Connect with us

World News

How foreign wars are distracting the US from its biggest threat on November 30, 2023 at 11:00 am

Published

on

U.S. defense officials often refer to China as America’s “pacing threat” — the foreign power most likely to challenge our military might. That message hasn’t changed as wars have broken out in Ukraine and the Middle East.

But new data shows the violence in Israel and Gaza is starting to pull public attention back to the Middle East, even amid a massive military buildup in the South China Sea and simmering tensions over Taiwan. 

President Biden insists the U.S. can provide military support to both Ukraine and Israel, while remaining vigilant in the Indo-Pacific. But keeping the focus on China while embroiled in two foreign wars will test the president in a crucial election year. 

“This is the problem for our current policymaking, which is we want to prioritize China as the threat it is, but at the same time we’re also being pulled and distracted by these other acute crises like the Ukraine war and the Gaza crisis,” Yun Sun, director of the Stimson Center’s China program, told The Hill.

Advertisement

These major geopolitical clashes over Europe and the Middle East are currently contrasting with warming ties between the U.S. and China, illustrated by the recent meeting between President Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping in San Francisco.

“There’s a perceptible dialing down of U.S.-China tensions in terms of the public attention,” said Lily McElwee, a China expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 

But McElwee doesn’t see this as a permanent development, saying there is “pretty widespread agreement within the government, within Congress, that China is kind of the number one national security threat.” 

The National Defense Strategy (NDS), released by the Defense Department a little more than a year ago, listed China as a top threat alongside Russia — the first version of the document in decades that didn’t focus U.S. defenses on violent extremist groups in the Middle East. 

Advertisement

China’s navy stands as the world’s largest in terms of number of vessels, with expectations it will expand by almost 40 percent by 2040. Amid the military buildup, Beijing has also built close ties with governments in Central and Southeast Asia, Africa and Latin America. 

“The most comprehensive and serious challenge to U.S. national security is [China’s] coercive and increasingly aggressive endeavor to refashion the Indo-Pacific region and the international system to suit its interests and authoritarian preferences,” the NDS states.  

The document seemed to offer an ominous warning when, just two months later at the end of January, a Chinese surveillance balloon was discovered flying over the U.S. and was subsequently shot down. 

The incident prompted Secretary of State Antony Blinken to postpone a planned diplomatic trip to Beijing. And in late February, Blinken voiced concerns that China was considering giving weapons to Russia in its war against Ukraine.  

Advertisement

Around the same time, Air Mobility Command head Gen. Mike Minihan penned a memo warning those under him to prepare for war with China in just two years — a prediction given after Xi had mandated that China’s military be capable of taking Taiwan by 2027.  

Long-simmering tensions over China’s ambition to take control of Taiwan appeared ready to boil. Beijing often holds military drills in the waters around the island, wargames that seem to pop up at any sign of overt U.S. support for Taipei, militarily or diplomatically. 

The friction between the two superpowers grew so contentious that by February, shortly after the spy balloon incident, a record-low 15 percent of Americans viewed China favorably, according to a poll by Gallup

The consulting company also found that favorable views on Beijing have dipped steadily since 2018, among Republicans and Democrats alike. 

Advertisement

The Biden administration prepared a defense budget to tackle the China issue, asking for $9.1 billion for the Pentagon’s Pacific Deterrence Initiative — a 40 percent increase from last year.

Washington has also responded by reinforcing alliances across the Indo-Pacific, sending additional forces and weaponry to Guam and the Philippines and strengthening defense ties with Japan and Australia. 

“We don’t want a great power war with China,” then-Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley told House lawmakers in March. “We want to prevent that, and the way to prevent it is a strong, powerful military with a demonstrated will to use it, if necessary.” 

More recently, Biden asked for $2 billion for Indo-Pacific efforts in his $106 billion request, released in October. 

Advertisement

The American public, meanwhile, still sees China as a dangerous concern, just one that is not as pressing as it was earlier this year.  

A new survey from the Ronald Reagan Institute indicated Americans now want the U.S. to focus its military efforts in the Middle East over East Asia, a month into the Israel-Hamas war, which has raised concerns of a wider conflict in the region. 

About 31 percent of responders to the Reagan National Defense Survey said the Middle East, including countries such as Iran and Syria, was the area in which Washington should focus its military forces, compared with only 11 percent who said the same a year earlier. 

Another 25 percent said the focus should be on East Asian countries, such as China, Japan, North Korea and South Korea, a drop from the 31 percent who thought the same the year prior. And 19 percent thought Europe, including Russia, should get the most attention.  

Advertisement

Survey takers also said the Middle East should be allocated about 19 percent of America’s military resources, forces and attention, 1 more percentage point over East Asia and 2 above Europe. 

Yet Americans still see China as the biggest danger to the country over other nations, with 51 percent of respondents pointing to Beijing as the country that poses the biggest threat to the U.S., followed by Russia at 24 percent and Iran at 5 percent.  

That was consistent with a Quinnipiac University poll, released in mid-November, that found 58 percent of voters eye Beijing as the biggest danger, followed by Russia at 22 percent, Iran at 9 percent and North Korea at 6 percent. 

“Americans are beginning to see China vying for global geopolitical influence vis-à-vis the United States rather than primarily as an economic competitor,” the report states, noting that the top concerns about Beijing are military buildup and human rights abuses. 

Advertisement

Another finding that may help explain the lack of urgency among Americans in countering China: an overconfidence in U.S. military superiority.  

“The American people have heard from their commander in chief on down … that America is the greatest fighting force in the world, and generally, you know, they’re talking about the people in uniform,” said Thomas Kenna, a policy associate at the Ronald Reagan Institute who briefed media on the report. 

“But when it comes to the overall military capability, the United States no longer has outright superiority, but the American people clearly have not internalized that.” 

About 50 percent of Americans perceive that the U.S. has military superiority over China, while only 15 percent believe Beijing has the upper hand. There is even greater belief in the Air Force, where 65 percent of Americans believe the U.S. has the advantage.

Advertisement

“I think they’re way too optimistic. It doesn’t line up with the data,” Kenna said. “China, of course, is pursuing an unprecedented military buildup, the United States is not. It is not keeping pace.” 

That disconnect is causing concerns among China hawks, including Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.). The chair of the China select committee, Gallagher on Nov. 19 led his six GOP colleagues on the panel in a letter to House and Senate leadership asking to secure billions more dollars for security initiatives in the Indo-Pacific to counter the growing ambitions of Beijing. 

Specifically, the Republicans pushed their colleagues to boost funding levels in the Biden administration’s supplemental request for the Indo-Pacific by $12 billion, citing Chinese aggression against the Philippines and other nations in the South China Sea, war drills over Taiwan and a massive military buildup. 

Lawmakers said Biden’s current $2 billion Indo-Pacific request in the supplemental is “wholly inadequate” to counter China. 

Advertisement

“The Indo-Pacific, our priority theater, must not be an afterthought,” the letter states. 

“If we fail to provide the resources necessary to deter [Chinese Communist Party] aggression tomorrow, history will not forgive our inaction nor will it spare us the consequences.” 

And regardless of how Americans see the threats from China or elsewhere, most voters are focused far more on domestic issues. 

When asked what the most important problem facing the country today was, 16 percent of respondents cited inflation, gas prices and grocery prices, while only 3 percent said national defense and 2 percent said foreign policy, according to the Reagan National Defense Survey. 

Advertisement

​ U.S. defense officials often refer to China as America’s “pacing threat” — the foreign power most likely to challenge our military might. That message hasn’t changed as wars have broken out in Ukraine and the Middle East. But new data shows the violence in Israel and Gaza is starting to pull public attention back to… 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
2 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Netanyahu’s UN Speech Triggers Diplomatic Walkouts and Mass Protests

Published

on

What Happened at the United Nations

On Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, defending Israel’s ongoing military operations in Gaza. As he spoke, more than 100 delegates from over 50 countries stood up and left the chamber—a rare and significant diplomatic walkout. Outside the UN, thousands of protesters gathered to voice opposition to Netanyahu’s policies and call for accountability, including some who labeled him a war criminal. The protest included activists from Palestinian and Jewish groups, along with international allies.

Why Did Delegates and Protesters Walk Out?

The walkouts and protests were a response to Israel’s continued offensive in Gaza, which has resulted in widespread destruction and a significant humanitarian crisis. Many countries and individuals have accused Israel of excessive use of force, and some international prosecutors have suggested Netanyahu should face investigation by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, including claims that starvation was used as a weapon against civilians. At the same time, a record number of nations—over 150—recently recognized the State of Palestine, leaving the United States as the only permanent UN Security Council member not to join them.

International Reaction and Significance

The diplomatic walkouts and street protests demonstrate increasing global concern over the situation in Gaza and growing support for Palestinian statehood. Several world leaders, including Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro, showed visible solidarity with protesters. Petro called for international intervention and, controversially, for US troops not to follow orders he viewed as supporting ongoing conflict. The US later revoked Petro’s visa over his role in the protests, which he argued was evidence of a declining respect for international law.

BILATERAL MEETING WITH THE PRIME MINISTER OF ISRAEL Photo credit: Matty STERN/U.S. Embassy Jerusalem

Why Is This News Important?

The Gaza conflict is one of the world’s most contentious and closely-watched issues. It has drawn strong feelings and differing opinions from governments, activists, and ordinary people worldwide. The United Nations, as an international organization focused on peace and human rights, is a key arena for these debates. The events surrounding Netanyahu’s speech show that many nations and voices are urging new action—from recognition of Palestinian rights to calls for sanctions against Israel—while discussion and disagreement over the best path forward continue.

This episode at the UN highlights how international diplomacy, public protests, and official policy are all intersecting in real time as the search for solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains urgent and unresolved.

Continue Reading

News

Is a Nuclear-Powered Alien Spacecraft Flying Toward Earth?

Published

on

A mysterious interstellar object speeding through our solar system has reignited debates about extraterrestrial technology — and whether Earth might currently be under quiet observation.

The object, known as 3I/ATLAS, is only the third confirmed interstellar visitor ever detected. Unlike ordinary comets, however, this cosmic traveler has baffled astronomers with its unusual brightness, strange trajectory, and lack of a visible cometary tail. While most scientists cautiously describe it as a natural body, one leading astrophysicist believes something much stranger is at play.

Harvard Scientist’s Bold Claim

Professor Avi Loeb of Harvard University, head of the Galileo Project, has suggested that 3I/ATLAS may in fact be a nuclear-powered alien spacecraft designed to test how humanity would respond to an interstellar visitor. He argues that its flight path is improbably precise, bringing it close to Mars, Venus, and Earth — a pattern highly unlikely to occur by chance.

Loeb also points out that telescope images show a glow inconsistent with ordinary dust behavior. Instead of trailing behind like a comet, the halo-like light appears to extend in unusual ways, sparking debate about whether the object could be emitting energy of its own.

Headed Toward Earth’s Neighborhood

3I/ATLAS is expected to make its closest approach in late 2025, passing near Mars before swinging by the inner solar system. Although Earth itself will be on the opposite side of the Sun when it comes closest, the alignment will still enable space-based observatories to capture sharper data.

Loeb has called on NASA and other agencies to use spacecraft already stationed near Mars or Jupiter — including the Juno mission — to take high-resolution photographs. He believes such efforts could reveal whether the interstellar object is truly natural, or the first technological probe humanity has ever encountered.

Should We Be Worried?

While most astronomers argue caution before jumping to alien conclusions, Loeb insists that scientific openness is key. “If it’s just a comet, we learn something new,” he said. “But if it’s a spacecraft, it would be the most important discovery in human history.”

Advertisement
Shop Our Store

For now, 3I/ATLAS remains a mysterious speck on astronomers’ charts, drifting closer with each passing day. Whether it proves to be a frozen remnant of another star system or something far more advanced, the interstellar visitor has already succeeded in one mission: reminding us how vast and unpredictable the universe really is.

Continue Reading

News

AI Automation Could Cause Up to 20% Unemployment—A Workforce on the Brink

Published

on

Stark Warning from Anthropic CEO Highlights Rapid Job Displacement Risk

The looming threat of widespread unemployment due to AI automation has sparked intense debate among experts, business leaders, and policymakers. Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic—the company behind the influential AI language model Claude—issued a stark warning that has sent shockwaves through corporate America:

“Up to half of all entry-level white collar jobs could disappear within the next one to five years, potentially pushing unemployment rates as high as 20% during this period.”

This dramatic forecast paints a picture of a rapid and unsettling transformation in the workforce, driven by AI technologies that can perform complex cognitive tasks.

Balancing Predictions: Worst-Case Scenarios vs. Moderate Impact

However, this forecast represents one end of a spectrum of expert predictions. While Amodei’s warning highlights the worst-case scenario driven by the swift adoption of AI agents capable of coding, analyzing data, drafting legal documents, and managing workflows around the clock, other analyses suggest a more moderate impact. For example, Goldman Sachs estimates that AI could temporarily displace about 6-7% of U.S. jobs, with unemployment rising by approximately half a percentage point during the adjustment period. Their research anticipates a more gradual transition with a mixture of job disruption and creation.

The Unprecedented Speed and Scope of AI-Driven Job Disruption

The truth likely lies somewhere in between. AI is advancing at unprecedented speed, and the scope of jobs affected spans far beyond blue-collar roles to white-collar positions that required college degrees and years of training. Entry-level roles such as customer service representatives, data entry clerks, junior analysts, and administrative assistants face the greatest near-term risk. Mid-level roles in accounting, marketing, law, and engineering could soon follow, with companies already laying off workers citing AI-driven efficiencies.

Shop Our Store- Click Here

Preparing for an AI-Transformed Workforce: Adaptation Is Essential

Ultimately, the AI-driven job transformation is no longer a distant prospect but unfolding now. Whether unemployment spikes to 20% or stabilizes at lower levels depends on many factors, including business adoption rates, government policies, and the ability of workers to reskill. What is certain is that the workforce of tomorrow will look very different from today—and the time to prepare is right now.

Continue Reading

Trending