Connect with us

Business

Senate set to return to a drama-filled September on September 3, 2023 at 6:15 pm Business News | The Hill

Published

on

The Senate returns Tuesday with less than four weeks to prevent the first government shutdown in years.

The countdown and high stakes set up a drama-filled September, and lawmakers are already pointing fingers over who to blame if government funding lapses.

Senators are also uneasily eyeing the House, where shutdown talk from some hard-line conservatives and a possible impeachment inquiry threaten to scramble an already jampacked schedule for September.

“We just don’t have very much time to get everything done,” Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) told reporters Friday, adding that she’s concerned the government could see a shutdown in the weeks ahead. 

Advertisement

“But this is really going to be driven by the House,” she added, putting the onus on Republicans in the lower chamber. “They’re the ones that are going to bring it upon the country.”

Democrats have been ramping up criticism of House Republicans as the conference pursues more aggressive spending cuts for fiscal 2024 — well below spending rates agreed upon in a budget cap deal between President Biden and Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) months back.

“When the Senate returns next week, our focus will be on funding the government and preventing House Republican extremists from forcing a government shutdown,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said in a letter Friday.

“The only way to avoid a shutdown is through bipartisanship, so I have urged House Republican leadership to follow the Senate’s lead and pass bipartisan appropriations bills,” Schumer said. 

Advertisement

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) didn’t hold back in discussing some of the hurdles Congress faces in averting a shutdown later this month, recently describing the current state of play as “a pretty big mess.” 

“The Speaker and the president reached an agreement which I supported in connection with raising the debt ceiling to set spending levels for next year,” he said in Kentucky on Wednesday, shortly before appearing to freeze while taking questions from reporters.

“The House then turned around and passed spending levels that were below that level,” he said. “Without stating an opinion about that, that’s not going to be replicated in the Senate.”

Before Congress left for the August recess, negotiators in both chambers advanced legislation laying out hundreds of billions of dollars in proposed funding for the next fiscal year — but at very different levels.

Advertisement

In the Democratic-led Senate, negotiators on both sides marked up their spending bills closer to levels agreed upon in the budget cap deal struck between Biden and McCarthy months ago, while Republicans went further below the negotiated levels amid pressure from hard-line conservatives demanding steeper cuts.

To buy time for a larger spending deal, leaders from both parties have been eyeing a short-term funding patch, known as a continuing resolution (CR), to freeze funding at levels worked out as part of a bipartisan agreement in the last Congress. But some Republicans aren’t warm to the idea of voting to continue funding at limits last hashed out when Democrats held control of both chambers and that many in the conference agree are too high. 

In recent weeks, hard-line conservatives have also made multiple demands related to issues like the border and what they describe as the “weaponization” of the Department of Justice as conditions to secure their support for a CR — putting pressure on McCarthy to hold a firm stance in extracting concessions from Democrats to prevent a shutdown.

The party has additionally seen internal rifts over the issue of Ukraine aid, as the White House’s requested funding for more assistance to aid the nation in its war against Russia meets opposition from conservatives — adding to a list of potential add-ons to a CR in the House that would greatly hurt its chances of passage in the upper chamber. 

Advertisement

Lawmakers also have other significant legislative priorities competing for time as they juggle deadlines for the National Flood Insurance Program, the Federal Aviation Administration and the farm bill, among other pressing items.

There’s also the House GOP-led push for an impeachment inquiry that has been taking up more oxygen on Capitol Hill, with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) announcing this week that she would go against a stopgap funding bill if the House fails to vote to open the impeachment inquiry.

The various demands underscore the balancing act McCarthy faces in keeping together the slim majority’s various factions amid the contentious funding process, while also finding common ground with Democrats to keep the government open. 

At the same time, some hard-line conservatives have already signaled openness to the idea of a shutdown if it comes to it. 

Advertisement

“If a shutdown occurs, then so be it if they’re not gonna stick to what [McCarthy] agreed to, which is starting on a path of financial security, which we don’t have,” Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) recently told The Hill.

But that doesn’t mean Republicans in the upper chamber are on board with the prospect.

“My guess is we will have a lot of screaming and shouting and we’ll end up shutting down the government,” Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) said during an appearance on “KSL Sunday Edition” last week. “And a lot of people will be inconvenienced or hurt as a result of doing that. But we’ll do it.”

“And by the way, we’ll shut down government and then we’ll open it,” he added. “It’s not like that means we win. We’re going to shut it down to show that we’re fighting and making noise.”

Advertisement

​Senate, Business, News The Senate returns Tuesday with less than four weeks to prevent the first government shutdown in years. The countdown and high stakes set up a drama-filled September, and lawmakers are already pointing fingers over who to blame if government funding lapses. Senators are also uneasily eyeing the House, where shutdown talk from some hard-line conservatives…  

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Why 9 Million Americans Have Left

Published

on

The Growing American Exodus

Nearly 9 million Americans now live outside the United States—a number that rivals the population of several states and signals a profound shift in how people view the American dream. This mass migration isn’t confined to retirees or the wealthy. Thanks to remote work, digital nomad visas, and mounting pressures at home, young professionals, families, and business owners are increasingly joining the ranks of expats.

Rising Costs and Shrinking Wallets

Living in the US has become increasingly expensive. Weekly grocery bills topping $300 are not uncommon, and everyday items like coffee and beef have surged in price over the last year. Rent, utilities, and other essentials also continue to climb, leaving many Americans to cut meals or put off purchases just to make ends meet. In contrast, life in countries like Mexico or Costa Rica often costs just 50–60% of what it does in the US—without sacrificing comfort or quality.

Health Care Concerns Drive Migration

America’s health care system is a major trigger for relocation. Despite the fact that the US spends more per person on health care than any other country, millions struggle to access affordable treatment. Over half of Americans admit to delaying medical care due to cost, with households earning below $40,000 seeing this rate jump to 63%. Many expats point to countries such as Spain or Thailand, where health care is both affordable and accessible, as a major draw.

Seeking Safety Abroad

Public safety issues—especially violent crime and gun-related incidents—have made many Americans feel unsafe, even in their own communities. The 2024 Global Peace Index documents a decline in North America’s safety ratings, while families in major cities often prioritize teaching their children to avoid gun violence over simple street safety. In many overseas destinations, newly arrived American families report a significant improvement in their sense of security and peace of mind.

Tax Burdens and Bureaucracy

US tax laws extend abroad, requiring expats to file annual returns and comply with complicated rules through acts such as FATCA. For some, the burden of global tax compliance is so great that thousands relinquish their US citizenship each year simply to escape the paperwork and scrutiny.

The Digital Nomad Revolution

Remote work has unlocked new pathways for Americans. Over a quarter of all paid workdays in the US are now fully remote, and more than 40 countries offer digital nomad visas for foreign professionals. Many Americans are leveraging this opportunity to maintain their US incomes while cutting costs and upgrading their quality of life abroad.

Conclusion: Redefining the Dream

The mass departure of nearly 9 million Americans reveals deep cracks in what was once considered the land of opportunity. Escalating costs, inaccessible healthcare, safety concerns, and relentless bureaucracy have spurred a global search for better options. For millions, the modern American dream is no longer tied to a white-picket fence, but found in newfound freedom beyond America’s borders.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Will Theaters Crush Streaming in Hollywood’s Next Act?

Published

on

Hollywood is bracing for a pivotal comeback, and for movie lovers, it’s the kind of shake-up that could redefine the very culture of cinema. With the freshly merged Paramount-Skydance shaking up its strategy, CEO David Ellison’s announcement doesn’t just signal a change—it reignites the passion for moviegoing that built the magic of Hollywood in the first place.

Theatrical Experience Roars Back

Fans and insiders alike have felt the itch for more event movies. For years, streaming promised endless options, but fragmented attention left many longing for communal spectacle. Now, with Paramount-Skydance tripling its film output for the big screen, it’s clear: studio leaders believe there’s no substitute for the lights, the hush before the opening credits, and the collective thrill of reacting to Hollywood’s latest blockbusters. Ellison’s pivot away from streaming exclusives taps deep into what unites cinephiles—the lived experience of cinema as art and event, not just content.

Industry Pulse: From Crisis to Renaissance

On the financial front, the numbers are as electrifying as any plot twist. After years of doubt, the box office is roaring. AMC, the world’s largest theater chain, reports a staggering 26% spike in moviegoer attendance and 36% revenue growth in Q2 2025. That kind of momentum hasn’t been seen since the heyday of summer tentpoles—and it’s not just about more tickets sold. AMC’s strategy—premium screens, with IMAX and Dolby Cinema, curated concessions, and branded collectibles—has turned every new release into an event, driving per-customer profits up nearly 50% compared to pre-pandemic norms.

Blockbusters Lead the Culture

Forget the gloom of endless streaming drops; when films like Top Gun: Maverick, Mission: Impossible, Minecraft, and surprise hits like Weapons and Freakier Friday draw crowds, the industry—and movie fans—sit up and take notice. Movie-themed collectibles and concession innovations, from Barbie’s iconic pink car popcorn holders to anniversary tie-ins, have made each screening a moment worth remembering, blending nostalgia and discovery. The focus: high-impact, shared audience experiences that streaming can’t replicate.

Streaming’s Limits and Studio Strategy

Yes, streaming is still surging, but the tide may be turning. The biggest franchises, and the biggest cultural events, happen when audiences come together for a theatrical release. Paramount-Skydance’s shift signals to rivals that premium storytelling and box office spectacle are again at the center of Hollywood value creation. The result is not just higher profits for exhibitors like AMC, but a rebirth of movie-going as the ultimate destination for fans hungry for connection and cinematic adventure.

Future Forecast: Culture, Community, and Blockbuster Dreams

As PwC and others warn that box office totals may take years to fully catch up, movie lovers and industry leaders alike are betting that exclusive theatrical runs, enhanced viewing experiences, and fan-driven engagement are the ingredients for long-term recovery—and a new golden age. The Paramount-Skydance play is more than a business move; it’s a rallying cry for the art of the theatrical event. Expect more big bets, more surprises, and—finally—a long-overdue renaissance for the silver screen.

For those who believe in the power of cinema, it’s a thrilling second act—and the best seat in the house might be front and center once again.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Why Are Influencers Getting $7K to Post About Israel?

Published

on

Influencers are being paid as much as $7,000 per post by the Israeli government as part of an expansive and sophisticated digital propaganda campaign. This effort is designed to influence global public opinion—especially among younger social media users—about Israel’s actions in Gaza and to counter critical narratives about the ongoing humanitarian situation.

How Much Is Being Spent?

Recent reports confirm that Israel has dedicated more than $40 million this year to social media and digital influence campaigns, targeting popular platforms such as TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram. In addition to direct influencer payments, Israel is investing tens of millions more in paid ads, search engine placements, and contracts with major tech companies like Google and Meta to push pro-Israel content and challenge critical coverage of issues like the famine in Gaza.

What’s the Strategy?

  • Influencer Contracts: Influencers are recruited—often with all-expenses-paid trips to Israel, highly managed experiences, and direct payments—to post content that improves Israel’s image.
  • Ad Campaigns: State-backed ad buys show lively Gaza markets and restaurants to counter global reports of famine and humanitarian crisis.
  • Narrative Management: These posts and ads often avoid overt propaganda. Instead, they use personal stories, emotional appeals, and “behind the scenes” glimpses intended to humanize Israel’s side of the conflict and create doubt about reports by the UN and humanitarian agencies.
  • Amplification: Paid content is strategically promoted so it dominates news feeds and is picked up by news aggregators, Wikipedia editors, and even AI systems that rely on “trusted” digital sources.

Why Is This Happening Now?

The humanitarian situation in Gaza has generated increasing international criticism, especially after the UN classified parts of Gaza as experiencing famine. In this environment, digital public relations has become a primary front in Israel’s efforts to defend its policies and limit diplomatic fallout. By investing in social media influencers, Israel is adapting old-school propaganda strategies (“Hasbara”) to the era of algorithms and youth-driven content.

Why Does It Matter?

This campaign represents a major blurring of the lines between paid promotion, journalism, and activism. When governments pay high-profile influencers to shape social media narratives, it becomes harder for audiences—especially young people—to distinguish between authentic perspectives and sponsored messaging.

As user trust in mainstream news decreases and social media’s power grows, understanding how digital influence operations work is critical for anyone who wants to stay informed and think critically about global events.


In short: Influencers are getting $7,000 per post because Israel is prioritizing social media as a battleground for public opinion, investing millions in shaping what global audiences see, hear, and believe about Gaza and the conflict.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending