Connect with us

Entertainment

‘Traitors’ Cast Recap Part 1: Phaedra’s Strategy, Sandra and Parvati’s Truce on January 13, 2024 at 3:00 am Us Weekly

Published

on

It didn’t take long for the scheming to start when season 2 of The Traitors premiered on Peacock Friday, January 12.

“I was excited to see all the gamers,” Big Brother‘s Janelle Pierzina told Us Weekly. “I love games on strategy. I love games that are thinking. So, immediately, I was very drawn to Parvati and Dan, of course.”

The “gamers” on season 2 are Janelle and fellow Big Brother winner Dan Gheesling, Survivor’s Parvati Shallow and Sandra Diaz-Twine, The Challenge’s Chris “CT” Tamburello, Johnny “Bananas” Devenanzio and Trishelle Cannatella.

“And then I saw the Bravo people, and MJ was so nice,” Janelle continued, referring to Shahs of Sunset‘s Mercedes “MJ” Javid. “There was really no one in the cast that I could say, ‘Oh yeah, I really wouldn’t work with you.’ I would work with anyone that would just be dumb not to. It’s a game about keeping yourself alive in that castle.”

Advertisement

The 21-person cast list spanned from former Bachelor Peter Weber and Housewives stars Larsa Pippin, Tamra Judge, Shereé Whitfield and Phaedra Parks to UK Parliament’s John Bercow and boxer Deontay Wilder.

Related: Us Breaks Down ‘The Traitors’ Season 2 Cast — And Predicts Their Game Fate

Advertisement
The season 2 cast of The Traitors has been announced — and Us Weekly is breaking down our predictions for who will flourish and who will flop. The group of 21 contestants features Real Housewives, athletes, champions of shows including Survivor and The Challenge and one former Member of Parliament. On The Traitors, the eclectic […]

“My strategy, though, was to identify the traitors and work with them as long as I could to potentially either get recruited or if it came down to it, get enough people together to go after them,” Janelle explained. “But I definitely didn’t want to get real traitors right away because it just seemed kind of, like, dumb gameplay. Why would we get rid of someone day one or two that was actually a traitor? They’re just going to recruit — [and] what if they don’t recruit me? They could recruit a really good faithful that I’m working with.”

While some stars wanted the opportunity to “murder” their fellow castle guests, MJ was happy she didn’t get tapped.

“I knew that if I were a traitor, I would not be able to keep a straight face for even, like, a second,” MJ told Us about the roundtable selection. “I am one of those nervous laughers. I would just [have] no game face There would be no way. Even that moment when we take our blindfolds off was so intense.”

John’s Breathing

Speaking of selection, the politician quickly came under fire when Janelle called out his heavy breathing when host Alan Cummings was walking around the roundtable picking the traitors.

Advertisement

John Bercow. Euan Cherry/PEACOCK

“It was almost certainly a mistake because you should probably be inscrutable [and] give nothing away. So it was probably a mistake because it led for a short period … [of] this suspicion. ‘This is odd, this is fishy, this is inexplicable, this is possibly a sign in the absence of any other evidence that this guy’s a traitor.’ All it was to be honest, was this: I passionately wanted to be a faithful. I’ve made it clear in advance that I wanted and hoped [but] I had no guarantee to be a faithful,” John told Us. “Alan walked round that room so many times in the blindfolded ceremony that it was quite, sort of stressful. And when it was over, I breathed heavily and I think I do often breathe heavily and through my mouth — and I was asked by Janelle, ‘Well, what’s going on?’ And I said, ‘Well, I’ve been asthmatic. And then there was an issue, ‘Well, do you use an inhaler? No. Are you asthmatic now?’ And I said, ‘No, look, historically I was asthmatic. I don’t breathe very well, but frankly you are putting two and two together and making five.’ So it was a crass miscalculation of people thought I made me a traitor, but did I make a mistake to do that? Yeah.”

Larsa Takes a Shot at Parvati

It’s not a surprise to Real Housewives of Miami viewers that Larsa wouldn’t waste time sharing her opinions during the same selection ceremony. So when she was convinced Cummings tapped Parvati on the shoulder based on an alleged noise coming from his jacket, she spoke up.

“My initial plan was to stay under the radar and not necessarily make too much noise, but I couldn’t help it. Her energy was just giving me to the left, to the left,” Larsa told Us of Parvati. Bananas subsequently chimed in, “You and me both.”

Advertisement

Related: ‘Survivor’ Winners Through the Years: Where Are They Now?

It’s not an easy game — but someone’s got to play it! Survivor first debuted in 2000, quickly becoming a fan-favorite and ratings juggernaut for CBS. The reality series, which awards one sole Survivor the $1 million each season after lasting 39 days outside, has come a long way over the years. Host Jeff Probst, […]

Sandra and Parvati’s Truce

After publicly arguing over who the true “queen of Survivor” is just last year, the two winners of the CBS show shocked viewers by letting RuPaul’s Drag Race star Peppermint help them make amends during the premiere.

Advertisement

“My stomach dropped and Sandra comes out of the cart with her finger in my face like this, and I’m like, ‘Oh God. … We got to stop meeting like this, girl,’” Parvati told Us. “Because we needed each other out there. I mean, I didn’t really know anybody besides Sandra. So we had to find a way to work together and not be at odds. And I’m so grateful that Peppermint took it upon her beautiful self to bring us together, help us shake hands and bury the hatchet.”

PEACOCK (3)

Sandra noted it was a quick turnaround. “I was like, ‘Oh no, not only now do I have to navigate this game, but now I have to deal with Parvati as well?’ But thanks to Peppermint, we chatted about it briefly, I don’t even think it was five minutes and I was ready to move on and we agreed to move on,” she said. “And when I agreed to something, that’s it. So I was just hoping that me being honest about moving on was also the same with Parvati. People tell you different things, but I was happy that Peppermint put us together and we were able to bury the hatchet. And hey it’s all great.”

Phaedra and Dan’s Plans as Traitors

During episode 1, viewers learn that Phaedra and Dan were selected as the traitors. “In my world, we fight, we drink Champagne, we glamorous – this world is all about strategy,” Phaedra told Us, noting part of her plan was to “lean into” working with Dan because she knew he won Big Brother. “I had no idea. I only knew the Bravolebrities. And so of course, being a Bravolebrity, I was going to lightweight protect all my Bravo family.”

Advertisement

Dan Gheesling PEACOCK

That included former Real Housewives of Atlanta costar Shereé. “We know she can be a little mischievous. I mean, she’s a good liar sometimes,” Shereé told Us of Phaedra, to which Tamra agreed. “I think that it’s in our nature being Housewives to be traitors in our core being. That’s what we do for a living. And the girls that were on were the ones that have been on for a long time, so I didn’t trust any of ’em.”

Phaedra, for her part, added that she wanted to be an “angel traitor.”

“Of course that is the position that works the hardest because everyone else is sleeping [and] you’re killing the people. But I wanted to make sure I did it justice,” Phaedra told Us. “My perspective was very different, probably from some of the other traitors because I am always going for the underdog. However, I sort of came in at a disadvantage because I didn’t know any of the gamers. … I used my personal conversations with people to sort determine who I really wanted to protect or really wanted to play this game with.”

Advertisement

Related: ‘Big Brother’ Winners: Where Are They Now? Dan, Derrick, Dr. Will and More

Since Big Brother premiered in July 2000, viewers have been introduced to hundreds of houseguests, many of whom have become fan favorites and competed on the show multiple times. It all started with Eddie McGee, who became the first player to walk away with the $500,000 grand prize. Since then, the Julie Chen-hosted CBS reality […]

As viewers saw, Dan “really wanted to play as a traitor” and got his shot. “I just didn’t want to sit on the sidelines. I’ve been sitting for 10 years. I wanted to go and mix it up, so I was definitely very eager and excited to play,” he said. “But throughout this game, I realized I’m used to playing chess, and this is more like poker.”

Advertisement

The first three episodes of The Traitors are streaming on Peacock now. Keep coming back to Us Weekly for more from the cast, including recaps for episodes 2 and 3.

It didn’t take long for the scheming to start when season 2 of The Traitors premiered on Peacock Friday, January 12. “I was excited to see all the gamers,” Big Brother‘s Janelle Pierzina told Us Weekly. “I love games on strategy. I love games that are thinking. So, immediately, I was very drawn to Parvati 

​   Us Weekly Read More 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

What We Can Learn Inside 50 Cent’s Explosive Diddy Documentary: 5 Reasons You Should Watch

Published

on

50 Cent’s new Netflix docuseries about Sean “Diddy” Combs is more than a headline-grabbing exposé; it is a meticulous breakdown of how power, celebrity, and silence can collide in the entertainment industry.

Across its episodes, the series traces Diddy’s rise, the allegations that followed him for years, and the shocking footage and testimonies now forcing a wider cultural reckoning.

For viewers, it offers not just drama, but lessons about media literacy, accountability, and how society treats survivors when a superstar is involved.

Rapper 50 Cent pictured in Tup Tup Palace night club with owners James Jukes and Matt LoveDough, Newcastle, UK, 7th November 2015

1. It Chronicles Diddy’s Rise and Fall – And How Power Warps Reality

The docuseries follows Combs from hitmaker and business icon to a figure facing serious criminal conviction and public disgrace, mapping out decades of influence, branding, and behind-the-scenes behavior. Watching that arc shows how money, fame, and industry relationships can shield someone from scrutiny and delay accountability, even as disturbing accusations accumulate.

Rapper 50 Cent pictured in Tup Tup Palace night club with owners James Jukes and Matt LoveDough, Newcastle, UK, 7th November 2015

2. Never-Before-Seen Footage Shows How Narratives Are Managed

Exclusive footage of Diddy in private settings and in the tense days around his legal troubles reveals how carefully celebrity narratives are shaped, even in crisis.

Viewers can learn to question polished statements and recognize that what looks spontaneous in public is often the result of strategy, damage control, and legal calculation.

HCFF
HCFF

3. Survivors’ Stories Highlight Patterns of Abuse and Silence

Interviews with alleged victims, former staff, and industry insiders describe patterns of control, fear, and emotional or physical harm that were long whispered about but rarely aired in this detail. Their stories underline how difficult it is to speak out against a powerful figure, teaching viewers why many survivors delay disclosure and why consistent patterns across multiple accounts matter.

4. 50 Cent’s Approach Shows Storytelling as a Tool for Accountability

As executive producer, 50 Cent uses his reputation and platform to push a project that leans into uncomfortable truths rather than protecting industry relationships. The series demonstrates how documentary storytelling can challenge established power structures, elevate marginalized voices, and pressure institutions to respond when traditional systems have failed.

5. The Cultural Backlash Reveals How Society Handles Celebrity Accountability

Reactions to the doc—ranging from people calling it necessary and brave to others dismissing it as a vendetta or smear campaign—expose how emotionally invested audiences can be in defending or condemning a famous figure. Watching that debate unfold helps viewers see how fandom, nostalgia, and bias influence who is believed, and why conversations about “cancel culture” often mask deeper questions about justice and who is considered too powerful to fall.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

South Park’s Christmas Episode Delivers the Antichrist

Published

on

A new Christmas-themed episode of South Park is scheduled to air with a central plot in which Satan is depicted as preparing for the birth of an Antichrist figure. The premise extends a season-long narrative arc that has involved Satan, Donald Trump, and apocalyptic rhetoric, positioning this holiday episode as a culmination of those storylines rather than a stand‑alone concept.

Episode premise and season context

According to published synopses and entertainment coverage, the episode frames the Antichrist as part of a fictional storyline that blends religious symbolism with commentary on politics, media, and cultural fear. This follows earlier Season 28 episodes that introduced ideas about Trump fathering an Antichrist child and tech billionaire Peter Thiel obsessing over prophecy and end‑times narratives. The Christmas setting is presented as a contrast to the darker themes, reflecting the series’ pattern of pairing holiday imagery with controversial subject matter.

HCFF
HCFF

Public and political reactions

Coverage notes that some figures connected to Donald Trump’s political orbit have criticized the season’s portrayal of Trump and his allies, describing the show as relying on shock tactics rather than substantive critique. Commentators highlight that these objections are directed more at the depiction of real political figures and the show’s tone than at the specific theology of the Antichrist storyline.

At the time of reporting, there have not been widely reported, detailed statements from major religious leaders focused solely on this Christmas episode, though religion-focused criticism of South Park in general has a long history.

Media and cultural commentary

Entertainment outlets such as The Hollywood Reporter, Entertainment Weekly, Forbes, Slate, and USA Today describe the Antichrist arc as part of South Park’s ongoing use of Trump-era and tech-world politics as material for satire.

These reports emphasize that the show’s treatment of the Antichrist, Satan, and prophecy is designed as exaggerated commentary rather than doctrinal argument, while also acknowledging that many viewers may see the storyline as offensive or excessive.

Viewer guidance and content advisory

South Park is rated TV‑MA and is intended for adult audiences due to strong language, explicit themes, and frequent use of religious and political satire. Viewers who are sensitive to depictions of Satan, the Antichrist, or parodies involving real political figures may find this episode particularly objectionable, while others may view it as consistent with the show’s long‑running approach to controversial topics. As with previous episodes, individual responses are likely to vary widely, and the episode is best understood as part of an ongoing satirical series rather than a factual or theological statement.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Sydney Sweeney Finally Confronts the Plastic Surgery Rumors

Published

on

Sydney Sweeney has decided she is finished watching strangers on the internet treat her face like a forensic project. After years of side‑by‑side screenshots, “then vs now” TikToks, and long comment threads wondering what work she has supposedly had done, the actor is now addressing the plastic surgery rumors directly—and using them to say something larger about how women are looked at in Hollywood and online.

Sweeney at the 2025 Toronto International Film Festival red carpet premiere of Christy

Growing Up on Camera vs. “Before and After” Culture

Sweeney points out that people are often mistaking normal changes for procedures: she grew up on camera, her roles now come with big‑budget glam teams, and her body has shifted as she has trained, aged, and worked nonstop. Yet every new red‑carpet photo gets folded into a narrative that assumes surgeons, not time, are responsible. Rather than walking through a checklist of what is “real,” she emphasizes how bizarre it is that internet detectives comb through pores, noses, and jawlines as if they are owed an explanation for every contour of a woman’s face.

HCFF
HCFF

The Real Problem Isn’t Her Face

By speaking up, Sweeney is redirecting the conversation away from her features and toward the culture that obsesses over them.

She argues that the real issue isn’t whether an actress has had work done, but why audiences feel so entitled to dissect her body as public property in the first place.

For her, the constant speculation is less about curiosity and more about control—another way to tell women what they should look like and punish them when they do not fit. In calling out that dynamic, Sweeney isn’t just defending herself; she is forcing fans and followers to ask why tearing apart someone else’s appearance has become such a popular form of entertainment.


Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending