Entertainment
Everything to Know About Russell Brand’s Sexual Assault Scandal on September 18, 2023 at 8:26 pm Us Weekly

Russell Brand Carl Court/Getty Images
Russell Brand is facing sexual assault, rape and emotional abuse allegations by multiple women.
The U.K. newspaper The Times published a bombshell article about the actor and comedian, 48, on Saturday, September 16, in which four women alleged being sexually assaulted by Brand between the years of 2006 and 2013.
Ahead of the article’s publication — a collaboration with the Channel 4 series Dispatches —Brand denied the “very serious allegations” against him in a video posted via X (formerly known as Twitter) on Saturday.
“I’ve received two extremely disturbing letters, or a letter and an email, one from a mainstream media TV company [and] one from a newspaper, listing a litany of extremely egregious and aggressive attacks,” he explained, though did not go into detail about the claims.
Brand noted that his past “promiscuous” relationships were “absolutely, always consensual.” He added: “I was always transparent about that then — almost too transparent. And I’m being transparent about it now as well. And to see that transparency metastasized into something criminal that I absolutely deny makes me question [if] there is another agenda at play?”
Scroll down for all the details on Russell’s ongoing sexual assault scandal:
What Are the Allegations Against Russell Brand?
According to The Sunday Times — the Times’ sister outlet —the allegations against Brand occurred between 2006 and 2013 during his time acting in Hollywood and working as a presenter for BBC Radio 2 and Channel 4. One woman, referred to by the name Alice, accused Brand of being sexually and emotionally abusive towards her throughout their 2006 relationship, during which she was 16 years old and he was 30. She previously reported her claims to Brand’s agent, who put her in touch with his lawyer who shut down her allegations.
Another woman, identified as Nadia, claims Brand raped her in his Los Angeles home in July 2012, after which she received treatment at a rape crisis center. A third woman — Phoebe — also accused Brand of sexually assaulting her while working at his home in 2013.
Following the initial article, the outlet reported that multiple women had come forward with new allegations against Brand, prompting Parliament member Caroline Nokes to call for U.K. and U.S. police to investigate.
“This merits and needs a criminal investigation, because for too long we have seen men — and the perpetrators of these sorts of crimes are almost invariably men — not being held to account for their behaviors and their actions,” she told BBC Radio, according to Time.
The London Metropolitan Police also shared on Monday that they were investigating a 2003 sexual assault investigation that was reported following the publication of The Times’ report.
Russell Brand at the Shockwaves NME Awards 2006 at Hammersmith Palais in London, Great Britain. Richard Lewis/WireImage
Has Russell Brand Denied the Allegations Against Him?
“I don’t mind [the media] using my books and my stand-up to talk about my promiscuous, consensual conduct in the past. What I seriously refute are these very, very serious criminal allegations,” Brand noted in his denial video, which was also uploaded to his YouTube channel. “Also, it’s worth mentioning that there are witnesses whose evidence directly contradicts the narratives that these two mainstream media outlets are trying to construct, apparently, in what seems to me to be a coordinated attack.”
He went on to state that he felt like he was “being attacked” and that he and his team were looking into the claims.
How Has Russell Brand’s Career Been Affected?
Hours after news of the misconduct scandal broke, Brand received a standing ovation during a stand-up show at London’s Troubadour Wembley Park Theatre. After the performance, it was announced that the remaining dates of his “Bipolarisation” comedy tour had been postponed.
At the time, Deadline reported that Brand was let go from the Comedy Central series Roast Battle after one season in 2018 following accusations of being a “sexual predator” on set.
Russell Brand speaks onstage during MusiCares Person of the Year at Los Angeles Convention Center on January 24, 2020 in Los Angeles, California. Lester Cohen/Getty Images
What Have Celebrities Said About Brand’s Past Behavior?
Amid the scandal, several interviews resurfaced featuring celebrities speaking out against Brand’s previous inappropriate behavior.
His ex-wife, Katy Perry, told Vogue in 2013 that she did not want to publicly detail what led to their 2011 divorce. “I felt a lot of responsibility for it ending, but then I found out the real truth, which I can’t necessarily disclose because I keep it locked in my safe for a rainy day,” she explained. “I let go and I was like: This isn’t because of me; this is beyond me. So I have moved on from that.”
Singer Dannii Minogue — sister of pop star Kylie Minogue — called Brand a “vile predator” following her interview on his former MTV series 1 Leicester Square. “I certainly don’t think he has cured his sex addiction, that’s for sure,” she told The Mirror in 2006. “He wouldn’t take no for an answer.”
She continued: “Throughout the whole interview he kept making shocking remarks that I can’t even repeat,” adding that he also made comments about her “fabulous breasts.”
If you have experienced sexual assault, call the National Sexual Assault Telephone Hotline at 1-800-656-4673 for confidential support.
Russell Brand is facing sexual assault, rape and emotional abuse allegations by multiple women. The U.K. newspaper The Times published a bombshell article about the actor and comedian, 48, on Saturday, September 16, in which four women alleged being sexually assaulted by Brand between the years of 2006 and 2013. Ahead of the article’s publication
Us Weekly Read More
Advice
How Far Would You Go to Book Your Dream Role?

The question Sydney Sweeney’s career forces every serious artist to ask themselves.
Most people say they want to be an actor. But wanting the life and being willing to do what the life requires are two entirely different things. Sydney Sweeney’s performance as Cassie Howard in Euphoria is one of the clearest examples in recent television of what it actually looks like when an artist refuses to protect themselves from the story they are telling.
The Performance That Started a Conversation
Cassie Howard is not a comfortable character to watch. She is messy, desperate, and heartbreakingly human in ways that most scripts would have softened or simplified. Sydney Sweeney did not soften her. She played every scene at full exposure — the breakdowns, the humiliation, the moments where Cassie is both completely wrong and completely understandable at the same time.
What made the performance remarkable was not the difficulty of the scenes. It was the consistency of her commitment to them. Night after night on set, take after take, she showed up and gave the camera something real. That is not a small thing. That is the kind of discipline that separates working actors from generational ones.
What the Industry Does Not Tell You
The entertainment industry sells you a version of success built around talent, timing, and luck. And while all three matter, none of them are the real differentiator in a room full of equally talented people. The real differentiator is willingness — the willingness to be honest, to be vulnerable, and to let the work require something personal from you.
Most actors hit a wall at some point in their career where a role demands more than they have publicly shown before. The ones who say yes to that moment, who trust the material and the director enough to go somewhere uncomfortable, are the ones audiences remember long after the credits roll.
Sydney Sweeney said yes repeatedly. And the industry took notice.
The Question Worth Asking Yourself
Before you answer, really think about it. There is a moment in every serious audition room where someone might ask you to go further than you are comfortable with — to access something real, to stop performing and start revealing. In that moment, you have to decide what your dream is actually worth to you and, more importantly, what parts of yourself you are not willing to trade for it.
That is the question Euphoria quietly raises for anyone watching with ambition in their chest. Not “could I do that,” but “should I ever feel pressured to.” There is a difference between an artist who chooses vulnerability as a creative tool and one who is pressured into exposure they never agreed to. Knowing that difference is not a weakness. It is the most important thing a young actor can understand before they walk into a room that will test it.
Because the only role that truly costs too much is the one that asks you to abandon who you are to play it.
What You Can Take From This
Whether you are an actor, a filmmaker, a content creator, or someone simply building something from scratch, the principle is the same. The work that connects with people is almost always the work that cost the creator something real. Audiences can feel the difference between performance and truth. They always could.
Sydney Sweeney did not become one of the most talked-about actresses of her generation because she got lucky. She got there because she was willing to be completely, uncomfortably human in front of a camera — and because she knew exactly who she was before she let the role take over.
That combination — full commitment and a clear sense of self — is rarer than talent. And it is the thing worth chasing.
Written for Bolanle Media | Entertainment. Culture. Conversation.
Entertainment
Bieber’s Coachella Set Has Everyone Arguing Again

And honestly? That might be exactly what he wanted.
Justin Bieber stepped onto the Coachella stage Saturday night as the highest-paid headliner in the festival’s history — reportedly pocketing $10 million — and proceeded to sit down at a laptop and play YouTube videos.
The internet, predictably, lost its mind.
What Actually Happened
This was Bieber’s first major U.S. performance since his Justice era — a long-awaited comeback after battling Ramsay Hunt syndrome in 2022, which caused partial facial paralysis, plus years of mental health struggles and a very public disappearing act from the industry.
The stage setup was minimal: a fluid cocoon-like structure, no backup dancers, no elaborate lighting rigs. Just Bieber, a stool, and a laptop.
He opened with tracks from his 2025 albums Swag and Swag II, then invited the crowd on a journey — “How far back do you go?”
What followed was a nostalgic scroll through his entire career: old YouTube covers before he was famous, classic hits “Baby“ and “Never Say Never“ playing on screen while he sang alongside his younger self. Guests including The Kid Laroi, Wizkid, and Tems joined him throughout the night.
He even played his viral “Standing on Business” paparazzi rant and re-enacted it live, hoodie on, completely unbothered.
The Moment Nobody Predicted
But here’s what the critics burying him in their hot takes chose not to lead with: Bieber closed his set with worship music.
In the middle of Coachella — one of the most secular stages on the planet — he performed songs rooted in his Christian faith, openly crediting Jesus as the reason he was standing on that stage at all.
It wasn’t subtle. It wasn’t a quick prayer and a thank-you. He leaned into it fully, in front of a crowd of 125,000 people who came expecting pop bangers and got a testimony instead.
For fans who have followed his faith journey — his deep involvement with Hillsong and later Churchome, his baptism in 2014, and his very public declaration that Jesus saved his life during his darkest years — the moment landed like a full-circle miracle.
Why People Are Mad
Critics have been brutal.
Zara Larsson summed up the skeptics perfectly, posting on TikTok: “It’s giving let’s smoke and watch YouTube“ — and that clip went just as viral as the performance itself.
One fan on X wrote: “I’m crying, this might actually be the worst performance I’ve ever seen. He’s just playing videos from YouTube… zero effort, pure laziness.”
The comparison to Sabrina Carpenter’s Friday headlining set — elaborate staging, multiple costume changes, celebrity cameos — only made Bieber’s stripped-down show look more controversial.
And the $10 million figure kept coming up. People felt cheated.
Why His Fans Think Everyone’s Missing the Point
Here’s where it gets interesting.
One commenter on X put it best: “He did not force a high-production machine that could burn him out again. Instead, he sat with his past, scrolling through old YouTube videos, duetting with his younger self, and mixing nostalgia with new chapters.”
As the set progressed, Bieber visibly opened up. He removed his sunglasses. He took off his hoodie. He smiled, made jokes about falling through a stage as a teenager.
One Instagram account with millions of followers posted: “This Justin Bieber performance healed something in me.”
That healing language is intentional for Bieber — it mirrors how he talks about his faith. In interviews, he has repeatedly said Jesus didn’t just save his career; He saved his life. The worship set at Coachella wasn’t a gimmick. It was a confession.
The Bigger Picture
Love it or hate it, Bieber’s Coachella set is the most talked-about moment from Weekend One — more than Karol G making history as the first Latina to headline the festival, more than Sabrina Carpenter’s spectacle.
That’s not an accident.
In an era where every headliner tries to out-produce the last one, Bieber walked out with a laptop, a stool, and his faith — and made it personal. For millions of fans watching, the worship songs weren’t filler. They were the point.
Whether you call it lazy or legendary, one thing is clear: Justin Bieber isn’t performing for the critics anymore. He’s performing for an audience of One — and the rest of us just happened to be there.
Drop your take in the comments — was Bieber’s Coachella set lazy, legendary, or something even bigger?
Entertainment
Vertical Films Changed Everything. Are You Ready?

People don’t watch films the way they used to—and if you’re still cutting everything for the big screen first, you’re losing the audience that lives in your pocket.
Every swipe on TikTok is a tiny festival: new voices, wild visuals, heartbreak, comedy, and chaos, all judged in under three seconds. In that world, vertical films aren’t a gimmick. They’re the new front door to your work, your brand, and your career.

The movie theater is now in your hand
Think about where you’ve discovered your favorite clips lately: your phone, in bed, in an Uber, between texts. The “cinema” experience has shrunk into a glowing rectangle we hold inches from our face. That’s intimate. That’s personal. That’s power.
Vertical video fills that space completely. No black bars. No distractions. Just one story, one face, one moment staring back at you. It feels less like “I’m watching a movie” and more like “this is happening to me.” For storytellers, that’s gold.
The old rules still matter—but they bend
Film school taught you:
- Compose for the wide frame.
- Let the world breathe at the edges.
- Save the close-up for maximum impact.
Vertical filmmaking says: bring all of that craft… and then flip it. You still need composition, rhythm, framing, and sound. But now:
- The close-up is the default, not the climax.
- Depth replaces width—what’s in front and behind matters more than left and right.
- Micro-scenes—60 seconds or less—must feel like complete emotional beats.
It’s not “less cinematic.” It’s a different kind of cinematic—one that lives where people already are instead of asking them to come to you.
Your characters can live beyond the film
Here’s the secret no one tells you: audiences don’t just fall in love with stories; they fall in love with people. Vertical video lets your characters exist outside the runtime.
Imagine this:
- The day your trailer drops, your lead character is already a recurring presence on people’s For You Pages.
- There are 10 short vertical scenes—arguments, confessions, jokes—that never made the final cut but live as their own mini-episodes.
- Fans aren’t asking “What is this movie?” They’re asking, “When do I get more of her?”
When someone feels like they “know” a character from their feed, buying a ticket or renting your film stops feeling like a risk. It feels like catching up with a friend.
Behind the scenes is no longer optional
Vertical films thrive on honesty. Shaky behind-the-scenes clips. Laughing fits between takes. The director’s 2 a.m. rant about a shot that won’t work. The makeup artist fixing tears after a heavy scene. That’s the texture that makes people care about the final product.
You don’t have to be perfect. You have to be present.
Ideas you can start capturing tomorrow:
- “What we can’t afford, so we’re faking it.”
- “The shot we were scared to try.”
- “One thing we argued about for three days.”
When you show the process, you’re not just selling a film—you’re inviting people into a journey.
Think in episodes, not posts
Most people treat vertical video like a one-off blast: post, pray, forget. Instead, think like a showrunner.
Ask yourself:
- If my project were a vertical series, what’s Episode 1? What’s the hook?
- How can I end each clip with a question, a twist, or a feeling that makes people need the next part?
- Can I tell one complete emotional story across 10 vertical videos?
Suddenly, your feed isn’t random. It’s a season. People don’t just “like” a video—they “follow” to see what happens next.
The attention is real. The opportunity is bigger.
We’re in a rare moment where a micro-drama shot on your phone can sit in the same feed as a studio campaign and still win. A fearless 45-second monologue in a bathroom. A quiet scene of someone deleting a text. A single, wordless push-in on a face that tells the whole story.
Vertical films give you:
- Low cost, high experimentation.
- Immediate feedback from real viewers.
- Proof that your story, your voice, your world can hold attention.
You don’t have to wait for permission, a greenlight, or a perfect budget. You can start where you are, with what you have, and let the audience tell you what’s working.

So, are you ready?
Some filmmakers will roll their eyes and call vertical a phase. They’ll keep making beautiful work that no one sees until a festival says it exists. Others will treat every swipe, every scroll, and every tiny screen as a chance to connect, teach, provoke, and move people.
Those are the filmmakers whose names we’ll be hearing in five years.
The question isn’t whether vertical films are “real cinema.” The question is: when the next person scrolls past your work, do they feel nothing—or do they stop, stare, and think, “I need more of this”?
News3 weeks agoThe Timothée Chalamet Guide to Ruining Your Image
Entertainment3 weeks agoThe machine isn’t coming. It’s aleady the room.
Advice4 weeks agoStop Waiting for Permission — The Film Industry Just Rewrote the Rules
Entertainment2 weeks agoWhat Kanye’s ‘Father’ Says About Power, Faith, and Control
News4 weeks agoHow She Earns $40M+ In 2026
News4 weeks agoDid OnlyFans Save Creators—or Trap Them?
News1 week agoWhy Your Indie Film Disappears Online
News2 weeks agoThe Franchise Is Over. Here’s Who’s Winning Now.





















