for BET or BET+. He is currently in negotiations with other streaming platforms to find a new home for the series, though no official announcement has been made regarding its next destination.

What’s Next for the Franchise?

Table: Key Developments

DevelopmentDetails
Leaving BET/BET+Confirmed by Christian Keyes
Reason for DepartureLack of communication, loss of creator credit, unprofessional conduct
New PlatformNegotiations ongoing, not yet announced
Prequels/SpinoffsWill not be produced for BET/BET+
Stage PlayPlanned for Las Vegas and touring
Season 4B PremiereJuly 24 (still on BET+)

The Future of “All the Queen’s Men”

While the next chapter for “All the Queen’s Men” remains uncertain, Christian Keyes’ commitment to the series and its fans is unwavering. As he seeks a new platform, viewers can expect the universe he created to continue evolving—just not under the BET+ banner.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

How to Be an Industry Puppet (The Sabrina Carpenter Way)

Published

on

Sabrina Carpenter’s rise to stardom was no overnight sensation. It was a meticulously crafted journey, marked by strategic reinvention, artistic growth, and a relentless pursuit of her identity as a performer. The Sabrina Carpenter we see today is the result of years of evolution—musically, visually, and personally.

Early Beginnings: A Star in the MakingBorn on May 11, 1999, in Quakertown, Pennsylvania, Sabrina Annlane Carpenter showed an early passion for music. So much so that her father built a soundproof booth in their basement to keep her singing from disturbing the neighbors. By age 10, she was already uploading cover songs to YouTube, signaling the start of her public journey.

Her early exposure to the industry came through an online talent contest linked to Miley Cyrus’s fan club, where she placed third. This modest win caught the attention of casting directors, leading to small acting roles, including a guest spot on Law & Order: SVU. Her big break came in 2014 when she landed the role of Maya Hart, the wisecracking best friend on Disney Channel’s Girl Meets World.The Disney Era: Building a FoundationThough not the lead, Sabrina’s role on Girl Meets World gave her a platform. Disney also recognized her singing talent, releasing her debut single, Can’t Blame a Girl for Trying. Between 2015 and 2019, she released four albums—Eyes Wide Open, EvolutionSingular: Act I, and Singular: Act II. These projects earned respectable chart positions and built a loyal fan base, but she had yet to break into mainstream pop stardom.

Advertisement

By the end of the decade, Sabrina was a familiar face with a solid resume but still seen by many as a Disney alum rather than a major pop artist. It was clear that a transformation was necessary.

The Turning Point: Reinvention and Industry Realities.

Advertisement

Sabrina’s journey reflects a common narrative for child stars transitioning to adult artists. She has spoken candidly about signing her first contract at 12, not fully understanding the implications, and navigating the pressures of the music industry. She faced the challenge of maintaining her identity while meeting industry expectations, including the unspoken rule to “sexify” her image to reach the next level.

Her transition was not just about image but also about artistic growth. The industry’s artist development process, sometimes involving vocal and dance training, stylistic changes, and even physical alterations, played a role in reshaping her brand.

New Beginnings with Island Records

Advertisement

In early 2021, Sabrina’s Disney contract ended, and she signed with Island Records. Her first single under the new label, Skin, sparked controversy and media attention, rumored to be a diss track aimed at Olivia Rodrigo. Whether intentional or not, it marked a new chapter, accompanied by noticeable changes in her appearance and style.

Her album Emails I Can’t Send (2022) showcased a more mature sound and personal songwriting, earning critical praise and fan admiration. The album’s success was bolstered by collaborations with top producers and songwriters, including Jack Antonoff, Ian Kirkpatrick, and Amy Allen, who helped craft a fresh, ‘80s-inspired pop sound with emotional depth.

Advertisement

Breaking Through: The Short and Sweet Era

Sabrina’s momentum continued with the release of Short and Sweet in 2024. The album debuted at number one on the Billboard charts and went platinum, signaling her arrival as a bona fide pop star. Her single Espresso reached number seven on the Hot 100 and topped the UK charts, cementing her global appeal.

Advertisement

Her live performances evolved into carefully choreographed shows blending soft ‘80s synth-pop with old Hollywood glam aesthetics. Brand partnerships with Rihanna’s Savage Fenty and Kim Kardashian’s Skims further elevated her profile, aligning her with powerful, fashion-forward female brands.

Controversy and Cultural Conversations

Advertisement

With fame came scrutiny. Sabrina’s increasingly provocative performances and imagery sparked debate, especially given her Disney roots and young fanbase. Videos of sexually suggestive stage acts and album cover art depicting submissive poses ignited discussions about feminism, sexual freedom, and the boundaries of artistic expression.

Advertisement

Critics accused her of glamorizing regressive gender roles, while supporters defended her right to explore sexuality on her terms. Sabrina herself acknowledged the complexity, emphasizing her normalcy and playful approach to performance.

The Artist Behind the Brand

Despite accusations of being an “industry plant,” Sabrina’s decade-long career and artistic involvement tell a different story. She is deeply involved in songwriting and creative decisions, dispelling myths that she is merely a manufactured product.

Advertisement

Her candid reflections reveal the toll of constant touring and the pressures of maintaining a public persona. Yet, she remains committed to her craft and evolving identity.What’s Next for Sabrina Carpenter?

Sabrina Carpenter’s story is far from over. Her latest album, Man’s Best Friend, has already sparked intense cultural debates, highlighting her ability to provoke thought and conversation. Whether loved or criticized, she commands attention and continues to push boundaries.

Advertisement

Credit: Heute.at

Her journey from a singing child in Pennsylvania to a global pop icon is a testament to perseverance, reinvention, and the complex machinery behind modern stardom. Sabrina Carpenter wasn’t just made overnight—she was made over years of hard work, strategic evolution, and fearless self-expression. The world is watching, and she’s just getting started.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Juror 25’s Behavior Sparks Debate Over Fairness in High-Profile Diddy Trial

Published

on

As the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs unfolds under intense national scrutiny, an unexpected figure has taken center stage—not a witness or attorney, but Juror 25. His conduct in the jury room has ignited a heated debate over the integrity and fairness of the proceedings in one of the year’s most closely watched cases.

Juror 25: The Unlikely Focal Point

Juror 25, a 51-year-old Manhattan scientist with a Ph.D. in molecular biology and neuroscience, lives with his partner and is known for his love of opera and nature documentaries. During jury selection, he disclosed having seen video evidence related to the case, a detail that already set him apart from his peers.

Tensions in the Jury Room

Shortly after deliberations began, the jury sent a note to Judge Arun Subramanian expressing concern: Juror 25 “cannot follow your honor’s instructions.” This rare move immediately raised questions about whether the juror was struggling to grasp legal concepts or was simply challenging the group’s consensus. The judge, after careful consideration, instructed the panel to continue and report any further issues.

A Divided Jury—and Public

The situation has sparked a broader debate:

  • Robust Deliberation or Disruption? Some argue that Juror 25’s insistence on thorough discussion is vital for justice, ensuring no detail is overlooked. Others worry that his approach could derail the process and threaten a fair verdict.
  • Judicial Dilemma: The judge’s decision not to remove Juror 25 reflects the delicate balance between respecting juror independence and maintaining order.
  • Media Spotlight: With every development dissected in real time, public opinion is sharply divided—some see Juror 25 as a conscientious holdout, others as an obstacle to justice.

What’s at Stake

This controversy highlights the challenges of jury selection in high-profile cases and the pressures jurors face under the national spotlight. It also raises fundamental questions about what fairness means in the American justice system: Is it about consensus, or about ensuring every voice is heard—even if it complicates the path to a verdict?

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending