Catastrophic flooding struck Central Texas beginning on July 4, 2025, primarily impacting the Hill Country region, including Kerr County and the Guadalupe River area. The disaster has resulted in over 110 confirmed deaths and left more than 161 people missing as of July 8. The floods were triggered by intense, record-breaking rainfall that caused rivers to rise rapidly, overwhelming communities and summer camps.

Key Facts

• Death Toll: Over 110 confirmed fatalities, including at least 27 children and counselors at Camp Mystic in Kerr County.
• Missing Persons: At least 161 people remain unaccounted for, with ongoing search and rescue operations.
• Affected Areas: Severe impacts in Kerr, Kendall, Burnet, Travis, Williamson, and Tom Green counties. The Guadalupe River rose by more than 26 feet in under an hour.

Emergency Response

• State Action: Governor Greg Abbott deployed more than 1,750 personnel and nearly 1,000 vehicles and equipment from over 20 state agencies.
• Federal Aid: President Donald Trump declared a major disaster, unlocking federal resources for relief and recovery.
• Ongoing Risk: Additional rainfall is forecasted, and flood watches remain in effect for much of Central Texas.

Communication and Alerts

• Emergency Alerts: The National Weather Service issued multiple flash flood warnings, but some residents did not receive alerts due to the lack of a local outdoor warning system and inconsistent cell service.
• Mobile Coverage Issues: Some areas near the Guadalupe River have spotty cell service, which may have prevented some residents from receiving critical alerts.

Aftermath and Community Impact

• Search and Rescue: Hundreds of emergency personnel continue to search for missing persons in challenging conditions.
• Infrastructure Damage: Roads, bridges, and homes have been severely damaged or destroyed.
• Calls for Change: The disaster has intensified calls for improved flood warning systems and greater investment in emergency preparedness.

What Texans Should Know

• Stay Alert: Residents in affected areas should monitor weather updates and follow local guidance.
• Support and Resources: Emergency shelters and assistance are available for displaced families.

This update reflects the situation as of July 8, 2025, and will continue to evolve as search and rescue operations progress.

Protests Erupt Over Housing and Migration in Mexico City

Mexico City has become the epicenter of growing unrest as hundreds of residents took to the streets on July 4, 2025, protesting against soaring rents, gentrification, and the increasing presence of U.S. migrants. What began as a peaceful demonstration quickly escalated, with incidents of vandalism and confrontations highlighting the depth of local frustration.

Key Drivers of the Unrest

• Gentrification and Housing Crisis:
  Rents in popular neighborhoods like Condesa and Roma have surged by nearly 50% over the past five years, pricing out many long-term residents. Young people and families are particularly affected, with some forced to leave homes they have occupied for decades.
• Influx of U.S. Migrants and Digital Nomads:
  The arrival of affluent foreigners—especially Americans working remotely—has intensified gentrification. Many U.S. citizens take advantage of Mexico’s 180-day visa-free stay, cycling in and out to maintain residency. This has led to resentment among locals who feel displaced and unable to compete with foreign purchasing power.

• Economic Displacement:
  Protesters argue that government policies favor those with higher incomes, resulting in forced or illegal evictions. Slogans like “Housing is a right, not a commodity” and “Mexico for Mexicans” were prominent during the marches.
• Demands for Regulation:
  Demonstrators called for stricter migration controls and for foreign residents to contribute more to the local economy, including paying fair taxes and respecting local culture.

Escalation and Official Response

• Vandalism and Confrontations:
  While the protest started peacefully, a subset of demonstrators vandalized businesses—particularly those catering to foreigners—and harassed tourists. Chants of “gringo go home” and “pay taxes, learn Spanish, respect my culture” echoed through the streets as windows were smashed and property damaged.
• Government Reaction:
  City officials condemned the violence and emphasized Mexico City’s tradition of openness and migration. At least 15 businesses and public facilities reported damage. Authorities called for dialogue and unity, while also acknowledging the real pressures of rising rents and displacement.

Broader Context and Global Parallels

• International Pattern:
  The protests in Mexico City mirror movements in cities like Barcelona and Madrid, where locals have also rallied against mass tourism and the transformation of neighborhoods by short-term rentals and foreign investment.

• Political Response:
  President Claudia Sheinbaum and other leaders have addressed the unrest, rejecting xenophobia but recognizing the legitimate concerns about housing affordability and community displacement.

Summary Table

Conclusion

The recent protests in Mexico City reflect mounting anger over gentrification, housing insecurity, and the impact of foreign migration on local communities. As tensions rise, calls for policy reform and greater protections for residents are intensifying. City leaders face mounting pressure to balance openness with protecting the rights and livelihoods of long-term residents, signaling that the debate over Mexico’s urban future is far from over.

As the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs unfolds under intense national scrutiny, an unexpected figure has taken center stage—not a witness or attorney, but Juror 25. His conduct in the jury room has ignited a heated debate over the integrity and fairness of the proceedings in one of the year’s most closely watched cases.

Juror 25: The Unlikely Focal Point

Juror 25, a 51-year-old Manhattan scientist with a Ph.D. in molecular biology and neuroscience, lives with his partner and is known for his love of opera and nature documentaries. During jury selection, he disclosed having seen video evidence related to the case, a detail that already set him apart from his peers.

Tensions in the Jury Room

Shortly after deliberations began, the jury sent a note to Judge Arun Subramanian expressing concern: Juror 25 “cannot follow your honor’s instructions.” This rare move immediately raised questions about whether the juror was struggling to grasp legal concepts or was simply challenging the group’s consensus. The judge, after careful consideration, instructed the panel to continue and report any further issues.

A Divided Jury—and Public

The situation has sparked a broader debate:

• Robust Deliberation or Disruption? Some argue that Juror 25’s insistence on thorough discussion is vital for justice, ensuring no detail is overlooked. Others worry that his approach could derail the process and threaten a fair verdict.
• Judicial Dilemma: The judge’s decision not to remove Juror 25 reflects the delicate balance between respecting juror independence and maintaining order.
• Media Spotlight: With every development dissected in real time, public opinion is sharply divided—some see Juror 25 as a conscientious holdout, others as an obstacle to justice.

What’s at Stake

This controversy highlights the challenges of jury selection in high-profile cases and the pressures jurors face under the national spotlight. It also raises fundamental questions about what fairness means in the American justice system: Is it about consensus, or about ensuring every voice is heard—even if it complicates the path to a verdict?