Connect with us

Entertainment

Is Josephine Langford in ‘After Everything’? Fan Backlash Explained on September 13, 2023 at 5:48 pm Us Weekly

Published

on

Josephine Langford YouTube

After Everything is receiving backlash following the absence of Josephine Langford as the film’s protagonist, Tessa Young.

The fifth and final movie in the After film franchise was released on Wednesday, September 13, but it wasn’t what fans were expecting. While Hero Fiennes Tiffin reprised his role as Hardin Scott, Langford was absent for most of the film. She did, however, appear in a proposal scene that has since been shared on social media.

“Now what we’re not going to do is blame Josephine here. Her contract was for 4 movies, the movies were meant to end,” one fan wrote on X (formerly Twitter). “It’s not her fault they decided to do a cash grab movie nothing like her books. Why would she want to continue working with these men after everything?”

Advertisement

The final installment in the franchise follows “Hardin struggling to move forward” following his breakup from Tessa, the Voltage Pictures official logline reads.

Related: The Spookiest Horror Movies Coming Out This Fall: ‘The Nun II’ and More

Advertisement
Some people mourn the end of summer, but the rest of Us are looking forward to a chill in the air — and on the big screen. The arrival of fall always brings at least a few new horror movies, but this year, purveyors of spooky entertainment have really outdone themselves. In addition to new […]

“Hardin travels to Portugal in search of a woman he wronged in the past — and to find himself,” the description continues. “Hoping to win back Tessa, he realizes he needs to change his ways before he can make the ultimate commitment.

Following its release, another social media user claimed the movie had ruined the story.

“We are so many fans that we love the story of the books and we love Hero and Jo(together) … and you just killed us,” they shared on X. “No respect for the fans No respect for the books No respect for Josephine Langford I need answers.”

Josephine Langford Frazer Harrison/Getty Images

Advertisement

When a first look at After Everything was released this past May, eagle-eyed fans were quick to point out that Langford appeared to have a reduced role, noting that all her scenes in the trailer had been taken from the other four films.

Because of this, the movie started receiving hate online with some fans harassing “cast, crew, and equally importantly, their friends and families,” something the film studio called “unacceptable” in a social media statement.

“It saddens us to have to write this message, but it is necessary given the behavior we have seen from some users,” the official After movie Instagram account shared in a statement on May 11. “As a community, we are open to hear your thoughts and opinions. If you’re upset with the studio, you have every right to tell us.”

The statement concluded: “We have been made aware of negative comments and messages by a few people and we do not tolerate it. Please be respectful to each other and direct your feedback — good or bad — to us.”

Advertisement

Fans continued to share their issues with the film franchise in the comments section at the time.

“A movie without the main character is not a movie, and the story is completely distorted from what it is in the book!!!!!” one social media user wrote. Another added, “If you really cared about us and the story none of this would be happening. You and your team decided to change Hardin and Tessa’s whole story of overcoming and love and wanted us to stay what? happy?”

Advertisement

Related: Austin Butler Exudes Cool Charisma in ‘The Bikeriders’: Early Review

3 stars (out of 4) Here’s an underrated trait of a legit movie star: The ability to exude cool charisma just by silently sitting on a barstool and taking a drag from a cigarette. This is how Austin Butler‘s character, Benny, is introduced in the first moment of The Bikeriders. He’s quietly minding his own […]

The After movie franchise is based on a series of books of the same name written by Anna Todd. Originally, the novels were written as fan-fiction on Wattpad, where the character of Hardin was inspired by Harry Styles — there are only four After novels and one prequel.

The first After film was released in April 2019 with fans anticipating its sequel. After We Collided was released in September 2020 and After We Fell got a September 2021 release date. When After Ever Happy was released in September 2022, it was set to be the final film in the series. However, it ended differently from the books — with Hardin and Tessa breaking up instead of ending up together. The announcement of the fifth movie caused confusion (and the eventual hate) from fans as it was so different from the novels.

While the film’s stars have stayed quiet amid the backlash, Langford previously spoke about wrapping up the franchise and what would get her to return as Tessa.

Advertisement

“I would want to come back if it was important, and it made sense,” Langford told StyleCaster in 2021. “I’m not a fan of overstaying your welcome. It can sometimes dampen a good thing if you’re creating something and it’s canon, and it doesn’t have a reason.”

After Everything is receiving backlash following the absence of Josephine Langford as the film’s protagonist, Tessa Young. The fifth and final movie in the After film franchise was released on Wednesday, September 13, but it wasn’t what fans were expecting. While Hero Fiennes Tiffin reprised his role as Hardin Scott, Langford was absent for most 

​   Us Weekly Read More 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Christian Keyes Announces ‘All the Queen’s Men’ Departure from BET+

Published

on

A Major Shift for the Hit Series

Christian Keyes, the creator and star of the popular drama series “All the Queen’s Men, has officially announced that the show will be leaving BET and BET+. This decision marks a significant turning point for the series, which has garnered a dedicated fanbase since its debut.

Credit: Christian Keyes Facebook

Keyes’ Frustrations with BET+

Keyes took to social media to share his reasons for the departure, citing ongoing frustrations with the network. He revealed that he often learned about major show updates, such as premiere dates and trailers, through the internet rather than directly from BET+. This lack of communication left him feeling sidelined from the very project he created.

“It is continuously disappointing to find out that your show is coming back on the internet instead of finding out from the network,” Keyes stated, describing the treatment as “dismissive and disrespectful.”

He also disclosed that his “Created By” credit was removed in the show’s second season, forcing him to involve the Writers Guild of America to have his credit restored. Keyes emphasized that he conceived the series 15 years ago and remains deeply protective of its legacy.

No More BET+ Projects

Keyes confirmed that he will not be developing any prequels, spinoffs, or future projects related to “All the Queen’s Men” for BET or BET+. He is currently in negotiations with other streaming platforms to find a new home for the series, though no official announcement has been made regarding its next destination.

What’s Next for the Franchise?

Table: Key Developments

DevelopmentDetails
Leaving BET/BET+Confirmed by Christian Keyes
Reason for DepartureLack of communication, loss of creator credit, unprofessional conduct
New PlatformNegotiations ongoing, not yet announced
Prequels/SpinoffsWill not be produced for BET/BET+
Stage PlayPlanned for Las Vegas and touring
Season 4B PremiereJuly 24 (still on BET+)

The Future of “All the Queen’s Men”

While the next chapter for “All the Queen’s Men” remains uncertain, Christian Keyes’ commitment to the series and its fans is unwavering. As he seeks a new platform, viewers can expect the universe he created to continue evolving—just not under the BET+ banner.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

How to Be an Industry Puppet (The Sabrina Carpenter Way)

Published

on

Sabrina Carpenter’s rise to stardom was no overnight sensation. It was a meticulously crafted journey, marked by strategic reinvention, artistic growth, and a relentless pursuit of her identity as a performer. The Sabrina Carpenter we see today is the result of years of evolution—musically, visually, and personally.

Early Beginnings: A Star in the MakingBorn on May 11, 1999, in Quakertown, Pennsylvania, Sabrina Annlane Carpenter showed an early passion for music. So much so that her father built a soundproof booth in their basement to keep her singing from disturbing the neighbors. By age 10, she was already uploading cover songs to YouTube, signaling the start of her public journey.

Her early exposure to the industry came through an online talent contest linked to Miley Cyrus’s fan club, where she placed third. This modest win caught the attention of casting directors, leading to small acting roles, including a guest spot on Law & Order: SVU. Her big break came in 2014 when she landed the role of Maya Hart, the wisecracking best friend on Disney Channel’s Girl Meets World.The Disney Era: Building a FoundationThough not the lead, Sabrina’s role on Girl Meets World gave her a platform. Disney also recognized her singing talent, releasing her debut single, Can’t Blame a Girl for Trying. Between 2015 and 2019, she released four albums—Eyes Wide Open, EvolutionSingular: Act I, and Singular: Act II. These projects earned respectable chart positions and built a loyal fan base, but she had yet to break into mainstream pop stardom.

Advertisement

By the end of the decade, Sabrina was a familiar face with a solid resume but still seen by many as a Disney alum rather than a major pop artist. It was clear that a transformation was necessary.

The Turning Point: Reinvention and Industry Realities.

Advertisement

Sabrina’s journey reflects a common narrative for child stars transitioning to adult artists. She has spoken candidly about signing her first contract at 12, not fully understanding the implications, and navigating the pressures of the music industry. She faced the challenge of maintaining her identity while meeting industry expectations, including the unspoken rule to “sexify” her image to reach the next level.

Her transition was not just about image but also about artistic growth. The industry’s artist development process, sometimes involving vocal and dance training, stylistic changes, and even physical alterations, played a role in reshaping her brand.

New Beginnings with Island Records

Advertisement

In early 2021, Sabrina’s Disney contract ended, and she signed with Island Records. Her first single under the new label, Skin, sparked controversy and media attention, rumored to be a diss track aimed at Olivia Rodrigo. Whether intentional or not, it marked a new chapter, accompanied by noticeable changes in her appearance and style.

Her album Emails I Can’t Send (2022) showcased a more mature sound and personal songwriting, earning critical praise and fan admiration. The album’s success was bolstered by collaborations with top producers and songwriters, including Jack Antonoff, Ian Kirkpatrick, and Amy Allen, who helped craft a fresh, ‘80s-inspired pop sound with emotional depth.

Advertisement

Breaking Through: The Short and Sweet Era

Sabrina’s momentum continued with the release of Short and Sweet in 2024. The album debuted at number one on the Billboard charts and went platinum, signaling her arrival as a bona fide pop star. Her single Espresso reached number seven on the Hot 100 and topped the UK charts, cementing her global appeal.

Advertisement

Her live performances evolved into carefully choreographed shows blending soft ‘80s synth-pop with old Hollywood glam aesthetics. Brand partnerships with Rihanna’s Savage Fenty and Kim Kardashian’s Skims further elevated her profile, aligning her with powerful, fashion-forward female brands.

Controversy and Cultural Conversations

Advertisement

With fame came scrutiny. Sabrina’s increasingly provocative performances and imagery sparked debate, especially given her Disney roots and young fanbase. Videos of sexually suggestive stage acts and album cover art depicting submissive poses ignited discussions about feminism, sexual freedom, and the boundaries of artistic expression.

Advertisement

Critics accused her of glamorizing regressive gender roles, while supporters defended her right to explore sexuality on her terms. Sabrina herself acknowledged the complexity, emphasizing her normalcy and playful approach to performance.

The Artist Behind the Brand

Despite accusations of being an “industry plant,” Sabrina’s decade-long career and artistic involvement tell a different story. She is deeply involved in songwriting and creative decisions, dispelling myths that she is merely a manufactured product.

Advertisement

Her candid reflections reveal the toll of constant touring and the pressures of maintaining a public persona. Yet, she remains committed to her craft and evolving identity.What’s Next for Sabrina Carpenter?

Sabrina Carpenter’s story is far from over. Her latest album, Man’s Best Friend, has already sparked intense cultural debates, highlighting her ability to provoke thought and conversation. Whether loved or criticized, she commands attention and continues to push boundaries.

Advertisement

Credit: Heute.at

Her journey from a singing child in Pennsylvania to a global pop icon is a testament to perseverance, reinvention, and the complex machinery behind modern stardom. Sabrina Carpenter wasn’t just made overnight—she was made over years of hard work, strategic evolution, and fearless self-expression. The world is watching, and she’s just getting started.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Juror 25’s Behavior Sparks Debate Over Fairness in High-Profile Diddy Trial

Published

on

As the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs unfolds under intense national scrutiny, an unexpected figure has taken center stage—not a witness or attorney, but Juror 25. His conduct in the jury room has ignited a heated debate over the integrity and fairness of the proceedings in one of the year’s most closely watched cases.

Juror 25: The Unlikely Focal Point

Juror 25, a 51-year-old Manhattan scientist with a Ph.D. in molecular biology and neuroscience, lives with his partner and is known for his love of opera and nature documentaries. During jury selection, he disclosed having seen video evidence related to the case, a detail that already set him apart from his peers.

Tensions in the Jury Room

Shortly after deliberations began, the jury sent a note to Judge Arun Subramanian expressing concern: Juror 25 “cannot follow your honor’s instructions.” This rare move immediately raised questions about whether the juror was struggling to grasp legal concepts or was simply challenging the group’s consensus. The judge, after careful consideration, instructed the panel to continue and report any further issues.

A Divided Jury—and Public

The situation has sparked a broader debate:

  • Robust Deliberation or Disruption? Some argue that Juror 25’s insistence on thorough discussion is vital for justice, ensuring no detail is overlooked. Others worry that his approach could derail the process and threaten a fair verdict.
  • Judicial Dilemma: The judge’s decision not to remove Juror 25 reflects the delicate balance between respecting juror independence and maintaining order.
  • Media Spotlight: With every development dissected in real time, public opinion is sharply divided—some see Juror 25 as a conscientious holdout, others as an obstacle to justice.

What’s at Stake

This controversy highlights the challenges of jury selection in high-profile cases and the pressures jurors face under the national spotlight. It also raises fundamental questions about what fairness means in the American justice system: Is it about consensus, or about ensuring every voice is heard—even if it complicates the path to a verdict?

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending