Connect with us

Business

Congress struggles to lock down key funding deal before heading home  on December 12, 2023 at 9:06 pm Business News | The Hill

Published

on

Congress is struggling to lock down a deal on government funding with just days until lawmakers are set to leave town for the rest of the year, as both chambers appear to have given up on passing their own spending bills. 

Lawmakers had been hopeful leadership would strike a deal last week on an overall topline level for government funding in fiscal 2024 as part of the annual appropriations process. But as negotiations continue, lawmakers say leadership is cutting it close. Congress is staring down a shutdown deadline next month, with little legislative time on the calendar. 

At a press conference on Tuesday, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said lawmakers are “all hands on deck on the appropriations bills,” noting the shutdown deadlines on the horizon.

“But what we also agreed to was what’s written in the law and that’s the [Fiscal Responsibility Act] numbers on top lines,” Johnson also said, referring to legislation Congress passed earlier this year to raise the debt limit. 

Advertisement

The measure, negotiated between the Biden administration and House GOP leadership back in spring, suspended the debt ceiling into 2025, staving off the threat of what experts warned could be a cataclysmic default, while also setting budget caps for fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2025.  

As part of the law, lawmakers agreed to a base discretionary spending cap of $1.59 trillion, or about $886 billion for defense spending and almost $704 billion for nondefense spending, for fiscal 2024. However, there is uncertainty on Capitol Hill around where other components of that agreement not reflected in the bill stand, including changes that the White House detailed earlier this year to offset further funding on the nondefense side. 

While appropriators say it’s unclear what are all the factors contributing to the holdup, some see the handshake agreement as a key hurdle.

In his comments on Tuesday, Johnson took aim at Senate Democrats over their appropriations work thus far, accusing the upper chamber of “projecting and writing well above” the spending cap agreed to in the debt ceiling law.  

Advertisement

“That’s not what the law says, and so I came in as the new Speaker and I said, again, as the rule of law team, we’re going to follow the law,” he said. “So, that’s where negotiation stands.” 

Meanwhile, Democrats have accused House Republicans of reneging on the full deal struck earlier this year, while also coming out fiercely against the prospect of a full-year stopgap bill to prevent a lapse in government funding in the weeks ahead. 

Senate Appropriations Chair Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said the backup plan, which has attracted support from some conservatives, could be harmful to the country’s national security, as well as hurt programs like the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC).

“The Speaker’s proposal would lock in outdated spending plans and devastating across-the-board cuts while locking all of us out of any kind of thoughtful decision-making process for our nation’s future, all of which should be unacceptable to everyone here,” she said last week. 

Advertisement

Last month, Congress agreed to temporarily freeze spending for certain agencies through mid-January and others until early February to allow time for both chambers to finish their funding work. 

Among the agencies under the Jan. 19 deadline are the departments of Agriculture, Veterans Affairs, Transportation (DOT) and Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 

Asked on Monday whether he was confident Congress would meet the deadline, Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), who chairs the House subcommittee that oversees funding for offices like the Department of Interior, said he preferred a different word, given the current pace of work. 

“Confident? That’s another word I’m not really sure I want to use,” he told The Hill, though he added he was hopeful lawmakers would be able to meet the January deadline. 

Advertisement

Both chambers failed to pass all 12 funding bills after falling behind on annual funding work earlier in the year. 

While Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), the Senate’s spending cardinal who oversees dollars for HUD and DOT, said “there’s a fair amount of enthusiasm” in the upper chamber for the Senate to move to pass its remaining nine funding bills, he acknowledged the “time crunch” Congress faces. 

As bicameral talks for a topline agreement continue, the appropriator said he thinks Congress has until closer to the “end of the calendar year” to strike a topline funding deal in time for them to conference and pass funding legislation to meet the January deadline. 

“Appropriators staff can do pretty quick work, but we don’t want to jam them up and cause them either heartache or precipitate a clerical error,” he told The Hill.

Advertisement

“There’s not that much writing to do, right. You’re negotiating over numbers for existing programs. So it’s not like you’re writing a new authorizing statute,” he said. “You’re just trying to figure out what number to plug into the existing law.” 

Congress has been bogged down in negotiations for further aid for Ukraine and Israel, as well as changes to border policy, while also working to pass a major annual defense authorization measure in the coming days. 

But the clock is ticking, and leadership has been keeping its cards close as to how far both sides are to reach a deal.  

Pressed Monday on whether there will be a topline agreement this week, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told The Hill: “I hope so, but we’re having some trouble with the House.” 

Advertisement

​Business, House, News, government funding Congress is struggling to lock down a deal on government funding with just days until lawmakers are set to leave town for the rest of the year, as both chambers appear to have given up on passing their own spending bills. Lawmakers had been hopeful leadership would strike a deal last week on an overall…  

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Harvard Grads Jobless? How AI & Ghost Jobs Broke Hiring

Published

on

America’s job market is facing an unprecedented crisis—and nowhere is this more painfully obvious than at Harvard, the world’s gold standard for elite education. A stunning 25% of Harvard’s MBA class of 2025 remains unemployed months after graduation, the highest rate recorded in university history. The Ivy League dream has become a harsh wakeup call, and it’s sending shockwaves across the professional landscape.

Jobless at the Top: Why Graduates Can’t Find Work

For decades, a Harvard diploma was considered a golden ticket. Now, graduates send out hundreds of résumés, often from their parents’ homes, only to get ghosted or auto-rejected by machines. Only 30% of all 2025 graduates nationally have found full-time work in their field, and nearly half feel unprepared for the workforce. Go to college, get a good job“—that promise is slipping away, even for the smartest and most driven.​

Tech’s Iron Grip: ATS and AI Gatekeepers

Applicant tracking systems (ATS) and AI algorithms have become ruthless gatekeepers. If a résumé doesn’t perfectly match the keywords or formatting demanded by the bots, it never reaches human eyes. The age of human connection is gone—now, you’re just a data point to be sorted and discarded.

AI screening has gone beyond basic qualifications. New tools “read” for inferred personality and tone, rejecting candidates for reasons they never see. Worse, up to half of online job listings may be fake—created simply to collect résumés, pad company metrics, or fulfill compliance without ever intending to fill the role.

The Experience Trap: Entry-Level Jobs Require Years

It’s not just Harvard grads who are hurting. Entry-level roles demand years of experience, unpaid internships, and portfolios that resemble a seasoned professional, not a fresh graduate. A bachelor’s degree, once the key to entry, is now just the price of admission. Overqualified candidates compete for underpaid jobs, often just to survive.

One Harvard MBA described applying to 1,000 jobs with no results. Companies, inundated by applications, are now so selective that only those who precisely “game the system” have a shot. This has fundamentally flipped the hiring pyramid: enormous demand for experience, shrinking chances for new entrants, and a brutal gauntlet for anyone not perfectly groomed by internships and coaching.

Advertisement

Burnout Before Day One

The cost is more than financial—mental health and optimism are collapsing among the newest generation of workers. Many come out of elite programs and immediately end up in jobs that don’t require degrees, or take positions far below their qualifications just to pay the bills. There’s a sense of burnout before careers even begin, trapping talent in a cycle of exhaustion, frustration, and disillusionment.

Cultural Collapse: From Relationships to Algorithms

What’s really broken? The culture of hiring itself. Companies have traded trust, mentorship, and relationships for metrics, optimizations, and cost-cutting. Managers no longer hire on potential—they rely on machines, rankings, and personality tests that filter out individuality and reward those who play the algorithmic game best.

AI has automated the very entry-level work that used to build careers—research, drafting, and analysis—and erased the first rung of the professional ladder for thousands of new graduates. The result is a workforce filled with people who know how to pass tests, not necessarily solve problems or drive innovation.

The Ghost Job Phenomenon

Up to half of all listings for entry-level jobs may be “ghost jobs”—positions posted online for optics, compliance, or future needs, but never intended for real hiring. This means millions of job seekers spend hours on applications destined for digital purgatory, further fueling exhaustion and cynicism.

Not Lazy—Just Locked Out

Despite the headlines, the new class of unemployed graduates is not lazy or entitled—they are overqualified, underleveraged, and battered by a broken process. Harvard’s brand means less to AI and ATS systems than the right keyword or résumé format. Human judgment has been sidelined; individuality is filtered out.

Advertisement

What’s Next? Back to Human Connection

Unless companies rediscover the value of human potential, mentorship, and relationships, the job search will remain a brutal numbers game—one that even the “best and brightest” struggle to win. The current system doesn’t just hurt workers—it holds companies back from hiring bold, creative talent who don’t fit perfect digital boxes.

Key Facts:

  • 25% of Harvard MBAs unemployed, highest on record
  • Only 30% of 2025 grads nationwide have jobs in their field
  • Nearly half of grads feel unprepared for real work
  • Up to 50% of entry-level listings are “ghost jobs”
  • AI and ATS have replaced human judgment at most companies

If you’ve felt this struggle—or see it happening around you—share your story in the comments. And make sure to subscribe for more deep dives on the reality of today’s economy and job market.

This is not just a Harvard problem. It’s a sign that America’s job engine is running on empty, and it’s time to reboot—before another generation is locked out.

Continue Reading

Business

Why 9 Million Americans Have Left

Published

on

The Growing American Exodus

Nearly 9 million Americans now live outside the United States—a number that rivals the population of several states and signals a profound shift in how people view the American dream. This mass migration isn’t confined to retirees or the wealthy. Thanks to remote work, digital nomad visas, and mounting pressures at home, young professionals, families, and business owners are increasingly joining the ranks of expats.

Rising Costs and Shrinking Wallets

Living in the US has become increasingly expensive. Weekly grocery bills topping $300 are not uncommon, and everyday items like coffee and beef have surged in price over the last year. Rent, utilities, and other essentials also continue to climb, leaving many Americans to cut meals or put off purchases just to make ends meet. In contrast, life in countries like Mexico or Costa Rica often costs just 50–60% of what it does in the US—without sacrificing comfort or quality.

Health Care Concerns Drive Migration

America’s health care system is a major trigger for relocation. Despite the fact that the US spends more per person on health care than any other country, millions struggle to access affordable treatment. Over half of Americans admit to delaying medical care due to cost, with households earning below $40,000 seeing this rate jump to 63%. Many expats point to countries such as Spain or Thailand, where health care is both affordable and accessible, as a major draw.

Seeking Safety Abroad

Public safety issues—especially violent crime and gun-related incidents—have made many Americans feel unsafe, even in their own communities. The 2024 Global Peace Index documents a decline in North America’s safety ratings, while families in major cities often prioritize teaching their children to avoid gun violence over simple street safety. In many overseas destinations, newly arrived American families report a significant improvement in their sense of security and peace of mind.

Tax Burdens and Bureaucracy

US tax laws extend abroad, requiring expats to file annual returns and comply with complicated rules through acts such as FATCA. For some, the burden of global tax compliance is so great that thousands relinquish their US citizenship each year simply to escape the paperwork and scrutiny.

The Digital Nomad Revolution

Remote work has unlocked new pathways for Americans. Over a quarter of all paid workdays in the US are now fully remote, and more than 40 countries offer digital nomad visas for foreign professionals. Many Americans are leveraging this opportunity to maintain their US incomes while cutting costs and upgrading their quality of life abroad.

Conclusion: Redefining the Dream

The mass departure of nearly 9 million Americans reveals deep cracks in what was once considered the land of opportunity. Escalating costs, inaccessible healthcare, safety concerns, and relentless bureaucracy have spurred a global search for better options. For millions, the modern American dream is no longer tied to a white-picket fence, but found in newfound freedom beyond America’s borders.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Will Theaters Crush Streaming in Hollywood’s Next Act?

Published

on

Hollywood is bracing for a pivotal comeback, and for movie lovers, it’s the kind of shake-up that could redefine the very culture of cinema. With the freshly merged Paramount-Skydance shaking up its strategy, CEO David Ellison’s announcement doesn’t just signal a change—it reignites the passion for moviegoing that built the magic of Hollywood in the first place.

Theatrical Experience Roars Back

Fans and insiders alike have felt the itch for more event movies. For years, streaming promised endless options, but fragmented attention left many longing for communal spectacle. Now, with Paramount-Skydance tripling its film output for the big screen, it’s clear: studio leaders believe there’s no substitute for the lights, the hush before the opening credits, and the collective thrill of reacting to Hollywood’s latest blockbusters. Ellison’s pivot away from streaming exclusives taps deep into what unites cinephiles—the lived experience of cinema as art and event, not just content.

Industry Pulse: From Crisis to Renaissance

On the financial front, the numbers are as electrifying as any plot twist. After years of doubt, the box office is roaring. AMC, the world’s largest theater chain, reports a staggering 26% spike in moviegoer attendance and 36% revenue growth in Q2 2025. That kind of momentum hasn’t been seen since the heyday of summer tentpoles—and it’s not just about more tickets sold. AMC’s strategy—premium screens, with IMAX and Dolby Cinema, curated concessions, and branded collectibles—has turned every new release into an event, driving per-customer profits up nearly 50% compared to pre-pandemic norms.

Blockbusters Lead the Culture

Forget the gloom of endless streaming drops; when films like Top Gun: Maverick, Mission: Impossible, Minecraft, and surprise hits like Weapons and Freakier Friday draw crowds, the industry—and movie fans—sit up and take notice. Movie-themed collectibles and concession innovations, from Barbie’s iconic pink car popcorn holders to anniversary tie-ins, have made each screening a moment worth remembering, blending nostalgia and discovery. The focus: high-impact, shared audience experiences that streaming can’t replicate.

Streaming’s Limits and Studio Strategy

Yes, streaming is still surging, but the tide may be turning. The biggest franchises, and the biggest cultural events, happen when audiences come together for a theatrical release. Paramount-Skydance’s shift signals to rivals that premium storytelling and box office spectacle are again at the center of Hollywood value creation. The result is not just higher profits for exhibitors like AMC, but a rebirth of movie-going as the ultimate destination for fans hungry for connection and cinematic adventure.

Future Forecast: Culture, Community, and Blockbuster Dreams

As PwC and others warn that box office totals may take years to fully catch up, movie lovers and industry leaders alike are betting that exclusive theatrical runs, enhanced viewing experiences, and fan-driven engagement are the ingredients for long-term recovery—and a new golden age. The Paramount-Skydance play is more than a business move; it’s a rallying cry for the art of the theatrical event. Expect more big bets, more surprises, and—finally—a long-overdue renaissance for the silver screen.

For those who believe in the power of cinema, it’s a thrilling second act—and the best seat in the house might be front and center once again.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending