Connect with us

World News

Why Israel’s push into southern Gaza could be a ‘real hell of a fight’ on November 29, 2023 at 12:00 am

Published

on

Once a temporary truce ends between Israel and Hamas, fighting is expected to enter the deadliest phase of the war, when Israeli troops confront the main Hamas force in southern Gaza. 

Israeli troops inside of Gaza for about a month have largely cemented control over the northern half of the coastal strip, including the urban center of Gaza City, and will next focus on the south, where 1.7 million Palestinian civilians are sequestered. 

But southern Gaza is also currently home to the bulk of Hamas, most of which is still intact after nearly two months of war. Many Hamas fighters fled Gaza City and other strongholds in the north to hide down south. 

Advertisement

If Israel wants to destroy Hamas, as per its stated goal, that will require taking the fight south — where they will risk a high rate of civilian casualties and increased pressure for a cease-fire, which could magnify depending on how long the ongoing truce extends and how many hostages are released. 

But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has pledged “there is no place in Gaza that we will not reach,” brushing aside any calls to halt the campaign to annihilate Hamas for launching a deadly Oct. 7 surprise attack on southern Israel that killed 1,200 people. 

“There is no hiding, no shelter, no refuge for the murderers of Hamas,” Netanyahu said earlier this month.

At the moment, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) says it is committed to securing the release of the hostages during a temporary truce while preparing for the next stage of the war. 

Advertisement

“We are determined to return to the battlefield and deepen our achievements,” said IDF spokesperson Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari at a Monday press briefing

Israel and Hamas are continuing to exchange hostages and prisoners as part of the temporary cease-fire agreement, which is also allowing for a much-needed surge of humanitarian aid into Gaza.  

The U.S. is working on extending the truce to get more hostages out of Gaza, which could end up taking more than a week if the current agreement of 10 detainees per day stays in place. Hamas took around 240 hostages when it attacked Israel on Oct. 7, and about 70 people have been released in the past five days. 

John Hannah, a senior defense fellow at the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, said Israel will struggle to make the case for a military operation in the south after a drawn-out cease-fire and the release of all the hostages. But he noted that public pressure was dependent on changing variables. 

Advertisement

“How long can Hamas keep dribbling out hostages? At what point in time does the momentum for a cease-fire build up sufficient international pressure on Israel to stand down?” Hannah said.

There are also crucial questions about how Israeli forces conduct the next phase of the war. 

The Biden administration told reporters this week that Israel must take extra precautions in the south and should avoid the same trappings of the fighting in the north, which has killed more than 14,000 people so far, many of them women and children, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza, which is run by Hamas. 

U.S. officials are pushing Israel to create “areas of deconfliction” in southern Gaza, which would include United Nations shelters and sites that would be kept out of the fighting.  

Advertisement

White House national security spokesperson John Kirby said Monday that President Biden “doesn’t want to see any more innocent civilians killed or wounded as a result of the fighting in Gaza.” 

“Not one. The right number of civilian casualties is zero,” Kirby said. “Each and every one of those data points is a grieving family, and the president understands that.” 

“That’s why we’re going to continue to urge our Israeli counterparts as they go back,” Kirby added, “that they do it in the most discrete, deliberate, careful, cautious way possible.” 

Israel may force civilians into Muwasi, a small strip of land on the coast of southern Gaza. But the entire coastal enclave of Gaza is just 141 square miles, and the even smaller block of territory in the south is crowded with nearly two million people. 

Advertisement

Robert Sanders, a professor of national security at the University of New Haven, expressed skepticism of whether Israel can safely manage to separate Hamas and civilians inside such a small zone of territory.  

“How do these people now get supported in all of the ways that human beings need to be supported when you push them into this so-called safer zone?” Sanders said. 

Sanders argued that if Israel heads south, it should conduct an operation that is more controlled and “more infantry intensive,” cautioning against the airstrikes that pummeled northern Gaza for weeks ahead of the ground invasion. 

“If they go into the south the way they went into the north, the ire of the world will just increase,” said Sanders. “I don’t think the world will accept that type of attack in the south, where the Israelis have told the people to go.” 

Advertisement

Hannah, from the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, said Israel must go south to dismantle Hamas, where he believes most of the militant group’s leaders and forces are. But he questioned if it was feasible to cram people into a tiny humanitarian zone, and he said the fighting could get more intense in an urban environment with crowds of civilians. 

“It’s going to be a real hell of a fight,” he said. “It’ll make the north look now like a walk in the park.”

After Israel entered northern Gaza in late October, troops quickly established control over that half of the territory. The fighting in northern Gaza and inside of Gaza City has been brutal, but Hamas fighters have so far only lost a small part of their forces and command structure, based on public death counts. 

Before the war, Hamas had a fighting force of between 30,000 and 40,000 fighters, and while Israel appears to have taken out some high-level officials and command structures, most of Hamas is still operating. 

Advertisement

Two-thirds of the more than 14,000 killed in Gaza have been women and children, according to the United Nations, and even the U.S. has acknowledged the heavy toll on civilians in the strip.  

That means many seasoned fighters have likely bunkered in the south, including Yahya Sinwar, the top Hamas official in Gaza. 

White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan said the truce has also given Hamas the ability to “retool” and reconfigure its operations, which he called a “hard trade-off” to get hostages home. 

“But the Israeli government has been prepared to accept that risk because of the benefit they’re getting, which are these incredible images of people being reunited with their families, the humanity of it, the sense of accomplishment of that,” Sullivan told NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday.  

Advertisement

Israel has lost about 77 IDF soldiers in the Gaza operation so far. Troops may suffer more losses in the south, especially if the IDF limits the operation to protect civilians. 

Jerry Meyerle, the principal research scientist for plans and warfighting at the Center for Naval Analyses, said the fighting in southern Gaza would not be easy, but he explained U.S. forces have faced similar challenges in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria.

“We learned a lot of lessons over the years,” he said of U.S. operations. “A lot of those lessons have migrated over to the Israeli Defense Forces, and I think that they’re employing a lot of those, those lessons and tactics, in Gaza. So it’s much more of a discriminant military operation in Gaza than I think people will realize or understand.” 

But Gaza is among the densest territories in the world and poses unique challenges, Meyerle added. 

Advertisement

“They’re facing challenges there I don’t think any other military has,” he said. “The more the population gets jammed up in southern Gaza, it just snowballs and becomes more and more difficult.”

​ Once a temporary truce ends between Israel and Hamas, fighting is expected to enter the deadliest phase of the war, when Israeli troops confront the main Hamas force in southern Gaza. Israeli troops inside of Gaza for about a month have largely cemented control over the northern half of the coastal strip, including the urban… 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

US May Completely Cut Income Tax Due to Tariff Revenue

Published

on

President Donald Trump says the United States might one day get rid of federal income tax because of money the government collects from tariffs on imported goods. Tariffs are extra taxes the U.S. puts on products that come from other countries.

What Trump Is Saying

Trump has said that tariff money could become so large that it might allow the government to cut income taxes “almost completely.” He has also talked about possibly phasing out income tax over the next few years if tariff money keeps going up.

How Taxes Work Now

Right now, the federal government gets much more money from income taxes than from tariffs. Income taxes bring in trillions of dollars each year, while tariffs bring in only a small part of that total. Because of this gap, experts say tariffs would need to grow by many times to replace income tax money.

Questions From Experts

Many economists and tax experts doubt that tariffs alone could pay for the whole federal budget. They warn that very high tariffs could make many imported goods more expensive for shoppers in the United States. This could hit lower- and middle‑income families hardest, because they spend a big share of their money on everyday items.

What Congress Must Do

The president can change some tariffs, but only Congress can change or end the federal income tax. That means any real plan to remove income tax would need new laws passed by both the House of Representatives and the Senate. So far, there is no detailed law or full budget plan on this idea.

What It Means Right Now

For now, Trump’s comments are a proposal, not a change in the law. People and businesses still have to pay federal income tax under the current rules. The debate over using tariffs instead of income taxes is likely to continue among lawmakers, experts, and voters.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Epstein Files to Be Declassified After Trump Order

Published

on


Former President Donald Trump has signed an executive order directing federal agencies to declassify all government files related to Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier whose death in 2019 continues to fuel controversy and speculation.

The order, signed Wednesday at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, instructs the FBI, Department of Justice, and intelligence agencies to release documents detailing Epstein’s network, finances, and alleged connections to high-profile figures. Trump described the move as “a step toward transparency and public trust,” promising that no names would be shielded from scrutiny.

“This information belongs to the American people,” Trump said in a televised statement. “For too long, powerful interests have tried to bury the truth. That ends now.”

U.S. intelligence officials confirmed that preparations for the release are already underway. According to sources familiar with the process, the first batch of documents is expected to be made public within the next 30 days, with additional releases scheduled over several months.

Reactions poured in across the political spectrum. Supporters praised the decision as a bold act of accountability, while critics alleged it was politically motivated, timed to draw attention during a volatile election season. Civil rights advocates, meanwhile, emphasized caution, warning that some records could expose private victims or ongoing legal matters.

The Epstein case, which implicated figures in politics, business, and entertainment, remains one of the most talked-about scandals of the past decade. Epstein’s connections to influential individuals—including politicians, royals, and executives—have long sparked speculation about the extent of his operations and who may have been involved.

Advertisement

Former federal prosecutor Lauren Fields said the release could mark a turning point in public discourse surrounding government transparency. “Regardless of political stance, this declassification has the potential to reshape how Americans view power and accountability,” Fields noted.

Officials say redactions may still occur to protect sensitive intelligence or personal information, but the intent is a near-complete disclosure. For years, critics of the government’s handling of Epstein’s case have accused agencies of concealing evidence or shielding elites from exposure. Trump’s order promises to change that narrative.

As anticipation builds, journalists, legal analysts, and online commentators are preparing for what could be one of the most consequential information releases in recent history.

Continue Reading

Politics

Netanyahu’s UN Speech Triggers Diplomatic Walkouts and Mass Protests

Published

on

What Happened at the United Nations

On Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, defending Israel’s ongoing military operations in Gaza. As he spoke, more than 100 delegates from over 50 countries stood up and left the chamber—a rare and significant diplomatic walkout. Outside the UN, thousands of protesters gathered to voice opposition to Netanyahu’s policies and call for accountability, including some who labeled him a war criminal. The protest included activists from Palestinian and Jewish groups, along with international allies.

Why Did Delegates and Protesters Walk Out?

The walkouts and protests were a response to Israel’s continued offensive in Gaza, which has resulted in widespread destruction and a significant humanitarian crisis. Many countries and individuals have accused Israel of excessive use of force, and some international prosecutors have suggested Netanyahu should face investigation by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, including claims that starvation was used as a weapon against civilians. At the same time, a record number of nations—over 150—recently recognized the State of Palestine, leaving the United States as the only permanent UN Security Council member not to join them.

International Reaction and Significance

The diplomatic walkouts and street protests demonstrate increasing global concern over the situation in Gaza and growing support for Palestinian statehood. Several world leaders, including Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro, showed visible solidarity with protesters. Petro called for international intervention and, controversially, for US troops not to follow orders he viewed as supporting ongoing conflict. The US later revoked Petro’s visa over his role in the protests, which he argued was evidence of a declining respect for international law.

BILATERAL MEETING WITH THE PRIME MINISTER OF ISRAEL Photo credit: Matty STERN/U.S. Embassy Jerusalem

Why Is This News Important?

The Gaza conflict is one of the world’s most contentious and closely-watched issues. It has drawn strong feelings and differing opinions from governments, activists, and ordinary people worldwide. The United Nations, as an international organization focused on peace and human rights, is a key arena for these debates. The events surrounding Netanyahu’s speech show that many nations and voices are urging new action—from recognition of Palestinian rights to calls for sanctions against Israel—while discussion and disagreement over the best path forward continue.

This episode at the UN highlights how international diplomacy, public protests, and official policy are all intersecting in real time as the search for solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains urgent and unresolved.

Continue Reading

Trending