Entertainment
3 Obsessed Michael Jackson Fans Who Made His Life a Nightmare

Few public figures have inspired as much adoration—or as much dangerous obsession—as Michael Jackson. While millions idolized him from afar, a handful of super-fans took their devotion into darker territory, crossing the line from fandom to frightening fixation. Here are the true accounts of three women whose obsessions made Michael Jackson’s life a very real nightmare.
Denise Feifer: From Devoted Admirer to Criminal Outlaw
Denise Feifer’s fascination with Michael Jackson began at age 12, blossoming into an intense, decades-long obsession. A former bank clerk from Leicestershire, England, Denise followed Jackson around the world during his “Dangerous” tour, attending nearly every date and spending about $40,000. Her devotion bordered on the extreme: she once waited at Heathrow airport for days and even bluffed her way into Jackson’s hotel room in Frankfurt, Germany, managing to spend over an hour with her idol.

But when child abuse allegations against Jackson erupted in 1993, Denise’s attachment took a dark turn. Convinced of his innocence, she flew to Los Angeles to confront the family of his accuser, Jordie Chandler. Her actions escalated to vandalism, threatening calls, and attempted break-ins. Denise was eventually arrested and held in harsh jail conditions. International headlines followed when actress Lynn Redgrave posted Denise’s bail. The experience shattered her illusions: feeling abandoned by Jackson and humiliated by her ordeal, she returned to England bitter and disillusioned, ultimately turning away from the fantasy life she had built around him.
Leavonne Powell: The Self-Styled “Billie Jean Jackson”
Leavonne Powell, known by various aliases including “Billie Jean Jackson” and “Gabriella Jamila,” became notorious in the late 1980s for her delusional pursuit of the pop star. Powell insisted that Jackson was her husband and the father of her children, repeatedly filing lawsuits—including a $150 million paternity claim in 1987—and even legally changing her name to Billie Jean Jackson.
Her behaviors went far beyond the legal realm. Powell trespassed on Jackson’s properties, billed luxury items to his name, and was caught trying to sneak into his house, all while disregarding restraining orders and serving multiple jail sentences. Even after her paternity suit was dismissed for lack of evidence and Powell was ordered to undergo psychiatric evaluation, her fixation endured for years. Remarkably, she reemerged in 2008, now seeking $1 billion in support and visitation rights for yet another child she claimed Jackson had fathered—again, with no proof. Courts repeatedly dismissed her outlandish claims, but for Leavonne Powell, obsession never faded.

Michelle Flowers: Accuser, Litigant, and Reluctant Recantation
Michelle Flowers, a Californian, made headlines in 1994 by filing a paternity and child support lawsuit against Jackson, demanding a mansion and $20 million a year for her alleged son. Her claims spun into ever stranger territory: tales of Jackson disguised and stalking her, kidnapping attempts, and spiritual manipulation. Despite sweeping and uncorroborated allegations, Flowers continued to press her case, even as courts conducted DNA tests that definitively proved Jackson was not the father—the biological father was her former husband.

Judges barred Flowers from filing further suits without special approval, but she persisted, shifting her narrative from paternity to claims of assault and psychological harassment. Years later, during Jackson’s own high-profile criminal trial, Flowers performed a dramatic reversal, publicly recanting her accusations, defending Jackson’s character, and expressing regret for her previous claims. Whether out of remorse or a new phase of obsession, her flip-flop closed one of the most bewildering chapters in Jackson’s decades of legal and personal distress.

The Dark Side of Stardom
For Michael Jackson, the world’s adulation came with a perilous price. Denise Feifer, Leavonne Powell, and Michelle Flowers were more than zealous fans—they were relentless, sometimes delusional presences that invaded his privacy, safety, and peace of mind. These stories expose a chilling truth: while fame can inspire devotion, it can also attract dangerous obsession. For Jackson, the real horror wasn’t just the rumors or the press—but the super-fans whose love became his nightmare.
Entertainment
Why HIM Movie Sparks Talk About Satanism and Occult Rituals

The 2025 horror film Him, produced by Jordan Peele and directed by Justin Tipping, has sparked significant discussion and controversy due to its prominent use of satanic and occult symbolism. Marlon Wayans stars as Isaiah White, a legendary but sinister quarterback who leads a secretive football cult where dark rituals and supernatural elements are central to the story.

The Occult and Satanism Themes at the Core of Him
The movie goes far beyond a traditional sports drama and plunges into horror by depicting an elite football mentorship that turns into a terrifying cult experience. Cameron Cade, a young quarterback injured early in his career, is invited to Isaiah White’s secluded compound to train. There, what seems like mentorship quickly reveals itself as indoctrination into a disturbing satanic cult.
One of the most striking symbols in the film is the pentagram combined with the infinity symbol that appears during a key scene where Cameron, blood-splattered, stands atop the symbol on the football field in a pose reminiscent of Christ’s crucifixion. This imagery blends themes of sacrifice, power, and eternity—tying the occult symbolism directly to the quest for greatness and the dark costs it entails.

As described in the teaser trailer breakdown:
“In the final shot, a blood-splattered Cameron stands on the field atop a sigil that combines a pentagram with the infinity symbol. He raises his arms in a Christ-like pose to form the I in ‘Him’.”
The pentagram here serves as a powerful symbol associated with satanism and occult practices, suggesting that the football cult is steeped in rituals that transcend the physical game and venture into supernatural terror.
Audience and Critical Reactions
The use of overt satanic imagery and occult symbolism like the pentagram has fascinated viewers and critics alike but also raised concerns. Some see it as a bold narrative choice adding depth and horror to the story, while others question the growing use of demonic and occult visuals in mainstream films.
One commentary notes:
“He’s stretching out like Jesus on the cross standing on top of a pentagram with, you know, blood depicted. What is this? Like, why is this happening in Hollywood? Why are people going more and more openly demonic with their direction?”

This is a reminder that the film’s horror is not just about external scares but about spiritual and psychological corruption as symbolized by the pentagram and other satanic imagery.
Social Commentary Behind the Horror
Him uses these occult motifs not just for shock but to critique the dark side of fame, power, and idol worship. The pentagram and cult rituals symbolize how the pursuit of excellence can consume individuals, turning mentorship into blind devotion and self-sacrifice.
The film asks viewers to consider:
“When the pursuit of greatness turns into blind devotion, the real horror lies in who we choose to follow.”
In Summary
Him is a unique blend of sports drama and horror, using satanic and occult rituals—especially the evocative pentagram symbolism—to explore themes of ambition, power, and corruption. Its unsettling depiction of a football cult infused with dark rituals has made it a standout horror film of 2025, sparking both fascination and debate over its use of these potent symbols and themes.

The film releases on September 19, 2025, inviting audiences to confront the terrifying price of greatness—and what it means to truly worship in the age of celebrity.
Entertainment
Hollywood Shake-Up: Warner Bros. Goes All In on Original Stories

Warner Bros. is making a decisive and strategic shift in 2025, emphasizing original movies as a core pillar of its box office strategy while maintaining a hybrid approach that balances franchise blockbusters with fresh, original content. This approach has already shown significant success, with the studio surpassing Disney to achieve a domestic gross of $1.32 billion as of mid-2025. While blockbuster franchises like Superman ($331 million domestic) and the Minecraft Movie ($950 million global) remain strong anchors, Warner Bros. is increasingly investing in a growing slate of original productions that resonate with audiences and prove financially rewarding.

Notable original films in 2025 include Ryan Coogler’s “Sinners,” an original vampire movie that earned over $200 million domestically, marking it the highest-grossing original film since “Coco.” Another example is the horror hit “Weapons,” which opened to $42 million and gained sizable viral attention on social media. Impressively, half of Warner Bros.’ recent streak of six consecutive $40 million+ opening weekends are original stories, underlining the studio’s commitment to diversifying beyond legacy franchises. This strategy helps attract both niche and mainstream viewers, emphasizing that originality can drive considerable box office returns.

To support this, Warner Bros. has adopted a tiered content model that balances high-budget franchise productions with moderate to low-budget original films. This approach mitigates financial risks by leveraging strong brand loyalty from established franchises like DC Comics, while also exploring new intellectual properties and underserved genres like horror and sports dramas. For instance, the $2 million horror film “Presence” grossed $9.3 million, exemplifying the studio’s ability to find profitable niches.
Warner Bros. plans to release between 12 and 14 theatrical films annually across its divisions—Warner Bros. Pictures, DC Studios, New Line Cinema, and Warner Bros. Animation. In this lineup, only 1 to 2 films will be DC superhero movies, reflecting a conscious effort to limit the superhero franchise output and broaden their portfolio with originals and diverse genres. According to CEO David Zaslav, this mix includes:
- 1-2 Warner Bros. Pictures tentpoles, primarily leveraging well-known Warner Bros. IP
- 1-2 DC Studios films
- 3-4 New Line Cinema releases, including horror and comedy genres
- 1-2 Warner Bros. Animation titles
- A select number of moderately budgeted original films
Zaslav has highlighted this sustainable growth strategy with a target of reaching $3 billion in annual studio profits, driven by both proven intellectual properties and innovative original storytelling. This strategic balance enhances the studio’s creative footprint, profitability, and cultural relevance, especially in a post-streaming era where theatrical exclusivity remains important.

Moreover, Warner Bros.’ hybrid approach reduces volatility by avoiding overreliance on any single content formula. Leveraging nostalgia through tentpole franchise films offers predictable revenue streams, while calculated bets on original films foster innovation and appeal to evolving audience tastes. This is particularly pertinent as theaters regain importance amid streaming fatigue, and audiences demonstrate enthusiasm for immersive, big-screen experiences.
Despite their successes, Warner Bros. faces challenges such as managing production costs and creative risks. Films like “Mickey 17,” though high-profile, have shown the risks inherent in overestimating demand for original IP. However, the tiered “franchise-plus” model provides an effective framework to balance financial stability and creative experimentation.

In summary, Warner Bros. in 2025 exemplifies a forward-thinking studio model that values originality alongside franchise strength. By focusing on more original movies while limiting DC superhero films to 1-2 per year, the studio is broadening its creative range, catering to diverse audiences, and positioning itself for sustained success and artistic innovation in a shifting industry landscape.
This strategy signals a shift where originality is not just a side bet but an essential element of Warner Bros.’ future in the film industry, blending financial prudence with cultural impact.
Business
Paramount Seals $7.7B Deal for Exclusive UFC Streaming Rights

Paramount Global has secured the exclusive U.S. rights to the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) in a groundbreaking deal worth $7.7 billion over seven years, beginning in 2026. This agreement marks a major shift in UFC’s distribution, moving away from the traditional pay-per-view model currently offered by ESPN to a new streaming-focused strategy centered on Paramount’s platform, Paramount+. All 43 annual UFC live events, including 13 major numbered events and 30 Fight Nights, will be available exclusively on Paramount+ at no additional cost to subscribers, with select marquee events also simulcast on the CBS broadcast network.

The deal comes just days after Paramount completed its merger with Skydance Media and represents the company’s first major sports rights acquisition under its new leadership. Paramount CEO David Ellison emphasized the uniqueness of partnering exclusively with a global sports powerhouse like UFC, highlighting the move as a key part of Paramount’s strategy to enhance viewer engagement and grow its streaming subscriber base.
For UFC, the deal ends the pay-per-view model common in the sport, greatly increasing accessibility for fans and potentially expanding the sport’s U.S. audience. The contract also doubles the yearly average payment compared to the $550 million ESPN currently pays, reflecting the growing value and popularity of UFC content.
TKO Group Holdings, UFC’s parent company, sees this agreement as a milestone in their decade-long growth, with TKO’s CEO Ari Emanuel affirming trust in Paramount’s vision to leverage technology to improve storytelling and the viewing experience.
This landmark deal reflects the rapidly evolving sports media landscape, with streaming services increasingly vying for premium content to attract and retain subscribers. Paramount’s move to bring UFC to its platform exclusively is a strong statement of commitment to live sports as a vital driver of engagement in the streaming age.
Key Points:
- Paramount secured UFC U.S. media rights for $7.7 billion over 7 years, starting 2026.
- UFC events will be exclusively streamed on Paramount+, ending ESPN’s pay-per-view model.
- The deal includes 13 major numbered events and 30 Fight Nights annually.
- Some marquee events will also air on CBS broadcast TV.
- The yearly payment doubles ESPN’s previous contract.
- The deal was announced shortly after Paramount’s merger with Skydance.
- Paramount aims to use UFC to boost Paramount+ subscriber growth and engagement.
- TKO Group (UFC parent company) supports the deal and foresees enhanced tech-enabled storytelling.
- Streaming services continue to disrupt traditional sports broadcasting models.
- Politics3 weeks ago
Kenya Is the New Home of the United Nations
- Entertainment4 weeks ago
Dakarai Akil: Reinventing Success from the Court to the Camera
- News3 weeks ago
Ciara Granted Benin Citizenship in Powerful Homecoming
- Entertainment4 weeks ago
Malcolm-Jamal Warner, Star of “The Cosby Show,” Dies at 54
- News3 weeks ago
FBI Raids 7M TikTok Cult in LA: Sex Trafficking & Fraud Allegations
- Entertainment4 weeks ago
Faith, Nostalgia & Belle Guillory: TV’s New Powerhouse
- Business4 weeks ago
How to Succeed in the Music Industry: Insights from Hanz & Theo of Room 380
- Business1 week ago
Paramount Seals $7.7B Deal for Exclusive UFC Streaming Rights