World News
Students for Justice in Palestine becomes flashpoint in college antisemitism, free speech debate on November 16, 2023 at 11:00 am

College group Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) is at the center of a hurricane over its responses to the Israel-Hamas conflict, banned and chastised at universities across the country after its statements and protests have drawn accusations of antisemitism.
SJP wasted no time after the Oct. 7 Hamas terrorist attack on Israel to spring into action, organizing a “Day of Resistance.” Chapters of the group said the world had witnessed “a historic win for the Palestinian resistance: across land, air, and sea, our people have broken down the artificial barriers of the Zionist entity.”
The blowback has been swift, sparking First Amendment debates and arguments over what constitutes antisemitism.
Columbia University has banned an SJP chapter, as well as Jewish Voice for Peace, through the end of the semester.
“This decision was made after the two groups repeatedly violated University policies related to holding campus events, culminating in an unauthorized event Thursday afternoon that proceeded despite warnings and included threatening rhetoric and intimidation,” said school Vice President Gerald Rosberg.
George Washington University suspended its SJP chapter this week after three of its members projected messages on a school building that included “Glory to our Martyrs.”
And Brandeis University has also banned SJP after saying the group “openly supports Hamas,” but the school indicated that the decision was tough because it is dedicated to upholding the principles of free speech.
Florida, meanwhile, has ordered its state universities to ban SJP chapters, claiming without evidence that the organization was giving material support to terrorist groups. Gov. Ron DeSantis, a GOP presidential candidate, said it is “not a First Amendment issue” because “these groups, Students for Justice [in] Palestine, they have said that they are in cahoots with Hamas.”
Alex Morey, director of campus rights advocacy for the Foundation of Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), a free speech group, said her organization is “not surprised” over backlash to SJP because “their speech right now is the unpopular speech,” noting that schools are under immense pressure to combat perceived antisemitism.
While Morey acknowledges the language of SJP is very distressing because its members are “endorsing what a lot of people think is terrorism,” she said that type of speech is “all protected.”
“There is zero evidence that any of these SJP groups have gone, to my knowledge anyway, have gone beyond the line of protected speech,” Morey said.
FIRE is not going after Columbia for banning SJP because it believes the school banned them for violating policy, not in direct response to their message. But Morey said her organization has sent a warning letter to a dozen schools telling them not to punish students who express pro-Palestinian sentiment.
“They’re just saying very controversial things about their sort of generalized support for Hamas or for Palestinian uprising. And while that’s very upsetting to people, it’s not unlawful, and the vast majority of all public institutions have to give students their First Amendment right to say those types of things,” she said. “Most private schools make similar promises and should also honor students’ expressive rights — to express views that are controversial right now.”
Republicans, on the other hand, are threatening to defund schools that don’t take stronger action against students and groups who voice support for Hamas, a designated terrorist group.
Antisemitism on college campuses has skyrocketed since the Oct. 7 attack, with the House holding two hearings on the problem in the following weeks.
In a House hearing Tuesday, a Yale student said there should be some consequences for SJP groups, especially ones that commemorate the terrorists who died attacking Israel.
In response, Rep. Bob Good (R-Va.) said, “Specifically, colleges don’t have to sanction or subsidize or condone these groups that are obviously hate groups, antisemitic groups.”
SJP, which did not respond to The Hill’s request for comment, has called efforts to censor its chapters “racist” and pushed back on claims that its views have crossed a line.
“There have been these inflammatory allegations made to say that SJP supports terrorism, but, again, that’s not true,” said Lina Assi, advocacy manager for Palestine Legal, adding there is an attempt to “criminalize” and “justify repression” of SJP chapters “despite their speech being protected under the First Amendment.”
Palestine Legal has received 600 requests for legal assistance since Oct. 7, according to Assi, and the group has written a letter to the Department of Education detailing incidents of Muslim and pro-Palestine students getting attacked on campuses. The department released a letter reminding schools of the duty to protect Palestinian students.
“I think, outside of the context of Oct. 7, and the statements following that, there’s this broader and longer timeline of pro-Israel groups attacking SJP chapters for the things that they say outside of [the] crisis moments,” Assi said. “They take issue with the fact that they’re advocating for the freedom of Palestinians from an apartheid regime.”
Jewish groups dispute such claims, saying SJP contributes to antisemitism on campus.
“SJP is responsible for leading many of the violent rallies we’ve been seeing on college campuses since the onset of the war. The organization is a major distributor of misinformation about Israel and the Jewish people, sparking these acts of aggression towards college students,” said Liora Rez, executive director of Stop Antisemitism, adding SJP is not a good representative for Palestinians.
“We’ve seen time and time again that wherever SJP exists, acts of antisemitism occur. Their violent rhetoric and misinformed beliefs about Jewish people and the state of Israel provide a foundation for antisemitism to spread,” Rez added.
She said Stop Antisemitism supports all SJP groups around the country getting suspended, blocking any anti-Israel rallies and expelling students who support antisemitism as potential ways to combat the issues on campuses.
“If you’re an organization whose members violate the safety of Jewish people, you should be removed from campus,” Rez said.
Assi, however, believes blaming Palestinian groups is ignoring the real cause of antisemitism that is hurting campuses.
“The issue of antisemitism has been an issue that, again, like anti-Palestinian racism, precedes Oct. 7. And it’s a real issue that needs to be addressed, especially in the context of the rise of right-wing white supremacist sentiment in this country,” Assi added.
College group Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) is at the center of a hurricane over its responses to the Israel-Hamas conflict, banned and chastised at universities across the country after its statements and protests have drawn accusations of antisemitism. SJP wasted no time after the Oct. 7 Hamas terrorist attack on Israel to spring…
Politics
Netanyahu’s UN Speech Triggers Diplomatic Walkouts and Mass Protests

What Happened at the United Nations
On Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, defending Israel’s ongoing military operations in Gaza. As he spoke, more than 100 delegates from over 50 countries stood up and left the chamber—a rare and significant diplomatic walkout. Outside the UN, thousands of protesters gathered to voice opposition to Netanyahu’s policies and call for accountability, including some who labeled him a war criminal. The protest included activists from Palestinian and Jewish groups, along with international allies.

Why Did Delegates and Protesters Walk Out?
The walkouts and protests were a response to Israel’s continued offensive in Gaza, which has resulted in widespread destruction and a significant humanitarian crisis. Many countries and individuals have accused Israel of excessive use of force, and some international prosecutors have suggested Netanyahu should face investigation by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, including claims that starvation was used as a weapon against civilians. At the same time, a record number of nations—over 150—recently recognized the State of Palestine, leaving the United States as the only permanent UN Security Council member not to join them.
International Reaction and Significance
The diplomatic walkouts and street protests demonstrate increasing global concern over the situation in Gaza and growing support for Palestinian statehood. Several world leaders, including Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro, showed visible solidarity with protesters. Petro called for international intervention and, controversially, for US troops not to follow orders he viewed as supporting ongoing conflict. The US later revoked Petro’s visa over his role in the protests, which he argued was evidence of a declining respect for international law.

Why Is This News Important?
The Gaza conflict is one of the world’s most contentious and closely-watched issues. It has drawn strong feelings and differing opinions from governments, activists, and ordinary people worldwide. The United Nations, as an international organization focused on peace and human rights, is a key arena for these debates. The events surrounding Netanyahu’s speech show that many nations and voices are urging new action—from recognition of Palestinian rights to calls for sanctions against Israel—while discussion and disagreement over the best path forward continue.
This episode at the UN highlights how international diplomacy, public protests, and official policy are all intersecting in real time as the search for solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains urgent and unresolved.
News
Is a Nuclear-Powered Alien Spacecraft Flying Toward Earth?

A mysterious interstellar object speeding through our solar system has reignited debates about extraterrestrial technology — and whether Earth might currently be under quiet observation.
The object, known as 3I/ATLAS, is only the third confirmed interstellar visitor ever detected. Unlike ordinary comets, however, this cosmic traveler has baffled astronomers with its unusual brightness, strange trajectory, and lack of a visible cometary tail. While most scientists cautiously describe it as a natural body, one leading astrophysicist believes something much stranger is at play.

Harvard Scientist’s Bold Claim
Professor Avi Loeb of Harvard University, head of the Galileo Project, has suggested that 3I/ATLAS may in fact be a nuclear-powered alien spacecraft designed to test how humanity would respond to an interstellar visitor. He argues that its flight path is improbably precise, bringing it close to Mars, Venus, and Earth — a pattern highly unlikely to occur by chance.
Loeb also points out that telescope images show a glow inconsistent with ordinary dust behavior. Instead of trailing behind like a comet, the halo-like light appears to extend in unusual ways, sparking debate about whether the object could be emitting energy of its own.
Headed Toward Earth’s Neighborhood
3I/ATLAS is expected to make its closest approach in late 2025, passing near Mars before swinging by the inner solar system. Although Earth itself will be on the opposite side of the Sun when it comes closest, the alignment will still enable space-based observatories to capture sharper data.

Loeb has called on NASA and other agencies to use spacecraft already stationed near Mars or Jupiter — including the Juno mission — to take high-resolution photographs. He believes such efforts could reveal whether the interstellar object is truly natural, or the first technological probe humanity has ever encountered.
Should We Be Worried?
While most astronomers argue caution before jumping to alien conclusions, Loeb insists that scientific openness is key. “If it’s just a comet, we learn something new,” he said. “But if it’s a spacecraft, it would be the most important discovery in human history.”
For now, 3I/ATLAS remains a mysterious speck on astronomers’ charts, drifting closer with each passing day. Whether it proves to be a frozen remnant of another star system or something far more advanced, the interstellar visitor has already succeeded in one mission: reminding us how vast and unpredictable the universe really is.
News
AI Automation Could Cause Up to 20% Unemployment—A Workforce on the Brink

Stark Warning from Anthropic CEO Highlights Rapid Job Displacement Risk
The looming threat of widespread unemployment due to AI automation has sparked intense debate among experts, business leaders, and policymakers. Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic—the company behind the influential AI language model Claude—issued a stark warning that has sent shockwaves through corporate America:

“Up to half of all entry-level white collar jobs could disappear within the next one to five years, potentially pushing unemployment rates as high as 20% during this period.”
This dramatic forecast paints a picture of a rapid and unsettling transformation in the workforce, driven by AI technologies that can perform complex cognitive tasks.
Balancing Predictions: Worst-Case Scenarios vs. Moderate Impact
However, this forecast represents one end of a spectrum of expert predictions. While Amodei’s warning highlights the worst-case scenario driven by the swift adoption of AI agents capable of coding, analyzing data, drafting legal documents, and managing workflows around the clock, other analyses suggest a more moderate impact. For example, Goldman Sachs estimates that AI could temporarily displace about 6-7% of U.S. jobs, with unemployment rising by approximately half a percentage point during the adjustment period. Their research anticipates a more gradual transition with a mixture of job disruption and creation.

The Unprecedented Speed and Scope of AI-Driven Job Disruption
The truth likely lies somewhere in between. AI is advancing at unprecedented speed, and the scope of jobs affected spans far beyond blue-collar roles to white-collar positions that required college degrees and years of training. Entry-level roles such as customer service representatives, data entry clerks, junior analysts, and administrative assistants face the greatest near-term risk. Mid-level roles in accounting, marketing, law, and engineering could soon follow, with companies already laying off workers citing AI-driven efficiencies.
Preparing for an AI-Transformed Workforce: Adaptation Is Essential
Ultimately, the AI-driven job transformation is no longer a distant prospect but unfolding now. Whether unemployment spikes to 20% or stabilizes at lower levels depends on many factors, including business adoption rates, government policies, and the ability of workers to reskill. What is certain is that the workforce of tomorrow will look very different from today—and the time to prepare is right now.
- Business3 weeks ago
Disney Loses $3.87 Billion as Subscription Cancellations Surge After Kimmel Suspension
- Entertainment3 weeks ago
What the Deletion Frenzy Reveals in the David and Celeste Tragedy
- Entertainment4 weeks ago
ABC Suspends ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ Indefinitely After Kirk Remarks
- Entertainment3 weeks ago
Executive Producer Debut: How Celia Carver Created Festival Hit ‘Afterparty’
- Filmmaking4 weeks ago
Why Hollywood’s Biggest Blockbusters Keep Failing at the Box Office
- Business4 weeks ago
The Rise Of Bullsh*t Jobs: Why Gen Z Hates Work
- Health3 weeks ago
Russia Claims 100% Success With New mRNA Cancer Vaccine
- News4 weeks ago
Body of Missing Teen Found in Tesla Linked to Musician D4vd