Connect with us

World News

On Israel-Hamas war, Biden goes where his top aides won’t  on October 27, 2023 at 9:30 am

Published

on

President Biden has come out ahead of some of his own administration’s official lines when it comes to the Israel-Hamas war, saying early on that another occupation of Gaza would be a mistake and this week suggesting he was open to the idea that he could ask for a ceasefire only if Hamas releases remaining hostages.

Officials such as Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and national security spokesperson John Kirby have been carefully tiptoeing around questions regarding Israel’s expected ground invasion into Gaza, humanitarian aid to Palestinians caught in a war zone and threats of a wider conflict in the region. But when it comes to the president answering questions from reporters, he’s been decidedly more candid about the volatile matter.

The U.S. response to the war between Israel and Hamas, which spawned in the wake of the surprise Oct. 7 attack on Israel, marks the latest example of Biden getting ahead of the official line, particularly when it comes to some of his top foreign policy issues. 

The most glaring example of that during his presidency was when he said in a speech in Warsaw  that Russian President Vladimir Putin can’t remain in power in the early weeks of the Ukraine war. More recently, he used a campaign fundraiser — the type of event he’s been known to speak frequently off-the-cuff  — to declare Chinese President Xi Jinping a dictator.

Advertisement

Since the war broke out, Biden has maintained that an Israeli occupation of Gaza should not be an option, a notion Israel also appears to support. But he has also warned Israel to use some rationale in its response, lest it not repeat the mistakes of the U.S. post-9/11. 

Biden administration officials have also been careful to sidestep the notion the U.S. is directing Israel’s response or plans in any way, but Biden seems to suggest their talks are more direct behind the scenes that they’re letting on, including on how to safely release the hostages ahead of a ground invasion.

“What I have indicated to him is that if that’s possible, to get these folks out safely, that’s what he should do.  It’s their decision, but I did not demand it.  I pointed out to him: If it’s real, it should be done,” Biden said of his conversations with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

A sticking point that has emerged in recent days is whether to trust information coming out of the Gaza Health Ministry, a government agency run by Hamas who politically control the Gaza Strip. Biden on Wednesday said he had “no confidence” in the official death toll, which has indicated more than 6,000 Palestinians have been killed since Israel launched its offensive, during a press conference alongside the Australian prime minister Wednesday. 

Advertisement

That left Kirby on Thursday being faced with follow-up questions on the president’s remarks, in which Biden said he believed innocents had been killed in Gaza but that it was the “price of waging a war,” which some Muslim and Arab groups deemed insensitive and called for the president to apologize. Kirby maintained the White House accepts Palestinian civilians have been killed, but cannot confirm how many.

One reason for Biden’s candidness is his sometimes jousting with the reporters asking the questions as he did during the press conference Wednesday when a reporter asked a follow-up question on the hostages, prompting Biden to interject: “You want to make a speech?”

“He likes the repartee with reporters. You see, he enjoys it. When you do something like that, he likes to have his sort of gotcha moment, sometimes with reporters, and that ends up maybe going further than then he would have wanted,” said Todd Belt, director of the political management master’s program at The George Washington University.

Biden’s allies say one reason he’s so comfortable speaking unscripted about foreign policy issues is his decades-long experience as a senator, including as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. 

Advertisement

“President Biden is very comfortable in the foreign and security policy space and is setting the direction for his administration to follow,” said former Rep. Chris Carney (D-Pa.), a senior policy adviser at Nossaman. “More so than most presidents in recent memory, President Biden has the experience, acumen, and relationships to successfully manage the crisis in Gaza.”

“Few global leaders, and essentially no other U.S. leaders, have the kind of relationship with Netanyahu that enable frank and honest discussions on how to contain the conflict while concurrently protecting Israeli interests,” Carney said.

That foreign policy background was on full display in March 2022, when Biden said during a passionate speech in Warsaw that Putin can’t remain in power, a comment that was later walked back the White House after interpretations indicated he was calling for a change in power in another country.

Biden has long been known to speak off hand, and has at times had unfortunate gaffes, which have spelled more trouble for him than perhaps other political leaders.

Advertisement

“His style has always been to speak off the cuff, and it’s gotten him into problems as vice president as a candidate and of course, as president, so this is nothing new for him,” Belt said. “He does like to go off script a bit, most politicians do. It’s just sometimes when he goes off script, he ends up getting other political players in a little bit of hot water.”

Another surprise remark made this year that was met with shockwaves was when Biden, during a fundraiser in California, called Xi a dictator who got upset when the Chinese spy balloon was shot down early this year because he didn’t know about it. 

The candid rhetoric from the president is typical when he is speaking to donors, especially in small settings where Biden tends to make news from speaking freely when cameras aren’t in the room and just a small group of journalists are there to report what he says.

Those candid comments will be even more common when the 2024 campaign picks up and Biden traverses the country to raise money. Donors, Belt said, now anticipate that personal style from him.

Advertisement

“It’s something people expect when they want to have some face time with a candidate or with the president, they expect him to be speaking in a way that is not scripted and not just another canned speech they can watch on TV,” Belt said.

​ President Biden has come out ahead of some of his own administration’s official lines when it comes to the Israel-Hamas war, saying early on that another occupation of Gaza would be a mistake and this week suggesting he was open to the idea that he could ask for a ceasefire only if Hamas releases remaining… 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

US May Completely Cut Income Tax Due to Tariff Revenue

Published

on

President Donald Trump says the United States might one day get rid of federal income tax because of money the government collects from tariffs on imported goods. Tariffs are extra taxes the U.S. puts on products that come from other countries.

What Trump Is Saying

Trump has said that tariff money could become so large that it might allow the government to cut income taxes “almost completely.” He has also talked about possibly phasing out income tax over the next few years if tariff money keeps going up.

How Taxes Work Now

Right now, the federal government gets much more money from income taxes than from tariffs. Income taxes bring in trillions of dollars each year, while tariffs bring in only a small part of that total. Because of this gap, experts say tariffs would need to grow by many times to replace income tax money.

Questions From Experts

Many economists and tax experts doubt that tariffs alone could pay for the whole federal budget. They warn that very high tariffs could make many imported goods more expensive for shoppers in the United States. This could hit lower- and middle‑income families hardest, because they spend a big share of their money on everyday items.

What Congress Must Do

The president can change some tariffs, but only Congress can change or end the federal income tax. That means any real plan to remove income tax would need new laws passed by both the House of Representatives and the Senate. So far, there is no detailed law or full budget plan on this idea.

What It Means Right Now

For now, Trump’s comments are a proposal, not a change in the law. People and businesses still have to pay federal income tax under the current rules. The debate over using tariffs instead of income taxes is likely to continue among lawmakers, experts, and voters.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Epstein Files to Be Declassified After Trump Order

Published

on


Former President Donald Trump has signed an executive order directing federal agencies to declassify all government files related to Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier whose death in 2019 continues to fuel controversy and speculation.

The order, signed Wednesday at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, instructs the FBI, Department of Justice, and intelligence agencies to release documents detailing Epstein’s network, finances, and alleged connections to high-profile figures. Trump described the move as “a step toward transparency and public trust,” promising that no names would be shielded from scrutiny.

“This information belongs to the American people,” Trump said in a televised statement. “For too long, powerful interests have tried to bury the truth. That ends now.”

U.S. intelligence officials confirmed that preparations for the release are already underway. According to sources familiar with the process, the first batch of documents is expected to be made public within the next 30 days, with additional releases scheduled over several months.

Reactions poured in across the political spectrum. Supporters praised the decision as a bold act of accountability, while critics alleged it was politically motivated, timed to draw attention during a volatile election season. Civil rights advocates, meanwhile, emphasized caution, warning that some records could expose private victims or ongoing legal matters.

The Epstein case, which implicated figures in politics, business, and entertainment, remains one of the most talked-about scandals of the past decade. Epstein’s connections to influential individuals—including politicians, royals, and executives—have long sparked speculation about the extent of his operations and who may have been involved.

Advertisement

Former federal prosecutor Lauren Fields said the release could mark a turning point in public discourse surrounding government transparency. “Regardless of political stance, this declassification has the potential to reshape how Americans view power and accountability,” Fields noted.

Officials say redactions may still occur to protect sensitive intelligence or personal information, but the intent is a near-complete disclosure. For years, critics of the government’s handling of Epstein’s case have accused agencies of concealing evidence or shielding elites from exposure. Trump’s order promises to change that narrative.

As anticipation builds, journalists, legal analysts, and online commentators are preparing for what could be one of the most consequential information releases in recent history.

Continue Reading

Politics

Netanyahu’s UN Speech Triggers Diplomatic Walkouts and Mass Protests

Published

on

What Happened at the United Nations

On Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, defending Israel’s ongoing military operations in Gaza. As he spoke, more than 100 delegates from over 50 countries stood up and left the chamber—a rare and significant diplomatic walkout. Outside the UN, thousands of protesters gathered to voice opposition to Netanyahu’s policies and call for accountability, including some who labeled him a war criminal. The protest included activists from Palestinian and Jewish groups, along with international allies.

Why Did Delegates and Protesters Walk Out?

The walkouts and protests were a response to Israel’s continued offensive in Gaza, which has resulted in widespread destruction and a significant humanitarian crisis. Many countries and individuals have accused Israel of excessive use of force, and some international prosecutors have suggested Netanyahu should face investigation by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, including claims that starvation was used as a weapon against civilians. At the same time, a record number of nations—over 150—recently recognized the State of Palestine, leaving the United States as the only permanent UN Security Council member not to join them.

International Reaction and Significance

The diplomatic walkouts and street protests demonstrate increasing global concern over the situation in Gaza and growing support for Palestinian statehood. Several world leaders, including Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro, showed visible solidarity with protesters. Petro called for international intervention and, controversially, for US troops not to follow orders he viewed as supporting ongoing conflict. The US later revoked Petro’s visa over his role in the protests, which he argued was evidence of a declining respect for international law.

BILATERAL MEETING WITH THE PRIME MINISTER OF ISRAEL Photo credit: Matty STERN/U.S. Embassy Jerusalem

Why Is This News Important?

The Gaza conflict is one of the world’s most contentious and closely-watched issues. It has drawn strong feelings and differing opinions from governments, activists, and ordinary people worldwide. The United Nations, as an international organization focused on peace and human rights, is a key arena for these debates. The events surrounding Netanyahu’s speech show that many nations and voices are urging new action—from recognition of Palestinian rights to calls for sanctions against Israel—while discussion and disagreement over the best path forward continue.

This episode at the UN highlights how international diplomacy, public protests, and official policy are all intersecting in real time as the search for solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains urgent and unresolved.

Continue Reading

Trending

Subscribe for the updates!