Business
Congress struggles to lock down key funding deal before heading home on December 12, 2023 at 9:06 pm Business News | The Hill
Congress is struggling to lock down a deal on government funding with just days until lawmakers are set to leave town for the rest of the year, as both chambers appear to have given up on passing their own spending bills.
Lawmakers had been hopeful leadership would strike a deal last week on an overall topline level for government funding in fiscal 2024 as part of the annual appropriations process. But as negotiations continue, lawmakers say leadership is cutting it close. Congress is staring down a shutdown deadline next month, with little legislative time on the calendar.
At a press conference on Tuesday, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said lawmakers are “all hands on deck on the appropriations bills,” noting the shutdown deadlines on the horizon.
“But what we also agreed to was what’s written in the law and that’s the [Fiscal Responsibility Act] numbers on top lines,” Johnson also said, referring to legislation Congress passed earlier this year to raise the debt limit.
The measure, negotiated between the Biden administration and House GOP leadership back in spring, suspended the debt ceiling into 2025, staving off the threat of what experts warned could be a cataclysmic default, while also setting budget caps for fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2025.
As part of the law, lawmakers agreed to a base discretionary spending cap of $1.59 trillion, or about $886 billion for defense spending and almost $704 billion for nondefense spending, for fiscal 2024. However, there is uncertainty on Capitol Hill around where other components of that agreement not reflected in the bill stand, including changes that the White House detailed earlier this year to offset further funding on the nondefense side.
While appropriators say it’s unclear what are all the factors contributing to the holdup, some see the handshake agreement as a key hurdle.
In his comments on Tuesday, Johnson took aim at Senate Democrats over their appropriations work thus far, accusing the upper chamber of “projecting and writing well above” the spending cap agreed to in the debt ceiling law.
“That’s not what the law says, and so I came in as the new Speaker and I said, again, as the rule of law team, we’re going to follow the law,” he said. “So, that’s where negotiation stands.”
Meanwhile, Democrats have accused House Republicans of reneging on the full deal struck earlier this year, while also coming out fiercely against the prospect of a full-year stopgap bill to prevent a lapse in government funding in the weeks ahead.
Senate Appropriations Chair Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said the backup plan, which has attracted support from some conservatives, could be harmful to the country’s national security, as well as hurt programs like the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC).
“The Speaker’s proposal would lock in outdated spending plans and devastating across-the-board cuts while locking all of us out of any kind of thoughtful decision-making process for our nation’s future, all of which should be unacceptable to everyone here,” she said last week.
Last month, Congress agreed to temporarily freeze spending for certain agencies through mid-January and others until early February to allow time for both chambers to finish their funding work.
Among the agencies under the Jan. 19 deadline are the departments of Agriculture, Veterans Affairs, Transportation (DOT) and Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
Asked on Monday whether he was confident Congress would meet the deadline, Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), who chairs the House subcommittee that oversees funding for offices like the Department of Interior, said he preferred a different word, given the current pace of work.
“Confident? That’s another word I’m not really sure I want to use,” he told The Hill, though he added he was hopeful lawmakers would be able to meet the January deadline.
Both chambers failed to pass all 12 funding bills after falling behind on annual funding work earlier in the year.
While Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), the Senate’s spending cardinal who oversees dollars for HUD and DOT, said “there’s a fair amount of enthusiasm” in the upper chamber for the Senate to move to pass its remaining nine funding bills, he acknowledged the “time crunch” Congress faces.
As bicameral talks for a topline agreement continue, the appropriator said he thinks Congress has until closer to the “end of the calendar year” to strike a topline funding deal in time for them to conference and pass funding legislation to meet the January deadline.
“Appropriators staff can do pretty quick work, but we don’t want to jam them up and cause them either heartache or precipitate a clerical error,” he told The Hill.
“There’s not that much writing to do, right. You’re negotiating over numbers for existing programs. So it’s not like you’re writing a new authorizing statute,” he said. “You’re just trying to figure out what number to plug into the existing law.”
Congress has been bogged down in negotiations for further aid for Ukraine and Israel, as well as changes to border policy, while also working to pass a major annual defense authorization measure in the coming days.
But the clock is ticking, and leadership has been keeping its cards close as to how far both sides are to reach a deal.
Pressed Monday on whether there will be a topline agreement this week, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told The Hill: “I hope so, but we’re having some trouble with the House.”
Business, House, News, government funding Congress is struggling to lock down a deal on government funding with just days until lawmakers are set to leave town for the rest of the year, as both chambers appear to have given up on passing their own spending bills. Lawmakers had been hopeful leadership would strike a deal last week on an overall…
Business
Why 9 Million Americans Have Left

The Growing American Exodus
Nearly 9 million Americans now live outside the United States—a number that rivals the population of several states and signals a profound shift in how people view the American dream. This mass migration isn’t confined to retirees or the wealthy. Thanks to remote work, digital nomad visas, and mounting pressures at home, young professionals, families, and business owners are increasingly joining the ranks of expats.

Rising Costs and Shrinking Wallets
Living in the US has become increasingly expensive. Weekly grocery bills topping $300 are not uncommon, and everyday items like coffee and beef have surged in price over the last year. Rent, utilities, and other essentials also continue to climb, leaving many Americans to cut meals or put off purchases just to make ends meet. In contrast, life in countries like Mexico or Costa Rica often costs just 50–60% of what it does in the US—without sacrificing comfort or quality.
Health Care Concerns Drive Migration
America’s health care system is a major trigger for relocation. Despite the fact that the US spends more per person on health care than any other country, millions struggle to access affordable treatment. Over half of Americans admit to delaying medical care due to cost, with households earning below $40,000 seeing this rate jump to 63%. Many expats point to countries such as Spain or Thailand, where health care is both affordable and accessible, as a major draw.

Seeking Safety Abroad
Public safety issues—especially violent crime and gun-related incidents—have made many Americans feel unsafe, even in their own communities. The 2024 Global Peace Index documents a decline in North America’s safety ratings, while families in major cities often prioritize teaching their children to avoid gun violence over simple street safety. In many overseas destinations, newly arrived American families report a significant improvement in their sense of security and peace of mind.
Tax Burdens and Bureaucracy
US tax laws extend abroad, requiring expats to file annual returns and comply with complicated rules through acts such as FATCA. For some, the burden of global tax compliance is so great that thousands relinquish their US citizenship each year simply to escape the paperwork and scrutiny.
The Digital Nomad Revolution
Remote work has unlocked new pathways for Americans. Over a quarter of all paid workdays in the US are now fully remote, and more than 40 countries offer digital nomad visas for foreign professionals. Many Americans are leveraging this opportunity to maintain their US incomes while cutting costs and upgrading their quality of life abroad.

Conclusion: Redefining the Dream
The mass departure of nearly 9 million Americans reveals deep cracks in what was once considered the land of opportunity. Escalating costs, inaccessible healthcare, safety concerns, and relentless bureaucracy have spurred a global search for better options. For millions, the modern American dream is no longer tied to a white-picket fence, but found in newfound freedom beyond America’s borders.
Business
Will Theaters Crush Streaming in Hollywood’s Next Act?

Hollywood is bracing for a pivotal comeback, and for movie lovers, it’s the kind of shake-up that could redefine the very culture of cinema. With the freshly merged Paramount-Skydance shaking up its strategy, CEO David Ellison’s announcement doesn’t just signal a change—it reignites the passion for moviegoing that built the magic of Hollywood in the first place.

Theatrical Experience Roars Back
Fans and insiders alike have felt the itch for more event movies. For years, streaming promised endless options, but fragmented attention left many longing for communal spectacle. Now, with Paramount-Skydance tripling its film output for the big screen, it’s clear: studio leaders believe there’s no substitute for the lights, the hush before the opening credits, and the collective thrill of reacting to Hollywood’s latest blockbusters. Ellison’s pivot away from streaming exclusives taps deep into what unites cinephiles—the lived experience of cinema as art and event, not just content.
Industry Pulse: From Crisis to Renaissance
On the financial front, the numbers are as electrifying as any plot twist. After years of doubt, the box office is roaring. AMC, the world’s largest theater chain, reports a staggering 26% spike in moviegoer attendance and 36% revenue growth in Q2 2025. That kind of momentum hasn’t been seen since the heyday of summer tentpoles—and it’s not just about more tickets sold. AMC’s strategy—premium screens, with IMAX and Dolby Cinema, curated concessions, and branded collectibles—has turned every new release into an event, driving per-customer profits up nearly 50% compared to pre-pandemic norms.
Blockbusters Lead the Culture
Forget the gloom of endless streaming drops; when films like Top Gun: Maverick, Mission: Impossible, Minecraft, and surprise hits like Weapons and Freakier Friday draw crowds, the industry—and movie fans—sit up and take notice. Movie-themed collectibles and concession innovations, from Barbie’s iconic pink car popcorn holders to anniversary tie-ins, have made each screening a moment worth remembering, blending nostalgia and discovery. The focus: high-impact, shared audience experiences that streaming can’t replicate.
Streaming’s Limits and Studio Strategy
Yes, streaming is still surging, but the tide may be turning. The biggest franchises, and the biggest cultural events, happen when audiences come together for a theatrical release. Paramount-Skydance’s shift signals to rivals that premium storytelling and box office spectacle are again at the center of Hollywood value creation. The result is not just higher profits for exhibitors like AMC, but a rebirth of movie-going as the ultimate destination for fans hungry for connection and cinematic adventure.

Future Forecast: Culture, Community, and Blockbuster Dreams
As PwC and others warn that box office totals may take years to fully catch up, movie lovers and industry leaders alike are betting that exclusive theatrical runs, enhanced viewing experiences, and fan-driven engagement are the ingredients for long-term recovery—and a new golden age. The Paramount-Skydance play is more than a business move; it’s a rallying cry for the art of the theatrical event. Expect more big bets, more surprises, and—finally—a long-overdue renaissance for the silver screen.
For those who believe in the power of cinema, it’s a thrilling second act—and the best seat in the house might be front and center once again.
Business
Why Are Influencers Getting $7K to Post About Israel?

Influencers are being paid as much as $7,000 per post by the Israeli government as part of an expansive and sophisticated digital propaganda campaign. This effort is designed to influence global public opinion—especially among younger social media users—about Israel’s actions in Gaza and to counter critical narratives about the ongoing humanitarian situation.

How Much Is Being Spent?
Recent reports confirm that Israel has dedicated more than $40 million this year to social media and digital influence campaigns, targeting popular platforms such as TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram. In addition to direct influencer payments, Israel is investing tens of millions more in paid ads, search engine placements, and contracts with major tech companies like Google and Meta to push pro-Israel content and challenge critical coverage of issues like the famine in Gaza.
What’s the Strategy?
- Influencer Contracts: Influencers are recruited—often with all-expenses-paid trips to Israel, highly managed experiences, and direct payments—to post content that improves Israel’s image.
- Ad Campaigns: State-backed ad buys show lively Gaza markets and restaurants to counter global reports of famine and humanitarian crisis.
- Narrative Management: These posts and ads often avoid overt propaganda. Instead, they use personal stories, emotional appeals, and “behind the scenes” glimpses intended to humanize Israel’s side of the conflict and create doubt about reports by the UN and humanitarian agencies.
- Amplification: Paid content is strategically promoted so it dominates news feeds and is picked up by news aggregators, Wikipedia editors, and even AI systems that rely on “trusted” digital sources.
Why Is This Happening Now?
The humanitarian situation in Gaza has generated increasing international criticism, especially after the UN classified parts of Gaza as experiencing famine. In this environment, digital public relations has become a primary front in Israel’s efforts to defend its policies and limit diplomatic fallout. By investing in social media influencers, Israel is adapting old-school propaganda strategies (“Hasbara”) to the era of algorithms and youth-driven content.
Why Does It Matter?
This campaign represents a major blurring of the lines between paid promotion, journalism, and activism. When governments pay high-profile influencers to shape social media narratives, it becomes harder for audiences—especially young people—to distinguish between authentic perspectives and sponsored messaging.

In short: Influencers are getting $7,000 per post because Israel is prioritizing social media as a battleground for public opinion, investing millions in shaping what global audiences see, hear, and believe about Gaza and the conflict.
- Business4 weeks ago
Disney Loses $3.87 Billion as Subscription Cancellations Surge After Kimmel Suspension
- Entertainment4 weeks ago
What the Deletion Frenzy Reveals in the David and Celeste Tragedy
- Entertainment4 weeks ago
Executive Producer Debut: How Celia Carver Created Festival Hit ‘Afterparty’
- Health4 weeks ago
Russia Claims 100% Success With New mRNA Cancer Vaccine
- News4 weeks ago
Body of Missing Teen Found in Tesla Linked to Musician D4vd
- Business2 weeks ago
Why Are Influencers Getting $7K to Post About Israel?
- Health4 weeks ago
Why Did Gen Z QUIT Drinking Alcohol?
- Business4 weeks ago
YouTube’s New Sponsorship Update Could Make Creators Richer