Connect with us

Entertainment

Jenelle Evans & David Eason Have “No Contact” With Jace; Whitney Rich … on November 9, 2023 at 3:10 pm The Hollywood Gossip

Published

on

When Jenelle Evans regained custody of her eldest son, Jace, fans hoped that the troubled Teen Mom star would turn over a new leaf and finally provide her kids with the safe, stable home life they deserve.

Needless to say, that didn’t happen.

After fleeing the property three times in as many weeks, Jace was finally removed from Jenelle’s home last month and placed back in his grandmother’s care.

Now, Jenelle’s husband, David Eason, is facing assault charges in connection with allegations made by Jace.

Advertisement

Jenelle Evans has a complicated and not very strong relationship with her son, Jace. (Instagram)

Eason is infamously unhinged and heavily armed, and the situation had led to widespread concern for Jace’s welfare.

But according to a new report from TMZ, Jace is safe and has had no contact with David or Jenelle since being removed their home.

After allegedly being pulled out of therapy and taken off his meds by his mother and stepfather, Jace is now receiving the treatment he needs and is “happier now than he’s been in a long time,” the site reports.

Advertisement

David Eason and stepson Jace Evans in happier times. (Instagram)

A warrant has been issued for David’s arrest, but it seems that authorities are in no hurry to take him into custody.

In the meantime, David and Jenelle’s home — which was once known as “the Land,” but is more commonly referred to as “the Swamp” these days — is still home to three kids.

Many have expressed concern for Maryssa, David’s daughter by Whitney Rich, as the Swamp doesn’t seem to be a very safe place for teenagers these days.

Advertisement

But thankfully, Whitney says there’s no reason to fear for her child’s safety.

t

T

J

Advertisement

D

a

A

I

Advertisement

Earlier this week, Whitney posted the audio clip above, in which David screams over the phone and threatens Whitney and her husband, Shane Rich.

“I’m gonna show you something that’s gonna bring the end of your f–king life!” Eason shrieks at one point.

For obvious reasons, viewers were quick to express their concern for Maryssa in the comments.

Advertisement

“She’s safe, that’s all I can say at the moment,” Whitney replied to one person who asked if Maryssa was still living on The Land with David and Jenelle.

Jenelle Evans and David Eason have had a very rocky relationship. They remain committed to each other, though. (Instagram)

“She is safe. We are concerned for all the kids,” Whitney elaborated, according to The Ashley’s Reality Roundup.

“She’s not being abused,” Whitney told another commenter.

Advertisement

“When we tell our story you’ll understand what has happened and what is going on away from the Swamp. But we appreciate everyone’s concern for all the kids.”

Whitney went to state that Kaiser and Ensley — the other two kids who are still living with the Easons — “need all the evidence they can get to help them out of the swamp and away from the abuse.”

David Eason, Ensley Eason and Jenelle Eason attend the Cosmopolitan NYFW fashion show during New York Fashion Week at Tribeca 360 on February 08, 2019 in New York City. (Getty)

“We feel the same way regarding all the kids,” she said.

Advertisement

Asked if she has any fear of being attacked by David, Whitney replied:

“No, [David] knows better than to come around. My husband don’t run his mouth, he just gets to the point.”

“Maryssa does not spend much time on [The Land] anymore. She usually stays with friends or her grandma,” a source close to the situation told The Ashley this week.

Pray for these kids. They live under the same roof as Jenelle Evans and David Eason. (Instagram)

Advertisement

“She has stayed with Whitney but now that [the Easons] are angry at Whitney and Shane, David doesn’t allow her to stay with Whitney if Shane is there.”

The insider added that the Easons have maintained custody through some tricky legal maneuvering, but Whitney is confident in Maryssa’s ability to stay safe.

“David still has custody, but now that Maryssa is 16, she kind of comes and goes as she pleases,” the source adds.

“Whitney won’t fight him for custody. Her and Shane can’t afford to go to court against David because he has Jenelle’s money to pay for it all.”

Advertisement

We’ll have further updates on this developing story as new information becomes available.

Jenelle Evans & David Eason Have “No Contact” With Jace; Whitney Rich … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

When Jenelle Evans regained custody of her eldest son, Jace, fans hoped that the troubled Teen Mom star would turn …
Jenelle Evans & David Eason Have “No Contact” With Jace; Whitney Rich … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip. 

​   The Hollywood Gossip Read More 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Jennifer Lopez’s Ex Fires Back: “You Are the Problem”

Published

on

Ojani Noa Accuses J.Lo of Cheating After “Never Been Loved” Comments

Jennifer Lopez is once again at the center of a media storm — but this time, it’s her first husband, Ojani Noa, turning up the heat. Following Lopez’s recent Howard Stern Show interview, in which she claimed she has “never been truly loved” by any of her exes, Noa has publicly accused the superstar of cheating and playing the victim.

In the viral Instagram post that has now spread across major outlets like TMZ and New York Post, Noa didn’t hold back.

“Stop putting us down. Stop putting me down with your victim card,” he wrote. “The problem is not us. Not me. The problem is you. You’re the one who couldn’t keep it in your pants.”

“You Chose Fame and Lies Over Love”

Noa and Lopez were married briefly from 1997 to 1998, before her rise to Hollywood superstardom. In his explosive statement, he accused her of being unfaithful during their marriage, claiming she prioritized fame over their relationship.

“You have been loved a few times. You’ve been married four times. And have had countless relationships in between,” Noa continued. “You decided to lie, to cheat on me. You begged me to keep the marriage intact to avoid bad press.”

Noa described himself as “faithful, honest, and loving,” saying he uprooted his life and career to support Lopez at the beginning of her entertainment journey. “I left my family, my friends, everything behind for you,” he wrote, “but once fame came calling, you left me behind.”​

Lopez Silent Amid Growing Backlash

As of now, Jennifer Lopez has not publicly responded to Noa’s allegations. During her Howard Stern interview, the singer and actress claimed her former partners “weren’t capable” of loving her, saying, “It’s not that I’m not lovable… it’s that they’re not capable.”

Advertisement

Her remarks were widely interpreted as referencing all of her ex-husbands — including Marc Anthony, Cris Judd, and Ben Affleck — but it was Noa who reacted first and most forcefully. His comments have ignited widespread debate online, with many questioning whether Lopez’s honesty came at the expense of others’ reputations.

Public Response and Media Fallout

The online reaction has been intense, with social media users split between defending Lopez’s right to share her truth and blasting her for allegedly rewriting history. Meanwhile, entertainment analysts note that the controversy adds to an increasingly turbulent year for the singer, following canceled tours, underperforming films, and ongoing scrutiny over her marriage to Affleck.

This latest backlash has also reignited conversations about Lopez’s highly publicized romantic history. As tabloids and fans speculate whether more exes might respond, the situation underscores an old truth in celebrity culture — that every candid confession comes with consequences.

For now, Jennifer Lopez remains silent. But in the court of public opinion, the debate about who’s really at fault in her love story is only just beginning.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Selling Your Soul in Hollywood: The Hidden Cost of Fame

Published

on

By all appearances, Hollywood is a dream factory — a place where charisma, talent, and luck collide to create stars. But behind the camera lights and red carpets lies a conversation few inside the industry speak openly about: the spiritual and moral price of ambition.

For actor Omar Gooding, the idea of “selling your soul” in Hollywood isn’t a metaphor — it’s a moral process that begins with tiny compromises. In an October 2025 interview, Gooding explained that no one in Hollywood makes a literal deal with the devil. Instead, it’s the quiet yeses, the moments when comfort overrides conviction, that mark the beginning of the trade. “They don’t say, ‘Take this or you’ll never make it,’” he said. “They just put it in front of you. You choose.”

Those choices, he argues, create a pattern. Once you show that you’ll accept something you once resisted, the industry notices. “Hollywood knows who it can get away with what,” Gooding said. “One thing always leads to another.” The phrase “selling your soul,” in this context, means losing your say — doing what you’re told rather than what you believe in.

That moral tension has long shadowed the arts. Comedians like Dave Chappelle, who famously walked away from millions to preserve his creative integrity, often serve as examples of where conviction and career collide. In resurfaced interviews, Chappelle hinted that he felt manipulated and silenced by powerful figures who sought control of his narrative, warning that “they’re trying to convince me I’m insane.”

This isn’t just about conspiracy — it’s about agency. Hollywood runs on perception. Performers are rewarded for being agreeable, moldable, entertaining. Those who question the machine or refuse the script risk exile, while those who conform are elevated — sometimes beyond what they can handle.

We see the ‘collections’ all the time,” Gooding explained. “When the bill comes due, you can tell. They made that deal long ago.”

But the story doesn’t end in darkness. Gooding also emphasizes that in today’s entertainment landscape, artists have more control than ever. With streaming, social media, and creator‑driven platforms, performers don’t have to “play the game” to be seen. Independent creators can build their own stages, speak their own truths, and reach millions without trading authenticity for access.

Still, the temptation remains — recognition, validation, quick success. And every generation of artists must answer the same question: What are you willing to do for fame?

Advertisement

As Gooding put it, “You just make the best choices you can. Because once it’s gone — your name, your peace, your soul — there’s no buying it back.”

Continue Reading

Entertainment

California Bans AI Clones from Replacing Real Talent

Published

on

California just made a dramatic stand for human creativity, defeating the threat of AI actor clones with a sweeping new law that puts people—not algorithms—back in the Hollywood spotlight. With the stroke of Governor Gavin Newsom’s pen in October 2025, the state has sent a clear message to studios, tech companies, and the world: entertainment’s heart belongs to those who create and perform, not to digital facsimiles.

California Draws a Hard Line: No More AI Clones

For months, the entertainment industry has been divided over the use of artificial intelligence in filmmaking. Studios, lured by promises of cost-cutting and creative flexibility, have invested in software that can mimic an actor’s face, voice, and even emotional range. But for performers, this wave of synthetic reproduction has triggered alarm—encouraged by chilling stories of deepfakes, unauthorized digital doubles, and contracts that let studios reuse a star’s likeness indefinitely, sometimes without pay or approval.

The new California law, anchored by AB 2602 and AB 1836, changes everything:

  • Every contract must explicitly detail how studios can use digital replicas or voice models, preventing once-common “blank check” agreements that overlooked this risk.
  • No one—not studios nor streaming giants—can create or release AI-generated clones of an actor, living or dead, without clear, written consent from the performer or their estate.
  • The law gives families new powers to defend loved ones from posthumous deepfake exploitation, closing painful loopholes that once let virtual versions of late icons appear in new ads, films, or games.

Actors Celebrate a Major Victory

The legislation rides the momentum of the recent SAG-AFTRA strike, where real-life talent demanded control over their own digital destinies. Leaders say these protections will empower artists to negotiate fair contracts and refuse participation in projects that cross ethical lines, restoring dignity and choice in an industry threatened by silent algorithms.

Stars, unions, and advocacy groups are hailing the law as the most robust defense yet against unwanted AI replications.

As one actor put it, “This isn’t just about money—it’s about identity, legacy, and respect for real artists in a synthetic age.”

A New Chapter for the Entertainment Industry

California’s move isn’t just a victory for local talent—it’s a warning shot to studios everywhere. Companies will now be forced to rethink production pipelines, consult legal counsel, and obtain proper clearance before digitally cloning anyone. Global entertainment platforms and tech developers will need to comply if they want to do business in the world’s entertainment capital.

These laws also set a template likely to ripple through other creative fields, from musicians whose voices can be synthesized to writers whose work could be mimicked by generative AI. For now, California performers finally have a powerful shield, ready to fight for the right to shape their own public image.

Conclusion: Human Talent Takes Center Stage

With its no-nonsense ban on AI actor clones, California draws a bold line, championing the work, likeness, and very humanity of its creative stars. It’s a landmark step that forces the entertainment industry to choose: respect real talent, or face real consequences. The age of the consentless digital double is over—human performers remain the true source of Hollywood magic.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending