Connect with us

Business

Former UAW leader: Biden must ‘take action’ to pressure companies for fair wages, benefits on September 16, 2023 at 2:24 pm Business News | The Hill

Published

on

A former president of the United Auto Workers (UAW) union pressured President Biden to do more to assist striking auto workers, saying a lot of what he has done so far is just talk.

“I think [Biden] should have done a lot more already,” former UAW president Bob King told NewsNation‘s Chris Cuomo on Friday. “I’m happy he came out with a statement yesterday… but words are not the issue. You need to take actions.”

“What actions is he going to take to really pressure those corporations to give the workers what they deserve?” King asked.

UAW began a strike against the “Big Three” automakers — Ford, General Motors and Stellantis — early Friday morning after negotiations were fruitless before the workers’ contracts ended. The union is demanding increased wages, shorter work weeks and better retirement benefits, among other things.

Advertisement

“There’s a lot of anger and a lot of frustration in the UAW members because they see the corporations doing so well, they see the CEOs make 40 percent or more increases in their pay, and what I’m really proud of — the highest seniority members are as angry about this as the lowest seniority,” King said.

“Everybody in there knows it’s wrong to have people making different rates of pay for long, sustained periods of time doing the same exact job,” he added.

The Biden administration has backed the strike — the first in the union’s history — and President Biden encouraged automakers to return to the bargaining table with an increased offer on Friday.

“I believe they should go further… Record corporate profits, which they have, should be shared by record contracts for the UAW,” Biden said. 

Advertisement

King backed current UAW President Shawn Fain’s decision not to endorse Biden for the 2024 election over concerns about federal electric vehicle (EV) policy. The former union head said too many EV jobs are moving out of areas where unions are strong, like Detroit, and into southern states with less union influence and more tax breaks for automakers.

He said he supported Fain’s decision not to endorse Biden “until he starts delivering.”

“It was a tremendous slap in the face to the UAW to give billions of dollars to these corporations,” King added.

The UAW orchestrated small-scale, randomized strikes instead of a mass general strike. The union chose three plants, revealed just two hours before the strike began, to walk out starting at midnight Friday.

Advertisement

Fain explained that the strategy was meant to “keep the companies guessing.”

Profits at the Big Three automakers increased by 92 percent in the last decade, totaling $250 billion, according to an analysis released Tuesday. CEO compensation rose by 40 percent through the same period.

The union reportedly rejected the latest counteroffers from all three automakers, which say the workers’ demands are not realistic and unaffordable, in part due to the cost of the shift to electric vehicles.

“We are committed to winning an agreement with the Big Three that reflects the incredible sacrifice and contributions UAW members have made to these companies,” Fain said in his Thursday address.

Advertisement

NewsNation is owned by Nexstar Media Group, which also owns The Hill. 

The Hill’s Taylor Giorno contributed to this report.

​Business, News, Bob King, labor policy, UAW, UAW strike, United Auto Workers A former president of the United Auto Workers (UAW) union pressured President Biden to do more to assist striking auto workers, saying a lot of what he has done so far is just talk. “I think [Biden] should have done a lot more already,” former UAW president Bob King told NewsNation’s Chris Cuomo on Friday….  

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

U.S. Adds 177,000 Jobs in April; Unemployment Holds Steady at 4.2%

Published

on

The U.S. labor market demonstrated continued resilience in April, adding 177,000 jobs and keeping the unemployment rate unchanged at 4.2%, according to the latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This job growth exceeded economists’ expectations, who had forecast around 133,000 to 138,000 new positions, despite mounting concerns over the economic impact of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs and ongoing policy uncertainty.

Job Gains Outpace Forecasts Despite Headwinds

April’s job creation, while slightly below the revised 185,000 jobs added in March, signaled a robust labor market even as the economy faces headwinds from aggressive trade policies and federal government cuts. The household survey, which measures employment differently from the payroll survey, showed an even stronger gain, with 436,000 more people reporting employment during the month.

Key sectors driving job growth included:

  • Health care: +51,000 jobs
  • Transportation and warehousing: +29,000 jobs, as companies rushed to import goods ahead of tariff deadlines
  • Leisure and hospitality: +24,000 jobs
  • Professional and business services: +17,000 jobs
  • Financial activities: +14,000 jobs

However, manufacturing and retail both saw declines, losing 1,000 and 1,800 jobs respectively, as uncertainty over tariffs and higher costs weighed on these industries.

Wages and Participation

Average hourly earnings rose by 6 cents to $36.06, marking a 3.8% increase over the past year, which aligns with the Federal Reserve’s inflation target. The labor force participation rate edged up to 62.6%, reflecting a slight increase in Americans either working or seeking work.

Broader Measures and Revisions

A broader measure of unemployment, which includes discouraged workers and those working part-time for economic reasons, fell to 7.8%. Meanwhile, revisions to February and March payrolls subtracted a combined 58,000 jobs from previous estimates, suggesting some moderation in earlier job gains.

Economic Outlook: Resilient, but Risks Loom

Economists note that while the job market remains strong, the outlook is clouded by policy risks. President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs-raising duties on a wide range of imports, including a 145% tariff on Chinese goods-have injected volatility into financial markets and could dampen future hiring if trade tensions persist. Federal government employment declined by 9,000 jobs last month, reflecting layoffs and budget cuts.

Despite these risks, the labor market’s performance in April provided some relief to investors, with stock futures rising after the report’s release. The Federal Reserve is now less likely to lower interest rates in the near term, as the jobs data eased fears of an imminent downturn.

“Job growth in April exceeded expectations, even amidst concerns regarding the effects of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs on U.S. trading partners,” CNBC reported.

While experts caution that the full impact of tariffs and policy changes may not be felt for several months, April’s job report underscores the U.S. economy’s capacity to generate jobs and maintain low unemployment in the face of uncertainty.

Advertisement

Bolanle Media covers a wide range of topics, including film, technology, and culture. Our team creates easy-to-understand articles and news pieces that keep readers informed about the latest trends and events. If you’re looking for press coverage or want to share your story with a wider audience, we’d love to hear from you! Contact us today to discuss how we can help bring your news to life

Continue Reading

Business

How Your Lipstick, Lunch & Underwear Predict a Recession

Published

on

As economists scrutinize GDP reports and unemployment rates, unconventional metrics—from cosmetics to undergarments—offer startlingly accurate glimpses into economic health. These “unofficial indicators” reveal how consumer behavior shifts under financial strain, often foreshadowing downturns before traditional metrics do.

Lipstick Effect: Small Luxuries in Hard Times

The lipstick index, coined by Estée Lauder’s Leonard Lauder, tracks rising sales of cosmetics during recessions. When budgets tighten, consumers skip big-ticket indulgences but splurge on affordable treats like lipstick. During the 2001 post-9/11 downturn, U.S. lipstick sales jumped 11%, while the Great Depression saw a 25% spike in cosmetics sales.

Today, brands like MAC and Sephora report 15% growth in cosmetics sales, with drugstore options gaining traction as consumers prioritize affordability. This trend reflects the “moisturizer index” observed during COVID-19, where skincare replaced lipstick due to mask mandates, but the core principle remains: small luxuries thrive when wallets shrink.

Men’s Underwear: A Bare Necessity

The men’s underwear index, popularized by Alan Greenspan, signals trouble when sales drop. Men postpone replacing worn-out undergarments until finances stabilize, making it a reliable recession harbinger. Recent data shows a 6% decline in sales, suggesting consumers are stretching non-essentials.

Lunch Habits: Brown-Bagging It

Economic anxiety reshapes meal choices. More workers now bring lunches from home, opting for cost-saving over convenience. Similarly, the snack index reveals downturns through reduced purchases of items like Chex Mix and pet treats—General Mills reported a 5% sales drop, linking it to weakened consumer confidence.

Beer and Beauty: Downgrading Discretionary Spending

The beer index highlights a shift from craft brews to budget six-packs during recessions. “Craft beer sales are significantly down,” notes supply chain expert Jackington, as social drinking becomes a lower priority. Meanwhile, beauty routines adapt: “recession blonde” trends (skipping salon touch-ups) and press-on nail searches (up 10%) reflect thriftiness3.

Why These Indicators Matter

These metrics capture real-time consumer sentiment often missed by lagging economic reports. While not foolproof, they underscore how financial strain permeates daily life—from skipped haircuts to stretched underwear. As economist Kevin Shahnazari explains, “Affordable indulgences provide psychological comfort without breaking the bank”.

Advertisement

In an era of uncertainty, the economy’s pulse beats in the details—proving that sometimes, the most telling signs are hiding in plain sight.


Bolanle Media covers a wide range of topics, including film, technology, and culture. Our team creates easy-to-understand articles and news pieces that keep readers informed about the latest trends and events. If you’re looking for press coverage or want to share your story with a wider audience, we’d love to hear from you! Contact us today to discuss how we can help bring your news to life

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Chinese Business Owners Face Uncertainty as Trade War Escalates and Growth Slows

Published

on

The deepening U.S.-China trade war has plunged Chinese entrepreneurs into a crisis of confidence, with retaliatory tariffs exceeding 145% on key exports and domestic economic pressures compounding fears of prolonged stagnation. While China reported stronger-than-expected GDP growth of 5.4% in Q1 2025, analysts warn this pre-dates the full impact of America’s sweeping tariffs enacted in April—a move that threatens to derail export-driven sectors and exacerbate existing vulnerabilities.

Trade War Fallout
The U.S. has imposed a 145% tariff on Chinese goods, prompting Beijing to retaliate with 125% duties on American imports, including agricultural products. This escalation has disrupted supply chains globally, with Chinese manufacturers reporting canceled orders from U.S. buyers and halted shipments across industries like furniture, toys, and apparel. Hong Kong-based exporters, such as Gaoxd, have seen sales drop by 20% this year, with owners citing a “wait-and-see” paralysis among clients.

Domestic Challenges
Despite the Q1 growth surge, China faces a fragile recovery:

  • Real estate crisis: Property market indicators remain weak despite minor price rebounds.
  • Consumer hesitancy: Domestic demand lacks momentum, with households reluctant to spend amid deflationary pressures.
  • Manufacturing strains: Factories report minimal room to further cut costs, with relocation to Southeast Asia hindered by underdeveloped supply chains.

Strategic Shifts
Beijing is aggressively diversifying trade partnerships, reducing U.S. export reliance from historic highs to 14.7% in 2024. President Xi Jinping’s recent Southeast Asia tour emphasized China’s pitch as a “reliable” alternative to U.S.-led trade frameworks. Meanwhile, state media insists China has “valuable experience” from eight years of trade tensions, framing the conflict as an existential struggle against Western decline.

Outlook
While China’s $586 billion fiscal stimulus and focus on high-end manufacturing aim to offset trade losses, analysts caution that the tariffs’ delayed effects could erase Q1 gains. With U.S. imports of Chinese goods effectively halted by prohibitive tariffs, businesses face a bifurcated future: adapt to decoupled markets or risk collapse in a prolonged standoff between the world’s largest economies.

As economist Vina Nadjibulla notes, the critical question is which economy can endure more pain—a calculus now keeping Chinese business owners awake at night.

Bolanle Media covers a wide range of topics, including film, technology, and culture. Our team creates easy-to-understand articles and news pieces that keep readers informed about the latest trends and events. If you’re looking for press coverage or want to share your story with a wider audience, we’d love to hear from you! Contact us today to discuss how we can help bring your news to life

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending