Connect with us

Business

Five things to know about Speaker Johnson’s spending deal with Democrats on January 9, 2024 at 11:00 am Business News | The Hill

Published

on

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is facing heat from the party’s right flank after striking a deal with Democrats on government funding that conservative hardliners are already dismissing as a “total failure.” 

Lawmakers say the bipartisan deal breaks through a heated stalemate on how much to spend to keep the government running through September by providing a framework for negotiators to work from as they craft the dozen annual funding bills.  

But with less than two weeks out from a key shutdown deadline key questions remain.

Here’s what you need to know about the spending agreement.

Advertisement

The topline 

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said both sides had agreed to a spending limit of $1.59 trillion for fiscal year 2024, including $886 billion for defense and $704 billion for nondefense discretionary funds. 

That’s largely in line with the budget caps included in a bipartisan deal that President Biden and former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) struck to raise the debt ceiling last year.

However, the number on the nondefense side is a notable contrast from what Democrats have been touting of the recent compromise, which they said would allow for additional funding for nondefense programs north of $60 billion.  

Both sides had been pushing for leadership to set a topline spending level as Congress continues to fall behind in its annual appropriations process.  

Advertisement

So far, Congress has sent zero of the 12 annual spending bills to Biden’s desk for signature, months after the initial deadline to hash out fiscal 2024 funding. Some negotiators have also signaled another stopgap measure, known as a continuing resolution (CR), might be necessary to prevent a funding lapse later this month as work lags. 

Where a previous ‘side deal’ stands 

Questions have been swirling around where a previous handshake agreement made between the White House and House GOP leadership as part of the larger debt limit deal stood in recent months amid opposition from hardline conservatives. 

Democrats say that side agreement was key to ensuring what experts say would effectively amount to a freeze for nondefense funding, when compared to the previous year’s levels, despite the budget caps written into law. 

As part of the handshake deal, both sides agreed to a series of budget changes, including rescinding funding for IRS and pandemic efforts, to offset further funding to the nondefense side. However, Johnson faced pressure from his right flank to abandon the agreement, struck under McCarthy, as conservatives have pursued steeper spending cuts beyond the debt limit deal. 

Advertisement

Democrats said on Sunday that they secured $772.7 billion for non-defense discretionary funding as part of the new deal, while also protecting “key domestic priorities like veterans’ benefits, health care and nutrition assistance from the draconian cuts sought by right-wing extremists.” 

House GOP leadership, meanwhile, touted “hard-fought concessions” from Democrats made as part of the agreement, including accelerated rescissions of IRS funding that Congress already agreed to, as well as the claw back of about $6 billion in COVID funding. 

“Overall, this agreement represents an actual year-over-year cut in non-VA, nondefense spending,” Johnson said in a letter on Sunday.  

But Democrats are singing another tune. 

Advertisement

“Not a nickel was cut. Again, our goal was [$772 billion] and that’s precisely the number we reached in this bipartisan agreement,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said on Monday.  

Conservatives mount opposition  

The newly announced compromise has been met with growing criticism from hardline conservatives who panned the additional funding for nondefense as “reckless.” 

“Don’t be fooled. The DC Uniparty’s spending ‘deal’ is a total sham. The REAL topline spending level is $1.658 trillion—not $1.59 trillion. Our nation simply cannot afford the Swamp’s reckless spending habits,” Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.), who serves on the House Appropriations Committee and is a member of the Freedom Caucus, tweeted on Monday. 

The pushback comes as the group has been pressing the conference to step up efforts to bring down spending, often citing the climbing national debt, which currently stands at roughly $34 trillion.  

Advertisement

However, not all Republicans have panned the plan.  

“While I continue to believe that additional defense funding is necessary, I hope this agreement will help us avoid a year-long Continuing Resolution, implementation of the FRA’S CR-penalty, or a government shutdown, which would be disastrous for our national defense, homeland security, biomedical research, and many other programs,” Sen. Susan Collins (Maine), top Republican on the Senate Appropriations Committee, said in a statement.  

‘Poison pills’ could threaten progress

There are also questions about where so-called poison pill policy riders will fit in spending talks. 

While Johnson acknowledged on Sunday that the agreed to spending limits “will not satisfy everyone,” he argued the deal provides lawmakers a path to move the appropriations process forward and “fight for the important policy riders included” in the party’s funding bills. Those riders have included policies regarding abortion and diversity efforts.

Advertisement

And some in his party are already keeping tabs on the issue.

“A $1659 topline in spending is terrible & gives away the leverage accomplished in the (already not great) caps deal. We’ll wait to see if we get meaningful policy riders… but 1) the NDAA was not a good preview, & 2) as usual, we keep spending more money we don’t have,” Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), a member of the House Freedom Caucus, wrote on X on Sunday.  

But those policy riders are nonstarters for Democrats, who reiterated their opposition this week.

Schumer and House Minority Leader (D-N.Y.) said Sunday that they have “made clear to Speaker Mike Johnson that Democrats will not support including poison pill policy changes in any of the twelve appropriations bills put before the Congress.” 

Advertisement

Time crunch 

There are less than two weeks before the first shutdown deadline of Jan. 19, when funding is set to lapse for agencies like the departments of Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Energy and Agriculture.

The deadline for the remaining government agencies is Feb. 2.

And even with the topline figures set, plenty of work remains. Lawmakers need to determine the process for passing 12 spending bills, write those bills and get them through an often-intransigent Congress.

While some appropriators said ahead of the Christmas break that they had begun informal bicameral spending talks, they also acknowledged limitations they faced in conferencing their bills without knowing their subcommittee’s respective allocations. 

Advertisement

There has also been concern around the length of a potential stopgap measure if another is needed next week to keep certain agencies open, particularly as some Republicans have floated a yearlong CR – which experts warn could mean further spending cuts for nondefense programs.  

​Budget, Business, House, News, Senate Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is facing heat from the party’s right flank after striking a deal with Democrats on government funding that conservative hardliners are already dismissing as a “total failure.” Lawmakers say the bipartisan deal breaks through a heated stalemate on how much to spend to keep the government running through September by providing a framework…  

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Why 9 Million Americans Have Left

Published

on

The Growing American Exodus

Nearly 9 million Americans now live outside the United States—a number that rivals the population of several states and signals a profound shift in how people view the American dream. This mass migration isn’t confined to retirees or the wealthy. Thanks to remote work, digital nomad visas, and mounting pressures at home, young professionals, families, and business owners are increasingly joining the ranks of expats.

Rising Costs and Shrinking Wallets

Living in the US has become increasingly expensive. Weekly grocery bills topping $300 are not uncommon, and everyday items like coffee and beef have surged in price over the last year. Rent, utilities, and other essentials also continue to climb, leaving many Americans to cut meals or put off purchases just to make ends meet. In contrast, life in countries like Mexico or Costa Rica often costs just 50–60% of what it does in the US—without sacrificing comfort or quality.

Health Care Concerns Drive Migration

America’s health care system is a major trigger for relocation. Despite the fact that the US spends more per person on health care than any other country, millions struggle to access affordable treatment. Over half of Americans admit to delaying medical care due to cost, with households earning below $40,000 seeing this rate jump to 63%. Many expats point to countries such as Spain or Thailand, where health care is both affordable and accessible, as a major draw.

Seeking Safety Abroad

Public safety issues—especially violent crime and gun-related incidents—have made many Americans feel unsafe, even in their own communities. The 2024 Global Peace Index documents a decline in North America’s safety ratings, while families in major cities often prioritize teaching their children to avoid gun violence over simple street safety. In many overseas destinations, newly arrived American families report a significant improvement in their sense of security and peace of mind.

Tax Burdens and Bureaucracy

US tax laws extend abroad, requiring expats to file annual returns and comply with complicated rules through acts such as FATCA. For some, the burden of global tax compliance is so great that thousands relinquish their US citizenship each year simply to escape the paperwork and scrutiny.

The Digital Nomad Revolution

Remote work has unlocked new pathways for Americans. Over a quarter of all paid workdays in the US are now fully remote, and more than 40 countries offer digital nomad visas for foreign professionals. Many Americans are leveraging this opportunity to maintain their US incomes while cutting costs and upgrading their quality of life abroad.

Conclusion: Redefining the Dream

The mass departure of nearly 9 million Americans reveals deep cracks in what was once considered the land of opportunity. Escalating costs, inaccessible healthcare, safety concerns, and relentless bureaucracy have spurred a global search for better options. For millions, the modern American dream is no longer tied to a white-picket fence, but found in newfound freedom beyond America’s borders.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Will Theaters Crush Streaming in Hollywood’s Next Act?

Published

on

Hollywood is bracing for a pivotal comeback, and for movie lovers, it’s the kind of shake-up that could redefine the very culture of cinema. With the freshly merged Paramount-Skydance shaking up its strategy, CEO David Ellison’s announcement doesn’t just signal a change—it reignites the passion for moviegoing that built the magic of Hollywood in the first place.

Theatrical Experience Roars Back

Fans and insiders alike have felt the itch for more event movies. For years, streaming promised endless options, but fragmented attention left many longing for communal spectacle. Now, with Paramount-Skydance tripling its film output for the big screen, it’s clear: studio leaders believe there’s no substitute for the lights, the hush before the opening credits, and the collective thrill of reacting to Hollywood’s latest blockbusters. Ellison’s pivot away from streaming exclusives taps deep into what unites cinephiles—the lived experience of cinema as art and event, not just content.

Industry Pulse: From Crisis to Renaissance

On the financial front, the numbers are as electrifying as any plot twist. After years of doubt, the box office is roaring. AMC, the world’s largest theater chain, reports a staggering 26% spike in moviegoer attendance and 36% revenue growth in Q2 2025. That kind of momentum hasn’t been seen since the heyday of summer tentpoles—and it’s not just about more tickets sold. AMC’s strategy—premium screens, with IMAX and Dolby Cinema, curated concessions, and branded collectibles—has turned every new release into an event, driving per-customer profits up nearly 50% compared to pre-pandemic norms.

Blockbusters Lead the Culture

Forget the gloom of endless streaming drops; when films like Top Gun: Maverick, Mission: Impossible, Minecraft, and surprise hits like Weapons and Freakier Friday draw crowds, the industry—and movie fans—sit up and take notice. Movie-themed collectibles and concession innovations, from Barbie’s iconic pink car popcorn holders to anniversary tie-ins, have made each screening a moment worth remembering, blending nostalgia and discovery. The focus: high-impact, shared audience experiences that streaming can’t replicate.

Streaming’s Limits and Studio Strategy

Yes, streaming is still surging, but the tide may be turning. The biggest franchises, and the biggest cultural events, happen when audiences come together for a theatrical release. Paramount-Skydance’s shift signals to rivals that premium storytelling and box office spectacle are again at the center of Hollywood value creation. The result is not just higher profits for exhibitors like AMC, but a rebirth of movie-going as the ultimate destination for fans hungry for connection and cinematic adventure.

Future Forecast: Culture, Community, and Blockbuster Dreams

As PwC and others warn that box office totals may take years to fully catch up, movie lovers and industry leaders alike are betting that exclusive theatrical runs, enhanced viewing experiences, and fan-driven engagement are the ingredients for long-term recovery—and a new golden age. The Paramount-Skydance play is more than a business move; it’s a rallying cry for the art of the theatrical event. Expect more big bets, more surprises, and—finally—a long-overdue renaissance for the silver screen.

For those who believe in the power of cinema, it’s a thrilling second act—and the best seat in the house might be front and center once again.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Why Are Influencers Getting $7K to Post About Israel?

Published

on

Influencers are being paid as much as $7,000 per post by the Israeli government as part of an expansive and sophisticated digital propaganda campaign. This effort is designed to influence global public opinion—especially among younger social media users—about Israel’s actions in Gaza and to counter critical narratives about the ongoing humanitarian situation.

How Much Is Being Spent?

Recent reports confirm that Israel has dedicated more than $40 million this year to social media and digital influence campaigns, targeting popular platforms such as TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram. In addition to direct influencer payments, Israel is investing tens of millions more in paid ads, search engine placements, and contracts with major tech companies like Google and Meta to push pro-Israel content and challenge critical coverage of issues like the famine in Gaza.

What’s the Strategy?

  • Influencer Contracts: Influencers are recruited—often with all-expenses-paid trips to Israel, highly managed experiences, and direct payments—to post content that improves Israel’s image.
  • Ad Campaigns: State-backed ad buys show lively Gaza markets and restaurants to counter global reports of famine and humanitarian crisis.
  • Narrative Management: These posts and ads often avoid overt propaganda. Instead, they use personal stories, emotional appeals, and “behind the scenes” glimpses intended to humanize Israel’s side of the conflict and create doubt about reports by the UN and humanitarian agencies.
  • Amplification: Paid content is strategically promoted so it dominates news feeds and is picked up by news aggregators, Wikipedia editors, and even AI systems that rely on “trusted” digital sources.

Why Is This Happening Now?

The humanitarian situation in Gaza has generated increasing international criticism, especially after the UN classified parts of Gaza as experiencing famine. In this environment, digital public relations has become a primary front in Israel’s efforts to defend its policies and limit diplomatic fallout. By investing in social media influencers, Israel is adapting old-school propaganda strategies (“Hasbara”) to the era of algorithms and youth-driven content.

Why Does It Matter?

This campaign represents a major blurring of the lines between paid promotion, journalism, and activism. When governments pay high-profile influencers to shape social media narratives, it becomes harder for audiences—especially young people—to distinguish between authentic perspectives and sponsored messaging.

As user trust in mainstream news decreases and social media’s power grows, understanding how digital influence operations work is critical for anyone who wants to stay informed and think critically about global events.


In short: Influencers are getting $7,000 per post because Israel is prioritizing social media as a battleground for public opinion, investing millions in shaping what global audiences see, hear, and believe about Gaza and the conflict.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending